fMRI in the public eye (original) (raw)

• Illes, J., Kirschen, M. P. & Gabrieli, J. D. From neuroimaging to neuroethics. Nature Neurosci. 6, 205 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Editorial. Brain scam? Nature Neurosci. 7, 683 (2004).
• Jaffe, S. Fake method for research impartiality (fMRI). Scientist 18, 64 (2004).
  Google Scholar
• Butler, D. Advances in neuroscience 'may threaten human rights'. Nature 391, 316 (1998).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Beyond Therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness. 328 (President's Council on Bioethics/Harper Collins, Washington DC, 2003).
• Editorial. Does neuroscience threaten human values? Nature Neurosci. 1, 535–536 (1998).
• Nelkin, D. Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1995).
  Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. The Content Analysis Guidebook (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, 2002).
  Google Scholar
• Anonymous. Fear of pain may be worse than pain itself. The New York Times (New York) 14 (22 Jun 1999).
• Anonymous. The cutting edge. The Washington Post (Washington) Z05 (17 Dec 1999).
• Anonymous. Acupuncture: brain images demonstrate pain relief. Pain Cent. Nerv. Syst. Week 13 (17 Dec 1999).
• Biskup, A. Fat really does bring pleasure. The Boston Globe (Boston) C3 (13 Apr 2004).
• Cookson, C. Brain can banish unwanted memorie. Financial Times (Lond.) 11 (9 Jan 2004).
• Blakeslee, S. How brain stores languages. Plain Dealer (Cleveland) 2J (27 Jul 1997).
• Anonymous. Brain stores perceptions into small meaningful chunks. The Hindu (India) (27 Jul 2001).
• Sample, I. & Adam, D. The brain can't lie: brain scans reveal how you think and feel and even how you might behave. The Guardian (Lond.) 4 (20 Nov 2003).
• Anonymous. Odds are that gambling addict's brain is built differently. Times–Picayune (New Orleans) 3 (18 Sep 2003).
• Begley, S. How it all starts inside your brain. Newsweek (New York) 137, 40–42 (12 Feb 2001).
  CAS Google Scholar
• Bacon, J. Group to prove pornography is addictive. The Daily Universe (Brigham Young University) (12 May 2004).
• Hall, S. S. The scientific method: test–tube moms. The New York Times (New York) 22 (5 Apr 1998).
• Editorial. Silence of the neuroengineers. Nature 423, 787 (2003).
• Hoag, H. Neuroengineering: remote control. Nature 423, 796–798 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Rudolph, A. Military: brain-machine could benefit millions. Nature 424, 369 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Rizzuto, D. S., Breznen, B. & Greger, B. Military-funded research is not unethical. Nature 424, 369 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Abella, H. A. fMRI knows your secrets. Diagn. Imaging 9 (1 Mar 2004).
• Conrad, P. Genetic optimism: framing genes and mental illness in the news. Cult. Med. Psychiatry 25, 225–247 (2001).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Geller, G., Bernhardt, B. A. & Holtzman, N. A. The media and the public reaction to genetic research. JAMA 287, 773 (2002).
  Article Google Scholar
• Condit, C. M., Ferguson, A., Thadhani, C. & Parrott, R. An exploratory study on the impact of news headlines on genetic determinism. Sci. Commun. 22, 379–395 (2001).
  Article Google Scholar
• Herculano-Houzel, S. Do you know your brain? A survey on public neuroscience literacy at the closing of the decade of the brain. Neuroscientist 8, 98–110 (2002).
  Article Google Scholar
• Diefenbach, G. J., Diefenbach, D., Baumeister, A. & West, M. Portrayal of lobotomy in the popular press: 1935–1960. J. Hist. Neurosci. 8, 60–69 (1999).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J. & Wolpe, P. R. Monitoring and manipulating brain function: new neuroscience technologies and their ethical implications. Hastings Cent. Rep. 34, 35–45 (2004).
  Article Google Scholar
• Illes, J. & Kirschen, M. New prospects and ethical challenges for neuroimaging within and outside the health care system. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 24, 1932–1934 (2003).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. A. & Nelson, C. A. Developmental science and the media. Am. Psychol. 56, 5–15 (2001).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Schmitz, M. F., Filippone, P. & Edelman, E. M. Social representations of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder 1988–1997. Cult. Psychol. 9, 383–406 (2003).
  Article Google Scholar
• Goldman, L. S., Genel, M., Bezman, R. & Slanetz, P. J. Diagnosis and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. JAMA 279, 1100–1107 (1998).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Diller, L. H. The run on Ritalin: attention deficit disorder and stimulant treatment in the 1990s. Hastings Cent. Rep. 26, 12–18 (1996).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Rose, S. P. 'Smart drugs': do they work? Are they ethical? Will they be legal? Nature Rev. Neurosci. 3, 975–979 (2002).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J. et al. Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do? Nature Rev. Neurosci. 5, 421–425 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Racine, E., Gareau, I. & Doucet, H. The press and public debate: a study of genomics in francophone press (1992–2001). GE3LS Symposium,Vancouver, Canada, 5 Feb 2004.
• Moreno, C., Lujan, J. & Moreno, L. La ingeníera genética humana en la prensa: Analisis de contenido de ABC, El Pais, y La Vanguardia (1988–1993). (Instituto de Estudios Avanzados (CSIC), Madrid, 1996).
  Google Scholar
• Mulkay, M. Embryos in the news. Public Underst. Sci. 3, 33–51 (1994).
  Article Google Scholar
• Kohring, M. & Matthes, J. The face(t)s of biotech in the nineties: how the German press framed modern biotechnology. Public Underst. Sci. 11, 143–154 (2002).
  Article Google Scholar
• Priest, S. H. & Talbert, J. Mass media and the ultimate technological fix: newspaper coverage of biotechnology. SWMCJ 10, 76–85 (1994).
  Google Scholar
• Craig, D. A. Ethical language and themes in news coverage of genetic testing. J&MCQ 77, 160–174 (2000).
  Google Scholar
• Petersen, A. Biofantasies: genetics and medicine in the print news media. Soc. Sci. Med. 52, 1255–1268 (2001).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Monasterky, R. Land mines in the world of mental maps. The Chronicle of Higher Education (USA) 20 (2 Nov 2001).
• Tambor, E. S., Bernhardt, B. A., Rodgers, J., Holtzman, N. A. & Geller, G. Mapping the human genome: an assessment of media coverage and public reaction. Genet. Med. 4, 31–36 (2002).
  Article Google Scholar
• Gostin, L. O. Ethical considerations of psychosurgery: the unhappy legacy of the prefrontal lobotomy. J. Med. Ethics 6, 149–156 (1980).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kulynych, J. Legal and ethical issues in neuroimaging research: human subjects protection, medical privacy, and the public communication of research results. Brain Cogn. 50, 345–357 (2002).
  Article Google Scholar
• Illes, J. & Racine, E. Imaging or Imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics. Am. J. Bioeth. (in the press).
• Editorial. A scared new world? Lancet Neurol. 1, 137 (2002).
• Editorial. Open your mind. The Economist (25 May 2002).
• Fins, J. J. The ethical limits of neuroscience. Lancet Neurol. 1, 213 (2002).
  Article Google Scholar
• Dalgleish, T. The emotional brain. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 5, 582–589 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Sheridan, J. F. & McClintock, M. K. Multi-level integrative analyses of human behavior: social neuroscience and the complementing nature of social and biological approaches. Psychol. Bull. 126, 829–843 (2000).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Rose, S. P. R. How to (or not to) communicate science. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 31, 307–312 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. After the 'two cultures': toward a '(multi)cultural' practice of science communication. Sci. Commun. 25, 177–190 (2003).
  Article Google Scholar
• The International HapMap Consortium. Integrating ethics and science in the International HapMap Project. Nature Rev. Genet. 5, 467–475 (2004).
  Article Google Scholar
• Racine, E. Discourse ethics as an ethics of responsibility: comparison and evaluation of citizen involvement in population genomics. J. Law Med. Ethics 31, 390–397 (2003).
  Article Google Scholar
• Condit, C. M., Parrott, R. L. & O'Grady, B. in Genetics and Public Health in the 21st Century: Using Genetic Information to Improve Health and Prevent Disease (eds Koury, M., Burke, W. & Thomson, E. J.) 549–568 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford/New York, 2000).
  Book Google Scholar
• Garland, M. J. Experts and the public: a needed partnership for genetic policy. Public Underst. Sci. 8, 2241–2254 (1999).
  Article Google Scholar
• Sclove, R. E. Better approaches to science policy. Science 279, 1283 (1998).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Abelson, J. et al. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Soc. Sci. Med. 57, 239–251 (2003).
  Article Google Scholar
• Cameron, W. & Chudler, E. A role for neuroscientist in engaging young minds. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 4, 1–6 (2003).
  Article Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Damon, W. Good Work: When Excellence and Ethics Meet (Basic Books, New York, 2001).
  Google Scholar
• Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S. & Baczek, L. Media coverage of scientific meetings: too much, too soon? JAMA 287, 2859–2863 (2002).
  Article Google Scholar