PEP 689 -- Add an unstable C-API tier · Issue #91744 · python/cpython (original) (raw)
Navigation Menu
- Explore
- Pricing
Provide feedback
Saved searches
Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly
Description
On python-dev, it became clear that it would be useful to have a “semi-stable” “unstable” C-API tier which will stay stable within a minor release.
- This API will go in a new directory (
Include/unstable/
) - see Nick's reply
You'll need to #definePy_USING_UNSTABLE_API
.
(name still up for bikeshedding). - Since we're nearing Beta and there's no rush to break things, in 3.11
you only get a warning if you try to use it without the opt-in #define.
In 3.12 it'll fail. - The functions will be renamed to drop the leading underscore. The old
names will be available, and may be removed
whenever the API changes. (Ideally, the underscore should always mark
API that's fully private with no guarantees at all.) - Get SC approval (this is now PEP-689 that will need acceptance)
- The API will be stable during a minor release. (As usual, for extreme
cases, exceptions are possible with SC approval.) - Docs:
- Update https://devguide.python.org/c-api/
- Update https://docs.python.org/3.10/c-api/stable.html
- Add individual reference entries for the API
- Document the new opt-in macro
- All ununstable API should be tested
- PEP-523 PyCode_* functions: tested in test_code
- ...
What should be here:
- Functions added in PEP-523
- PyCode_New, PyCode_NewWithPosOnlyArgs
- Ideally anything documented as subject to change between minor
releases. (To be kind to users, if something is added later we should
again have one release of compiler warnings before requiring the opt-in.
Unless that API just changed and users would get errors anyway.) - Cinder's dict writing API looks like it would feel at home here: add support for watching writes to selected dictionaries #91052 (comment)
- PyBytesObject.ob_shash sounds like a good candidate: see https://discuss.python.org/t/15108
- non-opaque access to frame structs and any other key APIs needed to
implement alternate eval loops with comparable performance to the default
eval loop (unless & until we can figure out stable public APIs that can
deliver equivalent performance) - see Nick's reply - C APIs that provide access to compiled code whether in AST or opcode
form (the API itself may be stable, but the compiled code isn't, so this is
kinda covered by your last point) - see Nick's reply _Py_HashDouble
, see comment below
First PR: #91789