A proposed framework for the description of plant metabolomics experiments and their results (original) (raw)

References

  1. Quackenbush, J. Data standards for 'omic' science. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 613–614 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Brazma, A. et al. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)—toward standards for microarray data. Nat. Genet. 29, 365–371 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Spellman, P.T. et al. Design and implementation of microarray gene expression markup language (MAGE-ML). Genome Biol. 3, research0046.0041–0046.0049 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Brazma, A. et al. ArrayExpress—a public repository for microarray gene expression data at the EBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 68–71 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Killion, P.J., Sherlock, G. & Iyer, V.R. The Longhorn Array Database (LAD): An open-source, MIAME compliant implementation of the Stanford Microarray database (SMD). BMC Bioinformatics 4, 32 (2003). http://biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/4
    Google Scholar
  6. Editorial. Microarray standards at last. Nature 419, 323 (2002).
  7. Glueck, S.B. & Dzau, V.J. Our new requirement for MIAME standards. Physiol. Genomics 13, 1–2 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Oliver, S. On the MIAME standards and central repositories, of microarray. Comp. Funct. Genomics 4, 1 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Taylor, C.F. et al. A systematic approach to modeling, capturing, and disseminating proteomics experimental data. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 247–254 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J. & Jacobson, I. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1999).
    Google Scholar
  11. Orchard, S., Hermjakob, H. & Apweiler, R. The proteomics standards initiative. Proteomics 3, 1374–1376 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Orchard, S. et al. Common interchange of standards for proteomics data: public availability of tools and schema. Proteomics 4, 490–491 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Fiehn, O. Combining genomics, metabolome analysis, and biochemical modelling to understand metabolic networks. Comp. Funct. Genomics 2, 155–168 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Fiehn, O. Metabolomics—the link between genotypes and phenotypes. Plant Mol. Biol. 48, 155–171 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Fiehn, O. & Weckwerth, W. Deciphering metabolic networks. Eur. J. Biochem. 270, 579–588 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Goodacre, R., Vaidyanathan, S., Dunn, W.B., Harrigan, G.G. & Kell, D.B. Metabolomics by numbers:acquiring and understanding global metabolite data. Trends Biotechnol. 22, 245–252 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Harrigan, G.G. & Goodacre, R. (eds.) Metabolic Profiling: Its Role in Biomarker Discovery and Gene Function Analysis (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2003).
    Book Google Scholar
  18. Mendes, P. Emerging bioinformatics for the metabolome. Brief. Bioinform. 3, 134–145 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Oliver, S.G., Winson, M.K., Kell, D.B. & Baganz, F. Systematic functional analysis of the yeast genome. Trends Biotechnol. 16, 373–378 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  20. Raamsdonk, L.M. et al. A functional genomics strategy that uses metabolome data to reveal the phenotype of silent mutations. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 45–50 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Roessner, U. et al. Metabolic profiling allows comprehensive phenotyping of genetically or environmentally modified plant systems. Plant Cell 13, 11–29 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Roessner, U., Wagner, C., Kopka, J., Trethewey, R.N. & Willmitzer, L. Simultaneous analysis of metabolites in potato tuber by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Plant J. 23, 131–142 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  23. Sumner, L.W., Mendes, P. & Dixon, R.A. Plant metabolomics: large-scale phytochemistry in the functional genomics era. Phytochemistry 62, 817–836 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. Weckwerth, W. Metabolomics in systems biology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 54, 669–689 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  25. Hall, R. et al. Plant metabolomics: the missing link in functional genomics strategies (Meeting report). Plant Cell 14, 1437–1440 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  26. van der Greef, J., van der Heiiden, R. & Verheij, E.R. The role of mass spectrometry in system biology: data processing and identification strategies in metabolomics. in Advances in Mass Spectrometry, vol. 16. (eds. Ashcroft, A.E., Brenton, G. & Monaghan, J.J.) 145–165 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004).
    Google Scholar
  27. Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  28. Krieger, C.J. et al. MetaCyc: a multiorganism database of metabolic pathways and enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D438–D442 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  29. Mueller, L.A., Zhang, P. & Rhee, S.Y. AraCyc: A biochemical pathway database for Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 132, 453–460 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  30. Harris, M.A. et al. The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 32 Special Issue, D258–D261 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  31. Nicholson, J.K., Lindon, J.C. & Homes, E. 'Metabonomics': understanding the metabolic responses of living systems to pathophysiological stimuli via multivariate statistical analysis of biological NMR spectroscopic data. Xenobiotica 29, 1181–1189 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  32. Bino, R.J. et al. Potential of metabolomics as a functional genomics tool. Trends Plant Sci. 9, 418–425 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  33. Stein, S.E. & Scott, D.R. Optimization and testing of mass spectral library search algorithms for compound identification. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5, 859–866 (1994).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  34. McLafferty, F.W., Zhang, M-Y., Stauffer, D.B. & Loh, S.Y. Comparison of algorithms and databases for matching unknown mass spectra. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 9, 92–95 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  35. Xirasagar, S. et al. CEBS object model for systems biology data, SysBio-OM. Bioinformatics 20, 2004–2015 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  36. Lampen, P. et al. An extension to the JCAMP-DX standard file format, JCAMP-DX V.5.01 (IUPAC Recommendations 1999). Pure Appl. Chem. 71, 1549–1556 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  37. Griffiths, P.R. & de Haseth, J.A. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry, vol. 83 (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England, 1986).
    Google Scholar
  38. Allen, J.K. et al. High-throughput classification of yeast mutants for functional genomics using metabolic footprinting. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 692–696 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  39. Smedsgaard, J. Terverticillate penicillia studied by direct electrospray mass spectrometric profiling of crude extracts: II. Database and identification. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 25, 65–71 (1997).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  40. Smedsgaard, J. & Frisvad, J.C. Using direct electrospray mass spectrometry in taxonomy and secondary metabolite profiling of crude fungal extracts. J Microbiol. Methods 25, 5–17 (1996).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the United Kingdom Food Standards Agency (under the G02006 project), the United Kingdom Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (particularly under the HiMet project) and the United Kingdom Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council for support of their work in metabolomics. We would also like to thank personnel at the United Kingdom Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research and delegates at the 1st, 2nd and 3rd International Plant Metabolomics Conferences for many useful discussions.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Janet Taylor
    Present address: IGER, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, Wales, UK, SY23 3EB

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, University of Wales, Penglais, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, Wales, SY23 3DB, UK
    Helen Jenkins, Nigel Hardy & Janet Taylor
  2. Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Penglais, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, Wales, SY23 3DB, UK
    Manfred Beckmann, John Draper & Aileen R Smith
  3. Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, 14424, Germany
    Oliver Fiehn & Joachim Kopka
  4. School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, PO Box 88, Manchester, M60 1QD, UK
    Royston Goodacre & Douglas B Kell
  5. Plant Research International, POB 16, Wageningen, 6700 AA, The Netherlands
    Raoul J Bino & Robert Hall
  6. Centre for BioSystems Genomics, POB 98, Wageningen, 6700 AB
    Raoul J Bino
  7. AgResearch Grasslands Research Centre, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North, New Zealand
    Geoffrey A Lane
  8. Institute of Biological Chemistry and Center for Integrated Biotechnology, Washington State University, Pullman, 99164-6340, Washington, USA
    B Markus Lange
  9. Plant Cell Biotechnology Laboratory of KRIBB and NRL of Eugentech Inc.,, PO Box 115, Yuseong, 305-600, Daejeon, Korea
    Jang R Liu
  10. Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Tech, 1880 Pratt Drive, Blacksburg, 24061, Virginia, USA
    Pedro Mendes
  11. Department of Biochemistry, Center for Designer Crops, W.M. Keck Metabolomics Research Laboratory, Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, 50011, Iowa, USA
    Basil J Nikolau
  12. School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
    Stephen G Oliver
  13. Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
    Norman W Paton
  14. Department of Plant Biology, The Arabidopsis Information Resource, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 260 Panama Street, Stanford, 94305, California, USA
    Sue Rhee
  15. Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics, School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia
    Ute Roessner-Tunali
  16. Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Yayoi-cho 1-33, Inage-ku, 263-8522, Chiba, Japan
    Kazuki Saito
  17. Technical University of Denmark, BioCentrum-DTU, Søltofts Plads Building 221, Kgs Lyngby, 2800, Denmark
    Jørn Smedsgaard
  18. The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, 2510 Sam Noble Parkway, Ardmore, 73401, Oklahoma, USA
    Lloyd W Sumner
  19. John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Colney, NR4 7UH, Norwich
    Trevor Wang & Sean Walsh
  20. Department of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, 441 Bessey Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, 50011, Iowa, USA
    Eve Syrkin Wurtele

Authors

  1. Helen Jenkins
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Nigel Hardy
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Manfred Beckmann
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. John Draper
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Aileen R Smith
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Janet Taylor
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Oliver Fiehn
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Royston Goodacre
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. Raoul J Bino
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. Robert Hall
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  11. Joachim Kopka
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  12. Geoffrey A Lane
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  13. B Markus Lange
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  14. Jang R Liu
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  15. Pedro Mendes
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  16. Basil J Nikolau
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  17. Stephen G Oliver
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  18. Norman W Paton
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  19. Sue Rhee
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  20. Ute Roessner-Tunali
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  21. Kazuki Saito
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  22. Jørn Smedsgaard
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  23. Lloyd W Sumner
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  24. Trevor Wang
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  25. Sean Walsh
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  26. Eve Syrkin Wurtele
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  27. Douglas B Kell
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toNigel Hardy.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jenkins, H., Hardy, N., Beckmann, M. et al. A proposed framework for the description of plant metabolomics experiments and their results.Nat Biotechnol 22, 1601–1606 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1041

Download citation