Similarities and divergent patterns in hydrologic fluxes and storages simulated by global water models (original) (raw)

References

1. Döll, P., Fritsche, M., Eicker, A. & Müller Schmied, H. Seasonal water storage variations as impacted by water abstractions: comparing the output of a global hydrological model with GRACE and GPS observations. Surv. Geophys. 35, 1311–1331 (2014).
   Article Google Scholar
2. Pokhrel, Y. N. et al. Incorporation of groundwater pumping in a global land surface model with the representation of human impacts. Water Resour. Res. 51, 78–96 (2015).
   Article Google Scholar
3. Hanasaki, N., Yoshikawa, S., Pokhrel, Y. & Kanae, S. A global hydrological simulation to specify the sources of water used by humans. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22, 789–817 (2018).
   Article Google Scholar
4. Milly, P. C. D., Dunne, K. A. & Vecchia, A. V. Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature 438, 347–350 (2005).
   Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
5. Schewe, J. et al. Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3245–3250 (2014).
   Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
6. Gudmundsson, L. et al. Globally observed trends in mean and extreme river flow attributed to climate change. Science 371, 1159–1162 (2021).
   Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
7. Dai, A. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 52–58 (2013).
   Article Google Scholar
8. Padrón, R. S. et al. Observed changes in dry-season water availability attributed to human-induced climate change. Nat. Geosci. 13, 477–481 (2020).
   Article Google Scholar
9. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2021).
10. Thompson, J. R., Gosling, S. N., Zaherpour, J. & Laizé, C. L. R. Increasing risk of ecological change to major rivers of the world with global warming. Earths Future 9, e2021EF002048 (2021).
    Article Google Scholar
11. Pokhrel, Y. et al. Global terrestrial water storage and drought severity under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 226–233 (2021).
    Article Google Scholar
12. Haddeland, I. et al. Global water resources affected by human interventions and climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3251–3256 (2014).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
13. Gädeke, A. et al. Performance evaluation of global hydrological models in six large Pan-Arctic watersheds. Clim. Change 163, 1329–1351 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
14. Beck, H. E. et al. Global evaluation of runoff from 10 state-of-the-art hydrological models. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21, 2881–2903 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
15. Eyring, V. et al. Taking climate model evaluation to the next level. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 102–110 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
16. Bierkens, M. F. P. et al. Hyper‐resolution global hydrological modelling: what is next? “Everywhere and locally relevant”. Hydrol. Process. 29, 310–320 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
17. Pokhrel, Y. N., Hanasaki, N., Wada, Y. & Kim, H. Recent progresses in incorporating human land–water management into global land surface models toward their integration into Earth system models. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Water 3, 548–574 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
18. Wada, Y. et al. Human-water interface in hydrological modelling: current status and future directions. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21, 4169–4193 (2017).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
19. Prudhomme, C. et al. How well do large-scale models reproduce regional hydrological extremes: in Europe? J. Hydrometeorol. 12, 1181–1204 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
20. Gudmundsson, L. & Seneviratne, S. I. Towards observation-based gridded runoff estimates for Europe. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 19, 2859–2879 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
21. Nazemi, A. & Wheater, H. S. On inclusion of water resource management in Earth system models—part 1: problem definition and representation of water demand. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 19, 33–61 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
22. Veldkamp, T. I. E. et al. Human impact parameterizations in global hydrological models improve estimates of monthly discharges and hydrological extremes: a multi-model validation study. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 055008 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
23. Zaherpour, J. et al. Worldwide evaluation of mean and extreme runoff from six global-scale hydrological models that account for human impacts. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 065015 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
24. Krysanova, V. et al. How evaluation of global hydrological models can help to improve credibility of river discharge projections under climate change. Clim. Change 163, 1353–1377 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
25. Gosling, S. N. & Arnell, N. W. Simulating current global river runoff with a global hydrological model: model revisions, validation, and sensitivity analysis. Hydrol. Process. 25, 1129–1145 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
26. Oki, T. & Kanae, S. Global hydrological cycles and world water resources. Science 313, 1068–1072 (2006).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
27. Döll, P., Douville, H., Güntner, A., Müller Schmied, H. & Wada, Y. Modelling freshwater resources at the global scale: challenges and prospects. Surv. Geophys. 37, 195–221 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
28. Milly, P. C. D. et al. in Understanding Sea-Level Rise and Variability (eds Church, J. A. et al.) 226–255 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).
29. Scanlon, B. R. et al. Global models underestimate large decadal declining and rising water storage trends relative to GRACE satellite data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E1080–E1089 (2018).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
30. Tapley, B. D. et al. Contributions of GRACE to understanding climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 358–369 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
31. Felfelani, F., Lawrence, D. M. & Pokhrel, Y. Representing intercell lateral groundwater flow and aquifer pumping in the community land model. Water Resour. Res. 57, e2020WR027531 (2021).
    Article Google Scholar
32. McDermid, S. et al. Irrigation in the Earth system. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 4, 435–453 (2023).
    Article Google Scholar
33. Haddeland, I. et al. Multimodel estimate of the global terrestrial water balance: setup and first results. J. Hydrometeorol. 12, 869–884 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
34. Beck, H. E. et al. Global-scale regionalization of hydrologic model parameters. Water Resour. Res. 52, 3599–3622 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
35. Zhang, Y., Zheng, H., Chiew, F. H. S., Peña-Arancibia, J. & Zhou, X. Evaluating regional and global hydrological models against streamflow and evapotranspiration measurements. J. Hydrometeorol. 17, 995–1010 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
36. Hattermann, F. F. et al. Cross‐scale intercomparison of climate change impacts simulated by regional and global hydrological models in eleven large river basins. Clim. Change 141, 561–576 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
37. Kumar, A. et al. Multi-model evaluation of catchment- and global-scale hydrological model simulations of drought characteristics across eight large river catchments. Adv. Water Resour. 165, 104212 (2022).
    Article Google Scholar
38. Gosling, S. N. et al. A comparison of changes in river runoff from multiple global and catchment-scale hydrological models under global warming scenarios of 1 °C, 2 °C and 3 °C. Clim. Change 141, 577–595 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
39. Gnann, S. et al. Functional relationships reveal differences in the water cycle representation of global water models. Nat. Water 1, 1079–1090 (2023).
    Article Google Scholar
40. Müller Schmied, H. et al. The global water resources and use model WaterGAP v2.2d: model description and evaluation. Geosci. Model Dev. 14, 1037–1079 (2021).
    Article Google Scholar
41. Wada, Y. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Sustainability of global water use: past reconstruction and future projections. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 104003 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
42. Pokhrel, Y. et al. Incorporating anthropogenic water regulation modules into a land surface model. J. Hydrometeorol. 13, 255–269 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
43. Rodell, M., Velicogna, I. & Famiglietti, J. S. Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India. Nature 460, 999–1002 (2009).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
44. Döll, P. et al. Impact of water withdrawals from groundwater and surface water on continental water storage variations. J. Geodyn. 59–60, 143–156 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
45. Scanlon, B. R. et al. Effects of climate and irrigation on GRACE-based estimates of water storage changes in major US aquifers. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 094009 (2021).
    Article Google Scholar
46. Shi, X. et al. Quantifying the long-term changes of terrestrial water storage and their driving factors. J. Hydrol. 635, 131096 (2024).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
47. Rodell, M. et al. Emerging trends in global freshwater availability. Nature 557, 651–659 (2018).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
48. An, L. et al. Divergent causes of terrestrial water storage decline between drylands and humid regions globally. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2021GL095035 (2021).
    Article Google Scholar
49. Burek, P. et al. Development of the community water model (CWatM v1.04)—a high-resolution hydrological model for global and regional assessment of integrated water resources management. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 3267–3298 (2020).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
50. Frieler, K. et al. Scenario setup and forcing data for impact model evaluation and impact attribution within the third round of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP3a). Geosci. Model Dev. 17, 1–51 (2024).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
51. Dangar, S. & Mishra, V. Natural and anthropogenic drivers of the lost groundwater from the Ganga River basin. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 114009 (2021).
    Article Google Scholar
52. Asoka, A., Gleeson, T., Wada, Y. & Mishra, V. Relative contribution of monsoon precipitation and pumping to changes in groundwater storage in India. Nat. Geosci. 10, 109–117 (2017).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
53. Rodell, M. & Famiglietti, J. S. An analysis of terrestrial water storage variations in Illinois with implications for the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE). Water Resour. Res. 37, 1327–1339 (2001).
    Article Google Scholar
54. Orth, R., Koster, R. D. & Seneviratne, S. I. Inferring soil moisture memory from streamflow observations using a simple water balance model. J. Hydrometeorol. 14, 1773–1790 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
55. Bibi, S. et al. Benchmarking multimodel terrestrial water storage seasonal cycle against Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) observations over major global river basins. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 28, 1725–1750 (2024).
    Article Google Scholar
56. Scanlon, B. R. et al. Tracking seasonal fluctuations in land water storage using global models and GRACE satellites. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 5254–5264 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
57. Zaherpour, J. et al. Exploring the value of machine learning for weighted multi-model combination of an ensemble of global hydrological models. Environ. Modell. Softw. 114, 112–128 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
58. Hanasaki, N. et al. An integrated model for the assessment of global water resources—part 1: model description and input meteorological forcing. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 12, 1007–1025 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
59. Stacke, T. & Hagemann, S. HydroPy (v1.0): a new global hydrology model written in Python. Geosci. Model Dev. 14, 7795–7816 (2021).
    Article Google Scholar
60. Best, M. J. et al. The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description—part 1: energy and water fluxes. Geosci. Model Dev. 4, 677–699 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
61. Wirth, S. B. et al. Biological nitrogen fixation of natural and agricultural vegetation simulated with LPJmL 5.7.9. EGUsphere https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2946 (2024).
62. Oberhagemann, L. et al. Sources of uncertainty in the global fire model SPITFIRE: development of LPJmL-SPITFIRE1.9 and directions for future improvements. Geosci. Model Dev. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1914 (2024).
63. Yokohata, T. et al. MIROC-INTEG-LAND version 1: a global biogeochemical land surface model with human water management, crop growth, and land-use change. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 4713–4747 (2020).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
64. Guimberteau, M. et al. ORCHIDEE-MICT (v8.4.1), a land surface model for the high latitudes: model description and validation. Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 121–163 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
65. Telteu, C. E. et al. Understanding each other’s models: an introduction and a standard representation of 16 global water models to support intercomparison, improvement, and communication. Geosci. Model Dev. 14, 3843–3878 (2021).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
66. Save, H., Bettadpur, S. & Tapley, B. D. High-resolution CSR GRACE RL05 mascons. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121, 7547–7569 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
67. Watkins, M. M., Wiese, D. N., Yuan, D. N., Boening, C. & Landerer, F. W. Improved methods for observing Earth’s time variable mass distribution with GRACE using spherical cap mascons. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 120, 2648–2671 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
68. Croteau, M. J., Nerem, R. S., Loomis, B. D. & Sabaka, T. J. Development of a daily GRACE mascon solution for terrestrial water storage. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 125, e2019JB018468 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
69. Yi, S. & Sneeuw, N. Filling the data gaps within GRACE missions using singular spectrum analysis. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 126, e2020JB021227 (2021).
    Article Google Scholar
70. Mann, H. B. Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13, 245–259 (1945).
    Article Google Scholar
71. Sen, P. K. Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 63, 1379–1389 (1968).
    Article Google Scholar
72. GRDC: Data Portal (GRDC, accessed 2 June 2023); https://grdc.bafg.de/data/data_portal/
73. Hao, Z. et al. Quantitative assessment of the impacts of irrigation on surface water fluxes in the Tarim River, China. Hydrol. Res. 46, 996–1007 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
74. Hajihosseini, H., Hajihosseini, M., Morid, S., Delavar, M. & Booij, M. J. Hydrological assessment of the 1973 treaty on the transboundary Helmand River, using the SWAT model and a global climate database. Water Resour. Manag. 30, 4681–4694 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
75. Tiwari, A. D. & Mishra, V. Sub-seasonal prediction of drought and streamflow anomalies for water management in India. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 127, e2021JD035737 (2022).
    Article Google Scholar
76. Lehner, B. & Grill, G. Global river hydrography and network routing: baseline data and new approaches to study the world’s large river systems. Hydrol. Process. 27, 2171–2186 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
77. Lehner, B. et al. High-resolution mapping of the world's reservoirs and dams for sustainable river-flow management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 494–502 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
78. Kling, H., Fuchs, M. & Paulin, M. Runoff conditions in the upper Danube Basin under an ensemble of climate change scenarios. J. Hydrol. 424–425, 264–277 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
79. Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K. & Martinez, G. F. Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: implications for improving hydrological modelling. J. Hydrol. 377, 80–91 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
80. Tiwari, A. D., Mukhopadhyay, P. & Mishra, V. Influence of bias correction of meteorological and streamflow forecast on hydrological prediction in India. J. Hydrometeorol. 23, 1171–1192 (2021).
    Google Scholar
81. Li, X. et al. Climate change threatens terrestrial water storage over the Tibetan Plateau. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 801–807 (2022).
    Article Google Scholar
82. Knoben, W. J. M., Freer, J. E. & Woods, R. A. Technical note: inherent benchmark or not? Comparing Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiency scores. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 23, 4323–4331 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
83. Beck, H. E. et al. MSWep v2 global 3-hourly 0.1° precipitation: methodology and quantitative assessment. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 100, 473–500 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
84. Tarek, M., Brissette, F. P. & Arsenault, R. Evaluation of the ERA5 reanalysis as a potential reference dataset for hydrological modelling over North America. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 24, 2527–2544 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
85. Muñoz-Sabater, J. et al. ERA5-Land: a state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 4349–4383 (2021).
    Article Google Scholar
86. Ollivier, C. C. et al. Ensemble precipitation estimates based on an assessment of 21 gridded precipitation datasets to improve precipitation estimations across Madagascar. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 47, 101400 (2023).
    Article Google Scholar
87. Pérez-Alarcón, A., Garcia-Cortes, D., Fernández-Alvarez, J. C. & Martínez-González, Y. Improving monthly rainfall forecast in a watershed by combining neural networks and autoregressive models. Environ. Process. 9, 53 (2022).
    Article Google Scholar
88. Chen, Y. & Yuan, H. Evaluation of nine sub-daily soil moisture model products over China using high-resolution in situ observations. J. Hydrol. 588, 125054 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
89. Rakovec, O. et al. Multiscale and multivariate evaluation of water fluxes and states over European river basins. J. Hydrometeorol. 17, 287–307 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
90. Chavarría, S. B., Werner, M., Salazar, J. F. & Vargas, T. B. Benchmarking global hydrological and land surface models against GRACE in a medium-sized tropical basin. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 26, 4323–4344 (2022).
    Article Google Scholar
91. Jia, B. et al. Potential future changes of terrestrial water storage based on climate projections by ensemble model simulations. Adv. Water Resour. 142, 103635 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
92. Yin, J. et al. GTWS-MLrec: global terrestrial water storage reconstruction by machine learning from 1940 to present. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 15, 5597–5615 (2023).
    Article Google Scholar
93. Bai, P., Liu, X. & Liu, C. Improving hydrological simulations by incorporating GRACE data for model calibration. J. Hydrol. 557, 291–304 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
94. Martens, B. et al. GLEAM v3: satellite-based land evaporation and root-zone soil moisture. Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 1903–1925 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
95. Felfelani, F., Pokhrel, Y., Guan, K. & Lawrence, D. M. Utilizing SMAP soil moisture data to constrain irrigation in the community land model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 12,892–12,902 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
96. Elkouk, A. et al. Multi-model ensemble projections of soil moisture drought over North Africa and the Sahel region under 1.5, 2, and 3 °C global warming. Clim. Change 167, 52 (2021).
    Article Google Scholar
97. Getirana, A. C. V. & Peters-Lidard, C. Estimating water discharge from large radar altimetry datasets. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17, 923–933 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
98. Tiwari, A. D. & Pokhrel, Y. Data and scripts supporting Tiwari et al. (2025) “Similarities and divergent patterns in hydrologic fluxes and storages simulated by global water models”. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28654751 (2024).
99. Tiwari, A. D. & Pokhrel, Y. Codes supporting Tiwari et al. (2025) “Similarities and divergent patterns in hydrologic fluxes and storages simulated by global water models”. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15079279 (2025).

Download references