Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector (original) (raw)

• Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options (FAO, 2006).
• Thornton, P. K. Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 2853–2867 (2010).
  Article Google Scholar
• Herrero, M., Thornton, P. K., Gerber, P. & Reid, R. S. Livestock, livelihoods and the environment: understanding the trade-offs. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sust. 1, 111–120 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• The State of Food and Agriculture: Livestock in the Balance (FAO, 2009).
• Rosegrant, M. W. et al. in Agriculture at a Crossroads (eds McIntyre, B. D. et al.) 307–376 (Island, 2009).
  Google Scholar
• Capper, J. L., Cady, R. A. & Bauman, D. E. The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007. J. Anim. Sci. 87, 2160–2167 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Smith, P. et al. How much land based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals? Glob. Change Biol. 19, 2285–2302 (2013).
  Article Google Scholar
• IPCC 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Vol. 4 (eds Eggleston, S. et al.) Ch. 10 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006).
• Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) v.4.2 (JRC and PBL, accessed 21 September 2014); http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu
• Global Anthropogenic Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 1990–2020 (US EPA, 2006).
• Popp, A., Lotze-Campen, H. & Bodirsky, B. Food consumption, diet shifts and associated non-CO2 greenhouse gases from agricultural production. Glob. Environ. Change 20, 451–462 (2010).
  Article Google Scholar
• Tubiello, F. N. et al. The FAOSTAT database of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 015009 (2013).
  Article Google Scholar
• Herrero, M. et al. Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20888–20893 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions From the Dairy Sector: A Life Cycle Assessment (FAO, 2010).
• Gerber, P. et al. Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock—A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities (FAO, 2013).
  Google Scholar
• Bodirsky, B. L. et al. N2O emissions from the global agricultural nitrogen cycle — current state and future scenarios. Biogeosciences 9, 4169–4197 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ruminant Supply Chains—A Global Life Cycle Assessment. (FAO, 2013).
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Pig and Chicken Supply Chains—A Global Life Cycle Assessment (FAO, 2013).
• Fowler, D. et al. Atmospheric composition change: ecosystems–atmosphere interactions. Atmos. Environ. 43, 5193–5267 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Davidson, E. A. The contribution of manure and fertilizer nitrogen to atmospheric nitrous oxide since 1860. Nature Geosci. 2, 659–662 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Reay, D. S. et al. Global agriculture and nitrous oxide emissions. Nature Clim. Change 2, 410–416 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Rypdal, K. & Winiwarter, W. Uncertainties in greenhouse gas emission inventories, evaluation, comparability and implications. Environ. Sci. Policy 4, 107–116 (2001).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Leip, A. et al. Evaluation of the Livestock Sector's Contribution to the EU Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GGELS) (Joint Research Centre, European Commission, 2010).
  Google Scholar
• Monni, S., Perala, P. & Regina, K. Uncertainty in agricultural CH4 and N2O emissions from Finland — possibilities to increase accuracy in emission estimates. Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Glob. Change 12, 545–571 (2007).
  Article Google Scholar
• Weiss, F. & Leip, A. Greenhouse gas emissions from the EU livestock sector: a life cycle assessment carried out with the CAPRI model. Agric, Ecosyst. Environ. 149, 124–134 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Leip, A. et al. Impacts of European livestock production: nitrogen, sulphur, phosphorus and greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water eutrophication and biodiversity. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 115004 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Global Mitigation of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases: 2010–2030 (US EPA, 2013).
• Westhoek, H. et al. The Protein Puzzle (PBL, 2011).
  Google Scholar
• Havlík, P. et al. Crop productivity and the global livestock sector: Implications for land use change and greenhouse gas emissions. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 95, 442–448 (2013).
  Article Google Scholar
• de Vries, M. and de Boer, I. J. M. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: a review of life cycle assessments. Livest. Sci. 128, 1–11 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Cederberg, C., Hedenus, F., Wirsenius, S. & Sonesson, U. Trends in greenhouse gas emissions from consumption and production of animal food products: implications for long-term climate targets. Animal 7, 330–340 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hristov, A. N. et al. Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Livestock Production. A Review of Technical Options for Non-CO2 Emissions (FAO, 2013).
  Google Scholar
• Boadi, D., Benchaar, C., Chiquette, J. & Massé, D. Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: update review. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84, 319–335 (2004).
  Article Google Scholar
• Martin, C., Morgavi, D. P. & Doreau, M. Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal 4, 351–365 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Cottle, D. J., Nolan, J. V. & Wiedemann, S. G. Ruminant enteric methane mitigation: a review. Anim. Prod. Sci. 51, 491–514 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hristov, A. N. et al. An inhibitor persistently decreased enteric methane emission from dairy cows with no negative effect on milk production. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 10663–10668 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. K. & Herrero, M. The potential for reduced methane and carbon dioxide emissions from livestock and pasture management in the tropics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19667–19672 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ripple, W. J. et al. Ruminants, climate change and climate policy. Nature Clim. Change 4, 2–5 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hristov, A. N. Historic, pre-European settlement, and present-day contribution of wild ruminants to enteric methane emissions in the United States. J. Anim. Sci. 90, 1371–1375 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Walsh, B. et al. New feed sources key to ambitious climate targets. Carbon Balance Manage. 10, 26 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Smith P. et al. Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 789–813 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Chadwick, D. et al. Manure management: implications for greenhouse gas emissions. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 166–167, 514–531 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Chadwick, D. Emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane from cattle manure heaps: effect of compaction and covering. Atmos. Environ. 39, 87–799 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Thomsen, I. K., Pedersen, A. R., Nyord, T. & Petersen, S. O. Effects of slurry pre-treatment and application technique on short-term N2O emissions as determined by a new non-linear approach. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 136, 227–235 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Clemens, J., Trimborn, M., Weiland, P. & Amon, B. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by anaerobic digestion of cattle slurry. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 112, 171–177 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• van Groenigen J. W. et al. Nitrous oxide emissions from silage maize fields under different mineral nitrogen fertilizer and slurry applications. Plant Soil 263, 101–111 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Webb, J., Pain, B., Bittman, S. & Morgan, J. The impacts of manure application methods on emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and on crop response—a review. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 137, 39–46 (2010).
  Article Google Scholar
• van Groeningen, J. W., Velthof, G. L., Oenema, O. & van Groeningen, K. J. Towards an agronomic assessment of N2O emissions: a case study for arable crops. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 61, 903–913 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Smith, K. A. & Conen, F. Impacts of land management on fluxes of trace greenhouse gases. Soil Use Manag. 20, 255–263 (2004).
  Article Google Scholar
• Snyder, C. S., Bruulsema, T. W., Jensen, T. L. & Fixen, P. E. Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 133, 247–266 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Clough T. J. et al. The mitigation potential of hippuric acid on N2O emissions from urine patches: an in situ determination of its effect. Soil Biol. Biochem. 41, 2222–2229 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Betram J. E. et al. Hippuric acid and benzoic acid inhibition of urine derived N2O emissions from soil. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 2067–2077 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Conant, R. T. & Paustian, K. Potential soil carbon sequestration in overgrazed grassland ecosystems. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 16, 1143–1152 (2002).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ojima, D. S. et al. Modeling the effects of climatic and CO2 changes on grassland storage of soil C. Water Air Soil Pollut. 70, 643–657 (1993).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Reid, R. S. et al. Is it possible to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in pastoral ecosystems of the tropics? Environ. Dev. Sust. 6, 91–109 (2004).
  Article Google Scholar
• Henderson, B. et al. Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world's grazing lands: modelling soil carbon and nitrogen fluxes of mitigation practices. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 207, 91–100 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• DeFries, R. & Rosenzweig, C. Toward a whole-landscape approach for sustainable land use in the tropics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19627–19632 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Gill, M., Smith, P. and Wilkinson, J. M. Mitigating climate change: the role of domestic livestock. Animal 4, 323–333 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Smith, P. Delivering food security without increasing pressure on land. Glob. Food Sec. 2, 18–23 (2013).
  Article Google Scholar
• Foresight The Future of Food and Farming (The Government Office for Science, 2011).
• Godfray, H. C. J. et al. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 812–818 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD, 2009); http://go.nature.com/O1GjwV
• Foley, J. A. et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337–342 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Mueller, N. D. et al. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 490, 254–257 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, B. L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20260–20264 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Valin, H. et al. Agricultural productivity and GHG emissions in developing countries: what future trade-offs between mitigation and food security? Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 035019 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Reaping the Benefits: Science and the Sustainable Intensification of Global Agriculture (Royal Society, 2009).
• Nijdam, D., Rood, T. & Westhoek, H. The price of protein: review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes. Food Policy 37, 760–770 (2012).
  Article Google Scholar
• Valin, H. et al. The future of food demand: understanding differences in global economic models. Agric. Econ. 45, 51–67 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• Willett, W. C. Eat, Drink, and Be Healthy: the Harvard Medical School Guide to Healthy Eating (Simon and Schuster, 2001).
  Google Scholar
• Stehfest, E. et al. Climate benefits of changing diet. Climatic Change 95, 83–102 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bajželj, B. et al. The importance of food demand management for climate mitigation. Nature Clim. Change 4, 924–929 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• Tilman, D. & Clark, M. Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature 515, 518–522 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hedenus, F., Wirsenius, S. & Johansson, D. J. The importance of reduced meat and dairy consumption for meeting stringent climate change targets. Climatic Change 124, 79–91 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• Westhoek, H. et al. Food choices, health and environment: effects of cutting Europe's meat and dairy intake. Glob. Environ. Change. 26, 126–135 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• Erb, K.-H., Haberl, H. & Plutzar, C. Dependency of global primary bioenergy crop potentials in 2050 on food systems, yields, biodiversity conservation and political stability. Energy Policy 47, 260–269 (2012).
  Article Google Scholar
• Wirsenius, S., Hedenus, F. & Mohlin, K. Greenhouse gas taxes on animal food products: rationale, tax scheme and climate mitigation effects. Climatic Change 108, 159–184 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Edjabou, L. D. & Smed, S. The effect of using consumption taxes on foods to promote climate friendly diets—the case of Denmark. Food Policy 39, 84–96 (2013).
  Article Google Scholar
• Havlík, P. et al. Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3709–3714 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Edenhofer, O. et al. (eds) Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
  Google Scholar
• Smith, P. et al. in Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Metz, B. et al.) Ch. 8 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
  Google Scholar
• Golub, A. et al. Global climate policy impacts on livestock, land use, livelihoods, and food security. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20894–20899 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Key, N. & Tallard, G. Mitigating methane emissions from livestock: a global analysis of sectoral policies. Climatic Change, 12, 387–414 (2012).
  Article Google Scholar
• Van Doorslaer, B. et al. An Economic Assessment of GHG Mitigation Policy Options for EU Agriculture (Joint Research Centre, European Commission, 2015).
  Google Scholar
• Lambin, E. F. & Meyfroidt, P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3465–3472 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Stehfest, E., Berg, M. V. D., Woltjer, G., Msangi, S. & Westhoek, H. Options to reduce the environmental effects of livestock production - Comparison of two economic models. Agric. Syst. 114, 38–53 (2013).
  Article Google Scholar
• Cohn, A. et al. Cattle ranching intensification in Brazil can reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by sparing land from deforestation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7236–7241 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Herrero, M. et al. Smart investments in sustainable food production: revisiting mixed crop-livestock systems. Science 327, 822–825 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Vervoort, J. et al. Challenges to scenario-guided adaptive action on food security under climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 28, 383–394 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• Garnett, T., Mathewson, S., Angelides, P. & Borthwick, F. Policies and Actions to Shift Eating Patterns. What Works? (Food and Climate Research Network, 2015).
  Google Scholar
• Conant, R. T., Paustian, K. & Elliott, E. T. Grassland management and conversion into grassland: effects on soil carbon. Ecol. Appl. 11, 343–355 (2001).
  Article Google Scholar
• Carvalho, J. L. N. et al. Potential of soil carbon sequestration in different biomes of Brazil. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo 34, 277–289 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304, 1623–1627 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Wang, S. et al. Management and land use change effects on soil carbon in northern China's grasslands: a synthesis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 142, 329–340 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Follett, R. F. & Schumann, G. E. in Grassland: A Global Resource (ed. McGilloway, D. A.) 264–277 (Wageningen, 2005).
  Google Scholar
• Schuman, J. E., Janzen, H. H. & Herrick, J. E. Soil carbon sequestration and potential carbon sequestration in rangelands. Environ. Pollut. 116, 391–396 (2002).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. et al. Carbon sequestration in agricultural lands of the United States. J. Soil Water Cons. 65, 6–13 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Lal, R. Carbon sequestration in dryland ecosystems. Environ. Manage. 33, 528–544, (2003).
  Google Scholar
• Bellarby, J. et al. Livestock greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential in Europe. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 3–18 (2013).
  Article Google Scholar
• Fitton, N. et al. Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of agricultural land in Great Britain. Soil Use Manage. 27, 491–501 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar