Validation of noise models for single-cell transcriptomics (original) (raw)
- Brief Communication
- Published: 20 April 2014
Nature Methods volume 11, pages 637–640 (2014)Cite this article
- 29k Accesses
- 428 Citations
- 59 Altmetric
- Metrics details
Subjects
Abstract
Single-cell transcriptomics has recently emerged as a powerful technology to explore gene expression heterogeneity among single cells. Here we identify two major sources of technical variability: sampling noise and global cell-to-cell variation in sequencing efficiency. We propose noise models to correct for this, which we validate using single-molecule FISH. We demonstrate that gene expression variability in mouse embryonic stem cells depends on the culture condition.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional access options:
Similar content being viewed by others
Accession codes
Primary accessions
Gene Expression Omnibus
References
- Munsky, B., Neuert, G. & van Oudenaarden, A. Science 336, 183–187 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Eldar, A. & Elowitz, M.B. Nature 467, 167–173 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Hashimshony, T., Wagner, F., Sher, N. & Yanai, I. Cell Rep. 2, 666–673 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Sasagawa, Y. et al. Genome Biol. 14, R31 (2013).
Article Google Scholar - Tang, F. et al. Nat. Methods 6, 377–382 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Ramsköld, D. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 777–782 (2012).
Article Google Scholar - Islam, S. et al. Genome Res. 21, 1160–1167 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Picelli, S. et al. Nat. Methods 10, 1096–1098 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Shapiro, E., Biezuner, T. & Linnarsson, S. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 618–630 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Kivioja, T. et al. Nat. Methods 9, 72–74 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Shiroguchi, K., Jia, T.Z., Sims, P.A. & Xie, X.S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1347–1352 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Hug, H. & Schuler, R. J. Theor. Biol. 221, 615–624 (2003).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Shalek, A.K. et al. Nature 498, 236–240 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Islam, S. et al. Nat. Methods 11, 163–166 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Jaitin, D.A. et al. Science 343, 776–779 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Brennecke, P. et al. Nat. Methods 10, 1093–1095 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Ying, Q.-L. et al. Nature 453, 519–523 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar - The External RNA Controls Consortium. Nat. Methods 2, 731–734 (2005).
- Raj, A., Peskin, C.S., Tranchina, D., Vargas, D.Y. & Tyagi, S. PLoS Biol. 4, e309 (2006).
Article Google Scholar - Raj, A., van den Bogaard, P., Rifkin, S.A., van Oudenaarden, A. & Tyagi, S. Nat. Methods 5, 877–879 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Li, H. & Durbin, R. Bioinformatics 26, 589–595 (2010).
Article Google Scholar - Meyer, L.R. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D64–D69 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Anders, S. & Huber, W. Genome Biol. 11, R106 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Robinson, M.D., McCarthy, D.J. & Smyth, G.K. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Byrd, R.H., Lu, P., Nocedal, J. & Zhu, C. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 16, 1190–1208 (1995).
Article Google Scholar
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a European Research Council Advanced grant (ERC-AdG 294325-GeneNoiseControl) and a Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO) Vici award.
Author information
Author notes
- Dominic Grün and Lennart Kester: These authors contributed equally to this work.
Authors and Affiliations
- Hubrecht Institute-KNAW (Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences), Utrecht, The Netherlands
Dominic Grün, Lennart Kester & Alexander van Oudenaarden - University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Dominic Grün, Lennart Kester & Alexander van Oudenaarden
Authors
- Dominic Grün
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Lennart Kester
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Alexander van Oudenaarden
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Contributions
D.G., L.K. and A.v.O. conceived the methods. D.G. developed the noise models, performed all computations and wrote the manuscript. L.K. performed all experiments and corrected the manuscript. A.v.O. guided experiments, data analysis and writing of the manuscript, and corrected the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Correspondence toAlexander van Oudenaarden.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Text and Figures
Supplementary Figures 1–15, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Notes 1–4. (PDF 11686 kb)
Supplementary Table 2
GO terms enriched among genes with increased expression variability in serum versus 2i culture condition. Enriched biological processes and enriched molecular functions are given as separate lists. Only significantly enriched GO-terms (P < 0.05) were included. The lists indicate the GO-term ID, the hypergeometric P-value, the odds ratio, the expected number of genes associated with each GO-term, the observed number of genes for each GO-term, the size of the GO-term (total number of genes associated) and a short description. For the inference of over-represented GO terms, the set of differentially variable genes was compared to the universe of all genes expressed in the two conditions. The GOstats package was used to compute GO enrichment in R. (XLSX 82 kb)
Supplementary Table 3
Probe set composition of smFISH probes used. Each column represents a probe set for the gene specified in the column header. All probes were labeled on the 3' end with TMR, Alexa594 or Cy5. (XLSX 56 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grün, D., Kester, L. & van Oudenaarden, A. Validation of noise models for single-cell transcriptomics.Nat Methods 11, 637–640 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2930
- Received: 16 October 2013
- Accepted: 25 March 2014
- Published: 20 April 2014
- Issue Date: June 2014
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2930