Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C (original) (raw)
References
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC, 1992).
Mahlstein, I., Knutti, R., Solomon, S. & Portmann, R. W. Early onset of significant local warming in low latitude countries. Environ. Res. Lett.6, 034009 (2011). Article Google Scholar
Schellnhuber, H. J., Cramer, W., Nakicenovic, N., Wigley, T. M. L. & Yohe, G. (eds) Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006). Google Scholar
The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the Work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action under the Convention FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1 Decision 1/CP.16 (UNFCCC, 2010).
Submissions from Parties FCCC/KP/AWG/2009/MISC.1/Add.1 (UNFCCC, 2009).
Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) 1–32 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Le Quéré, C. et al. The global carbon budget 1959–2011. Earth Syst. Sci. Data5, 165–185 (2013). Article Google Scholar
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Persistent growth of CO2 emissions and implications for reaching climate targets. Nature Geosci.7, 709–715 (2014). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Luderer, G. et al. Economic mitigation challenges: How further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. Environ. Res. Lett.8, 034033 (2013). Article Google Scholar
Rogelj, J., McCollum, D. L., Reisinger, A., Meinshausen, M. & Riahi, K. Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation. Nature493, 79–83 (2013). Article Google Scholar
Rogelj, J., McCollum, D. L., O'Neill, B. C. & Riahi, K. 2020 emissions levels required to limit warming to below 2 °C. Nature Clim. Change3, 405–412 (2013). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Azar, C., Johansson, D. J. A. & Mattsson, N. Meeting global temperature targets—the role of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. Environ. Res. Lett.8, 034004 (2013). Article Google Scholar
Ranger, N. et al. Is it possible to limit global warming to no more than 1.5 °C? Climatic Change111, 973–981 (2012). Article Google Scholar
Kriegler, E. et al. Diagnostic indicators for integrated assessment models of climate policy. Technol. Forecast. Soc.90, 45–61 (2015). Article Google Scholar
Meinshausen, M., Raper, S. C. B. & Wigley, T. M. L. Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 – Part 1: Model description and calibration. Atmos. Chem. Phys.11, 1417–1456 (2011). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Rogelj, J., Meinshausen, M. & Knutti, R. Global warming under old and new scenarios using IPCC climate sensitivity range estimates. Nature Clim. Change2, 248–253 (2012). Article Google Scholar
Meinshausen, M., et al. Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature458, 1158–1162 (2009). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Schaeffer, M. et al. Mid- and long-term climate projections for fragmented and delayed-action scenarios. Technol. Forecast. Soc.90, 257–268 (2015). Article Google Scholar
Collins, M. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1029–1136 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013). Google Scholar
Clarke, L. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) 413–510 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1–29 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
The Emissions Gap Report 2013 (UNEP, 2013).
Rogelj, J. et al. Emission pathways consistent with a 2 °C global temperature limit. Nature Clim. Change1, 413–418 (2011). Article Google Scholar
Mastrandrea, M. D. et al. Guidance Notes for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties (IPCC, 2010). Google Scholar
Jones, C. et al. Twenty-first-century compatible CO2 emissions and airborne fraction simulated by CMIP5 Earth system models under four Representative Concentration Pathways. J. Climate26, 4398–4413 (2013). Article Google Scholar
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.93, 485–498 (2011). Article Google Scholar
van Vuuren, D. et al. RCP2.6: Exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2 °C. Climatic Change109, 95–116 (2011). Article Google Scholar
Allen, M. R. et al. Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne. Nature458, 1163–1166 (2009). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Matthews, H. D., Gillett, N. P., Stott, P. A. & Zickfeld, K. The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions. Nature459, 829–832 (2009). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Zickfeld, K., Eby, M., Matthews, H. D. & Weaver, A. J. Setting cumulative emissions targets to reduce the risk of dangerous climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA106, 16129–16134 (2009). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Solomon, S. et al. Persistence of climate changes due to a range of greenhouse gases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107, 18354–18359 (2010). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Solomon, S., Plattner. G-K., Knutti, R. & Friedlingstein, P. Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA106, 1704–1709 (2009). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Myhre, G. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 659–740 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013). Google Scholar
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 33–115 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Weyant, J. P., de la Chesnaye, F. C. & Blanford, G. J. Overview of EMF-21: Multigas mitigation and climate policy. Energ. J.27, 1–32 (2006). Google Scholar
Blanford, G., Kriegler, E. & Tavoni, M. Harmonization vs. fragmentation: Overview of climate policy scenarios in EMF27. Climatic Change123, 383–396 (2014). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Johnson, N. et al. Stranded on a low-carbon planet: Implications of climate policy for the phase-out of coal-based power plants. Technol. Forecast. Soc.90(A), 89–102 (2014). Article Google Scholar
Davis, S. J., Caldeira, K. & Matthews, H. D. Future CO2 emissions and climate change from existing energy infrastructure. Science329, 1330–1333 (2010). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Krey, V., Luderer, G., Clarke, L. & Kriegler, E. Getting from here to there – energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios. Climatic Change123, 369–382 (2014). Article Google Scholar
Riahi, K. et al. in Global Energy Assessment - Toward a Sustainable Future (eds Johansson, T. B. et al.) Ch. 17, 1203–1306 (Cambridge Univ. Press and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2012). Google Scholar
Luderer, G. et al. The economics of decarbonizing the energy system—results and insights from the RECIPE model intercomparison. Climatic Change114, 9–37 (2012). Article Google Scholar
Pietzcker, R. C. et al. Long-term transport energy demand and climate policy: Alternative visions on transport decarbonization in energy-economy models. Energy64, 95–108 (2014). Article Google Scholar
Luderer, G., Bertram, C., Calvin, K., De Cian, E. & Kriegler, E. Implications of weak near-term climate policies on long-term mitigation pathways. Climatic Changehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0899-9 (2013).
Riahi, K. et al. Locked into Copenhagen pledges — Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. Technol. Forecast. Soc.90, 8–23 (2015). Article Google Scholar
Tavoni, M. & Socolow, R. Modeling meets science and technology: An introduction to a special issue on negative emissions. Climatic Change118, 1–14 (2013). Article Google Scholar
Fuss, S. et al. Betting on negative emissions. Nature Clim. Change4, 850–853 (2014). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Popp, A. et al. Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: Model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options. Climatic Change123, 495–509 (2014). Article Google Scholar
Kriegler, E. et al. What does the 2 °C target imply for a global climate agreement in 2020? The LIMITS study on Durban Platform scenarios. Clim. Change Econ.4, 1340008 (2013). Article Google Scholar
Bouttes, N., Gregory, J. M. & Lowe, J. A. The reversibility of sea level rise. J. Climate26, 2502–2513 (2012). Article Google Scholar
Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC, 1998).
Rogelj, J. et al. Copenhagen Accord pledges are paltry. Nature464, 1126–1128 (2010). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Kriegler, E. et al. The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: Overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. Climatic Change123, 353–367 (2014). Article Google Scholar
Meinshausen, M., Wigley, T. M. L. & Raper, S. C. B. Emulating atmosphere–ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 – Part 2: Applications. Atmos. Chem. Phys.11, 1457–1471 (2011). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Rogelj, J., Meinshausen, M., Sedláček, J. & Knutti, R. Implications of potentially lower climate sensitivity on climate projections and policy. Environ. Res. Lett.9, 031003 (2014). Article Google Scholar
Riahi, K., Gruebler, A. & Nakicenovic, N. Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization. Technol. Forecast. Soc.74, 887–935 (2007). Article Google Scholar
Luderer, G. et al. Description of the REMIND model (Version 1.5) (SSRN, 2013). Book Google Scholar