Molecular phylogenetics: principles and practice (original) (raw)

• Maser, P. et al. Phylogenetic relationships within cation transporter families of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 126, 1646–1667 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Edwards, S. V. Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging? Evolution 63, 1–19 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Marra, M. A. et al. The genome sequence of the SARS-associated coronavirus. Science 300, 1399–1404 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Grenfell, B. T. et al. Unifying the epidemiological and evolutionary dynamics of pathogens. Science 303, 327–332 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Salipante, S. J. & Horwitz, M. S. Phylogenetic fate mapping. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5448–5453 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gray, R. D., Drummond, A. J. & Greenhill, S. J. Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in pacific settlement. Science 323, 479–483 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Brady, A. & Salzberg, S. PhymmBL expanded: confidence scores, custom databases, parallelization and more. Nature Methods 8, 367 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kellis, M., Patterson, N., Endrizzi, M., Birren, B. & Lander, E. S. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423, 241–254 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pedersen, J. S. et al. Identification and classification of conserved RNA secondary structures in the human genome. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2, e33 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lindblad-Toh, K. et al. A high-resolution map of human evolutionary constraint using 29 mammals. Nature 478, 476–482 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Green, R. E. et al. A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome. Science 328, 710–722 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gronau, I., Hubisz, M. J., Gulko, B., Danko, C. G. & Siepel, A. Bayesian inference of ancient human demography from individual genome sequences. Nature Genet. 43, 1031–1034 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Li, H. & Durbin, R. Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences. Nature 475, 493–496 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Paten, B. et al. Genome-wide nucleotide-level mammalian ancestor reconstruction. Genome Res. 18, 1829–1843 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ma, J. Reconstructing the history of large-scale genomic changes: biological questions and computational challenges. J. Comput. Biol. 18, 879–893 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kingman, J. F. C. On the genealogy of large populations. J. Appl. Probab. 19A, 27–43 (1982).
  Article Google Scholar
• Kingman, J. F. C. The coalescent. Stoch. Process. Appl. 13, 235–248 (1982).
  Article Google Scholar
• Edwards, S. V., Liu, L. & Pearl, D. K. High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 5936–5941 (2007). This paper introduces a method for estimating the species tree despite the presence of conflicting gene trees.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Than, C. & Nakhleh, L. Species tree inference by minimizing deep coalescences. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000501 (2009).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Rannala, B. & Yang, Z. Phylogenetic inference using whole genomes. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 9, 217–231 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Felsenstein, J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1–15 (1985). This paper introduces the bootstrap approach to phylogenetic analysis. This is the most commonly used method for assessing sampling errors in estimated phylogenies.
  Article Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. in Handbook of Statistical Genetics (eds Balding, D., Bishop, M. & Cannings, C.) 377–406 (Wiley, New York, 2007).
  Google Scholar
• Felsenstein, J. Inferring Phylogenies (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 2004).
  Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. Computational Molecular Evolution (Oxford Univ. Press, UK, 2006).
  Book Google Scholar
• Saitou, N. & Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406–425 (1987).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jukes, T. H. & Cantor, C. R. in Mammalian Protein Metabolism (ed. Munro, H. N.) 21–123 (Academic Press, New York, 1969).
  Book Google Scholar
• Kimura, M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16, 111–120 (1980).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H. & Yano, T. Dating the human–ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22, 160–174 (1985).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tavaré, S. Some probabilistic and statistical problems on the analysis of DNA sequences. Lect. Math. Life Sci. 17, 57–86 (1986).
  Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 39, 105–111 (1994).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 1396–1401 (1993).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. & Edwards, A. W. F. Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Evolution 21, 550–570 (1967).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fitch, W. M. & Margoliash, E. Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science 155, 279–284 (1967).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rzhetsky, A. & Nei, M. A simple method for estimating and testing minimum-evolution trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9, 945–967 (1992).
  CAS Google Scholar
• Desper, R. & Gascuel, O. Fast and accurate phylogeny reconstruction algorithms based on the minimum-evolution principle. J. Comput. Biol. 9, 687–705 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gascuel, O. & Steel, M. Neighbor-joining revealed. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 1997–2000 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tamura, K. et al. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2731–2739 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bruno, W. J., Socci, N. D. & Halpern, A. L. Weighted neighbor joining: a likelihood-based approach to distance-based phylogeny reconstruction. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 189–197 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fitch, W. M. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20, 406–416 (1971).
  Article Google Scholar
• Hartigan, J. A. Minimum evolution fits to a given tree. Biometrics 29, 53–65 (1973).
  Article Google Scholar
• Swofford, D. L. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis by Parsimony (and Other Methods)4.0 Beta (Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts, 2000).
  Google Scholar
• Goloboff, P. A., Farris, J. S. & Nixon, K. C. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24, 774–786 (2008).
  Article Google Scholar
• Felsenstein, J. Cases in which parsimony and compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27, 401–410 (1978).
  Article Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck, J. P. Systematic bias in phylogenetic analysis: is the Strepsiptera problem solved? Syst. Biol. 47, 519–537 (1998).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Swofford, D. L. et al. Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. Syst. Biol. 50, 525–539 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 367–372 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Philippe, H. et al. Acoelomorph flatworms are deuterostomes related to Xenoturbella. Nature 470, 255–258 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhong, B. et al. Systematic error in seed plant phylogenomics. Genome Biol. Evol. 3, 1340–1348 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Felsenstein, J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17, 368–376 (1981). This paper introduces the pruning algorithm for likelihood calculation on a tree. This approach forms the basis for modern likelihood and Bayesian methods of phylogenetic analysis.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods. J. Mol. Evol. 42, 294–307 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Felsenstein, J. Phylip: Phylogenetic Inference Program, Version 3.6. (Univ. of Washington, Seattle, 2005).
• Adachi, J. & Hasegawa, M. MOLPHY version 2.3: programs for molecular phylogenetics based on maximum likelihood. Comput. Sci. Monogr. 28, 1–150 (1996).
  Google Scholar
• Guindon, S. & Gascuel, O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52, 696–704 (2003).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22, 2688–2690 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zwickl, D. Genetic Algorithm Approaches for the Phylogenetic Analysis of Large Biological Sequence Datasets Under the Maximum Likelihood Criterion. Thesis, Univ. Texas at Austin (2006).
  Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39, 306–314 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lartillot, N. & Philippe, H. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1095–1109 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Blanquart, S. & Lartillot, N. A site- and time-heterogeneous model of amino acid replacement. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 842–858 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Goldman, N. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 36, 182–198 (1993).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zuckerkandl, E. & Pauling, L. in Evolving Genes and Proteins (eds Bryson, V. & Vogel, H. J.) 97–166 (Academic Press, New York, 1965).
  Book Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R. & Yang, Z. Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene. Genetics 148, 929–936 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. Likelihood ratio tests for detecting positive selection and application to primate lysozyme evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 568–573 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. & Nielsen, R. Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 908–917 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Rannala, B. Phylogenetic methods come of age: testing hypotheses in an evolutionary context. Science 276, 227–232 (1997).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Whelan, S., Liò, P. & Goldman, N. Molecular phylogenetics: state of the art methods for looking into the past. Trends Genet. 17, 262–272 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rannala, B. & Yang, Z. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol. 43, 304–311 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. & Rannala, B. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov chain Monte Carlo Method. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 717–724 (1997).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mau, B. & Newton, M. A. Phylogenetic inference for binary data on dendrograms using Markov chain Monte Carlo. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 6, 122–131 (1997).
  Google Scholar
• Li, S., Pearl, D. & Doss, H. Phylogenetic tree reconstruction using Markov chain Monte Carlo. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 95, 493–508 (2000).
  Article Google Scholar
• Larget, B. & Simon, D. L. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 750–759 (1999).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17, 754–755 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Drummond, A. J., Ho, S. Y. W., Phillips, M. J. & Rambaut, A. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol. 4, e88 (2006). This paper introduces a Bayesian MCMC algorithm (the BEAST program) to estimate rooted trees under relaxed-clock models.
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Felsenstein, J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791 (1985).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Felsenstein, J. & Kishino, H. Is there something wrong with the bootstrap on phylogenies? A reply to Hillis and Bull. Syst. Biol. 42, 193–200 (1993).
  Article Google Scholar
• Efron, B., Halloran, E. & Holmes, S. Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 7085–7090 (1996); corrected article Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 13429–13434 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Berry, V. & Gascuel, O. On the interpretation of bootstrap trees: appropriate threshold of clade selection and induced gain. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 999–1011 (1996).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Susko, E. First-order correct bootstrap support adjustments for splits that allow hypothesis testing when using maximum likelihood estimation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 1621–1629 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Suzuki, Y., Glazko, G. V. & Nei, M. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16138–16143 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. O., Holder, M. T. & Holsinger, K. E. Polytomies and Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Syst. Biol. 54, 241–253 (2005).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. & Rannala, B. Branch-length prior influences Bayesian posterior probability of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 54, 455–470 (2005).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Rannala, B. Frequentist properties of Bayesian posterior probabilities of phylogenetic trees under simple and complex substitution models. Syst. Biol. 53, 904–913 (2004).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Brown, J. M., Hedtke, S. M., Lemmon, A. R. & Lemmon, E. M. When trees grow too long: investigating the causes of highly inaccurate Bayesian branch-length estimates. Syst. Biol. 59, 145–161 (2010).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Rannala, B., Zhu, T. & Yang, Z. Tail paradox, partial identifiability and influential priors in Bayesian branch length inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 325–335 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., Rannala, B. & Yang, Z. Robustness of compound Dirichlet priors for Bayesian inference of branch lengths. Syst. Biol. 10 Feb 2012 (doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys030).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Suchard, M. & Rambaut, A. Many-core algorithms for statistical phylogenetics. Bioinformatics 25, 1370–1376 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zierke, S. & Bakos, J. FPGA acceleration of the phylogenetic likelihood function for Bayesian MCMC inference methods. BMC Bioinform. 11, 184 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. Phylogenetic Supertrees: Combining Information to Reveal the Tree of Life (Kluwer Academic, the Netherlands, 2004).
  Book Google Scholar
• de Queiroz, A. & Gatesy, J. The supermatrix approach to systematics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 34–41 (2007).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. Maximum-likelihood models for combined analyses of multiple sequence data. J. Mol. Evol. 42, 587–596 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Shapiro, B., Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A. J. Choosing appropriate substitution models for the phylogenetic analysis of protein-coding sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 7–9 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ren, F., Tanaka, H. & Yang, Z. A likelihood look at the supermatrix–supertree controversy. Gene 441, 119–125 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Criscuolo, A., Berry, V., Douzery, E. J. & Gascuel, O. SDM: a fast distance-based approach for (super) tree building in phylogenomics. Syst. Biol. 55, 740–755 (2006).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Wiens, J. J. & Moen, D. S. Missing data and the accuracy of Bayesian phylogenetics. J. Syst. Evol. 46, 307–314 (2008).
  Google Scholar
• Dwivedi, B. & Gadagkar, S. Phylogenetic inference under varying proportions of indel-induced alignment gaps. BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 1471–2148 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, N., Philippe, H. & Lartillot, N. Mutation-selection models of coding sequence evolution with site-heterogeneous amino acid fitness profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 4629–4634 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pagel, M. & Meade, A. A phylogenetic mixture model for detecting pattern-heterogeneity in gene sequence or character-state data. Syst. Biol. 53, 571–581 (2004).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Nishihara, H., Okada, N. & Hasegawa, M. Rooting the Eutherian tree — the power and pitfalls of phylogenomics. Genome Biol. 8, R199 (2007).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Leigh, J. W., Susko, E., Baumgartner, M. & Roger, A. J. Testing congruence in phylogenomic analysis. Syst. Biol. 57, 104–115 (2008).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Higgins, D. G. & Sharp, P. M. CLUSTAL: a package for performing multiple sequence alignment on a microcomputer. Gene 73, 237–244 (1988).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Löytynoja, A. & Goldman, N. An algorithm for progressive multiple alignment of sequences with insertions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10557–10562 (2005).
  Article PubMed CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Löytynoja, A. & Goldman, N. Phylogeny-aware gap placement prevents errors in sequence alignment and evolutionary analysis. Science 320, 1632–1635 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Thorne, J. L., Kishino, H. & Felsenstein, J. An evolutionary model for maximum likelihood alignment of DNA sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 33, 114–124 (1991); erratum J. Mol. Evol. 34, 91 (1992).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hein, J., Jensen, J. L. & Pedersen, C. N. Recursions for statistical multiple alignment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 14960–14965 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Redelings, B. D. & Suchard, M. A. Joint Bayesian estimation of alignment and phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 54, 401–418 (2005).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Lunter, G., Miklos, I., Drummond, A., Jensen, J. L. & Hein, J. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment. BMC Bioinformatics 6, 83 (2005).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Thorne, J. L., Kishino, H. & Painter, I. S. Estimating the rate of evolution of the rate of molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 1647–1657 (1998). This paper describes the first Bayesian MCMC method for dating species divergence using minimum and maximum bounds to incorporate fossil calibrations.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kishino, H., Thorne, J. L. & Bruno, W. J. Performance of a divergence time estimation method under a probabilistic model of rate evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 352–361 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rannala, B. & Yang, Z. Inferring speciation times under an episodic molecular clock. Syst. Biol. 56, 453–466 (2007).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. & Rannala, B. Bayesian estimation of species divergence times under a molecular clock using multiple fossil calibrations with soft bounds. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 212–226 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Inoue, J., Donoghue, P. C. H. & Yang, Z. The impact of the representation of fossil calibrations on Bayesian estimation of species divergence times. Syst. Biol. 59, 74–89 (2010).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Tavaré, S., Marshall, C. R., Will, O., Soligos, C. & Martin, R. D. Using the fossil record to estimate the age of the last common ancestor of extant primates. Nature 416, 726–729 (2002).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. D. et al. Dating primate divergences through an integrated analysis of palaeontological and molecular data. Syst. Biol. 60, 16–31 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Knowles, L. L. Statistical phylogeography. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 40, 593–612 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Lemey, P., Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J. & Suchard, M. A. Bayesian phylogeography finds its roots. PLoS Comp. Biol. 5, e1000520 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lemey, P., Rambaut, A., Welch, J. J. & Suchard, M. A. Phylogeography takes a relaxed random walk in continuous space and time. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 1877–1885 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Takahata, N., Satta, Y. & Klein, J. Divergence time and population size in the lineage leading to modern humans. Theor. Popul. Biol. 48, 198–221 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rannala, B. & Yang, Z. Bayes estimation of species divergence times and ancestral population sizes using DNA sequences from multiple loci. Genetics 164, 1645–1656 (2003). This study describes the multi-species coalescent model. This is the basis for carrying out comparative analyses of individual genomes and phylogeographic studies and for applying species tree methods.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Drummond, A. J., Nicholls, G. K., Rodrigo, A. G. & Solomon, W. Estimating mutation parameters, population history and genealogy simultaneously from temporally spaced sequence data. Genetics 161, 1307–1320 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hey, J. Isolation with migration models for more than two populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 905–920 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Knowles, L. L. & Carstens, B. C. Delimiting species without monophyletic gene trees. Syst. Biol. 56, 887–895 (2007).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. & Rannala, B. Bayesian species delimitation using multilocus sequence data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9264–9269 (2010). This paper describes a Bayesian MCMC method for delimiting species using sequence data from multiple loci under the multi-species coalescent model.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rohland, N. et al. Genomic DNA sequences from mastodon and woolly mammoth reveal deep speciation of forest and savanna elephants. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000564 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bos, K. I. et al. A draft genome of Yersinia pestis from victims of the Black Death. Nature 478, 506–510 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Patterson, N., Richter, D. J., Gnerre, S., Lander, E. S. & Reich, D. Genetic evidence for complex speciation of humans and chimpanzees. Nature 441, 1103–1108 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Innan, H. & Watanabe, H. The effect of gene flow on the coalescent time in the human–chimpanzee ancestral population. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 1040–1047 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Becquet, C. & Przeworski, M. A new approach to estimate parameters of speciation models with application to apes. Genome Res. 17, 1505–1519 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hobolth, A., Christensen, O. F., Mailund, T. & Schierup, M. H. Genomic relationships and speciation times of human, chimpanzee, and gorilla inferred from a coalescent hidden Markov model. PLoS Genet. 3, e7 (2007).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Burgess, R. & Yang, Z. Estimation of hominoid ancestral population sizes under Bayesian coalescent models incorporating mutation rate variation and sequencing errors. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 1979–1994 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Becquet, C. & Przeworski, M. Learning about modes of speciation by computational approaches. Evolution 63, 2547–2562 (2009).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. A likelihood ratio test of speciation with gene flow using genomic sequence data. Genome Biol. Evol. 2, 200–211 (2010).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Reich, D. et al. Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia. Nature 468, 1053–1060 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sitnikova, T., Rzhetsky, A. & Nei, M. Interior-branch and bootstrap tests of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 319–333 (1995).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhong, B., Yonezawa, T., Zhong, Y. & Hasegawa, M. The position of gnetales among seed plants: overcoming pitfalls of chloroplast phylogenomics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 2855–2863 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Drummond, A. J. & Rambaut, A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 214 (2007).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Kosakovsky Pond, S. L., Frost, S. D. W. & Muse, S. V. HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies. Bioinformatics 21, 676–679 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586–1591 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lartillot, N. & Philippe, H. Computing Bayes factors using thermodynamic integration. Syst. Biol. 55, 195–207 (2006).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Xie, W., Lewis, P. O., Fan, Y., Kuo, L. & Chen, M.-H. Improving marginal likelihood estimation for Bayesian phylogenetic model selection. Syst. Biol. 60, 150–160 (2011).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar