Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life (original) (raw)

• Darwin, C. The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (Murray, London, 1859).
  Google Scholar
• Haeckel, E. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen: Allgemeine Grundzüge der Organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, Mechanisch Begründet durch die von Charles Darwin Reformirte Descendenz–Theorie (Georg Reimer, Berlin, 1866) (in German).
  Book Google Scholar
• Van Niel, C. B. in Perspectives and Horizons in Microbiology (ed. Waksman, S. S.) 3–12 (Rutgers Univ. Press, New Brunswick, 1955).
  Google Scholar
• Zuckerkandl, E. & Pauling, L. Molecules as documents of evolutionary history. J. Theor. Biol. 8, 357–366 (1965).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Woese, C. R. & Fox, G. E. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 74, 5088–5090 (1977).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Eisen, J. A. & Fraser, C. M. Phylogenomics: intersection of evolution and genomics. Science 300, 1706–1707 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Philippe, H. & Laurent, J. How good are deep phylogenetic trees? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8, 616–623 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rokas, A. & Holland, P. W. Rare genomic changes as a tool for phylogenetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 454–459 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gribaldo, S. & Philippe, H. Ancient phylogenetic relationships. Theor. Popul. Biol. 61, 391–408 (2002).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Holder, M. & Lewis, P. O. Phylogeny estimation: traditional and Bayesian approaches. Nature Rev. Genet. 4, 275–284 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Qiu, Y. L. et al. The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402, 404–407 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Moreira, D., Le Guyader, H. & Philippe, H. The origin of red algae: implications for the evolution of chloroplasts. Nature 405, 69–72 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Baldauf, S. L., Roger, A. J., Wenk-Siefert, I. & Doolittle, W. F. A kingdom-level phylogeny of eukaryotes based on combined protein data. Science 290, 972–977 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Madsen, O. et al. Parallel adaptive radiations in two major clades of placental mammals. Nature 409, 610–614 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Murphy, W. J. et al. Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals. Nature 409, 614–618 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Blair, J. E., Ikeo, K., Gojobori, T. & Hedges, S. B. The evolutionary position of nematodes. BMC Evol. Biol. 2, 7 (2002).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bapteste, E. et al. The analysis of 100 genes supports the grouping of three highly divergent amoebae: Dictyostelium, Entamoeba, and Mastigamoeba. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 1414–1419 (2002). The first phylogenomic study based on the supermatrix approach that includes more than 100 genes for a relatively broad taxon sampling of eukaryotes.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lerat, E., Daubin, V. & Moran, N. A. From gene trees to organismal phylogeny in prokaryotes: the case of the γ-Proteobacteria. PLoS Biol. 1, e19 (2003).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rokas, A., Williams, B. L., King, N. & Carroll, S. B. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425, 798–804 (2003). An empirical study on the phylogenomics of yeasts, which shows that, for the same number of positions, a robust phylogenetic tree is recovered more rapidly with randomly selected positions than with entire genes.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Philippe, H. et al. Phylogenomics of eukaryotes: impact of missing data on large alignments. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1740–1752 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wolf, Y. I., Rogozin, I. B. & Koonin, E. V. Coelomata and not Ecdysozoa: evidence from genome-wide phylogenetic analysis. Genome Res. 14, 29–36 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Driskell, A. C. et al. Prospects for building the tree of life from large sequence databases. Science 306, 1172–1174 (2004). References 20 and 22 demonstrate the robustness of the supermatrix approach to a surprisingly high amount of missing data in phylogenomic analyses.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Philippe, H., Lartillot, N. & Brinkmann, H. Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa and Protostomia. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9 February 2005 (10.1093/molbev/msi111). This study demonstrates the impact of the long-branch attraction artefact in phylogenomics and provides evidence for the new animal phylogeny based on relatively large species sampling.
• Lecointre, G., Philippe, H., Le, H. L. V. & Le Guyader, H. Species sampling has a major impact on phylogenetic inference. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2, 205–224 (1993).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Graybeal, A. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst. Biol. 47, 9–17 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Poe, S. & Swofford, D. L. Taxon sampling revisited. Nature 398, 299–300 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hillis, D. M., Pollock, D. D., McGuire, J. A. & Zwickl, D. J. Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference? Syst. Biol. 52, 124–126 (2003).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. S. & Kumar, S. Taxon sampling, bioinformatics, and phylogenomics. Syst. Biol. 52, 119–124 (2003). References 27 and 28 present a recent exchange on the relative importance of character and taxon sampling for phylogenetic inference.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Philippe, H. Rodent monophyly: pitfalls of molecular phylogenies. J. Mol. Evol. 45, 712–715 (1997).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. -H. et al. Four new mitochondrial genomes and the increased stability of evolutionary trees of mammals from improved taxon sampling. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 2060–2070 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Philip, G. K., Creevey, C. J. & McInerney, J. O. The Opisthokonta and the Ecdysozoa may not be clades: stronger support for the grouping of plant and animal than for animal and fungi and stronger support for the Coelomata than Ecdysozoa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9 February 2005 (10.1093/molbev/msi102).
• Sanderson, M. J., Driskell, A. C., Ree, R. H., Eulenstein, O. & Langley, S. Obtaining maximal concatenated phylogenetic data sets from large sequence databases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 1036–1042 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kluge, A. G. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38, 7–25 (1989).
  Article Google Scholar
• Felsenstein, J. Inferring Phylogenies (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 2004).
  Google Scholar
• Gatesy, J., Matthee, C., DeSalle, R. & Hayashi, C. Resolution of a supertree/supermatrix paradox. Syst. Biol. 51, 652–664 (2002).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Wiens, J. J. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 52, 528–538 (2003).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Gittleman, J. L. & Steel, M. A. The (super)tree of life: procedures, problems, and prospects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 265–289 (2002).
  Article Google Scholar
• Baum, B. Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees. Taxon 41, 3–10 (1992).
  Article Google Scholar
• Ragan, M. A. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1, 53–58 (1992).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. The evolution of supertrees. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 315–322 (2004).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Liu, F. G. et al. Molecular and morphological supertrees for eutherian (placental) mammals. Science 291, 1786–1789 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Daubin, V., Gouy, M. & Perriére, G. A phylogenomic approach to bacterial phylogeny: evidence of a core of genes sharing a common history. Genome Res. 12, 1080–1090 (2002). The first application of a supertree method in phylogenomics showing its usefulness for reconstructing bacterial phylogeny in the presence of horizontal gene transfer.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gatesy, J., Baker, R. H. & Hayashi, C. Inconsistencies in arguments for the supertree approach: supermatrices versus supertrees of Crocodylia. Syst. Biol. 53, 342–355 (2004).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Salamin, N., Hodkinson, T. R. & Savolainen, V. Building supertrees: an empirical assessment using the grass family (Poaceae). Syst. Biol. 51, 136–150 (2002).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. Trees versus characters and the supertree/supermatrix 'paradox'. Syst. Biol. 53, 356–359 (2004).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Brown, J. R., Douady, C. J., Italia, M. J., Marshall, W. E. & Stanhope, M. J. Universal trees based on large combined protein sequence data sets. Nature Genet. 28, 281–285 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Brochier, C., Bapteste, E., Moreira, D. & Philippe, H. Eubacterial phylogeny based on translational apparatus proteins. Trends Genet. 18, 1–5 (2002). A comprehensive study of bacterial phylogeny that is based on the supermatrix approach, using statistical methods to detect and exclude genes that are probably affected by horizontal transfer.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. On the best evolutionary rate for phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 47, 125–133 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wolf, Y. I., Rogozin, I. B., Grishin, N. V. & Koonin, E. V. Genome trees and the tree of life. Trends Genet. 18, 472–479 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Snel, B., Bork, P. & Huynen, M. A. Genome phylogeny based on gene content. Nature Genet. 21, 108–110 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tekaia, F., Lazcano, A. & Dujon, B. The genomic tree as revealed from whole proteome comparisons. Genome Res. 9, 550–557 (1999).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Clarke, G. D., Beiko, R. G., Ragan, M. A. & Charlebois, R. L. Inferring genome trees by using a filter to eliminate phylogenetically discordant sequences and a distance matrix based on mean normalized BLASTP scores. J. Bacteriol. 184, 2072–2080 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Korbel, J. O., Snel, B., Huynen, M. A. & Bork, P. SHOT: a web server for the construction of genome phylogenies. Trends Genet. 18, 158–162 (2002). This paper presents reconstruction of prokaryotic phylogenies based on gene content and the conservation of gene pairs, with a critical view on the impact of horizontal gene transfer on their accuracy.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dutilh, B. E., Huynen, M. A., Bruno, W. J. & Snel, B. The consistent phylogenetic signal in genome trees revealed by reducing the impact of noise. J. Mol. Evol. 58, 527–539 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lin, J. & Gerstein, M. Whole-genome trees based on the occurrence of folds and orthologs: implications for comparing genomes on different levels. Genome Res. 10, 808–818 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wolf, Y. I., Rogozin, I. B., Grishin, N. V., Tatusov, R. L. & Koonin, E. V. Genome trees constructed using five different approaches suggest new major bacterial clades. BMC Evol. Biol. 1, 8 (2001). A study of bacterial phylogenomics using five independent reconstruction methods to corroborate the emergence of a recurrent phylogenetic pattern.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fitz-Gibbon, S. T. & House, C. H. Whole genome-based phylogenetic analysis of free-living microorganisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 4218–4222 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• House, C. H. & Fitz-Gibbon, S. T. Using homolog groups to create a whole-genomic tree of free-living organisms: an update. J. Mol. Evol. 54, 539–547 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• House, C. H., Runnegar, B. & Fitz-Gibbon, S. T. Geobiological analysis using whole genome-based tree building applied to the Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya. Geobiology 1, 15–26 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lake, J. A. & Rivera, M. C. Deriving the genomic tree of life in the presence of horizontal gene transfer: conditioned reconstruction. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 681–690 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gu, X. & Zhang, H. Genome phylogenetic analysis based on extended gene contents. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1401–1408 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Huson, D. H. & Steel, M. Phylogenetic trees based on gene content. Bioinformatics 20, 2044–2049 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sankoff, D. et al. Gene order comparisons for phylogenetic inference: Evolution of the mitochondrial genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 6575–6579 (1992).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hannenhalli, S. & Pevzner, P. A. Transforming cabbage into turnip: polynomial algorithm for sorting signed permutations by reversals. J. ACM 46, 1–27 (1999).
  Article Google Scholar
• Blanchette, M., Kunisawa, T. & Sankoff, D. Gene order breakpoint evidence in animal mitochondrial phylogeny. J. Mol. Evol. 49, 193–203 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Moret, B., Tang, J. & Warnow, T. in Mathematics of Evolution and Phylogeny (ed. Gascuel, O.) 321–352 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2005).
  Google Scholar
• Koski, L. B. & Golding, G. B. The closest BLAST hit is often not the nearest neighbor. J. Mol. Evol. 52, 540–542 (2001).
  Article Google Scholar
• Philippe, H. & Douady, C. J. Horizontal gene transfer and phylogenetics. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6, 498–505 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fitch, W. M. Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. Syst. Zool. 19, 99–113 (1970).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stanhope, M. J. et al. Phylogenetic analyses do not support horizontal gene transfers from bacteria to vertebrates. Nature 411, 940–944 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sicheritz-Ponten, T. & Andersson, S. G. A phylogenomic approach to microbial evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 545–552 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., Mrázek, J. & Karlin, S. Genome signature comparisons among prokaryote, plasmid, and mitochondrial DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 9184–9189 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Edwards, S. V., Fertil, B., Giron, A. & Deschavanne, P. J. A genomic schism in birds revealed by phylogenetic analysis of DNA strings. Syst. Biol. 51, 599–613 (2002).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Pride, D. T., Meinersmann, R. J., Wassenaar, T. M. & Blaser, M. J. Evolutionary implications of microbial genome tetranucleotide frequency biases. Genome Res. 13, 145–158 (2003). A study showing that phylogenetic signal can be retrieved from the distribution of oligonucleotides in prokaryote genomes.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Qi, J., Wang, B. & Hao, B. I. Whole proteome prokaryote phylogeny without sequence alignment: a K-string composition approach. J. Mol. Evol. 58, 1–11 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nikaido, M., Rooney, A. P. & Okada, N. Phylogenetic relationships among cetartiodactyls based on insertions of short and long interspersed elements: hippopotamuses are the closest extant relatives of whales. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 10261–10266 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• van Dijk, M. A. et al. Protein sequence signatures support the African clade of mammals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 188–193 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, B., Erdmann, M. V. & Brenner, S. Molecular synapomorphies resolve evolutionary relationships of extant jawed vertebrates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 11382–11387 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Philippe, H. et al. Early-branching or fast-evolving eukaryotes? An answer based on slowly evolving positions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 1213–1221 (2000).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Stechmann, A. & Cavalier-Smith, T. Rooting the eukaryote tree by using a derived gene fusion. Science 297, 89–91 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Snel, B., Bork, P. & Huynen, M. Genome evolution. Gene fusion versus gene fission. Trends Genet. 16, 9–11 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bapteste, E. & Philippe, H. The potential value of indels as phylogenetic markers: position of trichomonads as a case study. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 972–977 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Krzywinski, J. & Besansky, N. J. Frequent intron loss in the White gene: a cautionary tale for phylogeneticists. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 362–366 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pecon-Slattery, J., Pearks Wilkerson, A. J., Murphy, W. J. & O'Brien, S, J. Phylogenetic assessment of introns and SINEs within the Y chromosome using the cat family Felidae as a species tree. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 2299–2309 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Murphy, W. J. et al. Resolution of the early placental mammal radiation using Bayesian phylogenetics. Science 294, 2348–2351 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Amrine-Madsen, H., Koepfli, K. P., Wayne, R. K. & Springer, M. S. A new phylogenetic marker, apolipoprotein B, provides compelling evidence for eutherian relationships. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28, 225–240 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Reyes, A. et al. Congruent mammalian trees from mitochondrial and nuclear genes using Bayesian methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 397–403 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E. & Chase, M. W. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 402, 402–404 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Barkman, T. J. et al. Independent and combined analyses of sequences from all three genomic compartments converge on the root of flowering plant phylogeny. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 13166–13171 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pryer, K. M. et al. Horsetails and ferns are a monophyletic group and the closest living relatives to seed plants. Nature 409, 618–622 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S. & Zanis, M. J. Phylogeny of seed plants based on evidence from eight genes. Am. J. Bot. 89, 1670–1681 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zanis, M. J., Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Mathews, S. & Donoghue, M. J. The root of the angiosperms revisited. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 6848–6853 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Savolainen, V. & Chase, M. W. A decade of progress in plant molecular phylogenetics. Trends Genet. 19, 717–724 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• King, N. & Carroll, S. B. A receptor tyrosine kinase from choanoflagellates: molecular insights into early animal evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 15032–15037 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lang, B. F., O'Kelly, C., Nerad, T., Gray, M. W. & Burger, G. The closest unicellular relatives of animals. Curr. Biol. 12, 1773–1778 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. G. & Roger, A. J. The real 'kingdoms' of eukaryotes. Curr. Biol. 14, R693–R696 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rivera, M. C. & Lake, J. A. The ring of life provides evidence for a genome fusion origin of eukaryotes. Nature 431, 152–155 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Esser, C. et al. A genome phylogeny for mitochondria among α-proteobacteria and a predominantly eubacterial ancestry of yeast nuclear genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1643–1660 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Woese, C. R. Bacterial evolution. Microbiol. Rev. 51, 221–271 (1987).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Doolittle, W. F. Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree. Science 284, 2124–2129 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ochman, H., Lawrence, J. G. & Groisman, E. A. Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation. Nature 405, 299–304 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yang, S., Doolittle, R. F. & Bourne, P. E. Phylogeny determined by protein domain content. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 373–378 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Matte-Tailliez, O., Brochier, C., Forterre, P. & Philippe, H. Archaeal phylogeny based on ribosomal proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 631–639 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Felsenstein, J. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27, 401–410 (1978).
  Article Google Scholar
• Felsenstein, J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791 (1985).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck, J. P., Ronquist, F., Nielsen, R. & Bollback, J. P. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294, 2310–2314 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck, J. P. Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 44, 17–48 (1995).
  Article Google Scholar
• Swofford, D. L. et al. Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. Syst. Biol. 50, 525–539 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kolaczkowski, B. & Thornton, J. W. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous. Nature 431, 980–984 (2004). A simulation study showing that the performance of current likelihood-based methods of phylogenetic reconstruction are noticeably affected by heterotachy.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Whelan, S., Lio, P. & Goldman, N. Molecular phylogenetics: state-of-the-art methods for looking into the past. Trends Genet. 17, 262–272 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Steel, M. A., Lockhart, P. J. & Penny, D. Confidence in evolutionary trees from biological sequence data. Nature 364, 440–442 (1993).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hendy, M. & Penny, D. A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 38, 297–309 (1989).
  Article Google Scholar
• Lopez, P., Casane, D. & Philippe, H. Heterotachy, an important process of protein evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 1–7 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mathews, S. & Donoghue, M. J. The root of angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochrome genes. Science 286, 947–950 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Goremykin, V. V., Hirsch-Ernst, K. I., Wölfl, S. & Hellwig, F. H. Analysis of the Amborella trichopoda chloroplast genome sequence suggests that Amborella is not a basal angiosperm. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 1499–1505 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Goremykin, V. V., Hirsch-Ernst, K. I., Wölfl, S. & Hellwig, F. H. The chloroplast genome of Nymphaea alba: whole-genome analyses and the problem of identifying the most basal angiosperm. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1445–1454 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Soltis, D. E. et al. Genome-scale data, angiosperm relationships, and 'ending incongruence': a cautionary tale in phylogenetics. Trends Plant Sci. 9, 477–483 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stefanovic, S., Rice, D. W. & Palmer, J. D. Long branch attraction, taxon sampling, and the earliest angiosperms: Amborella or monocots? BMC Evol. Biol. 4, 35 (2004).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Adoutte, A. et al. The new animal phylogeny: reliability and implications. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4453–4456 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Halanych, K. M. The new view of animal phylogeny. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 229–256 (2004).
  Article Google Scholar
• Aguinaldo, A. M. et al. Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals. Nature 387, 489–493 (1997).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dopazo, H., Santoyo, J. & Dopazo, J. Phylogenomics and the number of characters required for obtaining an accurate phylogeny of eukaryote model species. Bioinformatics 20 (Suppl. 1), I116–I121 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Keeling, P. J. & Fast, N. M. Microsporidia: biology and evolution of highly reduced intracellular parasites. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56, 93–116 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. & Swofford, D. L. Should we use model-based methods for phylogenetic inference when we know that assumptions about among-site rate variation and nucleotide substitution pattern are violated? Syst. Biol. 50, 723–729 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck, J. P. The robustness of two phylogenetic methods: four-taxon simulations reveal a slight superiority of maximum likelihood over neighbor joining. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 843–849 (1995).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gaut, B. S. & Lewis, P. O. Success of maximum likelihood phylogeny inference in the four-taxon case. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 152–162 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Siepel, A. & Haussler, D. Phylogenetic estimation of context-dependent substitution rates by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 413–428 (2004).
  Google Scholar
• Whelan, S. & Goldman, N. Estimating the frequency of events that cause multiple-nucleotide changes. Genetics 167, 2027–2043 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Robinson, D. M., Jones, D. T., Kishino, H., Goldman, N. & Thorne, J. L. Protein evolution with dependence among codons due to tertiary structure. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 1692–1704 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, N., Lartillot, N., Bryant, D. & Philippe, H. Site interdependence attributed to tertiary structure in amino acid sequence evolution. Gene 347, 207–217 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Galtier, N. & Gouy, M. Inferring pattern and process: maximum-likelihood implementation of a nonhomogeneous model of DNA sequence evolution for phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 871–879 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Foster, P. G. Modeling compositional heterogeneity. Syst. Biol. 53, 485–495 (2004).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Fitch, W. M. Rate of change of concomitantly variable codons. J. Mol. Evol. 1, 84–96 (1971).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tuffley, C. & Steel, M. Modeling the covarion hypothesis of nucleotide substitution. Math. Biosci. 147, 63–91 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Penny, D., McComish, B. J., Charleston, M. A. & Hendy, M. D. Mathematical elegance with biochemical realism: the covarion model of molecular evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 53, 711–723 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Galtier, N. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis under a covarion-like model. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 866–873 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck, J. P. Testing a covariotide model of DNA substitution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 698–707 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lartillot, N. & Philippe, H. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1095–1109 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pagel, M. & Meade, A. A phylogenetic mixture model for detecting pattern-heterogeneity in gene sequence or character-state data. Syst. Biol. 53, 571–581 (2004). References 138 and 139 explore promising mixture models to handle sequences that evolved under heterogeneous conditions.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Woese, C. R., Achenbach, L., Rouviere, P. & Mandelco, L. Archaeal phylogeny: reexamination of the phylogenetic position of Archaeoglobus fulgidus in light of certain composition-induced artifacts. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 14, 364–371 (1991).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Delsuc, F., Phillips, M. J. & Penny, D. Comment on 'Hexapod origins: Monophyletic or paraphyletic?' Science 301, 1482 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Phillips, M. J. & Penny, D. The root of the mammalian tree inferred from whole mitochondrial genomes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28, 171–185 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gibson, A., Gowri-Shankar, V., Higgs, P. G. & Rattray, M. A comprehensive analysis of mammalian mitochondrial genome base composition and improved phylogenetic methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 251–264 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Phillips, M. J., Delsuc, F. & Penny, D. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1455–1458 (2004). A cautionary tale for phylogenomic studies from the empirical demonstration that compositional bias can lead to inconsistency of some distance methods.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lopez, P., Forterre, P. & Philippe, H. The root of the tree of life in the light of the covarion model. J. Mol. Evol. 49, 496–508 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Trillo, I., Riutort, M., Littlewood, D. T. J., Herniou, E. A. & Baguna, J. Acoel flatworms: earliest extant bilaterian metazoans, not members of Platyhelminthes. Science 283, 1919–1923 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, H. & Philippe, H. Archaea sister group of Bacteria? Indications from tree reconstruction artifacts in ancient phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 817–825 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Burleigh, J. G. & Mathews, S. Phylogenetic signal in nucleotide data from seed plants: implications for resolving the seed plant tree of life. Am. J. Bot. 91, 1599–1613 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pisani, D. Identifying and removing fast-evolving sites using compatibility analysis: an example from the Arthropoda. Syst. Biol. 53, 978–989 (2004).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Miyamoto, M. M. & Fitch, W. M. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44, 64–76 (1995).
  Article Google Scholar
• Herniou, E. A. et al. Use of whole genome sequence data to infer baculovirus phylogeny. J. Virol. 75, 8117–8126 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Riesenfeld, C. S., Schloss, P. D. & Handelsman, J. Metagenomics: genomic analysis of microbial communities. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38, 525–552 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Philippe, H., Chenuil, A. & Adoutte, A. Can the Cambrian explosion be inferred through molecular phylogeny? Development 120, S15–S25 (1994).
  Google Scholar
• Dobzhansky, T. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Am. Biol. Teacher 35, 125–129 (1973).
  Article Google Scholar
• Saitou, N. & Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406–425 (1987).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rzhetsky, A. & Nei, M. Statistical properties of the ordinary least-squares, generalized least- squares, and minimum-evolution methods of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol. 35, 367–375 (1992).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Felsenstein, J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17, 368–376 (1981).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673–4680 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Castresana, J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 540–552 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. Maximum-likelihood models for combined analyses of multiple sequence data. J. Mol. Evol. 42, 587–596 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pupko, T., Huchon, D., Cao, Y., Okada, N. & Hasegawa, M. Combining multiple data sets in a likelihood analysis: which models are the best? Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 2294–2307 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Springer, M. S., Amrine, H. M., Burk, A. & Stanhope, M. J. Additional support for Afrotheria and Paenungulata, the performance of mitochondrial versus nuclear genes, and the impact of data partitions with heterogeneous base composition. Syst. Biol. 48, 65–75 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Swofford, D. L. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony and other methods (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Masachusetts, 2002).
  Google Scholar
• Guindon, S. & Gascuel, O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52, 696–704 (2003).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Philippe, H. & Lopez, P. On the conservation of protein sequences in evolution. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 414–416 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lockhart, P. J., Larkum, A. W., Steel, M., Waddell, P. J. & Penny, D. Evolution of chlorophyll and bacteriochlorophyll: the problem of invariant sites in sequence analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 1930–1934 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Philippe, H. & Germot, A. Phylogeny of eukaryotes based on ribosomal RNA: long-branch attraction and models of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 830–834 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Inagaki, Y., Susko, E., Fast, N. M. & Roger, A. J. Covarion shifts cause a long-branch attraction artifact that unites Microsporidia and Archaebacteria in EF-1α phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1340–1349 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kishino, H., Miyata, T. & Hasegawa, M. Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny, and the origin of chloroplasts. J. Mol. Evol. 31, 151–160 (1990).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Douady, C. J., Delsuc, F., Boucher, Y., Doolittle, W. F. & Douzery, E. J. P. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 248–254 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. J. & Piel, W. H. An assessment of accuracy, error, and conflict with support values from genome-scale phylogenetic data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1534–1537 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Rannala, B. Frequentist properties of Bayesian posterior probabilities of phylogenetic trees under simple and complex substitution models. Syst. Biol. 53, 904–913 (2004).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Lemmon, A. R. & Moriarty, E. C. The importance of proper model assumption in Bayesian phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 53, 265–277 (2004).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Strimmer, K. & von Haeseler, A. Quartet puzzling: a quartet maximum-likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 964–969 (1996).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Roshan, U., Moret, B. M. E., Williams, T. L. & Warnow, T. in Proc. 3rd Int. IEEE Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference (CSB, Stanford, California, 2004).
  Google Scholar
• Roshan, U., Moret, B. M. E., Williams, T. L. & Warnow, T. in Phylogenetic Supertrees: Combining Information to Reveal the Tree of Life. (ed. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P.) 301–328 (Springer, Berlin, 2004).
  Book Google Scholar
• Cavender, J. A. & Felsenstein, J. Invariants of phylogenies in a simple case with discrete states. J. Classif. 4, 57–71 (1987).
  Article Google Scholar
• Lecointre, G., Philippe, H., Le, H. L. V. & Le Guyader, H. How many nucleotides are required to resolve a phylogenetic problem? The use of a new statistical method applicable to available sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3, 292–309 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar