The three 'C' s of chromosome conformation capture: controls, controls, controls (original) (raw)

Nature Methods volume 3, pages 17–21 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

Transcription regulation in higher eukaryotes is controlled by regulatory elements such as enhancers that are recognized by transcription factors. In many cases regulatory elements can be located at distances up to several megabases from their target genes1,2. Recent evidence shows that long-range control of gene expression can be mediated through direct physical interactions between genes and these regulatory elements. Such looping interactions can be detected using the chromosome conformation capture (3C) methodology3. Although 3C is experimentally straightforward, to draw meaningful conclusions one must carefully design 3C experiments and implement the conscientious use of controls. The general guidelines presented here should help experimental design and minimize misinterpretation of 3C experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$259.00 per year

only $21.58 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kleinjan, D.A. & van Heyningen, V. Long-range control of gene expression: emerging mechanisms and disruption in disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 76, 8–32 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. West, A.G. & Fraser, P. Remote control of gene transcription. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14, R101–R111 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M. & Kleckner, N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295, 1306–1311 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Spilianakis, C.G., Lalioti, M.D., Town, T., Lee, G.R. & Flavell, R.A. Interchromosomal associations between alternatively expressed loci. Nature 435, 637–645 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Tolhuis, B., Palstra, R.J., Splinter, E., Grosveld, F. & de Laat, W. Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active β-globin locus. Mol. Cell 10, 1453–1465 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Osborne, C.S. et al. Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription. Nat. Genet. 36, 1065–1071 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Spilianakis, C.G. & Flavell, R.A. Long-range intrachromosomal interactions in the T helper type 2 cytokine locus. Nat. Immunol. 5, 1017–1027 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Vakoc, C. et al. Proximity among distant regulatory elements at the β-globin locus requires GATA-1 and FOG-1. Mol. Cell 17, 453–462 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Dekker, J. A closer look at long-range chromosomal interactions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 28, 277–280 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Splinter, E., Grosveld, F. & de Laat, W. 3C technology: analyzing the spatial organization of genomic loci in vivo. Methods Enzymol. 375, 493–507 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Miele, A., Gheldof, N., Tabuchi, T.M., Dostie, J. & Dekker, J. Mapping chromatin interactions by chromosome conformation capture (3C). In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (eds. Ausubel, F.M. et al.) Supplement 74 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, in the press).
  12. Palstra, R.J. et al. The β-globin nuclear compartment in development and erythroid differentiation. Nat. Genet. 35, 190–194 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Drissen, R. et al. The active spatial organization of the β-globin locus requires the transcription factor EKLF. Genes Dev. 18, 2485–2490 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Rippe, K. Making contacts on a nucleic acid polymer. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 733–740 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Liu, Z. & Garrard, W.T. Long-range interactions between three transcriptional enhancers, active Vkappa gene promoters, and a 3′ boundary sequence spanning 46 kilobases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 3220–3231 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Murrell, A., Heeson, S. & Reik, W. Interaction between differentially methylated regions partitions the imprinted genes Igf2 and H19 into parent-specific chromatin loops. Nat. Genet. 36, 889–893 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. ENCODE Project Consortium. The ENCODE (ENCyclopedia Of DNA Elements) Project. Science 306, 636–640 (2004).

Download references

Acknowledgements

I acknowledge members of the Dekker lab, M. Walhout and J. Perry, for discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. Research in the Dekker lab is supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (HG03143).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Program in Gene Function and Expression and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Lazare Research Building, Room 519, 364 Plantation Street, Worcester, 01605, Massachusetts, USA
    Job Dekker

Authors

  1. Job Dekker
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toJob Dekker.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dekker, J. The three 'C' s of chromosome conformation capture: controls, controls, controls.Nat Methods 3, 17–21 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth823

Download citation

This article is cited by