Extending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correction in superconducting circuits (original) (raw)

Nature volume 536, pages 441–445 (2016)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Quantum error correction (QEC) can overcome the errors experienced by qubits1 and is therefore an essential component of a future quantum computer. To implement QEC, a qubit is redundantly encoded in a higher-dimensional space using quantum states with carefully tailored symmetry properties. Projective measurements of these parity-type observables provide error syndrome information, with which errors can be corrected via simple operations2. The ‘break-even’ point of QEC—at which the lifetime of a qubit exceeds the lifetime of the constituents of the system—has so far remained out of reach3. Although previous works have demonstrated elements of QEC4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16, they primarily illustrate the signatures or scaling properties of QEC codes rather than test the capacity of the system to preserve a qubit over time. Here we demonstrate a QEC system that reaches the break-even point by suppressing the natural errors due to energy loss for a qubit logically encoded in superpositions of Schrödinger-cat states17 of a superconducting resonator18,19,20,21. We implement a full QEC protocol by using real-time feedback to encode, monitor naturally occurring errors, decode and correct. As measured by full process tomography, without any post-selection, the corrected qubit lifetime is 320 microseconds, which is longer than the lifetime of any of the parts of the system: 20 times longer than the lifetime of the transmon, about 2.2 times longer than the lifetime of an uncorrected logical encoding and about 1.1 longer than the lifetime of the best physical qubit (the |0〉f and |1〉f Fock states of the resonator). Our results illustrate the benefit of using hardware-efficient qubit encodings rather than traditional QEC schemes. Furthermore, they advance the field of experimental error correction from confirming basic concepts to exploring the metrics that drive system performance and the challenges in realizing a fault-tolerant system.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Figure 1: The cat-code cycle.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Figure 2: Example of a two-step quantum trajectory executed by the QEC state machine.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Figure 3: QEC process tomography.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shor, P. W. Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory. Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493–R2496 (1995)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  2. Nielsen, M. & Chuang, I. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010)
  3. Devoret, M. H. & Schoelkopf, R. J. Superconducting circuits for quantum information: an outlook. Science 339, 1169–1174 (2013)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  4. Cory, D. et al. Experimental quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2152–2155 (1998)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  5. Knill, E., Laflamme, R., Martinez, R. & Negrevergne, C. Benchmarking quantum computers: the five-qubit error correcting code. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5811–5814 (2001)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  6. Chiaverini, J. et al. Realization of quantum error correction. Nature 432, 602–605 (2004)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  7. Schindler, P. et al. Experimental repetitive quantum error correction. Science 332, 1059–1061 (2011)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  8. Waldherr, G. et al. Quantum error correction in a solid-state hybrid spin register. Nature 506, 204–207 (2014)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  9. Taminiau, T. H., Cramer, J., van der Sar, T., Dobrovitski, V. V. & Hanson, R. Universal control and error correction in multi-qubit spin registers in diamond. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 171–176 (2014)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  10. Cramer, J. et al. Repeated quantum error correction on a continuously encoded qubit by real-time feedback. Nat. Commun. 7, 11526 (2016)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  11. Pittman, T. B., Jacobs, B. C. & Franson, J. D. Demonstration of quantum error correction using linear optics. Phys. Rev. A 71, 052332 (2005)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  12. Aoki, T. et al. Quantum error correction beyond qubits. Nat. Phys. 5, 541–546 (2009)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Reed, M. D. et al. Realization of three-qubit quantum error correction with superconducting circuits. Nature 482, 382–385 (2012)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  14. Kelly, J. et al. State preservation by repetitive error detection in a superconducting quantum circuit. Nature 519, 66–69 (2015)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  15. Córcoles, A. D. et al. Demonstration of a quantum error detection code using a square lattice of four superconducting qubits. Nat. Commun. 6, 6979 (2015)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  16. Ristè, D. et al. Detecting bit-flip errors in a logical qubit using stabilizer measurements. Nat. Commun. 6, 6983 (2015)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  17. Haroche, S. & Raimond, J.-M. Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities, and Photons (Oxford Univ. Press, 2006)
  18. Leghtas, Z. et al. Hardware-efficient autonomous quantum memory protection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 120501 (2013)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  19. Mirrahimi, M. et al. Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation. New J. Phys. 16, 045014 (2014)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  20. Vlastakis, B. et al. Deterministically encoding quantum information using 100-photon Schrödinger cat states. Science 342, 607–610 (2013)
    Article CAS ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  21. Sun, L. et al. Tracking photon jumps with repeated quantum non-demolition parity measurements. Nature 511, 444–448 (2014)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  22. Steane, A. M. Error correcting codes in quantum theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 793–797 (1996)
    Article CAS ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  23. Braunstein, S. L. & van Loock, P. Quantum information with continuous variables. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513–577 (2005)
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  24. Leghtas, Z. et al. Confining the state of light to a quantum manifold by engineered two-photon loss. Science 347, 853–857 (2015)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  25. Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J. M. & Cleland, A. N. Surface codes: towards practical large-scale quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 86, 032324 (2012)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  26. Wallraff, A. et al. Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nature 431, 162–167 (2004)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  27. Paik, H. et al. Observation of high coherence in Josephson junction qubits measured in a three-dimensional circuit QED architecture. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 240501 (2011)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  28. Vijay, R., Slichter, D. H. & Siddiqi, I. Observation of quantum jumps in a superconducting artificial atom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 110502 (2011)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  29. Bergeal, N. et al. Phase-preserving amplification near the quantum limit with a Josephson ring modulator. Nature 465, 64–68 (2010)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  30. Bertet, P. et al. Direct measurement of the Wigner function of a one-photon Fock state in a cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 200402 (2002)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Sliwa, A. Narla and L. Sun for discussions. This research was supported by the US Army Research Office (W911NF-14-1-0011). A.P. was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) (PHY-1309996). S.M.G. acknowledges additional support from NSF DMR-1301798. Facilities use was supported by the Yale Institute for Nanoscience and Quantum Engineering (YINQE), the Yale SEAS cleanroom and the NSF (MRSECDMR 1119826).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zaki Leghtas
    Present address: †Present address: Centre Automatique et Systèmes, Mines-ParisTech, PSL Research University, 60, boulevard Saint-Michel, 75006 Paris, France.,
  2. Nissim Ofek and Andrei Petrenko: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Physics and Applied Physics, Yale University, New Haven, 06510, Connecticut, USA
    Nissim Ofek, Andrei Petrenko, Reinier Heeres, Philip Reinhold, Zaki Leghtas, Brian Vlastakis, Yehan Liu, Luigi Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, L. Jiang, Mazyar Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret & R. J. Schoelkopf
  2. QUANTIC team, INRIA de Paris, 2 Rue Simone Iff, Paris, 75012, France
    Mazyar Mirrahimi

Authors

  1. Nissim Ofek
  2. Andrei Petrenko
  3. Reinier Heeres
  4. Philip Reinhold
  5. Zaki Leghtas
  6. Brian Vlastakis
  7. Yehan Liu
  8. Luigi Frunzio
  9. S. M. Girvin
  10. L. Jiang
  11. Mazyar Mirrahimi
  12. M. H. Devoret
  13. R. J. Schoelkopf

Contributions

A.P. and N.O. performed the experiment and analysed the data. N.O. designed and built the feedback architecture with help from Y.L. under the supervision of R.J.S. and M.H.D. R.H. and P.R. developed the optimal control pulses. M.M., Z.L., L.J., S.M.G. and B.V. provided theoretical support. R.H. and L.F. fabricated the transmon qubit. R.J.S. supervised the project. A.P., N.O., L.F. and R.J.S. wrote the manuscript with feedback from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence toNissim Ofek, Andrei Petrenko or R. J. Schoelkopf.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

R.J.S., M.H.D. and L.F. are founders and equity shareholders of Quantum Circuits, Inc.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

This file contains Supplementary Text and Data including Supplementary Methods, additional references, Supplementary Tables 1-2 and Supplementary Figures 1-11. (PDF 7058 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ofek, N., Petrenko, A., Heeres, R. et al. Extending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correction in superconducting circuits.Nature 536, 441–445 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18949

Download citation

This article is cited by

Editorial Summary

Extended quantum error correction

Although quantum error correction is a crucial ingredient when building a fully-fledged quantum computer, experimental demonstrations of this concept have so far been incomplete proof-of-principles. Here, Nissim Ofek et al. take another important step towards practical quantum error correction. Encoding a logical state in superpositions of Schrödinger-cat states, the authors demonstrate that they can extend the lifetime of a superconducting qubit beyond the lifetime of any of its constituents. Although the scheme is not fully fault-tolerant, it demonstrates all of the crucial ingredients of quantum error correction. Because the scheme is hardware efficient, it might become the method of choice when correcting errors in superconducting qubits.

Associated content