Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C (original) (raw)

References

  1. Adoption of the Paris Agreement FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev. 1 (UNFCCC, 2015); http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf
  2. Otto, F. E. L., Frame, D. J., Otto, A. & Allen, M. R. Embracing uncertainty in climate change policy. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 917–920 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Morice, C. P., Kennedy, J. J., Rayner, N. A. & Jones, P. D. Quantifying uncertainties in global and regional temperature change using an ensemble of observational estimates: the HadCRUT4 data set. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D08101 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Rogelj, J. et al. Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 519–527 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Sanderson, B. M., O’Neill, B. C. & Tebaldi, C. What would it take to achieve the Paris temperature targets? Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 7133–7142 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Fawcett, A. A. et al. Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change? Science 350, 1168–1169 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Matthews, H. D. & Caldeira, K. Stabilizing climate requires near-zero emissions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L04705 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Allen, M. R. et al. Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne. Nature 458, 1163–1166 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Meinshausen, M. et al. Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature 458, 1158–1162 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Zickfeld, K., Eby, M., Matthews, H. D. & Weaver, A. J. Setting cumulative emissions targets to reduce the risk of dangerous climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16129–16134 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report (eds Pachauri, R. K. & Meyer, L. A.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
  12. Le Quéré, C. et al. Global carbon budget 2015. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 7, 349–396 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Rogelj, J. et al. Paris Agreement climate proposals need boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature 534, 631–639 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Collins, M. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1029–1136 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
    Google Scholar
  15. Rogelj, J. et al. Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 245–252 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
  17. Richardson, M., Cowtan, K., Hawkins, E. & Stolpe, M. B. Reconciled climate response estimates from climate models and the energy budget of Earth. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 931–935 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Hawkins, E. et al. Estimating changes in global temperature since the pre-industrial period. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0007.1 (2017).
  19. MacDougall, A. H., Zickfeld, K., Knutti, R. & Matthews, H. D. Sensitivity of carbon budgets to permafrost carbon feedbacks and non-CO2 forcings. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 125003 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Myhre, G. et al. Multi-model simulations of aerosol and ozone radiative forcing due to anthropogenic emission changes during the period 1990–2015. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 2709–2720 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  21. van Vuuren, D. et al. RCP 2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2 °C. Climatic Change 109, 95–116 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  22. Riahi, K. et al. RCP 8.5-A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. Climatic Change 109, 33–57 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
  24. Clarke, L. E. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) 413–510 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
    Google Scholar
  25. Shindell, D. T. Inhomogeneous forcing and transient climate sensitivity. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 18–21 (2014).
    Google Scholar
  26. Kummer, J. R. R. & Dessler, A. E. E. The impact of forcing efficacy on the equilibrium climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 3565–3568 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Andrews, T., Gregory, J. M., Webb, M. J. & Taylor, K. E. Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere–ocean climate models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L09712 (2012).
    Google Scholar
  28. Myhre, G. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 659–740 (IPCC, Cambirdge Univ. Press, 2013).
    Google Scholar
  29. Millar, R. J., Nicholls, Z. R., Friedlingstein, P. & Allen, M. R. A modified impulse-response representation of the global near-surface air temperature and atmospheric concentration response to carbon dioxide emissions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 7213–7228 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Weaver, A. J. et al. The UVic Earth System Climate Model: model description, climatology, and applications to past, present and future climates. Atmos.-Ocean 39, 361–428 (2001).
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Eby, M. et al. Historical and idealized climate model experiments: an intercomparison of Earth system models of intermediate complexity. Clim. Past 9, 1111–1140 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  32. Zickfeld, K. et al. Long-term climate change commitment and reversibility: an EMIC intercomparison. J. Clim. 26, 5782–5809 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  33. Millar, R., Allen, M., Rogelj, J. & Friedlingstein, P. The cumulative carbon budget and its implications. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 32, 323–342 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  34. Jarvis, A. J., Leedal, D. T. & Hewitt, C. N. Climate-society feedbacks and the avoidance of dangerous climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 668–671 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  35. Stevens, B. Rethinking the lower bound on aerosol radiative forcing. J. Clim. 28, 4794–4819 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  36. Etminan, M., Myhre, G., Highwood, E. J. & Shine, K. P. Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: a significant revision of the methane radiative forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 12614–12623 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  37. Emission Gap Report 2015 (UNEP, 2015).
  38. Rogelj, J. et al. Understanding the origin of Paris Agreement emission uncertainties. Nat. Commun. 8, 15748 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  39. Fuglestvedt, J. S., Berntsen, T. K., Godal, O. & Skodvin, T. Climate implications of GWP-based reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 409–412 (2000).
    Article Google Scholar
  40. Pierrehumbert, R. T. Short-lived climate pollution. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 42, 341–379 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  41. Allen, M. R. et al. New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 773–776 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  42. Bowerman, N. H. A. et al. The role of short-lived climate pollutants in meeting temperature goals. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 8–11 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  43. Pfeiffer, A., Millar, R., Hepburn, C. & Beinhocker, E. The ‘2 °C capital stock’ for electricity generation: committed cumulative carbon emissions from the electricity generation sector and the transition to a green economy. Appl. Energy 179, 1395–1408 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  44. Riahi, K. et al. Locked into Copenhagen pledges—implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 90, 8–23 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  45. Smith, P. et al. Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 4–50 (2015).
    Google Scholar
  46. Jackson, R. B. et al. Reaching peak emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 7–10 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  47. Grubb, M. et al. A review of Chinese CO2 emission projections to 2030: the role of economic structure and policy. Clim. Policy 15, S7–S39 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  48. Green, F. & Stern, N. China’s changing economy: implications for its carbon dioxide emissions. Clim. Policy 17, 423–442 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  49. Kirtman, B. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 95–1028 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
    Google Scholar
  50. Pueyo, S. Solution to the paradox of climate sensitivity. Climatic Change 113, 163–179 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  51. Armour, K. C. Energy budget constraints on climate sensitivity in light of inconstant climate feedbacks. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 331–335 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  52. Millar, R. J. et al. Model structure in observational constraints on transient climate response. Climatic Change 131, 199–211 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  53. Meinshausen, M., Raper, S. C. B. & Wigley, T. M. L. Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6–Part 1: Model description and calibration. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 1417–1456 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  54. Stocker, T. F. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 33–115 (IPCC, Cambirdge Univ. Press, 2013).
    Google Scholar

Download references