WNT signaling regulates self-renewal and differentiation of prostate cancer cells with stem cell characteristics (original) (raw)

Introduction

Prostate cancer is a leading cause of male cancer-related deaths 1. In those who are not suitable for attempts at cure with radiotherapy or surgery, treatment is by androgen deprivation therapy, which effectively shrinks androgen-dependent tumours. However, this usually leads to recurrent androgen-independent prostate cancer, which undergoes metastasis 2, 3 with a median survival time of 20-24 months 4. The majority of human prostate adenocarcinoma cells express luminal cell markers that include androgen receptor (AR), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), keratins 8 and 18 5. This has led to the speculation that prostate cancers are derived from either mature luminal cells that have acquired proliferation ability, transit-amplifying epithelial cells that precede luminal cell differentiation or from androgen-independent prostate stem cells 6, 7. A role for stem cells is suggested by the regenerative capacity of rodent prostate glands following androgen ablation 8, the ability of some prostate cancer cells to survive androgen deprivation therapy and to subsequently progress to metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer 5, 6, and the finding that AR-negative human prostate cancer cells with stem cell characteristics can give rise to AR-positive cells 9, 10.

Cancer cells that are capable of self-renewal and differentiation, properties of normal tissue stem cells, have been shown to be the fundamental cause of both human acute myeloid and lymphoid leukemia 11, 12. These cells have been termed “cancer stem cells” and there is increasing evidence that cells with stem cell characteristics are also the driving force behind tumour formation in many solid tissue cancers including cancers of brain, colon and breast 13, 14, 15. Non-adherent, defined media culture techniques have been used to isolate neuronal, colon and breast cancer cells with stem cell characteristics 15, 16, 17, 18. The use of this culture system has recently been extended to cells derived from the prostate and it has been reported that hTERT-immortalized primary prostate cancer cells can form spheres which were termed “prostaspheres” 19 and that dissociated primary murine prostate stem cells demonstrate clonal self-renewal in prostate sphere cultures 20. In this study we report the use of non-adherent sphere cultures for clonal growth of single cells from human prostate cancer cell lines.

As the majority of androgen-independent cancer cells express the AR 21, the aberrant activation of AR by low circulating levels of androgen may contribute to the growth of androgen-independent prostate cancers 5. Several proteins have been described, which could potentiate AR transactivity and contribute to androgen-independent prostate cancer 5. One such protein is β-catenin 22, the major effector of canonical WNT signaling 23. WNT signaling can be inhibited by Dickkopf-1 (DKK1), which directly binds to the cell surface protein LRP5/6 (associated with the Frizzled family of WNT receptors) and blocks canonical WNT signaling 24, 25, 26, or by Soluble Frizzled Related Proteins (sFRP), which resemble the cysteine-rich ligand-binding domain of the Frizzled family and are believed to function as extracellular WNT inhibitors 27, 28. Mutations that stabilize β-catenin occur in a variety of human tumours and can lead to accumulation of nuclear β-catenin 23. In prostate cancer activation of β-catenin by mutation is reported in 5% of tumours 29, 30. However, WNT signaling may also play a significant role in the development and progression of metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer, as 25-38% of these cancers have tumour cells with nuclear β-catenin localization 29, 30. Increased nuclear β-catenin accumulation in prostate cancer cells could cause transcriptional changes through its interaction with TCF family transcription factors or the AR. In this study, we show that WNT signaling can regulate the self-renewal of prostate cancer cells with stem cell characteristics independently of AR activity.

Results

A stem cell-like subpopulation exists within prostate cell lines

Utilizing the technique of non-adherent suspension culture or sphere formation (Figure 1A) we have identified a subpopulation of cells with prostasphere-forming ability within the prostate cancer cell lines 22RV1, DU145, PC3, VCaP, LNCaP and the LNCaP subline C4-2B. Whereas the majority of cells in suspension culture failed to proliferate, rare cells (0.1-8%) displayed the ability to grow as spherical prostaspheres (Figure 1B). The efficiency of prostasphere formation (P0) varied and was highest in the cell types of LNCaP and its androgen-independent derivative C4-2B, which express AR and PSA 31.

Figure 1

figure 1

Prostasphere formation and culture. (A) Schematic representation of prostate cancer cell prostasphere self-renewal and proliferation. Adherent prostate cancer cells were dissociated and plated at low density in non-adherent cultures to form P0 spheres. Individual spheres were isolated, dissociated and serial dilution used to replate cells at 1 cell/well. After 6-10 days the new P1 spheres were counted, dissociated and a single cell/well replated (P2+), to demonstrate the ability of single cells to self-renewal. Dissociated spheres obtained in P0 were also serially plated in order to proliferate the spheres. (B) Prostasphere formation (P0) was observed with different prostate cell lines, with only a small percentage of cells being able to form spheres. (C) Typical LNCaP and C4-2B spheres generated from a single cell after 6 and 12 days in non-adherent culture (scale bar 50 μm). (D) LNCaP and C4-2B spheres formation relative to the initial spheres counted at passage (P) 1 to 7. (E) Percentage of LNCaP and C4-2B spheres with diameters <100, 100-150 or >150 μm.

Full size image

Self-renewal and proliferation of prostaspheres

To confirm that the LNCaP and C4-2B prostasheres were the progeny of individual cells, rather than the aggregation of quiescent cells, we performed clonal growth assays with single cells derived from P0 prostaspheres (Figure 1C). Following P0 prostasphere dissociation and plating at one cell per well, we observed the generation of one to three new spheres (P1-P2) from single cells (Figure 1D). These prostaspheres were typically 25-100 μm in diameter after 6 days. At 12 days only 20% of LNCaP prostaspheres were greater than 100 μm in diameter, compared with 60% of C4-2B prostaspheres. The 12-day LNCaP spheres were the same size as C4-2B spheres cultured for 6 days (Figure 1E). It was also possible to generate further new spheres from single dissociated cells of P1-2 prostaspheres. This clonal protasphere self-renewal was observed for four passages with LNCaP cells and eight passages with C4-2B cells (Figure 1D). To estimate the number of cells contained in an individual prostate sphere and the total number of cells that could be derived from a single P0 cell, we used the method described by Reynolds and Rietze 32. C4-2B-derived spheres after 12 days in culture had a median diameter of 100 μm and an average of 1 000 cloned cells. As the cells derived from spheres have been diluted to only one cell per well (Figure 1C) at each passage this suggests that a self-renewing C4-2B P0 cell has the capacity to generate, after eight passages, 128 000 daughter cells in 128 spheres, (based on our observation that each sphere on average gave rise to two daughter spheres and would contain 1 000 cells/100 μm sphere). As the number of LNCaP spheres reduced with serial passage and the LNCaP spheres had a reduced median size, this suggests the self-renewing LNCaP P0 cell had the capacity to generate 2 250 daughter cells in five spheres (containing 450 cells/75 μm sphere).

Prostasphere characterization

Keratin 5/14 expression was not detected in adherent cultures, rarely detected in LNCaP spheres and significantly expressed in C4-2B spheres (P < 0.0001; Figure 2). In contrast, keratin 18 expression was detected in both adherent cultures (LNCaP 37%; C4-2B 40%) and prostaspheres with LNCaP cells expressing higher levels than C4-2B cells (P < 0.014; Figure 2). Nuclear AR expression was detectable in both LNCaP and C4-2B adherent cultures and prostaspheres, with the majority of both adherent and prostasphere LNCaP and C4-2B cells expressing AR; however negative cells could also be observed (Figure 2). No significant differences were observed between the levels of AR expression in prostasphere cultures (Figure 2). The expression of nuclear Ki67 (indicating cells in the active phases of the cell cycle: G1, S, G2 and mitosis) was significantly higher in the C4-2B than the LNCaP spheres (P < 0.0001; Figure 2). CD133, ABCG2 and CD44 were enriched in both LNCaP and C4-2B prostaspheres compared with adherent cultures (Figure 3). In both LNCaP and C4-2B adherent cultures we were able to identify rare CD133 positive cells (0.05–0.4% of the total population) following MACS CD133 enrichment (Figure 3J, inset). CD133 and ABCG2 expression was detected in 40% of LNCaP spheres, whereas 100% of C4-2B spheres were positive for these markers. The number of cells expressing CD133 was significantly higher in C4-2B spheres compared with LNCaP spheres (Figure 3M). C4-2B spheres on average contained 2 CD133 positive cells compared with 0.4 CD133 positive cells per LNCaP sphere (P = 0.014) (Figure 3M). Interestingly, nuclear AR expression was not detected in CD133 positive cells (Figure 2I). The expression of ABCG2 was also significantly higher in C4-2B spheres, which on average contained 10 ABCG2 positive cells compared with 1 ABCG2 positive cell per LNCaP sphere (P < 0.0001; Figure 3M). Similar levels of CD44 expression was detected in both cell types (1-3 positive cells per sphere; P = 0.74; Figure 3M).

Figure 2

figure 2

Prostate cancer spheres derived from a single cell contain a heterogeneous population of proliferating and differentiating cells. Expression of proliferation and epithelial differentiation markers in LNCaP (A-C, G) and C4-2B (D-F, H) spheres after 12 and 7 days in culture, respectively. Immunofluorescence showing K5/14 (A, D; green), K18 (B, E; in green), AR (C, F; red) and Ki67 (G, H; green). (I) Co-staining for AR (red) and CD133 (green) in a C4-2B sphere (arrow indicates lack of nuclear AR expression in a CD133 positive cell, enlarged in the inset). Expression of proliferation and differentiation markers in adherent cultures of LNCaP (J-L) and C4-2B (M-O): K5/14 (J, M), K18 (K, N) and AR (L, O), where the arrows indicate AR-negative cells. DAPI nuclear counterstaining (blue), scale bar 50 μm. (P) Percentage of positive cells for Ki67, K15/14, K18 and AR expression per sphere (Student's _t_-test: *P = 0.05–0.005; **P < 0.005).

Full size image

Figure 3

figure 3

Prostate cancer sphere cells express putative stem cell markers. LNCaP (A-C) and C4-2B (D-F) spheres after 12 and 7 days in culture, stained for CD133 (A, D), ABCG2 (B, E) and CD44 (C, F) immunofluorescence (green), DAPI nuclear counterstaining (blue), scale bar 50 μm. Note the CD133 positive cells are indicated by the white arrows. Expression of CD133 (G, J), ABCG2 (H, K), CD44 (I, L) in LNCaP (G-I) and C4-2B (J-L) in adherent culture, scale bar 50 μm. CD133 immunoreactivity in C4-2B cells cultured under adherent conditions following dissociation and MACS CD133 enrichment (J, inset). (M) Number of CD133, ABCG2 and CD44 positive cells counted per LNCaP and C4-2B spheres (Student's _t_-test: *P = 0.05–0.005; **P < 0.005).

Full size image

Androgen receptor activity affects prostasphere size

As AR activity could contribute to cell proliferation and sphere self-renewal in both LNCaP and C4-2B cultures, we determined the effects of AR inhibition using the AR antagonist bicalutamide, which inhibits receptor activity in both LNCaP and C4-2B cells. Bicalutamide treatment was associated with a decrease in sphere size in both cell types after 12 days in culture but an increase in the ability of P0 dissociated cells to generate P1 spheres (Figure 4A and 4B). Consistent with bicalutamide-inhibiting AR activity we observed a significant decrease in the expression by prostasphere cells of the androgen-responsive protein PSA (LNCaP, P = 0.003; C4-2B, P = 0.014) and the AR (LNCaP, P = 0.014; C4-2B, P = 0.002; Figure 4C). A reduction in the expression of Ki67 following bicalutamide treatment was only observed in C4-2B cells (P = 0.001; Figure 4C), whereas, CD133 expression was not significantly affected in either cell type by bicalutamide treatment (Figure 4D).

Figure 4

figure 4

AR activity is not required for sphere formation but affects sphere size. (A) Bicalutamide (Bic) treatment of LNCaP and C4-2B cells increased sphere formation after 12 days in culture. P0 proliferating LNCaP or C4-2B spheres were pooled at day 6, dissociated and 160 cells plated per well for each culture condition in triplicate. The relative number of spheres that formed after 12 days from 160 cells is shown. (B) Bicalutamide (Bic) treatment caused a reduction in sphere diameter in both LNCaP and C4-2B cells. Percentage of spheres categorized by diameter: <50, 50-100, 100-150 and >150 μm, measured after 12 days in culture (Student's _t_-test: *P = 0.05–0.005). (C) Bicalutamide treatment inhibits AR activity affecting PSA, AR expression and Ki67 expression. Percentage of PSA, AR and Ki67 positive cells in control spheres and spheres treated with bicalutamide. (D) Bicalutamide treatment does not affect the number of CD133 positive cells in control spheres and spheres treated with bicalutamide (Student's _t_-test: *P = 0.05–0.005; **P < 0.005).

Full size image

WNT signaling regulates prostasphere formation and self-renewal

As WNT dysregulation is associated with a variety of cancers and WNT activity can regulate stem cells in a number of tissues we evaluated the effects of WNT signaling on prostasphere formation. Wnt3a or two secreted inhibitors of WNT signaling were added to dissociated prostate cells derived from LNCaP or C4-2B P0 spheres (Figure 5). The Wnt3a-treated cells generated larger prostaspheres (Figure 5A-5D, 5G), with two-fold more Wnt3a C4-2B spheres obtaining a diameter of more than 100 μm. In addition, the ability to form spheres was significantly increased by Wnt3a treatment of dissociated P1 LNCaP and P1 LNCaP C4-2B cells (Figure 5H). Wnt3a-treated C4-2B P2 and P3 spheres also produced a similar 1.5-fold increase in sphere formation. In contrast, DKK1 and sFRP2 treatment was associated with a decrease in C4-2B prostasphere size (no spheres were observed which were > 100 μm in diameter) and formation (Figure 5E-5H). WNT inhibitor treatment blocked significantly (P = 0.04) the self-renewal ability of P0 C4-2B prostaspheres, with 60% fewer secondary spheres forming in the treated groups. No significant differences in the cell viability or levels of apoptosis within spheres following Wnt3a or DKK1 treatment were observed (Figure 5I-5M). Using trypan blue dye exclusion staining, 98.7% cells were viable in DKK1-treated spheres compared with 100% in untreated spheres.

Figure 5

figure 5

WNT activity regulates prostasphere formation. Representative LNCaP (A, B) and C4-2B (C, D) spheres generated from single cells after 12 days in non-adherent culture. Control cultures (A, C), Wnt3a (B, D), DKK1 (E) and sFRP2 (F). Scale bar 50 μm. (G) Prostasphere size is increased by Wnt3a treatment and reduced by WNT inhibitors. (H) Prostasphere formation is increased by Wnt3a treatment and reduced by WNT inhibitors. (I-M) Tunel in situ showing apoptotic cells are rare in control (I) C4-2B prostaspheres (5%) and not induced by Wnt3a (K) or DKK1 (L), whereas camptothecin treatment (J) induces apoptosis in 57% of cells (M). The results are the mean and standard deviation from three replicates (*P < 0.05).

Full size image

Characterization of Wnt3a-treated prostaspheres

The C4-2B prostaspheres treated with Wnt3a were analysed for the expression of prostate, cell cycle and stem cell-associated markers (Figure 6). Keratin 18 expression was significantly increased in the Wnt3a spheres (C4-2B control 16% K18+; C4-2B + Wnt3a 61% K18+, P < 0.005, n = 5; Figure 6A, 6D, 6M). The majority of the cells in the spheres were positive for Ki67 and although the expression of Ki67 was higher in the Wnt3a-treated spheres (87% of cells Ki67 positive) in comparison with untreated cells (74% of cells Ki67 positive) the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.066, n = 5). The majority of cells were AR positive (87-94%) and no significant difference in nuclear AR expression was observed following Wnt3a treatment (Figure 6C, 6F, 6M). We then determined expression of CD133, ABCG2 and CD44 in both control and Wnt3a-treated prostaspheres. CD133 and CD44 positive cells were both significantly higher in Wnt3a-treated spheres (Figure 6G, 6H, 6J, 6H, 6K, 6N). Control C4-2B spheres on average contained two CD133 positive cells whereas in Wnt3a-treated spheres five CD133 positive cells were typically detected (P = 0.04, n = 8). CD44 expression was found in five cells per C4-2B sphere whereas 11 positive cells were found on average in a Wnt3a-treated sphere (P = 0.045 n = 5). Similar levels of ABCG2 expression were detected in untreated and Wnt3a spheres (10-11 positive cells per sphere; P = 0.73, n = 5). Analysis of CD133 and CD44 expression by flow cytometry confirmed the presence of rare CD133Hi (1%) and CD44Hi (1.4%) cells in the prostaspheres. The addition of Wnt3a increased the CD133Hi population 2.2-fold without affecting the CD44Hi (1.5%) population. Wnt3a-treated prostaspheres were dissociated and sorted for CD133Hi or CD44Hi cells and cultured for 10 days to determine sphere-forming ability. CD44Hi cells failed to form spheres whereas 2–3% of CD44Lo cells formed spheres. In contrast, 2-3% of both CD133Hi and CD133Lo selected cells formed spheres. CD44Hi cells therefore have a reduced ability to form spheres while both CD133Hi and CD133Lo cells can form spheres.

Figure 6

figure 6

Wnt3a affects keratin 18, CD133, CD44 and nuclear localization of β-catenin. (A-N) Expression of markers in C4-2B control (A-C, G-I) and Wnt3a (D-F, J-L) treated spheres after 7 days in culture. Immunofluorescence showing K18 (A, D; green), Ki67 (B, E; green), AR (C, F; red), DAPI nuclear counterstaining (blue), scale bar 50 μm. (M) Percentage of positive cells for K18, Ki67 and AR expression per sphere. The results are the mean and standard deviation of four replicates (*P < 0.05). Immunofluorescence showing CD133 (G, J; green), CD44 (H, K; green) and ABCG2 (I, L; green) by immunofluorescence, DAPI nuclear counterstaining (blue), scale bar 50 μm. (N) Number of positive cells for CD133, CD44 and ABCG2 counted per sphere. The results are the mean and standard deviation of five (CD44, ABCG2) and eight (CD133) replicates (*P < 0.05). (O, P) Confocal microscope images of β-catenin expression (Red) in control (O) and Wnt3a (P) treated spheres cultured for 7 days (white scale bar 10 μm). The nucleus was stained by DAPI (blue). Nuclear β-catenin expression (red/pink) increased following Wnt3a treatment (O-Q). The pixel intensities in each channels were quantified on the nucleus predefined confocal Z sections (yellow bar inserts). Typical numeral values of pixel intensities are shown plotted on the histogram for β-catenin (red) and DAPI (blue) for a cell from (R) control and (S) Wnt3a-treated spheres. A significant increase in mean fluorescence nuclear β-catenin (t_-test: *P < 0.0001) and number of cells expressing moderate-high levels nuclear β-catenin (chi-squared: ^_P < 0.005) were observed following Wnt3a treatment.

Full size image

Nuclear β-catenin expression was also affected by Wnt3a treatment. β-catenin was strongly detected in untreated spheres at cell junctions and only rarely found in the nucleus, whereas Wnt3a treatment was associated with increased nuclear β-catenin accumulation (Figure 6O and 6P). The nuclear (blue channel corresponding to DAPI) and β-catenin (red channel) pixel intensity was quantified on a defined nuclear section (Figure 6R and 6S) 33. The mean nuclear β-catenin fluorescence value was significantly higher in Wnt3a-treated cells (fluorescence value of 120) compared with control cells (fluorescence value of 64; P < 0.0001), with significantly more Wnt3a-treated cells expressed high levels of nuclear β-catenin (28%) compared with control cells (4%; P < 0.005) (Figure 6Q).

The WNT effects are independent of androgen receptor activity

We next investigated the interaction between WNT and AR signaling. We treated dissociated C4-2B cells for 6 days with Wnt3a (C4-2B + Wnt3a), bicalutamide (C4-2B + Bic) and bicalutamide plus Wnt3a (C4-2B + Bic + Wnt3a). Wnt3a treatment on its own caused an increase in sphere size, whereas bicalutmanide treatment was associated with a decrease in sphere size, as expected. The diameter of spheres co-treated with Wnt3a and bicalutamide was similar to the group treated with Wnt3a alone. CD133 expression increased following Wnt3a but not bicalutamide treatment (Figure 7). This Wnt3a-induced increase in CD133 expression was not inhibited by bicalutamide treatment (Figure 7). As expected bicalutamide decreased the number of prostasphere cells expressing the AR (78% untreated cells, 54% bicalutamide-treated cells, P = 0.036; Figure 7). Interestingly, the addition of Wnt3a to bicalutamide-treated cells was associated with a further reduction in AR expression (41%), demonstrating that Wnt3a does not induce AR expression.

Figure 7

figure 7

Wnt3a treatment induces CD133 and inhibits AR expression in the presence of bicalutamide. Expression of CD133 in C4-2B spheres: (A) control, (B) Wnt3a, (C) bicalutamide (Bic) and (D) Bic-Wnt3a for 7 days; CD133 (green) and DAPI nuclear counterstaining (blue), scale bar 50 μm. (E) Number of positive cells counted per sphere in C4-2B control, C4-2B+Wnt3a, C4-2B+Bic and C4-2B+Bic+Wnt3a. The results are the mean and standard deviation of 6-8 spheres per group (*P < 0.05). Expression of AR in C4-2B spheres: (F) control, (G) Wnt3a, (I) Bic and (J) Bic+Wnt3a for 7 days; AR (red) and DAPI nuclear counterstaining (blue), scale bar 50 μm. (J) Percentage of AR positive cells counted per sphere in C4-2B control, C4-2B+Wnt3a, C4-2B+Bic and C4-2B+Bic+Wnt3a. The results are the mean and standard deviation of 4-8 spheres per group (*P = 0.05–0.005; **P < 0.005).

Full size image

Discussion

The cancer stem cell hypothesis proposes that tumour cells in vivo are organized as a hierarchy with a cell with stem cell characteristics at the apex, which has the ability to self-renew and generate differentiated progeny (Figure 8) 34. Normal murine prostate stem cells have been functionally identified by their ability to form prostate spheres 20 and to form differentiated prostate tubular structures when returned to an in vivo environment 20, 35. The in vivo generation of prostate structures from normal human prostate cells in xenograft studies and the ability to isolate a human basal prostate cell population with enriched capacity for prolonged clonal expansion and luminal differentiation ability have led to the hypothesis that normal human prostate stem cells are located within the basal layer of the gland 36, 37, 38, 39. Several candidate markers of prostate stem cells have been proposed including α2β1 integrin, Sca-1, CD44, CD133, CD117 and the ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2, which is also associated with the resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents 35, 38, 40, 41. However, many of these markers are reported to be expressed in both stem and non-stem cells, including stromal and differentiated cells 35, 42, 43. Although CD117 has recently been reported to be a marker of murine prostate stem cells and a single Lin−CD117+CD44+CD133+Sca-1+ murine prostate cell has been shown to generate prostate epithelial tubules when combined with rat stromal cells under the renal capsule 35, whether CD117 also defines a human prostate stem cell has not been demonstrated.

Figure 8

figure 8

A schematic model of self-renewing cancer cells and their progeny. WNT signaling regulates the self-renewal of cells with stem cell characteristics and the proliferation/differentiation of transit amplifying cells, while AR activity drives the proliferation/differentiation of transit amplifying cells. Interaction between the pathways is also possible as β-catenin (an effector of WNT signaling) can interact with the AR.

Full size image

There is increasing evidence that human prostate cancers are also hierarchal with rare tumour-initiating cells that are distinct from the non-tumour-initiating, bulk population of the tumour 10. This has led to the proposal that prostate cancer cells with stem cell characteristics may contribute to tumour initiation and progression 44, 45. Prostate cancer cells demonstrating clonogenic growth and heterogeneous progeny have been enriched from human prostate tissue by selection with α2β1 integrin or CD133 10. In addition, carcinoma-derived cell lines from prostate (DU145 and PC3) exhibit adherent in vitro colony patterns 46, 47, which are similar to the tightly adherent holoclones of primary keratinocytes in adherent clonogenicity assays 48 and are consistent with the retention of self-renewing cells with stem cell characteristics. However, these colony patterns are not generated by LNCaP cells that are only lightly attached to the substrate in adherent cultures, do not become confluent and tend to clump (Bisson and Prowse, unpublished observations). The distinctive PC3 holoclones, but not the paraclones, were also tumourigenic in xenograft assays (showing the presence of self-renewing tumour-initiating cells) and enriched for CD44, α2β1 integrin and β-catenin 47. CD44 is an adhesion molecule with multiple isoforms, which is expressed in both stem and differentiated cell populations and has pleiotropic roles in signaling, migration and homing 34. Interestingly, CD44HI LNCaP, LAPC and DU145 cells have also been reported to be enriched in tumour-initiating cells 49, 50. However, it should also be noted that nine of ten implants of 1 000 LAPC9 CD44−α2β1+ cells 49 and two of five implants of 100 DU145 CD44− cells 50 formed xenograft tumours in these studies. The xenograft assay system may also not support the growth of all cancer stem cell populations, as tumour cell engraftment and growth require an intricate network of interactions with diverse supporting murine cells (including fibroblasts, endothelial cells, macrophages, mast cells, and mesenchymal stem cells), and many of the cytokines and receptors required for these two-way interactions are incompatible between mice and humans 51, 52.

Non-adherent sphere cultures have also been used to functionally enrich and identify neural, breast and colon cancer cells with stem cell characteristics. In this study we have investigated the ability of prostate cancer cell lines to form prostaspheres in non-adherent cultures. We found that all the prostate cancer cell lines tested had the ability to form spheres, although heterogeneity existed in the percentage of cells of each cancer line that were able to form spheres, which could reflect differences in the frequency of cells with stem cell characteristics or differences in adaption to non-adherent culture. Interestingly, both AR-negative (PC-3, DU145) and AR-positive (LNCaP, VCaP, 22RV1) cell lines were able to form prostaspheres. Primary cells from human prostate cancers were also found to form spheres (Bisson and Prowse, unpublished), which is in agreement with the finding that hTERT-immortalized primary prostate cancer cells form prostaspheres 19, 53. Prostasphere formation was most prominent in the androgen-dependent LNCaP cancer cell line and the androgen-independent LNCaP subline C4-2B, in which up to 8% of single cells could form spheres. This is consistent with recent reports that cancer stem cells need not be rare 54.

In addition to their ability to self-renew from a single cell, the analysis of marker expression revealed that the prostaspheres contained a heterogeneous mixture of cells, expressing markers associated with both differentiation (keratin 18 and PSA) and proliferation (Ki67), consistent with prostaspheres originating from a cancer cell with stem cell characteristics. The smaller size and lower potential for self-renewal of LNCaP spheres compared with C4-2B spheres, would suggest that LNCaP cells with stem cell characteristics identified using the prostasphere assay, have a greater tendency to differentiate during prolonged culture under these conditions. This is in keeping with the expression in LNCaP prostasphere cells of lower levels of the cell cycle marker Ki67, higher levels of keratin 18 and low levels of keratin 5 (which has been associated with a more aggressive prostate cancer cell phenotype) 55, 56. The expression of the stem cell-associated markers, CD133 and CD44, was also significantly enhanced in non-adherent culture and highest in C4-2B prostasphere cells. However, while C4-2B CD133Hi cells formed prostaspheres, CD133 and CD44 selection by FACS failed to enrich for C4-2B cells with prostasphere-forming ability. This may indicate phenotypic heterogeneity between cancer cell populations, as CD133 and CD44 do not always appear to tightly mark a cell population with stem cell characteristics 49, 57, and also reflects the challenge that definitive cancer stem cell markers have not been identified 34, 51.

We also investigated the expression of AR and ABCG2 in the prostasphere cultures, as AR can regulate both the proliferation and differentiation of prostate cells 3, 5 and ABCG2 has been reported to identify stem cells 58, 59, 60, 61 or a transit amplifying populations 49, 62 and is also linked with dihydrotestosterone efflux 63, which could confer reduced sensitivity to androgens. Interestingly, the expression of ABCG2 was significantly higher in C4-2B spheres, whereas AR was expressed by the majority but not all LNCaP and C4-2B prostasphere cells. We therefore determined whether AR activity contributed to cell proliferation and sphere self-renewal in both LNCaP and C4-2B cultures, utilizing the AR antagonist bicalutamide, which is widely used to treat patients with hormone naïve prostate cancer and is associated with a reduction in PSA levels 64. Bicalutamide inhibits the activity and expression of AR in adherent LNCaP cultures 64, 65, causing an AR-specific, progressive inhibition of cell growth and an associated reduction in the percentage of S-phase cells 66. Bicalutamide also inhibits the proliferation of adherent cultures of C4-2B cells 67. Bicalutamide treatment reduced the size of both LNCaP and C4-2B prostaspheres but did not inhibit prostasphere formation. The bicalutamide-treated spheres were associated with a significant decrease in both AR and PSA expression, consistent with the expected effects of bicalutamide treatment 64, 68. No inhibition of CD133 levels were observed, suggesting AR activity does not contribute to CD133 expression. A significant reduction in the cell cycle marker, Ki67, following bicalutamide treatment was only observed in C4-2B prostaspheres. This may be due to the presence of a larger population of C4-2B transit amplifying cells that are dependent on AR activity for proliferation. The inhibition of AR activity also caused a small but significant increase in the relative sphere number in both cell types, which is consistent with prostasphere formation being driven by a small population of cells that can self-renew independently of AR activity.

WNT signaling has also been implicated in the regulation of stem cells in a number of tissues and its dysregulation is associated with a variety of cancers 23. Overexpression of WNT growth factors 25, 69 and reduced expression of WNT inhibitors 25, 70 are reported in prostate cancer and WNT growth factors can also regulate adherent human prostate cancer cell growth 71, 72. We investigated whether WNT signaling affects prostasphere formation using the small molecule inhibitors DKK1 (which blocks the canonical WNT pathway) and sFRP2 (which blocks both canonical and non-canonical WNT signaling) 28. We have found that WNT pathway inhibition causes a significant decrease in prostasphere size and relative sphere formation independently of apoptosis. As predicted by the inhibitor studies, treatment with the ligand Wnt3a, which is not expressed by C4-2B prostate cancer cells and is an activator of canonical WNT signaling 25, 71, caused a significant increase in prostasphere size and self-renewal. This was associated with a significant increase in the expression of nuclear β-catenin, consistent with the ability of Wnt3a to activate canonical WNT signaling. This suggests that WNT treatment promotes the self-renewal of prostate cancer cells with stem cell characteristics, consistent with other reports that Wnt3a signaling can preserve an undifferentiated phenotype in CD133+ human cord blood-derived cells 73, Wnt3a supports embryonic stem cell self-renewal 74, WNT/β-catenin selectively enhanced mammosphere-forming ability of Sca1+ murine mammary cells 75, and the detection of high levels of β-catenin in PC3 holoclones. We also found that WNT treatment was associated with increased CD133 expression, which may be a direct effect as TCF/LEF1 binding sites are reported in the CD133 promoter 76. However, although the CD133 positive cells were often AR-negative, CD133 selection failed to enrich for prostasphere-forming ability. The function of CD133 in LNCaP and C4-2B cells is therefore uncertain, although it has been suggested that CD133 functions as an organizer of plasma membrane topology 77. Interestingly, Wnt3a treatment also caused increased expression of the differentiation-associated keratin 18. This is consistent with WNT signaling being able to promote not only stem cell renewal but also terminal differentiation in the gut crypt and hair follicle lineage 23, 78. An association of WNT signaling with differentiation may therefore be a normal mechanism to promote homeostasis, by balancing self-renewal and proliferation with the induction of differentiation, thus preventing uncontrolled cell expansion 23.

The effect of AR inhibition suggests the self-renewal of cells with stem cell characteristics is an androgen-independent event and AR activity may cause these cells to become androgen-dependent transit amplifying cells. WNT signaling can also be affected by AR expression, as β-catenin can directly interact with the TCF transcription factors or the AR 72. This suggests a model for tumour propagation involving a cellular hierarchy in which the balance between WNT and AR activity regulates both the self-renewal of cancer cells with stem cell characteristics and the proliferation/differentiation of transit amplifying cells (Figure 8).

In conclusion, we provide evidence that WNT activity regulates the self-renewal of prostate cancer cells with stem cell characteristics independently of AR activity. This is consistent with the initial response of prostate cancers to hormone therapy and the subsequent progression to androgen-independent prostate cancer 3, 79. In addition, WNT activity may not only maintain prostate cancer but it may also promote metastasis, by contributing to the mechanism through which prostate cancer cells with stem cell characteristics induce osteoblastic activity in the bone 25. Inhibition of WNT signaling therefore has the potential to reduce the uncontrolled prostate cancer cell self-renewal that drives cancer and improve the therapeutic outcome.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and prostasphere formation

Prostate cancer cell lines PC3, VCAP, LNCaP, 22RV1 and DU145 were purchased from the European Collection of Cell Cultures through Sigma-Aldrich). The androgen independent LNCaP subline C4-2B was purchased from Viromed Laboratories. Androgens are essential for the optimal growth of LNCaP but not C4-2B cells. C4-2B cells were originally derived following the growth of LNCaP cells transplanted into castrated athymic mice 80. C4-2B cells proliferate as fast in the absence as the presence of androgens and over-express AR 3. Both LNCaP and C4-2B cells express a common gain-of-function AR mutant (that remains sensitive to the drug, bicalutamide) 31. All cells were cultured at 37 °C in RPMI media without phenol red (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen) or 10% (v/v) charcoal-stripped FBS (Hyclone), 2.4 mM glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich), 1% (v/v) pyruvate (Sigma-Aldrich), penicillin and streptomycin (50 U and 50 μg/ml) (Invitrogen). Cells were detached using trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich), then centrifuged and counted. On low attachment on a 6-well plate (Costar), single cells were plated at 50 cells/cm2 in DMEM/F12 (Invitrogen) supplemented with B27 and N2 (Invitrogen). Cells were grown under these conditions for 6-12 days and formed non-adherent P0 spheres, termed prostaspheres. The prostaspheres were dissociated with Accutase (Sigma-Aldrich) to generate single cells and re-plated into new low attachment plates. For the clonogenicity assay, the prostaspheres were diluted after 6 days in culture and transferred into 96-well low attachment plates (Costar) in order to isolate individual spheres. Each sphere was dissociated with Accutase (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37 °C and regularly triturated by pipetting to generate single cells (20 min). By dilution one cell was plated per well of 96 low attachment plates containing DMEM/F12 with B27 and N2. Single cell cloning was confirmed by microscopic analysis.

WNT inhibitors, Wnt3a and bicalutamide treatement

Prostaspheres were dissociated with accutase (Sigma-Aldrich) to generate single cells and plated at 160 cells/well on a 96-well low attachment plate (Costar). The medium was supplemented with WNT inhibitors DKK1 at 4 μg/ml (R&D Systems) or sFRP2 at 4 μg/ml (BD Bioscience); Wnt3a at 5, 10 or 20 ng/ml (R&D Systems) and the AR inhibitor, bicalutamide, at 1 μM (Toronto Research Chemicals Inc) and prostaspheres counted and sized at 7 days. For self-renewal culture assays, individual untreated prostaspheres and those cultured with Wnt3a (20 ng/ml) and/or bicalutamide (1 μM) were serially dissociated with accutase and the cells were re-plated into three wells (low attachment 96-well plates) and cultured for 6 days. Replicate independent experiments were performed.

Tunel and trypan blue assays

At least 200 spheres were passaged and cultured with and without Wnt3a at 20 ng/ml. The spheres were dissociated using accutase and cells counted using trypan blue (Sigma-Aldrich) to calculate the percentage of live cells. The same number of spheres was used for the in-situ cell death assays (Tunel assay; Roche). Camptothecin (Sigma-Aldrich) treatment at 2.4 μM, was used as a positive control for apoptosis. The spheres were incubated for 16 hours in chamber slides before staining, following the instruction of the manufacturer. The spheres were analysed by confocal microscopy (Zeiss LSM 510).

Flow cytometry

The protaspheres after 5-7 days in culture were dissociated with accutase until single cells and labelled with anti-CD133-PE (CD133/1 Myltenyi) or CD44-PE (clone) for 10 min in dark. The cells were sorted using the FACSAria (BD biosciences). After sorting the cells were seeded in 96-well plates in DMEM/F12 (Invitrogen) supplemented with B27 and N2 (Invitrogen) and Wnt3a at 20 ng/ml.

Immunofluorescence

The prostaspheres were incubated for 16 h in chamber slides before paraformaldehyde (4%) fixation at room temperature for 20 min 81. The prostaspheres were washed and incubated with 0.1% triton (30 min), and were then washed and blocked with 0.2% BSA (15 min). Slides were incubated with the following antibodies: anti-AR (dilution 1/50 rabbit IgG polyclonal PG-21, Upstate), ABCG2 (dilution 1/50 rat IgG2a monoclonal BXP-53, Abcam), keratin 18 (dilution 1/50 mouse IgG1 monoclonal DC10, Abcam), CD44 (dilution 1/50 mouse IgG2b monoclonal G44-26, BD Pharmingen), CD133 (dilution 1/100 rabbit polyclonal to CD133, Abcam), Ki67 (dilution 1/50 clone MIB-1, DakoCytomation) and β-catenin (dilution 1/500 mouse IgG1 clone 14/β-catenin, BD Transduction Laboratories). The slides were then washed with PBS and incubated (1 h) with secondary antibodies labelled with Alexa 488 and 594 (Invitrogen). Control incubations with non-specific primary antibodies or secondary antibody alone did not label. The slides were finally washed with PBS and mounted using mounting solution containing DAPI before observation using a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 510).

Confocal β-catenin analysis

Prostaspheres images were analyzed for nuclear β-catenin expression following Wnt3a treatment. Confocal imaging was performed using a Zeiss LSM 510, 40× objective zoom 2–3. Images were analyzed using personal computer-based LSM 510 and ImageJ software. To evaluate the level of β-catenin expressed in the cell nucleus, we selected distinct prostasphere cells and defined nuclear horizontal sections corresponding to the DAPI nuclear staining (blue). We quantified the intensities of the pixels in each channel (DAPI: blue; β-catenin: red) on the sections and generated histograms. The levels of nuclear β-catenin were determined and mean values calculated within the nucleus 33.

Statistical analysis

Results of prostaspheres formation and sized were analyzed by _t_-test and/or chi-square test using Minitab software. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

References

  1. Carson CC, 3rd . Carcinoma of the prostate: overview of the most common malignancy in men. N C Med J 2006; 67:122–127.
    PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Shaw GL, Wilson P, Cuzick J, et al. International study into the use of intermittent hormone therapy in the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate: a meta-analysis of 1446 patients. BJU Int 2007; 99:1056–1065.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Shaw G, Prowse DM . Inhibition of androgen-independent prostate cancer cell growth is enhanced by combination therapy targeting Hedgehog and ErbB signalling. Cancer Cell Int 2008; 8:3.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  4. Petrylak DP, Tangen CM, Hussain MH, et al. Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:1513–1520.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Litvinov IV, De Marzo AM, Isaacs JT . Is the Achilles' heel for prostate cancer therapy a gain of function in androgen receptor signaling? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88:2972–2982.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Lawson DA, Witte ON . Stem cells in prostate cancer initiation and progression. J Clin Invest 2007; 117:2044–2050.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  7. Verhagen AP, Ramaekers FC, Aalders TW, et al. Colocalization of basal and luminal cell-type cytokeratins in human prostate cancer. Cancer Res 1992; 52:6182–6187.
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  8. English HF, Santen RJ, Isaacs JT . Response of glandular versus basal rat ventral prostatic epithelial cells to androgen withdrawal and replacement. Prostate 1987; 11:229–242.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Patrawala L, Calhoun T, Schneider-Broussard R, et al. Highly purified CD44+ prostate cancer cells from xenograft human tumors are enriched in tumorigenic and metastatic progenitor cells. Oncogene 2006; 25:1696–1708.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Collins AT, Berry PA, Hyde C, et al. Prospective identification of tumorigenic prostate cancer stem cells. Cancer Res 2005; 65:10946–10951.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Bonnet D, Dick JE . Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nat Med 1997; 3:730–737.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  12. George AA, Franklin J, Kerkof K, et al. Detection of leukemic cells in the CD34(+)CD38(−) bone marrow progenitor population in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2001; 97:3925–3930.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, et al. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:3983–3988.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  14. Singh SK, Clarke ID, Terasaki M, et al. Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. Cancer Res 2003; 63:5821–5828.
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Ricci-Vitiani L, Lombardi DG, Pilozzi E, et al. Identification and expansion of human colon-cancer-initiating cells. Nature 2007; 445:111–115.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Uchida N, Buck DW, He D, et al. Direct isolation of human central nervous system stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:14720–14725.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  17. Wicha MS, Liu S, Dontu G . Cancer stem cells: an old idea--a paradigm shift. Cancer Res 2006; 66:1883–1890.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Dontu G, Abdallah WM, Foley JM, et al. In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells. Genes Dev 2003; 17:1253–1270.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  19. Miki J, Furusato B, Li H, et al. Identification of putative stem cell markers, CD133 and CXCR4, in hTERT-immortalized primary nonmalignant and malignant tumor-derived human prostate epithelial cell lines and in prostate cancer specimens. Cancer Res 2007; 67:3153–3161.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Xin L, Lukacs RU, Lawson DA, Cheng D, Witte ON . Self-renewal and multilineage differentiation in vitro from murine prostate stem cells. Stem Cells 2007; 25:2760–2769.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Linja MJ, Savinainen KJ, Saramaki OR, et al. Amplification and overexpression of androgen receptor gene in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2001; 61:3550–3555.
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Truica CI, Byers S, Gelmann EP . Beta-catenin affects androgen receptor transcriptional activity and ligand specificity. Cancer Res 2000; 60:4709–4713.
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Clevers H . Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in development and disease. Cell 2006; 127:469–480.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Glinka A, Wu W, Delius H, et al. Dickkopf-1 is a member of a new family of secreted proteins and functions in head induction. Nature 1998; 391:357–362.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Hall CL, Bafico A, Dai J, Aaronson SA, Keller ET . Prostate cancer cells promote osteoblastic bone metastases through Wnts. Cancer Res 2005; 65:7554–7560.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Mao B, Wu W, Davidson G, et al. Kremen proteins are Dickkopf receptors that regulate Wnt/beta-catenin signalling. Nature 2002; 417:664–667.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Hoang B, Moos M, Jr, Vukicevic S, Luyten FP . Primary structure and tissue distribution of FRZB, a novel protein related to Drosophila frizzled, suggest a role in skeletal morphogenesis. J Biol Chem 1996; 271:26131–26137.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Hall CL, Keller ET . The role of Wnts in bone metastases. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2006; 25:551–558.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Chesire DR, Isaacs WB . Ligand-dependent inhibition of beta-catenin/TCF signaling by androgen receptor. Oncogene 2002; 21:8453–8469.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  30. de la Taille A, Rubin MA, Chen MW, et al. Beta-catenin-related anomalies in apoptosis-resistant and hormone-refractory prostate cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 2003; 9:1801–1807.
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  31. van Bokhoven A, Varella-Garcia M, Korch C, et al. Molecular characterization of human prostate carcinoma cell lines. Prostate 2003; 57:205–225.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Reynolds BA, Rietze RL . Neural stem cells and neurospheres--re-evaluating the relationship. Nat Methods 2005; 2:333–336.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Adam L, Mazumdar A, Sharma T, Jones TR, Kumar R . A three-dimensional and temporo-spatial model to study invasiveness of cancer cells by heregulin and prostaglandin E2. Cancer Res 2001; 61:81–87.
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Visvader JE, Lindeman GJ . Cancer stem cells in solid tumours: accumulating evidence and unresolved questions. Nat Rev 2008; 8:755–768.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  35. Leong KG, Wang BE, Johnson L, Gao WQ . Generation of a prostate from a single adult stem cell. Nature 2008; 456:804–808.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Hudson DL, O'Hare M, Watt FM, Masters JR . Proliferative heterogeneity in the human prostate: evidence for epithelial stem cells. Lab Invest 2000; 80:1243–1250.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Hudson DL, Guy AT, Fry P, et al. Epithelial cell differentiation pathways in the human prostate: identification of intermediate phenotypes by keratin expression. J Histochem Cytochem 2001; 49:271–278.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Collins AT, Habib FK, Maitland NJ, Neal DE . Identification and isolation of human prostate epithelial stem cells based on alpha(2)beta(1)-integrin expression. J Cell Sci 2001; 114:3865–3872.
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Litvinov IV, Vander Griend DJ, Xu Y, et al. Low-calcium serum-free defined medium selects for growth of normal prostatic epithelial stem cells. Cancer Res 2006; 66:8598–8607.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  40. Huss WJ, Gray DR, Greenberg NM, Mohler JL, Smith GJ . Breast cancer resistance protein-mediated efflux of androgen in putative benign and malignant prostate stem cells. Cancer Res 2005; 65:6640–6650.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Richardson GD, Robson CN, Lang SH, et al CD133, a novel marker for human prostatic epithelial stem cells. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:3539–3545.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Xin L, Lawson DA, Witte ON . The Sca-1 cell surface marker enriches for a prostate-regenerating cell subpopulation that can initiate prostate tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005; 102:6942–6947.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  43. Shmelkov SV, Butler JM, Hooper AT, et al. CD133 expression is not restricted to stem cells, and both CD133+ and CD133− metastatic colon cancer cells initiate tumors. J Clin Invest 2008; 118:2111–2120.
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  44. Signoretti S, Loda M . Prostate stem cells: from development to cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 2007; 17:219–224.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Collins AT, Maitland NJ . Prostate cancer stem cells. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42:1213–1218.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  46. Locke M, Heywood M, Fawell S, Mackenzie IC . Retention of intrinsic stem cell hierarchies in carcinoma-derived cell lines. Cancer Res 2005; 65:8944–8950.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Li H, Chen X, Calhoun-Davis T, Claypool K, Tang DG . PC3 human prostate carcinoma cell holoclones contain self-renewing tumor-initiating cells. Cancer Res 2008; 68:1820–1825.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Janes SM, Ofstad TA, Campbell DH, Watt FM, Prowse DM . Transient activation of FOXN1 in keratinocytes induces a transcriptional programme that promotes terminal differentiation: contrasting roles of FOXN1 and Akt. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:4157–4168.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Patrawala L, Calhoun-Davis T, Schneider-Broussard R, Tang DG . Hierarchical organization of prostate cancer cells in xenograft tumors: the CD44+alpha2beta1+ cell population is enriched in tumor-initiating cells. Cancer Res 2007; 67:6796–6805.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  50. Hurt EM, Kawasaki BT, Klarmann GJ, Thomas SB, Farrar WL . CD44+ CD24(−) prostate cells are early cancer progenitor/stem cells that provide a model for patients with poor prognosis. Br J Cancer 2008; 98:756–765.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  51. Vezzoni L, Parmiani G . Limitations of the cancer stem cell theory. Cytotechnology 2008; 58:3–9.
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  52. Adams JM, Strasser A . Is tumor growth sustained by rare cancer stem cells or dominant clones? Cancer Res 2008; 68:4018–4021.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  53. Gu G, Yuan J, Wills M, Kasper S . Prostate cancer cells with stem cell characteristics reconstitute the original human tumor in vivo. Cancer Res 2007; 67:4807–4815.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  54. Kelly PN, Dakic A, Adams JM, Nutt SL, Strasser A . Tumor growth need not be driven by rare cancer stem cells. Science 2007; 317:337.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  55. van Leenders GJ, Aalders TW, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Ruiter DJ, Schalken JA . Expression of basal cell keratins in human prostate cancer metastases and cell lines. J Pathol 2001; 195:563–570.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  56. Schalken JA, van Leenders G . Cellular and molecular biology of the prostate: stem cell biology. Urology 2003; 62:11–20.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  57. Beier D, Hau P, Proescholdt M, et al. CD133(+) and CD133(−) glioblastoma-derived cancer stem cells show differential growth characteristics and molecular profiles. Cancer Res 2007; 67:4010–4015.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  58. Zhou S, Schuetz JD, Bunting KD, et al. The ABC transporter Bcrp1/ABCG2 is expressed in a wide variety of stem cells and is a molecular determinant of the side-population phenotype. Nat Med 2001; 7:1028–1034.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  59. Bunting KD . ABC transporters as phenotypic markers and functional regulators of stem cells. Stem Cells 2002; 20:11–20.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  60. Pascal LE, Oudes AJ, Petersen TW, et al. Molecular and cellular characterization of ABCG2 in the prostate. BMC Urol 2007; 7:6.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  61. Bhatt RI, Brown MD, Hart CA, et al. Novel method for the isolation and characterisation of the putative prostatic stem cell. Cytometry A 2003; 54:89–99.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  62. Patrawala L, Calhoun T, Schneider-Broussard R, et al. Side population is enriched in tumorigenic, stem-like cancer cells, whereas ABCG2+ and ABCG2− cancer cells are similarly tumorigenic. Cancer Res 2005; 65:6207–6219.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  63. Reya T, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF, Weissman IL . Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature 2001; 414:105–111.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  64. Wang LG, Mencher SK, McCarron JP, Ferrari AC . The biological basis for the use of an anti-androgen and a 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor in the treatment of recurrent prostate cancer: case report and review. Oncol Rep 2004; 11:1325–1329.
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  65. Waller AS, Sharrard RM, Berthon P, Maitland NJ . Androgen receptor localisation and turnover in human prostate epithelium treated with the antiandrogen, casodex. J Mol Endocrinol 2000; 24:339–351.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  66. Masiello D, Cheng S, Bubley GJ, Lu ML, Balk SP . Bicalutamide functions as an androgen receptor antagonist by assembly of a transcriptionally inactive receptor. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:26321–26326.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  67. Lu Y, Zhang J, Dai J, et al. Osteoblasts induce prostate cancer proliferation and PSA expression through interleukin-6-mediated activation of the androgen receptor. Clin Exp Metastasis 2004; 21:399–408.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  68. Hara T, Miyazaki J, Araki H, et al. Novel mutations of androgen receptor: a possible mechanism of bicalutamide withdrawal syndrome. Cancer Res 2003; 63:149–153.
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  69. Hwang SI, Thumar J, Lundgren DH, et al. Direct cancer tissue proteomics: a method to identify candidate cancer biomarkers from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded archival tissues. Oncogene 2007; 26:65–76.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  70. Wissmann C, Wild PJ, Kaiser S, et al. WIF1, a component of the Wnt pathway, is down-regulated in prostate, breast, lung, and bladder cancer. J Pathol 2003; 201:204–212.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  71. Zhu H, Mazor M, Kawano Y, et al. Analysis of Wnt gene expression in prostate cancer: mutual inhibition by WNT11 and the androgen receptor. Cancer Res 2004; 64:7918–7926.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  72. Verras M, Brown J, Li X, Nusse R, Sun Z . Wnt3a growth factor induces androgen receptor-mediated transcription and enhances cell growth in human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res 2004; 64:8860–8866.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  73. Nikolova T, Wu M, Brumbarov K, et al. WNT-conditioned media differentially affect the proliferation and differentiation of cord blood-derived CD133+ cells in vitro. Differentiation 2007; 75:100–111.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  74. Singla DK, Schneider DJ, LeWinter MM, Sobel BE . Wnt3a but not wnt11 supports self-renewal of embryonic stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006; 345:789–795.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  75. Chen MS, Woodward WA, Behbod F, et al. Wnt/beta-catenin mediates radiation resistance of Sca1+ progenitors in an immortalized mammary gland cell line. J Cell Sci 2007; 120:468–477.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  76. Katoh Y, Katoh M . Comparative genomics on PROM1 gene encoding stem cell marker CD133. Int J Mol Med 2007; 19:967–970.
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  77. Mizrak D, Brittan M, Alison MR . CD133: molecule of the moment. J Pathol 2008; 214:3–9.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  78. Lo Celso C, Prowse DM, Watt FM . Transient activation of beta-catenin signalling in adult mouse epidermis is sufficient to induce new hair follicles but continuous activation is required to maintain hair follicle tumours. Development 2004; 131:1787–1799.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  79. Shaw G, Price AM, Ktori E, et al. Hedgehog signalling in androgen independent prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2008; 54:1333–1343.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  80. Thalmann GN, Anezinis PE, Chang SM, et al. Androgen-independent cancer progression and bone metastasis in the LNCaP model of human prostate cancer. Cancer Res 1994; 54:2577–2581.
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  81. Weiss S, Dunne C, Hewson J, et al. Multipotent CNS stem cells are present in the adult mammalian spinal cord and ventricular neuroaxis. J Neurosci 1996; 16:7599–7609.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge our colleague Ms Beade Numbre for technical assistance with prostate cancer cell line culture and P0 prostasphere establishment. We would like to thank the Bart's and the London Charitable Foundation and the Orchid Cancer Appeal for funding this research. DMP is a Research Council UK Academic Fellow.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Cancer, Bart's and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
    Isabelle Bisson & David M Prowse

Authors

  1. Isabelle Bisson
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. David M Prowse
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toDavid M Prowse.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bisson, I., Prowse, D. WNT signaling regulates self-renewal and differentiation of prostate cancer cells with stem cell characteristics.Cell Res 19, 683–697 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2009.43

Download citation

Keywords