Nanog and Oct4 associate with unique transcriptional repression complexes in embryonic stem cells (original) (raw)

Nature Cell Biology volume 10, pages 731–739 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

Nanog and Oct4 are essential transcription factors that regulate self-renewal and pluripotency of ES cells. However, the mechanisms by which Nanog and Oct4 modulate ES cell fate remain unknown. Through characterization of endogenous Nanog and Oct4 protein complexes in mouse ES cells, we found that these transcription factors interact with each other and associate with proteins from multiple repression complexes, including the NuRD, Sin3A and Pml complexes. In addition, Nanog, Oct4 and repressor proteins co-occupy Nanog-target genes in mouse ES cells, suggesting that Nanog and Oct4 together may communicate with distinct repression complexes to control gene transcription. To our surprise, of the various core components in the NuRD complex with which Nanog and Oct4 interact, Mta1 was preferred, whereas Mbd3 and Rbbp7 were either absent or present at sub-stoichiometric levels. We named this unique Hdac1/2- and Mta1/2-containing complex NODE (for Nanog and Oct4 associated deacetylase). Interestingly, NODE contained histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity that seemed to be comparable to NuRD, and retained its association with Nanog and Oct4 in Mbd3 −/− ES cells. In contrast to Mbd3 loss-of-function, knockdown of NODE subunits led to increased expression of developmentally regulated genes and ES-cell differentiation. Our data collectively suggest that Nanog and Oct4 associate with unique repressor complexes on their target genes to control ES cell fate.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$209.00 per year

only $17.42 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chambers, I. & Smith, A. Self-renewal of teratocarcinoma and embryonic stem cells. Oncogene 23, 7150–7160 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Rossant, J. Stem cells from the mammalian blastocyst. Stem Cells 19, 477–482 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Nichols, J. et al. Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell 95, 379–391 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Chambers, I. et al. Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell 113, 643–655 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Mitsui, K. et al. The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell 113, 631–642 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Okita, K., Ichisaka, T. & Yamanaka, S. Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 448, 313–317 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Wernig, M. et al. In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 448, 318–324 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Yu, J. et al. Induced Pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 318, 1917–1920 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Takahashi, K. et al. Induction of Pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861–872 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Kaji, K. et al. The NuRD component Mbd3 is required for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 285–292 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Wang, J. et al. A protein interaction network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature 444, 364–368 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Wu, Q. et al. Sall4 interacts with Nanog and co-occupies Nanog genomic sites in embryonic stem cells. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 24090–24094 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Smith, C. L. & Peterson, C. L. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 65, 115–148 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Workman, J. L. Nucleosome displacement in transcription. Genes Dev. 20, 2009–2017 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Xue, Y. et al. NURD, a novel complex with both ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling and histone deacetylase activities. Mol. Cell 2, 851–861 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Zhang, Y. et al. Analysis of the NuRD subunits reveals a histone deacetylase core complex and a connection with DNA methylation. Genes Dev. 13, 1924–1935 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Toh, Y., Pencil, S. D. & Nicolson, G. L. A novel candidate metastasis-associated gene, mta1, differentially expressed in highly metastatic mammary adenocarcinoma cell lines. cDNA cloning, expression, and protein analyses. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 22958–22963 (1994).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Ahringer, J. NuRD and SIN3 histone deacetylase complexes in development. Trends Genet. 16, 351–356 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  20. Shi, Y. et al. Histone demethylation mediated by the nuclear amine oxidase homolog LSD1. Cell 119, 941–953 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Wu, W. S. et al. The growth suppressor PML represses transcription by functionally and physically interacting with histone deacetylases. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 2259–2268 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Boyer, L. A. et al. Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 122, 947–956 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  23. Loh, Y. H. et al. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature Genet. 38, 431–440 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. Chen, L. Y., Liu, D. & Songyang, Z. Telomere maintenance through spatial control of telomeric proteins. Mol. Cell Biol. 27, 5898–5909 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  25. Feng, Q. & Zhang, Y. The NuRD complex: linking histone modification to nucleosome remodeling. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 274, 269–290 (2003).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Saitou, M., Barton, S. C. & Surani, M. A. A molecular programme for the specification of germ cell fate in mice. Nature 418, 293–300 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  27. Bortvin, A. et al. Incomplete reactivation of Oct4-related genes in mouse embryos cloned from somatic nuclei. Development 130, 1673–1680 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  28. Manavathi, B. & Kumar, R. Metastasis tumor antigens, an emerging family of multifaceted master coregulators. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 1529–1533 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  29. Gu, P., Le Menuet, D., Chung, A. C. & Cooney, A. J. Differential recruitment of methylated CpG binding domains by the orphan receptor GCNF initiates the repression and silencing of Oct4 expression. Mol. Cell Biol. 26, 9471–9483 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  30. Bernstein, B. E. et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 315–326 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  31. Liu, D. et al. PTOP interacts with POT1 and regulates its localization to telomeres. Nature Cell Biol. 6, 673–680 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  32. O'Connor, M. S., Safari, A., Xin, H., Liu, D. & Songyang, Z. A critical role for TPP1 and TIN2 interaction in high-order telomeric complex assembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11874–11879 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  33. Xin, H. et al. TPP1 is a homologue of ciliate TEBP-β and interacts with POT1 to recruit telomerase. Nature 445, 559–562 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  34. Chew, J. L. et al. Reciprocal transcriptional regulation of Pou5f1 and Sox2 via the Oct4/Sox2 complex in embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 6031–6046 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  35. Yoon, H. G., Chan, D. W., Reynolds, A. B., Qin, J. & Wong, J. N-CoR mediates DNA methylation-dependent repression through a methyl CpG binding protein Kaiso. Mol. Cell 12, 723–734 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Amin Safari, Xueping Xu and Ok-Hee Lee for technical assistance. We also thank Yaoyun Liang and Xinhua Feng for helping us with quantitative PCR analysis. We thank Brian Hendrich for providing the Mbd3 −/− ES cells. This work was supported by NIH grants GM69572 and GM81627 to Z.S and DK73524 to A.J.C. D.L. is supported by American Heart Association. Z.S. is a Leukemia and Lymphoma Society scholar.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Peili Gu
    Present address: Current address: Department of Cancer Genetics, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.,
  2. Jiemin Wong
    Present address: Current address: The Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Life Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.,
  3. Jiancong Liang and Ma Wan: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, 77030, Texas, USA
    Jiancong Liang, Ma Wan, Yi Zhang, Huawei Xin, Sung Yun Jung, Jun Qin, Dan Liu & Zhou Songyang
  2. Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, 77030, Texas, USA
    Peili Gu, Jun Qin, Jiemin Wong & Austin J. Cooney
  3. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, 77030, Texas, USA
    Austin J. Cooney & Zhou Songyang

Authors

  1. Jiancong Liang
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Ma Wan
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Yi Zhang
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Peili Gu
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Huawei Xin
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Sung Yun Jung
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Jun Qin
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Jiemin Wong
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. Austin J. Cooney
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. Dan Liu
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  11. Zhou Songyang
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.L., M.W., Y.Z., P.G., H.X., S.Y.J., J.Q. and D.L. performed the experiments; J.W. and A.J.C. provided reagents; Z.S. provided advice on the experimental design and wrote the manuscript. All authors commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toZhou Songyang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liang, J., Wan, M., Zhang, Y. et al. Nanog and Oct4 associate with unique transcriptional repression complexes in embryonic stem cells.Nat Cell Biol 10, 731–739 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1736

Download citation

This article is cited by

Associated content