Achieving net-zero emissions through the reframing of UK national targets in the post-Paris Agreement era (original) (raw)

References

  1. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report (eds Pachauri, R. K. & Meyer, L. A. ) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014); https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full.pdf
    Google Scholar
  2. Rogelj, J. et al. Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 ∘C. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 519–527 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Conf. of the Parties Twenty-First Session: Adoption of the Paris Agreement (UNFCCC, 2015); https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf
  4. Rogelj, J. et al. Zero emission targets as long-term global goals for climate protection. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 105007 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Rogelj, J. et al. Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 ∘C. Nature 534, 631–639 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Ea Energy Analyses & COWI Bhutan: A National Strategy and Action Plan for Low Carbon Development (Ea Energy Analyses, 2012); http://www.ea-energianalyse.dk/reports/1148_bhutan_a_national_strategy_and_action_plan_for_low_carbon_development.pdf
  7. Pratt, L., Rivera, L. & Sancho, F. Options for Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Costa Rica: Towards Carbon Neutrality in 2021 (INCAE Business School/MINAET, 2010); https://unfccc.int/files/cooperation_and_support/financial_mechanism/application/pdf/costa_rica_eng_needs_report_final.pdf
    Google Scholar
  8. Environmental Protection Agency Ethiopia’s Climate-Resilient Green Economy Strategy (Government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, 2011); http://www.undp.org/content/dam/ethiopia/docs/Ethiopia CRGE.pdf
  9. Knowledge Base for Low-Carbon Transition in Norway (Kuunskapsgrunnlag for lavutslippsutvikling) (Norwegian Environment Agency, 2014); http://www.miljodirektoratet.no/no/Publikasjoner/2014/Desember-2014/Knowledge-base-for-low-carbon-transition-in-Norway
  10. Roadmap Basis for Sweden without Climate Emissions in 2050 (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, 2012); https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Documents/publikationer6400/978-91-620-6537-9.pdf
  11. O’Neill, B. C., Riahi, K. & Keppo, I. Mitigation implications of midcentury targets that preserve long-term climate policy options. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1011–1016 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Riahi, K. et al. Locked into Copenhagen pledges—implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 90, 8–23 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project Pathways to Deep Decarbonization 2015 Report (2015); http://deepdecarbonization.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/DDPP_2015_REPORT.pdf
  14. Allen, M. R. et al. Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne. Nature 458, 1163–1166 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Meinshausen, M. et al. Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 ∘C. Nature 458, 1158–1162 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Rogelj, J. et al. Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 245–252 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Füssel, H. M. How inequitable is the global distribution of responsibility, capability, and vulnerability to climate change: a comprehensive indicator-based assessment. Glob. Environ. Change 20, 597–611 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Höhne, N., Elzen, M. D. & Escalante, D. Regional GHG reduction targets based on effort sharing: a comparison of studies. Clim. Policy 14, 122–147 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Ringius, L., Torvanger, A. & Underdal, A. Burden sharing and fairness principles in international climate policy. Int. Environ. Agreem. 2, 1–22 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Raupach, M. R. et al. Sharing a quota on cumulative carbon emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 873–879 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Peters, G. P., Andrew, R. M., Solomon, S. & Friedlingstein, P. Measuring a fair and ambitious climate agreement using cumulative emissions. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 105004 (2015).
    Google Scholar
  22. Clarke, L. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) 413–510 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
    Google Scholar
  23. Bruckner, T. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) 511–597 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
    Google Scholar
  24. Leung, D. Y. C., Caramanna, G. & Maroto-Valer, M. M. An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 39, 426–443 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Grübler, A. The costs of the French nuclear scale-up: a case of negative learning by doing. Energy Policy 38, 5174–5188 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  26. Corner, A. et al. Nuclear power, climate change and energy security: exploring British public attitudes. Energy Policy 39, 4823–4833 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Fuss, S. et al. Betting on negative emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 850–853 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Smith, P. et al. Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 42–50 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  29. Slade, R., Bauen, A. & Gross, R. Global bioenergy resources. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 99–105 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Pye, S., Usher, W. & Strachan, N. The uncertain but critical role of demand reduction in meeting long-term energy decarbonisation targets. Energy Policy 73, 575–586 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Infrastructure and Projects Authority National Infrastructure Delivery Plan 2016–2021 (HMSO, 2016); https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/520086/2904569_nidp_deliveryplan.pdf
  32. Energy and Climate Change Committee Future of Carbon Capture and Storage in the UK (UK Parliament, 2016); http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201516/cmselect/cmenergy/692/692.pdf
  33. Geden, O. An actionable climate target. Nat. Geosci. 9, 340–342 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  34. Reducing Emissions and Preparing for Climate Change: 2015 Progress Report to Parliament (Committee on Climate Change, 2015); https://www.theccc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/6.738_CCC_ExecSummary_2015_FINAL_WEB_250615.pdf
  35. UK Climate Action Following the Paris Agreement (Committee on Climate Change, 2016); https://www.theccc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/UK-climate-action-following-the-Paris-Agreement-Committee-on-Climate-Change-October-2016.pdf
  36. Climate Change Act 2008 (HMSO, 2008); http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/27/pdfs/ukpga_20080027_en.pdf
  37. Lockwood, M. The political sustainability of climate policy: the case of the UK Climate Change Act. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1339–1348 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  38. Anandarajah, G., Strachan, N., Ekins, P., Kannan, R. & Hughes, N. Pathways to a Low Carbon Economy: Energy Systems Modelling (UK Energy Research Centre, 2009); http://www.ukerc.ac.uk/publications/pathways-to-a-low-carbon-economy-energy-systems-modelling-working-paper.html
    Google Scholar
  39. Usher, W. & Strachan, N. UK MARKAL Modelling—Examining Decarbonisation Pathways in the 2020s on the Way to Meeting the 2050 Emissions Target: Final Report for the Committee on Climate Change (CCC, 2010); https://www.ucl.ac.uk/energy-models/models/uk-markal/ccc-fourth-carbon-budget-final-report-uk-markal-updates
    Google Scholar
  40. Pye, S., Anandarajah, G., Fais, B., McGlade, C. & Strachan, N. Pathways to Deep Decarbonization in the United Kingdom (IDDRI & UNSDSN, 2015); http://deepdecarbonization.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/DDPP_GBR.pdf
    Google Scholar
  41. Kannan, R., Strachan, N., Pye, S., Anandarajah, G. & Balta-Ozkan, N. UK MARKAL Model Documentation (University College London, 2007); www.ucl.ac.uk/energy-models/models/uk-markal
    Google Scholar
  42. Building a Low-Carbon Economy—the UK’s Contribution to Tackling Climate Change (Committee on Climate Change, 2008); http://archive.theccc.org.uk/archive/pdf/TSO-ClimateChange.pdf
  43. The Carbon Plan: Delivering Our Low Carbon Future (HMSO, 2011); https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/47613/3702-the-carbon-plan-delivering-our-low-carbon-future.pdf
  44. The Fifth Carbon Budget: The Next Step Towards a Low-Carbon Economy (Committee on Climate Change, 2015); https://documents.theccc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Committee-on-Climate-Change-Fifth-Carbon-Budget-Report.pdf
  45. DECC Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics 2011 (National Statistics, 2011); https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/digest-of-uk-energy-statistics-dukes
  46. HM Treasury The Green Book (TSO London, 2011); https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/220541/green_book_complete.pdf
  47. Pye, S., Sabio, N. & Strachan, N. An integrated systematic analysis of uncertainties in UK energy transition pathways. Energy Policy 87, 673–684 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  48. DECC Fossil Fuel Price Projections: 2014 (Committee on Climate Change, 2014); https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/fossil-fuel-price-projections-2014
  49. Bioenergy Review (Committee on Climate Change, 2011); https://www.theccc.org.uk/publication/bioenergy-review
  50. DECC Dynamic Dispatch Model (DDM) (Department of Energy & Climate Change, 2012); https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/65709/5425-decc-dynamic-dispatch-model-ddm.pdf
  51. Griffin, P., Hammond, G. & Norman, J. Industrial Energy Use from a Bottom-Up Perspective: Developing the Usable Energy Database (Beta version) (UK Energy Research Centre, 2013); http://data.ukedc.rl.ac.uk/simplebrowse/edc/efficiency/industry/EnergyConsumption/UED_Documentation.pdf
    Google Scholar
  52. Fais, B., Sabio, N. & Strachan, N. The critical role of the industrial sector in reaching long-term emission reduction, energy efficiency and renewable targets. Appl. Energy 162, 699–712 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  53. A Review of the Efficiency and Cost Assumptions for Road Transport Vehicles to 2050 (Ricardo-AEA, 2012); http://ee.ricardo.com/cms/assets/Documents-for-Insight-pages/8.-Review-of-cost-and-efficiency.pdf
  54. Agricultural GHG Emissions Abatement—An Appraisal and Update of Agricultural Marginal Abatement Cost Curve analyses. Unpublished analysis (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, 2015).

Download references