Predicting expression patterns from regulatory sequence in Drosophila segmentation (original) (raw)

• Jackle, H. et al. Transcriptional control by Drosophila gap genes. J. Cell Sci. (suppl.) 16, 39–51 (1992)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ren, B. et al. Genome-wide location and function of DNA binding proteins. Science 290, 2306–2309 (2000)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Berman, B. P. et al. Computational identification of developmental enhancers: conservation and function of transcription factor binding-site clusters in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genome Biol. 5, R61 (2004)
  Article Google Scholar
• Ochoa-Espinosa, A. et al. The role of binding site cluster strength in Bicoid-dependent patterning in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4960–4965 (2005)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Schroeder, M. D. et al. Transcriptional control in the segmentation gene network of Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 2, E271 (2004)
  Article Google Scholar
• Xie, X. et al. Systematic discovery of regulatory motifs in human promoters and 3′ UTRs by comparison of several mammals. Nature 434, 338–345 (2005)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Tavazoie, S., Hughes, J. D., Campbell, M. J., Cho, R. J. & Church, G. M. Systematic determination of genetic network architecture. Nature Genet. 22, 281–285 (1999)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Albert, R. & Othmer, H. G. The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Theor. Biol. 223, 1–18 (2003)
  Article MathSciNet CAS Google Scholar
• Segal, E. et al. Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data. Nature Genet. 34, 166–176 (2003)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Granek, J. A. & Clarke, N. D. Explicit equilibrium modeling of transcription-factor binding and gene regulation. Genome Biol. 6, R87 (2005)
  Article Google Scholar
• Bintu, L. et al. Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: models. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 15, 116–124 (2005)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Zinzen, R. P., Senger, K., Levine, M. & Papatsenko, D. Computational models for neurogenic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo. Curr. Biol. 16, 1358–1365 (2006)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• von Dassow, G., Meir, E., Munro, E. M. & Odell, G. M. The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature 406, 188–192 (2000)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Eldar, A. et al. Robustness of the BMP morphogen gradient in Drosophila embryonic patterning. Nature 419, 304–308 (2002)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Jaeger, J. et al. Dynamic control of positional information in the early Drosophila embryo. Nature 430, 368–371 (2004)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Janssens, H. et al. Quantitative and predictive model of transcriptional control of the Drosophila melanogaster even skipped gene. Nature Genet. 38, 1159–1165 (2006)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Nasiadka, A., Dietrich, B. H. & Krause, H. M. in Advances in Developmental Biology and Biochemistry: Regulation of Gene Expression at the Beginning of Development (ed. DePamphilis, M.). 155–204 (2002)
  Google Scholar
• Rivera-Pomar, R. & Jackle, H. From gradients to stripes in Drosophila embryogenesis: filling in the gaps. Trends Genet. 12, 478–483 (1996)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Furriols, M. & Casanova, J. In and out of Torso RTK signalling. EMBO J. 22, 1947–1952 (2003)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• St Johnston, D. & Nusslein-Volhard, C. The origin of pattern and polarity in the Drosophila embryo. Cell 68, 201–219 (1992)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Stormo, G. D. & Hartzell, G. W. Identifying protein-binding sites from unaligned DNA fragments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 1183–1187 (1989)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Myasnikova, E., Samsonova, A., Kozlov, K., Samsonova, M. & Reinitz, J. Registration of the expression patterns of Drosophila segmentation genes by two independent methods. Bioinformatics 17, 3–12 (2001)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Rajewsky, N., Vergassola, M., Gaul, U. & Siggia, E. D. Computational detection of genomic _cis_-regulatory modules applied to body patterning in the early Drosophila embryo. BMC Bioinformatics 3, 30 (2002)
  Article Google Scholar
• Simpson-Brose, M., Treisman, J. & Desplan, C. Synergy between the hunchback and bicoid morphogens is required for anterior patterning in Drosophila. Cell 78, 855–865 (1994)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Tanay, A. Extensive low-affinity transcriptional interactions in the yeast genome. Genome Res. 16, 962–972 (2006)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Carr, A. & Biggin, M. D. A comparison of in vivo and in vitro DNA-binding specificities suggests a new model for homeoprotein DNA binding in Drosophila embryos. EMBO J. 18, 1598–1608 (1999)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Biggin, M. D. & Tjian, R. Transcriptional regulation in Drosophila: the post-genome challenge. Funct. Integr. Genomics 1, 223–234 (2001)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Raser, J. M. & O'Shea, E. K. Control of stochasticity in eukaryotic gene expression. Science 304, 1811–1814 (2004)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Ptashne, M. & Gann, A. Genes and Signals 26–37 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, 2002)
  Google Scholar
• Crauk, O. & Dostatni, N. Bicoid determines sharp and precise target gene expression in the Drosophila embryo. Curr. Biol. 15, 1888–1898 (2005)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lebrecht, D. et al. Bicoid cooperative DNA binding is critical for embryonic patterning in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13176–13181 (2005)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Segal, E. et al. A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature 442, 772–778 (2006)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Vashee, S., Melcher, K., Ding, W. V., Johnston, S. A. & Kodadek, T. Evidence for two modes of cooperative DNA binding in vivo that do not involve direct protein–protein interactions. Curr. Biol. 8, 452–458 (1998)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hoch, M., Seifert, E. & Jackle, H. Gene expression mediated by _cis_-acting sequences of the Krüppel gene in response to the Drosophila morphogens bicoid and hunchback. EMBO J. 10, 2267–2278 (1991)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Small, S., Kraut, R., Hoey, T., Warrior, R. & Levine, M. Transcriptional regulation of a pair-rule stripe in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 5, 827–839 (1991)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Rivera-Pomar, R., Lu, X., Perrimon, N., Taubert, H. & Jackle, H. Activation of posterior gap gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm. Nature 376, 253–256 (1995)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Arnosti, D. N., Barolo, S., Levine, M. & Small, S. The eve stripe 2 enhancer employs multiple modes of transcriptional synergy. Development 122, 205–214 (1996)
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sauer, F. & Jackle, H. Heterodimeric Drosophila gap gene protein complexes acting as transcriptional repressors. EMBO J. 14, 4773–4780 (1995)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• La Rosee, A., Hader, T., Taubert, H., Rivera-Pomar, R. & Jackle, H. Mechanism and Bicoid-dependent control of hairy stripe 7 expression in the posterior region of the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 16, 4403–4411 (1997)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Langeland, J. A., Attai, S. F., Vorwerk, K. & Carroll, S. B. Positioning adjacent pair-rule stripes in the posterior Drosophila embryo. Development 120, 2945–2955 (1994)
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Meinhardt, H. Hierarchical inductions of cell states: a model for segmentation in Drosophila. J. Cell Sci. (Suppl.) 4, 357–381 (1986)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Driever, W. & Nusslein-Volhard, C. The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner. Cell 54, 95–104 (1988)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ephrussi, A. & St Johnston, D. Seeing is believing: the bicoid morphogen gradient matures. Cell 116, 143–152 (2004)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hoch, M., Gerwin, N., Taubert, H. & Jackle, H. Competition for overlapping sites in the regulatory region of the Drosophila gene Kruppel. Science 256, 94–97 (1992)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Stanojevic, D., Small, S. & Levine, M. Regulation of a segmentation stripe by overlapping activators and repressors in the Drosophila embryo. Science 254, 1385–1387 (1991)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Sutrias-Grau, M. & Arnosti, D. N. CtBP contributes quantitatively to Knirps repression activity in an NAD binding-dependent manner. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 5953–5966 (2004)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Gray, S. & Levine, M. Short-range transcriptional repressors mediate both quenching and direct repression within complex loci in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 10, 700–710 (1996)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Arnosti, D. N., Gray, S., Barolo, S., Zhou, J. & Levine, M. The gap protein knirps mediates both quenching and direct repression in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 15, 3659–3666 (1996)
  Article CAS Google Scholar