Tracking issue for integer methods for Wrapping (original) (raw)
u32 and other primitive integer types implement a number of bit-manipulation methods like rotate_left, but Wrapping<_> does not. At the moment this can be worked around with code like Wrapping(x.0.rotate_left(n)) instead of x.rotate_left(n).
It would be nice to implement:
count_onescount_zeroesleading_zeroestrailing_zeroesrotate_leftrotate_rightswap_bytesfrom_be(?)from_le(?)to_beto_lepow(?)
Edit: Others added after #32463 (comment)
is_power_of_two(?)next_power_of_two(?)min_value(?)max_value(?)from_str_radix(?)reverse_bitsabsAdd missing Wrapping methods, use doc_comment! #49393Add missing Wrapping methods, use doc_comment! #50465signumAdd missing Wrapping methods, use doc_comment! #49393Add missing Wrapping methods, use doc_comment! #50465is_positiveAdd missing Wrapping methods, use doc_comment! #49393Add missing Wrapping methods, use doc_comment! #50465is_negativeAdd missing Wrapping methods, use doc_comment! #49393Add missing Wrapping methods, use doc_comment! #50465
and maybe other methods, for:
Wrapping<u8>Wrapping<u16>Wrapping<u32>Wrapping<u64>Wrapping<usize>Wrapping<i8>Wrapping<i16>Wrapping<i32>Wrapping<i64>Wrapping<isize>
Edit: From #50465
- Decide on correct behavior for
wrapping_next_power_of_two