Fix CVE-2022-21658 by pietroalbini · Pull Request #93112 · rust-lang/rust (original) (raw)
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
Conversation5 Commits5 Checks0 Files changed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
[ Show hidden characters]({{ revealButtonHref }})
📌 Commit 32080ad has been approved by pietroalbini
bors added the S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
📌 Commit 0a6c9ad has been approved by pietroalbini
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 600. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request
…askrgr
Rollup of 13 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang#89747 (Add MaybeUninit::(slice_)as_bytes(_mut))
- rust-lang#89764 (Fix variant index / discriminant confusion in uninhabited enum branching)
- rust-lang#91606 (Stabilize
-Z print-link-args
as--print link-args
) - rust-lang#91694 (rustdoc: decouple stability and const-stability)
- rust-lang#92183 (Point at correct argument when async fn output type lifetime disagrees with signature)
- rust-lang#92582 (improve
_
constants in item signature handling) - rust-lang#92680 (intra-doc: Use the impl's assoc item where possible)
- rust-lang#92704 (Change lint message to be stronger for &T -> &mut T transmute)
- rust-lang#92861 (Rustdoc mobile: put out-of-band info on its own line)
- rust-lang#92992 (Help optimize out backtraces when disabled)
- rust-lang#93038 (Fix star handling in block doc comments)
- rust-lang#93108 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer)
- rust-lang#93112 (Fix CVE-2022-21658)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot
modify labels: rollup
sunfishcode added a commit to bytecodealliance/cap-std that referenced this pull request
sunfishcode added a commit to bytecodealliance/cap-std that referenced this pull request
seritools added a commit to rust9x/rust that referenced this pull request
The recursive directory removal implementation falls back to the old one
if the necessary APIs are not available (NtCreateFile
,
GetFileInformationByHandleEx
, SetFileInformationByHandle
). The APIs
are available on Vista/Server 2008.
See notes on fileextd.lib
above to extend the support to Windows
XP/Server 2003. This might cause security issues, see
rust-lang#93112
mbilker pushed a commit to mbilker/rust that referenced this pull request
The recursive directory removal implementation falls back to the old one
if the necessary APIs are not available (NtCreateFile
,
GetFileInformationByHandleEx
, SetFileInformationByHandle
). The APIs
are available on Vista/Server 2008.
See notes on fileextd.lib
above to extend the support to Windows
XP/Server 2003. This might cause security issues, see
rust-lang#93112
snev68 added a commit to snev68/cap-std that referenced this pull request
seritools added a commit to rust9x/rust that referenced this pull request
The recursive directory removal implementation falls back to the old one
if the necessary APIs are not available (NtCreateFile
,
GetFileInformationByHandleEx
, SetFileInformationByHandle
). The APIs
are available on Vista/Server 2008.
See notes on fileextd.lib
above to extend the support to Windows
XP/Server 2003. This might cause security issues, see
rust-lang#93112
seritools added a commit to rust9x/rust that referenced this pull request
The recursive directory removal implementation falls back to the old one
if the necessary APIs are not available (NtCreateFile
,
GetFileInformationByHandleEx
, SetFileInformationByHandle
). The APIs
are available on Vista/Server 2008.
See notes on fileextd.lib
above to extend the support to Windows
XP/Server 2003. This might cause security issues, see
rust-lang#93112
seritools added a commit to rust9x/rust that referenced this pull request
The recursive directory removal implementation falls back to the old one
if the necessary APIs are not available (NtCreateFile
,
GetFileInformationByHandleEx
, SetFileInformationByHandle
). The APIs
are available on Vista/Server 2008.
See notes on fileextd.lib
above to extend the support to Windows
XP/Server 2003. This might cause security issues, see
rust-lang#93112
seritools added a commit to rust9x/rust that referenced this pull request
The recursive directory removal implementation falls back to the old one
if the necessary APIs are not available (NtCreateFile
,
GetFileInformationByHandleEx
, SetFileInformationByHandle
). The APIs
are available on Vista/Server 2008.
See notes on fileextd.lib
above to extend the support to Windows
XP/Server 2003. This might cause security issues, see
rust-lang#93112
seritools added a commit to rust9x/rust that referenced this pull request
The recursive directory removal implementation falls back to the old one
if the necessary APIs are not available (NtCreateFile
,
GetFileInformationByHandleEx
, SetFileInformationByHandle
). The APIs
are available on Vista/Server 2008.
See notes on fileextd.lib
above to extend the support to Windows
XP/Server 2003. This might cause security issues, see
rust-lang#93112
Labels
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.