The model organism as a system: integrating 'omics' data sets (original) (raw)

• Fleischmann, R. D. et al. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science 269, 496–512 (1995).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ehrenman, G. Mining what others miss: highlighting the subtleties in 1012 bytes of data, technology tries to clear up its own complex mess. Mechanical Engineering-CIME 127, 26 (2005).
  Article Google Scholar
• Hays, C. L. What Wal-Mart Knows About Customers' Habits. New York Times (14 Nov 2004).
  Google Scholar
• Hand, D. J., Blunt, G., Kelly, M. G. & Adams, N. M. Data mining for fun and profit. Stat. Sci. 15, 111–131 (2000).
  Article Google Scholar
• Kluger, Y., Yu, H., Qian, J. & Gerstein, M. Relationship between gene co-expression and probe localization on microarray slides. BMC Genomics 4, 49 (2003).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Quackenbush, J. Data standards for 'omic' science. Nature Biotechnol. 22, 613–614 (2004). A short, incisive report that introduces some of the problems that the omics sciences face with regards to data quality and representation standards.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bader, G. D. & Hogue, C. W. Analyzing yeast protein–protein interaction data obtained from different sources. Nature Biotechnol. 20, 991–997 (2002).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ge, H., Walhout, A. J. & Vidal, M. Integrating 'omic' information: a bridge between genomics and systems biology. Trends Genet. 19, 551–560 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Liolios, K., Tavernarakis, N., Hugenholtz, P. & Kyrpides, N. C. The genomes on line database (GOLD) v.2: a monitor of genome projects worldwide. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D332–D334 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kellis, M., Patterson, N., Endrizzi, M., Birren, B. & Lander, E. S. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423, 241–254 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chimpanzee Sequencing And Analysis Consortium. Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature 437, 69–87 (2005).
• Delsuc, F., Brinkmann, H. & Philippe, H. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nature Rev. Genet. 6, 361–375 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tompa, M. et al. Assessing computational tools for the discovery of transcription factor binding sites. Nature Biotechnol. 23, 137–144 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Brasch, M. A., Hartley, J. L. & Vidal, M. ORFeome cloning and systems biology: standardized mass production of the parts from the parts-list. Genome Res. 14, 2001–2009 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hardiman, G. Microarray platforms — comparisons and contrasts. Pharmacogenomics 5, 487–502 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Harbers, M. & Carninci, P. Tag-based approaches for transcriptome research and genome annotation. Nature Methods 2, 495–502 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Li, L. & Akashi, K. Unraveling the molecular components and genetic blueprints of stem cells. Biotechniques 35, 1233–1239 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rhodes, D. R. & Chinnaiyan, A. M. Integrative analysis of the cancer transcriptome. Nature Genet. 37, S31–S37 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jenner, R. G. & Young, R. A. Insights into host responses against pathogens from transcriptional profiling. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 3, 281–294 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Mata, J., Marguerat, S. & Bahler, J. Post-transcriptional control of gene expression: a genome-wide perspective. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30, 506–514 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Patterson, S. D. & Aebersold, R. H. Proteomics: the first decade and beyond. Nature Genet. 33 (Suppl.), 311–323 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ghaemmaghami, S. et al. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425, 737–741 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yates, J. R. 3rd, Gilchrist, A., Howell, K. E. & Bergeron, J. J. Proteomics of organelles and large cellular structures. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 702–714 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kuster, B., Schirle, M., Mallick, P. & Aebersold, R. Scoring proteomes with proteotypic peptide probes. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 577–583 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Griffin, J. L. & Bollard, M. E. Metabonomics: its potential as a tool in toxicology for safety assessment and data integration. Curr. Drug Metab. 5, 389–398 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. & Oliver, S. The next wave in metabolome analysis. Trends Biotechnol. 23, 544–546 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dunn, W. B., Bailey, N. J. & Johnson, H. E. Measuring the metabolome: current analytical technologies. Analyst 130, 606–625 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fridman, E. & Pichersky, E. Metabolomics, genomics, proteomics, and the identification of enzymes and their substrates and products. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 8, 242–248 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Markuszewski, M. J., Szczykowska, M., Siluk, D. & Kaliszan, R. Human red blood cells targeted metabolome analysis of glycolysis cycle metabolites by capillary electrophoresis using an indirect photometric detection method. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 39, 636–642 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wu, L. et al. Quantitative analysis of the microbial metabolome by isotope dilution mass spectrometry using uniformly 13C-labeled cell extracts as internal standards. Anal. Biochem. 336, 164–171 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Memelink, J. Tailoring the plant metabolome without a loose stitch. Trends Plant Sci. 10, 305–307 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. G. Metabonomics in toxicology: a review. Toxicol. Sci. 85, 809–822 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gibney, M. J. et al. Metabolomics in human nutrition: opportunities and challenges. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 82, 497–503 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Arita, M., Robert, M. & Tomita, M. All systems go: launching cell simulation fueled by integrated experimental biology data. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16, 344–349 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Huh, W. K. et al. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425, 686–691 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dupuy, D. et al. A first version of the Caenorhabditis elegans promoterome. Genome Res. 14, 2169–2175 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Guda, C. & Subramaniam, S. pTARGET: a new method for predicting protein subcellular localization in eukaryotes. Bioinformatics 21, 3963–3969 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Coulton, G. Are histochemistry and cytochemistry 'Omics'? J. Mol. Histol. 35, 603–613 (2004).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Wenk, M. R. The emerging field of lipidomics. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 4, 594–610 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Shriver, Z., Raguram, S. & Sasisekharan, R. Glycomics: a pathway to a class of new and improved therapeutics. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 3, 863–873 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Levine, M. & Davidson, E. H. Gene regulatory networks for development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4936–4942 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mockler, T. C. et al. Applications of DNA tiling arrays for whole-genome analysis. Genomics 85, 1–15 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Buck, M. J. & Lieb, J. D. ChIP–chip: considerations for the design, analysis, and application of genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments. Genomics 83, 349–360 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Herring, C. D. et al. Immobilization of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and location of binding sites by use of chromatin immunoprecipitation and microarrays. J. Bacteriol. 187, 6166–6174 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pokholok, D. K., Hannett, N. M. & Young, R. A. Exchange of RNA polymerase II initiation and elongation factors during gene expression in vivo. Mol. Cell 9, 799–809 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kim, T. H. et al. A high-resolution map of active promoters in the human genome. Nature 436, 876–880 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Harbison, C. T. et al. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 431, 99–104 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, Z. et al. A global transcriptional regulatory role for c-Myc in Burkitt's lymphoma cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8164–8169 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Martone, R. et al. Distribution of NF-κB-binding sites across human chromosome 22. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12247–12252 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cawley, S. et al. Unbiased mapping of transcription factor binding sites along human chromosomes 21 and 22 points to widespread regulation of noncoding RNAs. Cell 116, 499–509 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhang, X. et al. Genome-wide analysis of cAMP-response element binding protein occupancy, phosphorylation, and target gene activation in human tissues. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4459–4464 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pokholok, D. K. et al. Genome-wide map of nucleosome acetylation and methylation in yeast. Cell 122, 517–527 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cusick, M., Klitgord, N., Vidal, M. & Hill, D. E. Interactome: gateway into systems biology. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14, R171–R181 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fields, S. High-throughput two-hybrid analysis. The promise and the peril. FEBS J. 272, 5391–5399 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ben-Hur, A. & Noble, W. S. Kernel methods for predicting protein–protein interactions. Bioinformatics 21 (Suppl. 1), i38–i46 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pazos, F., Ranea, J. A., Juan, D. & Sternberg, M. J. Assessing protein co-evolution in the context of the tree of life assists in the prediction of the interactome. J. Mol. Biol. 352, 1002–1015 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Droit, A., Poirier, G. G. & Hunter, J. M. Experimental and bioinformatic approaches for interrogating protein–protein interactions to determine protein function. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 34, 263–280 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Butland, G. et al. Interaction network containing conserved and essential protein complexes in Escherichia coli. Nature 433, 531–537 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rain, J. C. et al. The protein–protein interaction map of Helicobacter pylori. Nature 409, 211–215 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lacount, D. J. et al. A protein interaction network of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 438, 103–107 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ito, T. et al. Roles for the two-hybrid system in exploration of the yeast protein interactome. Mol. Cell Proteomics 1, 561–566 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Formstecher, E. et al. Protein interaction mapping: a Drosophila case study. Genome Res. 15, 376–384 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, S. et al. A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science 303, 540–543 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Stelzl, U. et al. A human protein–protein interaction network: a resource for annotating the proteome. Cell 122, 957–968 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Scholtens, D., Vidal, M. & Gentleman, R. Local modeling of global interactome networks. Bioinformatics 21, 3548–3557 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hahn, M. W., Conant, G. C. & Wagner, A. Molecular evolution in large genetic networks: does connectivity equal constraint? J. Mol. Evol. 58, 203–211 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sprinzak, E., Sattath, S. & Margalit, H. How reliable are experimental protein–protein interaction data? J. Mol. Biol. 327, 919–923 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Roehrl, M. H., Wang, J. Y. & Wagner, G. A general framework for development and data analysis of competitive high-throughput screens for small-molecule inhibitors of protein–protein interactions by fluorescence polarization. Biochemistry 43, 16056–16066 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bochner, B. R. New technologies to assess genotype–phenotype relationships. Nature Rev. Genet. 4, 309–314 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bredel, M. & Jacoby, E. Chemogenomics: an emerging strategy for rapid target and drug discovery. Nature Rev. Genet. 5, 262–275 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dykxhoorn, D. M. & Lieberman, J. The silent revolution: RNA interference as basic biology, research tool, and therapeutic. Annu. Rev. Med. 56, 401–423 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tong, A. H. et al. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303, 808–813 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sauer, U. High-throughput phenomics: experimental methods for mapping fluxomes. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 15, 58–63 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Li, H. & Wang, W. Dissecting the transcription networks of a cell using computational genomics. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13, 611–616 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wang, W. et al. Inference of combinatorial regulation in yeast transcriptional networks: a case study of sporulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 1998–2003 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bar-Joseph, Z. et al. Computational discovery of gene modules and regulatory networks. Nature Biotechnol. 21, 1337–1342 (2003). Introduces the GRAM algorithm that can be used to identify gene modules or groups of co-expressed genes that share a common transcriptional regulator. This approach is useful for inferring transcriptional-regulatory networks from omics data sets.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Gat-Viks, I., Tanay, A. & Shamir, R. Modeling and analysis of heterogeneous regulation in biological networks. J. Comput. Biol. 11, 1034–1049 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yeang, C. H. et al. Validation and refinement of gene-regulatory pathways on a network of physical interactions. Genome Biol. 6, R62 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jansen, R. et al. A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein–protein interactions from genomic data. Science 302, 449–453 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rhodes, D. R. et al. Probabilistic model of the human protein–protein interaction network. Nature Biotechnol. 23, 951–959 (2005). This study illustrates the use of a Bayesian classification strategy to predict the structure of molecular networks — orthologous protein–protein interactions, transcriptomics and genomics data were integrated to develop a Bayesian model that predicts 40,000 human protein–protein interactions.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Yeger-Lotem, E. et al. Network motifs in integrated cellular networks of transcription-regulation and protein–protein interaction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 5934–5939 (2004). This work presents a methodology to decompose cellular networks into their constituent basic building blocks, or network motifs. Although the technique can be applied to networks of any type, this study focuses on the analysis of a S. cerevisiae network derived from genome-scale protein–protein- and protein–DNA-interaction data sets.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yeger-Lotem, E. & Margalit, H. Detection of regulatory circuits by integrating the cellular networks of protein–protein interactions and transcription regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 6053–6061 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. V. et al. Motifs, themes and thematic maps of an integrated Saccharomyces cerevisiae interaction network. J. Biol. 4, 6 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Luscombe, N. M. et al. Genomic analysis of regulatory network dynamics reveals large topological changes. Nature 431, 308–312 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Han, J. D. et al. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction network. Nature 430, 88–93 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tanay, A., Sharan, R., Kupiec, M. & Shamir, R. Revealing modularity and organization in the yeast molecular network by integrated analysis of highly heterogeneous genomewide data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 2981–2986 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ideker, T., Ozier, O., Schwikowski, B. & Siegel, A. F. Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks. Bioinformatics 18 (Suppl. 1), S233–S240 (2002).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Wong, S. L. et al. Combining biological networks to predict genetic interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15682–15687 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kelley, R. & Ideker, T. Systematic interpretation of genetic interactions using protein networks. Nature Biotechnol. 23, 561–566 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kanehisa, M., Goto, S., Kawashima, S., Okuno, Y. & Hattori, M. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D277–D280 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Price, N. D., Reed, J. L. & Palsson, B. O. Genome-scale models of microbial cells: evaluating the consequences of constraints. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 2, 886–897 (2004). This review discusses the COBRA approach to modelling genome-scale molecular networks by integrating genome-scale data sets with a specific emphasis on the many recent analytical methods that are associated with these models for studying characteristics and capabilities of microorganisms.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Reed, J. L., Famili, I., Thiele, I. & Palsson, B. O. Towards multidimensional genome annotation. Nature Rev. Genet. 7, 130–141 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Palsson, B. Two-dimensional annotation of genomes. Nature Biotechnol. 22, 1218–1219 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Patil, K. R., Akesson, M. & Nielsen, J. Use of genome-scale microbial models for metabolic engineering. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 15, 64–69 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Patil, K. R. & Nielsen, J. Uncovering transcriptional regulation of metabolism by using metabolic network topology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 2685–2689 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Covert, M. W., Knight, E. M., Reed, J. L., Herrgard, M. J. & Palsson, B. O. Integrating high-throughput and computational data elucidates bacterial networks. Nature 429, 92–96 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Papin, J. A. & Palsson, B. O. The JAK–STAT signaling network in the human B-cell: an extreme signaling pathway analysis. Biophys. J. 87, 37–46 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Longabaugh, W. J., Davidson, E. H. & Bolouri, H. Computational representation of developmental genetic regulatory networks. Dev. Biol. 283, 1–16 (2005). The reconstruction and modelling of developmental gene-regulatory networks is detailed by integrating various data types using the BioTapestry modelling software.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Saghatelian, A. & Cravatt, B. F. Global strategies to integrate the proteome and metabolome. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 9, 62–68 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Begley, T. J., Rosenbach, A. S., Ideker, T. & Samson, L. D. Hot spots for modulating toxicity identified by genomic phenotyping and localization mapping. Mol. Cell 16, 117–125 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lee, W. et al. Genome-wide requirements for resistance to functionally distinct DNA-damaging agents. PLoS Genet. 1, e24 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Haugen, A. C. et al. Integrating phenotypic and expression profiles to map arsenic-response networks. Genome Biol. 5, R95 (2004).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kim, J. K. et al. Functional genomic analysis of RNA interference in C. elegans. Science 308, 1164–1167 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tewari, M. et al. Systematic interactome mapping and genetic perturbation analysis of a C. elegans TGF-β signaling network. Mol. Cell 13, 469–482 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Boulton, S. J. et al. Combined functional genomic maps of the C. elegans DNA damage response. Science 295, 127–131 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gunsalus, K. C. et al. Predictive models of molecular machines involved in Caenorhabditis elegans early embryogenesis. Nature 436, 861–865 (2005). This study integrated transcriptomics, protein–protein interactions and RNAi-based phenomics to map the molecular network topology of genes associated with early embryogenesis in C. elegans . The resulting structure is used to infer potential network organizational and functional properties such as interacting molecular complexes and cellular-process crosstalk.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Oksman-Caldentey, K. M. & Saito, K. Integrating genomics and metabolomics for engineering plant metabolic pathways. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16, 174–179 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kristensen, C. et al. Metabolic engineering of dhurrin in transgenic Arabidopsis plants with marginal inadvertent effects on the metabolome and transcriptome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 1779–1784 (2005). This study used omics data integration to diagnose unexpected impacts of genomic manipulations on the phenotype of the organism. Metabolomic and transcriptomic data were integrated to assess the systems-wide impact of introducing exogenous high-flux pathways to A. thaliana.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hirai, M. Y. et al. Integration of transcriptomics and metabolomics for understanding of global responses to nutritional stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 10205–10210 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ippolito, J. E. et al. An integrated functional genomics and metabolomics approach for defining poor prognosis in human neuroendocrine cancers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9901–9906 (2005). The utility of integrating omics data to identify biomarkers is shown in this work, which integrated transcriptomics and metabolomics data to determine a molecular signature that is associated with poor-prognosis human neuroendocrine cancers.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yan, W. et al. System-based proteomic analysis of the interferon response in human liver cells. Genome Biol. 5, R54 (2004).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Enard, W. et al. Intra- and interspecific variation in primate gene expression patterns. Science 296, 340–343 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Khaitovich, P. et al. Parallel patterns of evolution in the genomes and transcriptomes of humans and chimpanzees. Science 309, 1850–1854 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Khaitovich, P. et al. Regional patterns of gene expression in human and chimpanzee brains. Genome Res. 14, 1462–1473 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ihmels, J. et al. Rewiring of the yeast transcriptional network through the evolution of motif usage. Science 309, 938–940 (2005). Genomics and transcriptomics data are integrated to identify a cis -regulatory element associated with the evolutionary emergence of rapid anaerobic growth capacity in certain yeast species. This study highlights the potential of integrating omics data sets to address fundamental evolutionary questions.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tanay, A., Regev, A. & Shamir, R. Conservation and evolvability in regulatory networks: the evolution of ribosomal regulation in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7203–7208 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shields, R. MIAME, we have a problem. Trends Genet. 22, 65–66 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003). One of the most widely used and broadly accessible software packages designed to facilitate omics data integration and analysis, known as Cytoscape, is detailed in this report.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hucka, M. et al. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics 19, 524–531 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Novere, N. L. et al. Minimum information requested in the annotation of biochemical models (MIRIAM). Nature Biotechnol. 23, 1509–1515 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Stierum, R., Heijne, W., Kienhuis, A., van Ommen, B. & Groten, J. Toxicogenomics concepts and applications to study hepatic effects of food additives and chemicals. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 207, 179–188 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Corthesy-Theulaz, I. et al. Nutrigenomics: the impact of biomics technology on nutrition research. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 49, 355–365 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Desiere, F. Towards a systems biology understanding of human health: interplay between genotype, environment and nutrition. Biotechnol. Annu. Rev. 10, 51–84 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Roche, H. M., Phillips, C. & Gibney, M. J. The metabolic syndrome: the crossroads of diet and genetics. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 64, 371–377 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, S. M. & Gold, R. Genomics, proteomics, metabolomics: what is in a word for multiple sclerosis? Curr. Opin. Neurol. 18, 231–235 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Khalil, I. G. & Hill, C. Systems biology for cancer. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 17, 44–48 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nikolsky, Y., Nikolskaya, T. & Bugrim, A. Biological networks and analysis of experimental data in drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today 10, 653–662 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Billings, P. R. et al. Ready for genomic medicine? Perspectives of health care decision makers. Arch. Intern. Med. 165, 1917–1919 (2005).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Deeds, E. J., Ashenberg, O. & Shakhnovich, E. I. A simple physical model for scaling in protein–protein interaction networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 311–316 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar