Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming (original) (raw)

References

• Adams, M. J. (1979). Models of word recognition.Cognitive Psychology,11, 133–176.
  Article Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 775–800.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bodner, G. E., &Masson, M. E. J. (1997). Masked repetition priming for words and nonwords: Evidence for a nonlexical basis for priming.Journal of Memory & Language,37, 268–293.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (in press). Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
• Bourassa, D. C., &Besner, D. (1998). When do nonwords activate semantics? Implications for models of visual word recognition.Memory & Cognition,26, 61–74.
  Article Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. M. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 225–241.
  Article Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 335–359.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1976). Random means random.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 261–262.
  Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. F., &Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Ziegler, J., &Langdon, R. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.Psychological Review,108, 204–256.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (1999).The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales.
• De Groot, A. M. B., &Nas, G. L. J. (1991). Lexical representation of cognates and noncognates in compound bilinguals.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 90–123.
  Article Google Scholar
• De Groot, A. M. B., Thomassen, A. J. W. M., &Hudson, P. T. W. (1982). Associative facilitation of word recognition as measured from a neutral prime.Memory & Cognition,10, 358–370.
  Article Google Scholar
• De Moor, W., &Brysbaert, M. (2000). Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets have different lengths.Psychological Research,63, 159–162.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Dosher, B. A. (1976). The retrieval of sentences from memory: A speed-accuracy study.Cognitive Science,8, 291–310.
  Google Scholar
• Drieghe, D., &Brysbaert, M. (2002). Strategic effects in associative priming with words, homophones and pseudohomophones.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 962–982.
  Article Google Scholar
• Estes, W. K. (1975). The locus of inferential and perceptual processes in letter identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology,104, 122–145.
  Google Scholar
• Estes, W. K., Allmeyer, D. H., &Reder, S. M. (1976). Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 1–15.
  Article Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. W. Walker (Eds.),New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 257–287). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., &Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 680–698.
  Article Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., &Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,39A, 211–251.
  Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., Mohan, K., &Hector, J. (2003). The mechanics of masked priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.),Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 3–37). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
  Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., &Gvion, A. (2001). Letter position dyslexia.Cognitive Neuropsychology,18, 673–696.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Frost, R., Forster, K. I., &Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked priming investigation of morphological representation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 829–856.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gómez, P., Perea, M., & Ratcliff, R. (2002, April).Dinámica temporal de la activación léxica en pseudopalabras [Time course of lexical activation in pseudowords]. Paper presented at the 4th meeting of the Sociedad Española de Psicología Experimental, Oviedo, Spain.
• Gonnerman, L. M., & Plaut, D. C. (2000, April).Semantic and morphological effects in masked priming. Poster presented at the 7th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, San Francisco.
• Grainger, J. (1992). Orthographic neighborhoods and visual word recognition. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.),Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 131–146). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  Chapter Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., &Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model.Psychological Review,103, 518–565.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. L., &Curran, T. (1997). Comparing retrieval dynamics in recognition memory and lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 228–247.
  Article Google Scholar
• Holmes, V. M., &Ng, E. (1993). Word-specific knowledge, wordrecognition strategies, and spelling ability.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 230–257.
  Article Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., &Quinlan, P. T. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition.Cognitive Psychology,22, 517–560.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., &Grainger, J. (1998). MROMp: An interactive activation, multiple readout model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.),Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 147–188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. F., &Pugh, K. R. (1994). An examination of cohort models of visual word recognition: On the role of letters in word-level processing.Cognitive Psychology,26, 240–346.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Joordens, S., &Becker, S. (1997). The long and short of semantic priming effects in lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1083–1105.
  Article Google Scholar
• Jordan, T. R. (1990). Presenting words without interior letters: Superiority over single letters and influence of postmark boundaries.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 891–909.
  Article Google Scholar
• Keppel, G. (1976). Words as random variables.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 263–265.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kuïcera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Lukatela, G., Carello, C., Savić, M., Uroïsević, Z., &Turvey, M. T. (1998). When nonwords activate semantics better than words.Cognition,68, B31-B40.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Lukatela, G., &Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming from words, homophones, and pseudohomophones.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 107–128.
  Article Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. J., &Isaak, M. I. (1999). Masked priming of words and nonwords in a naming task: Further evidence for a nonlexical basis for priming.Memory & Cognition,27, 399–412.
  Article Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L. (1986). The programmable blackboard model of reading. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.),Parallel distributed processing: Exploration in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. II: Psychological and biological models (pp. 122–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Pt. 1. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.
  Article Google Scholar
• Mozer, M. (1987). Early parallel processing in reading: A connectionist approach. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 83–104). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Norris, D. (1986). Word recognition: Context effects without priming.Cognition,22, 93–361.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• O’Connor, R. E., &Forster, K. I. (1981). Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition.Memory & Cognition,9, 78–92.
  Article Google Scholar
• Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect.Psychological Review,89, 573–594.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Perea, M. (1998). Orthographic neighbours are not all equal: Evidence using an identification technique.Language & Cognitive Processes,13, 77–90.
  Article Google Scholar
• Perea, M., &Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and neighborhood syllable frequency in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1–11.
  Google Scholar
• Perea, M., &Gotor, A. (1997). Associative and semantic priming effects occur at very short SOAs in lexical decision and naming.Cognition,67, 223–240.
  Article Google Scholar
• Perea, M., &Lupker, S. J. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.),Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97–120). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
  Google Scholar
• Perea, M., &Rosa, E. (2002a). Does the proportion of associatively related pairs modulate the associative priming effect at very brief stimulus-onset asynchronies?Acta Psychologica,110, 103–124.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Perea, M., &Rosa, E. (2000b). The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task.Psychological Research,66, 180–194.
  Article Google Scholar
• Peressotti, F., &Grainger, J. (1999). The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 691–706.
  Article Google Scholar
• Pexman, P. M., &Lupker, S. J. (1999). The impact of semantic ambiguity on visual word recognition: Do homophone and polysemy effects co-occur?Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,53, 323–334.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Pexman, P. M., Lupker, S. J., &Jared, D. (2001). Homophone effects in lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 139–156.
  Article Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., &Well, A. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 785–794.
  Article Google Scholar
• Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., &Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with “the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”: Common misconceptions and alternative solutions.Journal of Memory & Language,41, 416–429.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R. (1981). A theory of order relations in perceptual matching.Psychological Review,88, 552–572.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., Gómez, P., & McKoon, G. (in press). A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task.Psychological Review.
• Ratcliff, R., &McKoon, G. (1982). Speed and accuracy in the processing of false statements about semantic information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 16–36.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., &McKoon, G. (1995). Sequential effects in lexical decision: Tests of compound cue retrieval theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1380–1388.
  Article Google Scholar
• Reed, A. V. (1973). Speed-accuracy trade-off in recognition memory.Science,181, 574–576.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., &McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Pt. 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model.Psychological Review,89, 60–94.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Sereno, J. A. (1991). Graphemic, associative, and syntactic priming effects at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony in lexical decision and naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 459–477.
  Article Google Scholar
• Smith, J. E. K. (1976). The assuming-will-make-it-so fallacy.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 262–263.
  Google Scholar
• Stone, G. O., &Van Orden, G. C. (1993). Strategic control of processing in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 744–774.
  Article Google Scholar
• Taft, M., &van Graan, F. (1998). Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task.Journal of Memory & Language,38, 203–224.
  Article Google Scholar
• Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 221–243.
  Article Google Scholar
• Wike, E. L., &Church, J. D. (1976). Comments on Clark’s “The language-as fixed-effect fallacy.”Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 249–255.
  Article Google Scholar
• Williams, J. N. (1996). Is automatic priming semantic?European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,8, 113–161.
  Article Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg, R., Pecher, D., De Kok, D., &Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1998). Inhibition for nonword primes in lexical decision re-examined: The influence of instructions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1068–1079.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references