Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity (original) (raw)

Nature volume 428, pages 748–751 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract

Contrary to our rich phenomenological visual experience, our visual short-term memory system can maintain representations of only three to four objects at any given moment1,2. For over a century, the capacity of visual memory has been shown to vary substantially across individuals, ranging from 1.5 to about 5 objects3,4,5,6,7. Although numerous studies have recently begun to characterize the neural substrates of visual memory processes8,9,10,11,12, a neurophysiological index of storage capacity limitations has not yet been established. Here, we provide electrophysiological evidence for lateralized activity in humans that reflects the encoding and maintenance of items in visual memory. The amplitude of this activity is strongly modulated by the number of objects being held in the memory at the time, but approaches a limit asymptotically for arrays that meet or exceed storage capacity. Indeed, the precise limit is determined by each individual's memory capacity, such that the activity from low-capacity individuals reaches this plateau much sooner than that from high-capacity individuals. Consequently, this measure provides a strong neurophysiological predictor of an individual's capacity, allowing the demonstration of a direct relationship between neural activity and memory capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luck, S. J. & Vogel, E. K. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 390, 279–281 (1997)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  2. Sperling, G. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychol. Monogr. 74, Whole No. 498 (1960)
  3. Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F. & Luck, S. J. Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27, 92–114 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Jevons, W. S. The power of numerical discrimination. Nature 3, 281–282 (1871)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  5. Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J. & Tuholski, S. W. in Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control (eds Miyake, A. & Shah, P.) 102–134 (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1999)
    Book Google Scholar
  6. Miller, G. A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63, 81–97 (1956)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Cowan, N. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 87–185 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Jonides, J. et al. Spatial working memory in humans as revealed by PET. Nature 363, 623–625 (1993)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  9. Courtney, S. M., Ungerleider, L. G., Keil, K. & Haxby, J. V. Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory. Nature 386, 608–611 (1997)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. D. et al. Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task. Nature 386, 604–608 (1997)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  11. Miller, E. K., Erickson, C. A. & Desimone, R. Neural mechanisms of visual working memory in prefrontal cortex of the macaque. J. Neurosci. 16, 5154–5167 (1996)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Fuster, J. M. & Jervey, J. P. Neuronal firing in the inferotemporal cortex of the monkey in a visual memory task. J. Neurosci. 2, 361–375 (1982)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Ruchkin, D., Johnson, R., Grafman, J., Canoune, H. & Ritter, W. Multiple visuospatial working memory buffers: Evidence from spatiotemporal patterns of brain activity. Neuropsychologia 35, 195–209 (1997)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Ruchkin, D., Johnson, R., Canoune, H. & Ritter, W. Short-term memory storage and retention: An event-related brain potential study. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 76, 419–439 (1990)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Gratton, G. The contralateral organization of visual processing: A theoretical concept and a research tool. Psychophysiology 35, 638–647 (1998)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Woodman, G. F. & Luck, S. J. Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature 400, 867–869 (1999)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  17. Miller, E. K., Li, L. & Desimone, R. Activity of neurons in anterior inferior temporal cortex during a short-term memory task. J. Neurosci. 13, 1460–1478 (1993)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Baddeley, A. Exploring the central executive. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 49, 5–28 (1996)
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Hillyard, S. A., Vogel, E. K. & Luck, S. J. Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 1257–1270 (1998)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  20. Rypma, B. & D'Esposito, M. D. The roles of prefrontal brain regions in components of working memory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 6558–6563 (1999)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  21. Ruchkin, D., Canoune, H., Johnson, R. & Ritter, W. Working memory and preparation elicit different patterns of slow wave event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 32, 399–410 (1995)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Rypma, B. & D'Esposito, M. D. A subsequent-memory effect in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Cogn. Brain Res. 16, 162–166 (2003)
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Rypma, B., Prabhakaran, V., Desmond, J., Glover, G. H. & Gabrieli, J. D. Load-dependent roles of frontal brain regions in the maintenance of working memory. Neuroimage 9, 216–226 (1999)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. Eriksen, C. W. & St James, J. D. Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Percept. Psychophys. 40, 225–240 (1986)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  25. Pashler, H. Familiarity and visual change detection. Percept. Psychophys. 44, 369–378 (1988)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  26. Logie, R. H. Visuo-Spatial Working Memory (Erlbaum, Hove, UK, 1995)
    Google Scholar
  27. Kane, M. J. & Engle, R. W. Working memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132, 47–70 (2003)
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Daneman, M. & Merikle, P. M. Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 3, 422–433 (1996)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  29. Kyllonen, P. C. & Christal, R. E. Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity. Intelligence 14, 398–433 (1990)
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Vogel, E. K., Luck, S. J. & Shapiro, K. L. Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 1656–1674 (1998)
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research reported here was supported by a grant from the US National Institute of Mental Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, 97403-1227, USA
    Edward K. Vogel & Maro G. Machizawa

Authors

  1. Edward K. Vogel
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Maro G. Machizawa
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toEdward K. Vogel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vogel, E., Machizawa, M. Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity.Nature 428, 748–751 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02447

Download citation

This article is cited by