pelin ARSLAN - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Uploads
Conference organization by pelin ARSLAN
Pesquisas conjuntas . Itália/Brasil sobre patrimônio e novas tecnologias São Paolo, Brazil, dia ... more Pesquisas conjuntas . Itália/Brasil sobre patrimônio e novas tecnologias
São Paolo, Brazil, dia 13 de agosto 2019
Lançamento do ArCo 2020
“1ª Convenção Internacional sobre patrimônio, segurança e inovação digital” Dipartimento di Architettura DiDA Università di Firenze, 28-30 de maio de 2020 www.arcoconference.com
Instituto Italiano de Cultura, São Paulo
dia 13 de agosto, terça, 17hrs
Av. Higienópolis, 436 - Higienópolis, São Paulo
Michele Gialdroni - direttore IIC San Paolo Beatriz Mugayar Kühl e Renata Cima Campiotto - FAUUSP As experiências Getty-FAUUSP e Museu Paulista Em colaboração com DIAPReM - Università di Ferrara Luciano Migliaccio e Beatriz Siqueira Piccolotto Bueno - FAUUSP
Regina Helena Vieira Santos - Museu da Cidade de São Paulo “LabSampa: Uma experiência didática de levantamento com laser scanner 3d para a história da arquitetura e da cidade” Em colaboração com: DiDA-Università di Firenze
Giacomo Pirazzoli - EAV Parque Lage e DiDA-Università di Firenze “Entre sabedoria tradicional e nova tecnologia: uma obra do
século XVI reconstruída e musealizada”
Sobre a Convenção ArCo 2020:
O patrimônio representa um recurso inestimável do nosso capital cultural. Entretanto, nem sempre é adequadamente protegido contra eventuais riscos e perigos. Nas últimas décadas, as novas tecnologias
– tais como o controle digital, as reconstruções em 3D, etc.
– foram aplicadas com sucesso no setor, facilitando as atividades de monitoramento e os controles de segurança. Essa Convenção visa
reagrupar as contribuições de diferentes áreas para a preservação e proteção dos bens artísticos expostos nos museus e do patrimônio.
Chamada aberta até dia 15 de setembro: www.arcoconference.com
by Giorgio Verdiani, FRANCESCO COLLOTTI, MARCO TANGANELLI, Giada Cerri, Serena Acciai, Eliana Martinelli, pelin ARSLAN, Alessandro Brodini, Zeynep Ceylanli, Orietta Lanzarini, and Giacomo Pirazzoli
ArCO, 2019
ArCo Conference will take place in Florence, Italy on the 28-30 May 2020 It is an International ... more ArCo Conference will take place in Florence, Italy on the 28-30 May 2020
It is an International Conference dedicated to innovative experiences in Museums and Art Collections.
The call for abstract is open from the 25th of June to the 15th September 2019.
All the details and key dates at: www.arcoconference.com
Books by pelin ARSLAN
Collection of the Abstracts of the AACCP 2019 ROME, ITALY Committee: Liisa Seppänen, Per Cornel... more Collection of the Abstracts of the AACCP 2019 ROME, ITALY
Committee: Liisa Seppänen, Per Cornell, Giorgio Verdiani, Pablo Rodriguez-Navarro, James Dixon, Sinan Burat. The workshop will be realized in collaboration between the University of Turku, Finland, the Architecture Department of the University of Florence, Italy and the Department of Historical Studies of the University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Papers by pelin ARSLAN
Architects are used to being in relationships with museums and are accustomed to planning them an... more Architects are used to being in relationships with museums and are accustomed to planning them and learning how to organise their specific structures. Inspiration can be found in museums, and sometimes the ideas of other architects can be emulated. The rules and solutions usually adopted for museums are based on well-established procedures, with the design contribution guiding and organising the theoretical, pedagogical and scenographic aspects of the space. An architecture is created which is specific and pervasive, and ideas should be balanced between the meaning of this architecture and the valourisation of what we want to bring onto the scene. In this paper, the resonance and vision of the Montemartini Museum in Rome will be analysed as a reference to interpret how the special poetry of this building is generated and how certain parallels can be both a choice and an opportunity in terms of the design of future museums.
Nowadays the urban tissue often presents mixed architectures, abandoned parts from a recent past,... more Nowadays the urban tissue often presents mixed architectures, abandoned parts from a recent past, mostly former industrial buildings, near new saturation and developments. The city growth has included them after they lost their use, they have still a strong appeal on the collective imagination. Recovering them is not necessarily a demolition and reconstruction operation while such an intervention is at risk about causing the loss of important urban aspects and characterizations. The historical or even “popular” beliefs about them can be something to implement and/or enhance the quality of urban areas, increasing the chances of a real reintegration into productive reuse. In this complex logic of interventions, the contemporary, “digital layer” may play a strategic role. In the use of this very contemporary solution, both industrial and archaeological heritage are interesting subjects, with very different declinations. From one side there is the need for mixing old peculiar aspects with new functions, with risk about missing the chance in being fully efficient in communication. On the other there is the new, almost intangible, possibility to overlay reality with onsite or online elements, creating “new realities” where anyone should find fascinating elements coming from usual places and/or discovering new information, learning about the value of a place. To better identify strategies and proposals three “operative clusters” will be defined to group the functions and tools for the architect/built heritage expert to operate. A set of case studies, selected while consistent, thus not “compromised by an excess of popularity”, will help to put in evidence aspects that can be useful contributions in defining intervention choices: the Montemartini Museum in Rome; industrial buildings from the Beyoğlu neighborhood in Istanbul; London King’s Cross intervention, the LocHal Library, in Tilburg, Netherlands, the industrial heritage forgiveness in Tirana, Albania.
Istanbul has an extended story to tell, but sometimes the idea of its urban development seems fro... more Istanbul has an extended story to tell, but sometimes the idea of its urban development seems frozen to some specific passages in time, while, on the contrary, such an urban context is subject to a continuous transformation of its tissue, changing functions, behaviours, rules. The built heritage keeps on being exploited and reused, dragged in the contemporary age with alterations, superfetation demolitions. The actions of the people living and using the neighbourhoods sometimes cause the decay of a structure into a poorly used facility, sometimes it acts changing decay into opportunity, keeping somehow alive the place. In the case of the waterfront of the Beyoglu quarter, the use of 3D laser scanner for urban documentation allowed to capture a 3D model usable for investigations and understanding, working as a first central node in the interpretation of the complexity of a difficult mix of commercial activities, past abandoned industrial blocks and heritage. This research describes the main passages and activities aimed at the definition of possible guidelines for urban regeneration while preserving intangible heritage values, recognized as a richness for the community itself.
Proceedings of the LIVENARCH VI livable environments & architecture conference, 2019
Nowadays the urban tissue often presents mixed architectures, abandoned parts from a recent past,... more Nowadays the urban tissue often presents mixed architectures, abandoned parts from a recent past, mostly former industrial buildings, near new saturation and developments. The city growth has included them after they lost their use, they have still a strong appeal on the collective imagination. Recovering them is not necessarily a demolition and reconstruction operation while such an intervention is at risk about causing the loss of important urban aspects and characterizations. The historical or even “popular” beliefs about them can be something to implement and/or enhance the quality of urban areas, increasing the chances of a real reintegration into productive reuse. In this complex logic of interventions, the contemporary, “digital layer” may play a strategic role. In the use of this very contemporary solution, both industrial and archaeological heritage are interesting subjects, with very different declinations. From one side there is the need for mixing old peculiar aspects with new functions, with risk about missing the chance in being fully efficient in communication. On the other there is the new, almost intangible, possibility to overlay reality with onsite or online elements, creating “new realities” where anyone should find fascinating elements coming from usual places and/or discovering new information, learning about the value of a place. To better identify strategies and proposals three “operative clusters” will be defined to group the functions and tools for the architect/built heritage expert to operate. A set of case studies, selected while consistent, thus not “compromised by an excess of popularity”, will help to put in evidence aspects that can be useful contributions in defining intervention choices: the Montemartini Museum in Rome; industrial buildings from the Beyoğlu neighborhood in Istanbul; London King’s Cross intervention, the LocHal Library, in Tilburg, Netherlands, the industrial heritage forgiveness in Tirana, Albania.
Pesquisas conjuntas . Itália/Brasil sobre patrimônio e novas tecnologias São Paolo, Brazil, dia ... more Pesquisas conjuntas . Itália/Brasil sobre patrimônio e novas tecnologias
São Paolo, Brazil, dia 13 de agosto 2019
Lançamento do ArCo 2020
“1ª Convenção Internacional sobre patrimônio, segurança e inovação digital” Dipartimento di Architettura DiDA Università di Firenze, 28-30 de maio de 2020 www.arcoconference.com
Instituto Italiano de Cultura, São Paulo
dia 13 de agosto, terça, 17hrs
Av. Higienópolis, 436 - Higienópolis, São Paulo
Michele Gialdroni - direttore IIC San Paolo Beatriz Mugayar Kühl e Renata Cima Campiotto - FAUUSP As experiências Getty-FAUUSP e Museu Paulista Em colaboração com DIAPReM - Università di Ferrara Luciano Migliaccio e Beatriz Siqueira Piccolotto Bueno - FAUUSP
Regina Helena Vieira Santos - Museu da Cidade de São Paulo “LabSampa: Uma experiência didática de levantamento com laser scanner 3d para a história da arquitetura e da cidade” Em colaboração com: DiDA-Università di Firenze
Giacomo Pirazzoli - EAV Parque Lage e DiDA-Università di Firenze “Entre sabedoria tradicional e nova tecnologia: uma obra do
século XVI reconstruída e musealizada”
Sobre a Convenção ArCo 2020:
O patrimônio representa um recurso inestimável do nosso capital cultural. Entretanto, nem sempre é adequadamente protegido contra eventuais riscos e perigos. Nas últimas décadas, as novas tecnologias
– tais como o controle digital, as reconstruções em 3D, etc.
– foram aplicadas com sucesso no setor, facilitando as atividades de monitoramento e os controles de segurança. Essa Convenção visa
reagrupar as contribuições de diferentes áreas para a preservação e proteção dos bens artísticos expostos nos museus e do patrimônio.
Chamada aberta até dia 15 de setembro: www.arcoconference.com
by Giorgio Verdiani, FRANCESCO COLLOTTI, MARCO TANGANELLI, Giada Cerri, Serena Acciai, Eliana Martinelli, pelin ARSLAN, Alessandro Brodini, Zeynep Ceylanli, Orietta Lanzarini, and Giacomo Pirazzoli
ArCO, 2019
ArCo Conference will take place in Florence, Italy on the 28-30 May 2020 It is an International ... more ArCo Conference will take place in Florence, Italy on the 28-30 May 2020
It is an International Conference dedicated to innovative experiences in Museums and Art Collections.
The call for abstract is open from the 25th of June to the 15th September 2019.
All the details and key dates at: www.arcoconference.com
Collection of the Abstracts of the AACCP 2019 ROME, ITALY Committee: Liisa Seppänen, Per Cornel... more Collection of the Abstracts of the AACCP 2019 ROME, ITALY
Committee: Liisa Seppänen, Per Cornell, Giorgio Verdiani, Pablo Rodriguez-Navarro, James Dixon, Sinan Burat. The workshop will be realized in collaboration between the University of Turku, Finland, the Architecture Department of the University of Florence, Italy and the Department of Historical Studies of the University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Architects are used to being in relationships with museums and are accustomed to planning them an... more Architects are used to being in relationships with museums and are accustomed to planning them and learning how to organise their specific structures. Inspiration can be found in museums, and sometimes the ideas of other architects can be emulated. The rules and solutions usually adopted for museums are based on well-established procedures, with the design contribution guiding and organising the theoretical, pedagogical and scenographic aspects of the space. An architecture is created which is specific and pervasive, and ideas should be balanced between the meaning of this architecture and the valourisation of what we want to bring onto the scene. In this paper, the resonance and vision of the Montemartini Museum in Rome will be analysed as a reference to interpret how the special poetry of this building is generated and how certain parallels can be both a choice and an opportunity in terms of the design of future museums.
Nowadays the urban tissue often presents mixed architectures, abandoned parts from a recent past,... more Nowadays the urban tissue often presents mixed architectures, abandoned parts from a recent past, mostly former industrial buildings, near new saturation and developments. The city growth has included them after they lost their use, they have still a strong appeal on the collective imagination. Recovering them is not necessarily a demolition and reconstruction operation while such an intervention is at risk about causing the loss of important urban aspects and characterizations. The historical or even “popular” beliefs about them can be something to implement and/or enhance the quality of urban areas, increasing the chances of a real reintegration into productive reuse. In this complex logic of interventions, the contemporary, “digital layer” may play a strategic role. In the use of this very contemporary solution, both industrial and archaeological heritage are interesting subjects, with very different declinations. From one side there is the need for mixing old peculiar aspects with new functions, with risk about missing the chance in being fully efficient in communication. On the other there is the new, almost intangible, possibility to overlay reality with onsite or online elements, creating “new realities” where anyone should find fascinating elements coming from usual places and/or discovering new information, learning about the value of a place. To better identify strategies and proposals three “operative clusters” will be defined to group the functions and tools for the architect/built heritage expert to operate. A set of case studies, selected while consistent, thus not “compromised by an excess of popularity”, will help to put in evidence aspects that can be useful contributions in defining intervention choices: the Montemartini Museum in Rome; industrial buildings from the Beyoğlu neighborhood in Istanbul; London King’s Cross intervention, the LocHal Library, in Tilburg, Netherlands, the industrial heritage forgiveness in Tirana, Albania.
Istanbul has an extended story to tell, but sometimes the idea of its urban development seems fro... more Istanbul has an extended story to tell, but sometimes the idea of its urban development seems frozen to some specific passages in time, while, on the contrary, such an urban context is subject to a continuous transformation of its tissue, changing functions, behaviours, rules. The built heritage keeps on being exploited and reused, dragged in the contemporary age with alterations, superfetation demolitions. The actions of the people living and using the neighbourhoods sometimes cause the decay of a structure into a poorly used facility, sometimes it acts changing decay into opportunity, keeping somehow alive the place. In the case of the waterfront of the Beyoglu quarter, the use of 3D laser scanner for urban documentation allowed to capture a 3D model usable for investigations and understanding, working as a first central node in the interpretation of the complexity of a difficult mix of commercial activities, past abandoned industrial blocks and heritage. This research describes the main passages and activities aimed at the definition of possible guidelines for urban regeneration while preserving intangible heritage values, recognized as a richness for the community itself.
Proceedings of the LIVENARCH VI livable environments & architecture conference, 2019
Nowadays the urban tissue often presents mixed architectures, abandoned parts from a recent past,... more Nowadays the urban tissue often presents mixed architectures, abandoned parts from a recent past, mostly former industrial buildings, near new saturation and developments. The city growth has included them after they lost their use, they have still a strong appeal on the collective imagination. Recovering them is not necessarily a demolition and reconstruction operation while such an intervention is at risk about causing the loss of important urban aspects and characterizations. The historical or even “popular” beliefs about them can be something to implement and/or enhance the quality of urban areas, increasing the chances of a real reintegration into productive reuse. In this complex logic of interventions, the contemporary, “digital layer” may play a strategic role. In the use of this very contemporary solution, both industrial and archaeological heritage are interesting subjects, with very different declinations. From one side there is the need for mixing old peculiar aspects with new functions, with risk about missing the chance in being fully efficient in communication. On the other there is the new, almost intangible, possibility to overlay reality with onsite or online elements, creating “new realities” where anyone should find fascinating elements coming from usual places and/or discovering new information, learning about the value of a place. To better identify strategies and proposals three “operative clusters” will be defined to group the functions and tools for the architect/built heritage expert to operate. A set of case studies, selected while consistent, thus not “compromised by an excess of popularity”, will help to put in evidence aspects that can be useful contributions in defining intervention choices: the Montemartini Museum in Rome; industrial buildings from the Beyoğlu neighborhood in Istanbul; London King’s Cross intervention, the LocHal Library, in Tilburg, Netherlands, the industrial heritage forgiveness in Tirana, Albania.