Sampling theory for alleles in a random environment (original) (raw)

Nature volume 266, pages 443–445 (1977)Cite this article

Abstract

A MAJOR effort in theoretical population genetics has been aimed at developing statistical tests to distinguish between various explanations of observed patterns of enzyme variation1. Perhaps the most useful result to emerge from this effort is Ewens' sampling theory of neutral alleles2. This theory allows one to use the number and configuration of alleles in a sample to test for departures from neutrality. Watterson3 has derived the analogous sampling distribution for a finite population subject to the joint effects of mutation and symmetric heterotic selection. It differs from the neutral sampling theory, providing a stronger hypothesis-testing situation than has previously been available. In this note I present a third sampling distribution. It applies to an infinite population in which the selective coefficients fluctuate at random through time and space. Quite unexpectedly, the sampling distribution turns out to be identical to that for the neutral model, indicating that agreement of data with Ewens' sampling distribution does not rule out the possibility that natural selection is responsible for the genetic variation in the sample. Furthermore, the properties of random-selection populations at equilibrium are indistinguishable from neutral-allele populations for observations made at a single time point. This result calls into question the claim that agreement of data with predictions of the neutral model argues against natural selection as an important factor for the maintenance of genetic variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ewens, W. J. & Feldman, M. W. in Population Genetics and Ecology (eds Karlin S. & Nevo, E.) 303–338 (Academic, New York, 1976).
    Google Scholar
  2. Ewens, W. J. Theor. Pop. Biol. 3, 87–112 (1972).
    Article CAS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  3. Watterson, G. A. Genetics (in the press).
  4. Gillespie, J. H. Am. Nat. 108, 145–151 (1974).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Gillespie, J. H. & Guess, H. Am. Nat. (in the press).
  6. Gillespie, J. H. Am. Nat. 110, 802–821 (1976).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Gillespie, J. H. Evolution (in the press).
  8. Kimura, M. J. appl. Prob. 1, 177–232 (1964).
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Wright, S. Evolution and the Genetics of Population 2, (University of Chicago Press, 1969).
    Google Scholar
  10. Kingman, J. F. C. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 31, 1–22 (1975).
    Google Scholar
  11. Kingman, J. F. C. Theor. Pop. Biol. (in the press).
  12. Watterson, G. A. J. appl. Prob. (in the press).
  13. Yamazaki, T. & Maruyama, T. Science 198, 56–58 (1973).
    Google Scholar
  14. Kimura, M. Johns Hopkins Med. J. 138, 253–261 (1976).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, G. & Feldman, M. W. Theor. Pop. Biol. 4, 209–221 (1973).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Nei, M., Fuerst, P. A. & Chakraborty, R. Nature 262, 490–493 (1976).
    Article ADS Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19174
    JOHN H. GILLESPIE

Authors

  1. JOHN H. GILLESPIE
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GILLESPIE, J. Sampling theory for alleles in a random environment.Nature 266, 443–445 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/266443a0

Download citation

This article is cited by