Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9 (original) (raw)

• Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823–826 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819–823 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Jinek, M. et al. RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells. eLife 2, e00471 (2013).
  Article Google Scholar
• Hartenian, E. & Doench, J.G. Genetic screens and functional genomics using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. FEBS J. 282, 1383–1393 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Shalem, O. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science 343, 84–87 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Wang, T., Wei, J.J., Sabatini, D.M. & Lander, E.S. Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Science 343, 80–84 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Koike-Yusa, H., Li, Y., Tan, E.-P., Velasco-Herrera, Mdel.C. & Yusa, K. Genome-wide recessive genetic screening in mammalian cells with a lentiviral CRISPR-guide RNA library. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 267–273 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Fu, Y. et al. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 822–826 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Veres, A. et al. Low incidence of off-target mutations in individual CRISPR-Cas9 and TALEN targeted human stem cell clones detected by whole-genome sequencing. Cell Stem Cell 15, 27–30 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ran, F.A. et al. Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell 154, 1380–1389 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Guilinger, J.P., Thompson, D.B. & Liu, D.R. Fusion of catalytically inactive Cas9 to FokI nuclease improves the specificity of genome modification. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 577–582 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hsu, P.D. et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 827–832 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Doench, J.G. et al. Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene inactivation. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1262–1267 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Sanjana, N.E., Shalem, O. & Zhang, F. Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening. Nat. Methods 11, 783–784 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Whittaker, S.R. et al. A genome-scale RNA interference screen implicates NF1 loss in resistance to RAF inhibition. Cancer Discov. 3, 350–362 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bollag, G. et al. Clinical efficacy of a RAF inhibitor needs broad target blockade in BRAF-mutant melanoma. Nature 467, 596–599 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Johannessen, C.M. et al. COT drives resistance to RAF inhibition through MAP kinase pathway reactivation. Nature 468, 968–972 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Davies, B.R. et al. AZD6244 (ARRY-142886), a potent inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase 1/2 kinases: mechanism of action in vivo, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship, and potential for combination in preclinical models. Mol. Cancer Ther. 6, 2209–2219 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Storey, J.D. & Tibshirani, R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9440–9445 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Li, W. et al. MAGeCK enables robust identification of essential genes from genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens. Genome Biol. 15, 554 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• Lawrence, M.S. et al. Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumour types. Nature 505, 495–501 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bae, S. et al. TRIAD1 inhibits MDM2-mediated p53 ubiquitination and degradation. FEBS Lett. 586, 3057–3063 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Gamper, A.M. & Roeder, R.G. Multivalent binding of p53 to the STAGA complex mediates coactivator recruitment after UV damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 2517–2527 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hart, T., Brown, K.R., Sircoulomb, F., Rottapel, R. & Moffat, J. Measuring error rates in genomic perturbation screens: gold standards for human functional genomics. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 733 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Wang, T. et al. Identification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome. Science 350, 1096–1101 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Caskey, C.T. & Kruh, G.D. The HPRT locus. Cell 16, 1–9 (1979).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Brinkman, E.K., Chen, T., Amendola, M. & van Steensel, B. Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e168 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• Zha, M. et al. Molecular mechanism of ADP-ribose hydrolysis by human NUDT5 from structural and kinetic studies. J. Mol. Biol. 379, 568–578 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Cheok, M.H. & Evans, W.E. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a model for the pharmacogenomics of cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 6, 117–129 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Barretina, J. et al. The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature 483, 603–607 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Liberzon, A. et al. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics 27, 1739–1740 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Shi, J. et al. Discovery of cancer drug targets by CRISPR-Cas9 screening of protein domains. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 661–667 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Chari, R., Mali, P., Moosburner, M. & Church, G.M. Unraveling CRISPR-Cas9 genome engineering parameters via a library-on-library approach. Nat. Methods 12, 823–826 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Xu, H. et al. Sequence determinants of improved CRISPR sgRNA design. Genome Res. 25, 1147–1157 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Jinek, M. et al. Structures of Cas9 endonucleases reveal RNA-mediated conformational activation. Science 343, 1247997 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S.H., Redding, S., Jinek, M., Greene, E.C. & Doudna, J.A. DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Nature 507, 62–67 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bae, S., Kweon, J., Kim, H.S. & Kim, J.-S. Microhomology-based choice of Cas9 nuclease target sites. Nat. Methods 11, 705–706 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Gilbert, L.A. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-mediated control of gene repression and activation. Cell 159, 647–661 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 systems have off-target activity with insertions or deletions between target DNA and guide RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 7473–7485 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Stemmer, M., Thumberger, T., Del Sol Keyer, M., Wittbrodt, J. & Mateo, J.L. CCTop: an intuitive, flexible and reliable CRISPR/Cas9 target prediction tool. PLoS One 10, e0124633–e11 (2015).
  Article Google Scholar
• Tsai, S.Q. et al. GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 187–197 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Heigwer, F., Kerr, G. & Boutros, M. E-CRISP: fast CRISPR target site identification. Nat. Methods 11, 122–123 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bae, S., Park, J., Kim, J.S. & Kim, J.S. Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics 30, 1473–1475 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kampmann, M. et al. Next-generation libraries for robust RNA interference-based genome-wide screens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, E3384–E3391 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Steiger, J.H. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychol. Bull. 87, 245–251 (1980).
  Article Google Scholar
• Blasi, E., Radzioch, D., Durum, S.K. & Varesio, L. A murine macrophage cell line, immortalized by v-raf and v-myc oncogenes, exhibits normal macrophage functions. Eur. J. Immunol. 17, 1491–1498 (1987).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Stansley, B., Post, J. & Hensley, K. A comparative review of cell culture systems for the study of microglial biology in Alzheimer's disease. J. Neuroinflammation 9, 115 (2012).
  Article Google Scholar
• Ben-Hur, A., Ong, C.S., Sonnenburg, S., Schölkopf, B. & Rätsch, G. Support vector machines and kernels for computational biology. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000173 (2008).
  Article Google Scholar
• Cock, P.J.A. et al. Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 25, 1422–1423 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Le Novère, N. MELTING, computing the melting temperature of nucleic acid duplex. Bioinformatics 17, 1226–1227 (2001).
  Article Google Scholar
• Steiger, J.H. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychol. Bull. 87, 245–251 (1980).
  Article Google Scholar