Using FlyAtlas to identify better Drosophila melanogaster models of human disease (original) (raw)

• Kaiser, K. From gene to phenotype in Drosophila and other organisms. Bioessays 12, 297–301 (1990).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Adams, M.D. & Sekelsky, J.J. From sequence to phenotype: reverse genetics in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 189–198 (2002).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Orkin, S.H. Reverse genetics and human disease. Cell 47, 845–850 (1986).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ruddle, F.H. Reverse genetics as a means of understanding and treating genetic disease. Adv. Neurol. 35, 239–242 (1982).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bargmann, C.I. High-throughput reverse genetics: RNAi screens in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Biol. 2, REVIEWS1005 (2001).
• Brown, S.D.M. & Peters, J. Combining mutagenesis and genomics in the mouse–closing the phenotype gap. Trends Genet. 12, 433–435 (1996).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bullard, D.C. Mind the phenotype gap. Trends Mol. Med. 7, 537–538 (2001).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Dow, J.A.T. The Drosophila phenotype gap - and how to close it. Brief. Funct. Genomic. Proteomic. 2, 121–127 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Adams, M.D. et al. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287, 2185–2195 (2000).
  Article Google Scholar
• Arbeitman, M.N. et al. Gene expression during the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 297, 2270–2275 (2002).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Andrews, J. et al. Gene discovery using computational and microarray analysis of transcription in the Drosophila melanogaster testis. Genome Res. 10, 2030–2043 (2000).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Krogh, A. The progress of physiology. Am. J. Physiol. 90, 243–251 (1929).
  Article Google Scholar
• Brand, A.H. & Perrimon, N. Targetted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118, 401–415 (1993).
  CAS Google Scholar
• Vandesompele, J. et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 3, RESEARCH0034 (2002).
• Stanewsky, R. et al. The cryb mutation identifies cryptochrome as a circadian photoreceptor in Drosophila. Cell 95, 681–692 (1998).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Emery, P., So, W.V., Kaneko, M., Hall, J.C. & Rosbash, M. CRY, a Drosophila clock and light-regulated cryptochrome, is a major contributor to circadian rhythm resetting and photosensitivity. Cell 95, 669–679 (1998).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ivanchenko, M., Stanewsky, R. & Giebultowicz, J.M. Circadian photoreception in Drosophila: functions of cryptochrome in peripheral and central clocks. J. Biol. Rhythms 16, 205–215 (2001).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Giebultowicz, J.M., Stanewsky, R., Hall, J.C. & Hege, D.M. Transplanted Drosophila excretory tubules maintain circadian clock cycling out of phase with the host. Curr. Biol. 10, 107–110 (2000).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Carthew, R.W. Adhesion proteins and the control of cell shape. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 15, 358–363 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Graham, L.A. & Davies, P.L. The odorant-binding proteins of Drosophila melanogaster: annotation and characterization of a divergent gene family. Gene 292, 43–55 (2002).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hekmat-Scafe, D.S., Scafe, C.R., McKinney, A.J. & Tanouye, M.A. Genome-wide analysis of the odorant-binding protein gene family in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Res. 12, 1357–1369 (2002).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Dominguez, M., Ferres-Marco, D., Gutierrez-Avino, F.J., Speicher, S.A. & Beneyto, M. Growth and specification of the eye are controlled independently by Eyegone and Eyeless in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Genet. 36, 31–39 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Aldaz, S., Morata, G. & Azpiazu, N. The Pax-homeobox gene eyegone is involved in the subdivision of the thorax of Drosophila. Development 130, 4473–4482 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Jimenez, F. et al. vnd, a gene required for early neurogenesis of Drosophila, encodes a homeodomain protein. EMBO J. 14, 3487–3495 (1995).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Robinson, D.N. & Cooley, L. Drosophila kelch is an oligomeric ring canal actin organizer. J. Cell Biol. 138, 799–810 (1997).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bomont, P. et al. The gene encoding gigaxonin, a new member of the cytoskeletal BTB/kelch repeat family, is mutated in giant axonal neuropathy. Nat. Genet. 26, 370–374 (2000).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Chien, S., Reiter, L.T., Bier, E. & Gribskov, M. Homophila: human disease gene cognates in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 149–151 (2002).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Byers, D., Davis, R.L. & Kiger, J.A. Defect in cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase due to the dunce mutation of learning in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 289, 79–81 (1981).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Konopka, R.J. & Benzer, S. Clock mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 68, 2112–2116 (1971).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Salkoff, L. & Wyman, R. Genetic modification of potassium channels in Drosophila Shaker mutants. Nature 293, 228–230 (1981).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Dow, J.A.T. & Davies, S.A. The Malpighian tubule: rapid insights from post-genomic biology. J. Insect Physiol. 52, 365–378 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Yang, J. et al. A Drosophila systems approach to xenobiotic metabolism. Physiol. Genomics published online 8 May 2007 (doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00018.2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• McGettigan, J. et al. Insect renal tubules constitute a cell-autonomous immune system that protects the organism against bacterial infection. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 35, 741–754 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kaneko, T. et al. PGRP-LC and PGRP-LE have essential yet distinct functions in the Drosophila immune response to monomeric DAP-type peptidoglycan. Nat. Immunol. 7, 715–723 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Davies, S.A. et al. Analysis and inactivation of vha55, the gene encoding the V-ATPase B-subunit in Drosophila melanogaster, reveals a larval lethal phenotype. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 30677–30684 (1996).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Allan, A.K., Du, J., Davies, S.A. & Dow, J.A.T. Genome-wide survey of V-ATPase genes in Drosophila reveals a conserved renal phenotype for lethal alleles. Physiol. Genomics 22, 128–138 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Karet, F.E. et al. Mutations in the gene encoding B1 subunit of H+-ATPase cause renal tubular acidosis with sensorineural deafness. Nat. Genet. 21, 84–90 (1999).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Evans, J.M., Allan, A.K., Davies, S.A. & Dow, J.A.T. Sulphonylurea sensitivity and enriched expression implicate inward rectifier K+ channels in Drosophila melanogaster renal function. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 3771–3783 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Glassman, E. & Mitchell, H.K. Mutants of Drosophila melanogaster deficient in xanthine dehydrogenase. Genetics 44, 153–162 (1959).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dent, C.E. & Philpot, G.R. Xanthinuria: an inborn error of metabolism. Lancet 263, 182–185 (1954).
  Article Google Scholar
• Wang, J. et al. Function-informed transcriptome analysis of Drosophila renal tubule. Genome Biol. 5, R69 (2004).
  Article Google Scholar
• Dow, J.A.T. & Davies, S.A. Integrative physiology and functional genomics of epithelial function in a genetic model organism. Physiol. Rev. 83, 687–729 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., Edenberg, H.J. & Davis, R.L. Isolation of mRNA from specific tissues of Drosophila by mRNA tagging. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, e148 (2005).
  Article Google Scholar
• Manak, J.R. et al. Biological function of unannotated transcription during the early development of Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Genet. 38, 1151–1158 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar