On the W&Y interpretation of high-energy Drell-Yan measurements (original) (raw)

• M. Farina, G. Panico, D. Pappadopulo, J.T. Ruderman, R. Torre and A. Wulzer, Energy helps accuracy: electroweak precision tests at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B 772 (2017) 210 [arXiv:1609.08157] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• K. Hagiwara, R.D. Peccei, D. Zeppenfeld and K. Hikasa, Probing the Weak Boson Sector in e+e − → W+W −, Nucl. Phys. B 282 (1987) 253 [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• K. Hagiwara, J. Woodside and D. Zeppenfeld, Measuring the WWZ coupling at the Tevatron, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 2113 [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• CMS collaboration, Measurement of the W+W − cross section in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV and limits on anomalous gauge couplings, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 401 [arXiv:1507.03268] [INSPIRE].
• ATLAS collaboration, Measurements of W_±_Z production cross sections in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector and limits on anomalous gauge boson self-couplings, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 092004 [arXiv:1603.02151] [INSPIRE].
• A. Butter, O.J.P. Éboli, J. Gonzalez-Fraile, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, T. Plehn and M. Rauch, The gauge-Higgs legacy of the LHC Run I, JHEP 07 (2016) 152 [arXiv:1604.03105] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Z. Zhang, Time to go beyond triple-gauge-boson-coupling interpretation of W pair production, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 011803 [arXiv:1610.01618] [INSPIRE].
• D.R. Green, P. Meade and M.-A. Pleier, Multiboson interactions at the LHC, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 (2017) 035008 [arXiv:1610.07572] [INSPIRE].
• A. Biekötter, A. Knochel, M. Krämer, D. Liu and F. Riva, Vices and virtues of Higgs effective field theories at large energy, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 055029 [arXiv:1406.7320] [INSPIRE].
• A. Falkowski, M. Gonzalez-Alonso, A. Greljo and D. Marzocca, Global constraints on anomalous triple gauge couplings in effective field theory approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 011801 [arXiv:1508.00581] [INSPIRE].
• J. Baglio, S. Dawson and I.M. Lewis, An NLO QCD effective field theory analysis of W+W − production at the LHC including fermionic operators, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 073003 [arXiv:1708.03332] [INSPIRE].
• R. Franceschini, G. Panico, A. Pomarol, F. Riva and A. Wulzer, Electroweak precision tests in high-energy diboson processes, JHEP 02 (2018) 111 [arXiv:1712.01310] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• G. Panico, F. Riva and A. Wulzer, Diboson interference resurrection, Phys. Lett. B 776 (2018) 473 [arXiv:1708.07823] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• C. Grojean, M. Montull and M. Riembau, Diboson at the LHC vs LEP, JHEP 03 (2019) 020 [arXiv:1810.05149] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• S. Banerjee, C. Englert, R.S. Gupta and M. Spannowsky, Probing electroweak precision physics via boosted Higgs-strahlung at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 095012 [arXiv:1807.01796] [INSPIRE].
• D. Liu and L.-T. Wang, Prospects for precision measurement of diboson processes in the semileptonic decay channel in future LHC runs, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 055001 [arXiv:1804.08688] [INSPIRE].
• B. Henning, D. Lombardo, M. Riembau and F. Riva, Measuring Higgs couplings without Higgs bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 181801 [arXiv:1812.09299] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• S. Alioli, M. Farina, D. Pappadopulo and J.T. Ruderman, Catching a new force by the tail, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 101801 [arXiv:1712.02347] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• M. Farina, C. Mondino, D. Pappadopulo and J.T. Ruderman, New physics from high energy tops, JHEP 01 (2019) 231 [arXiv:1811.04084] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• R.K. Ellis et al., Physics briefing book, arXiv:1910.11775 [INSPIRE].
• B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J. de Blas, M. Chala and J. Santiago, Global constraints on lepton-quark contact interactions, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 095011 [arXiv:1307.5068] [INSPIRE].
• J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Greljo, J. Martin Camalich and J.D. Ruiz-Alvarez, Charm physics confronts high-p T lepton tails, JHEP 11 (2020) 080 [arXiv:2003.12421] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi and A. Strumia, Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2, Nucl. Phys. B 703 (2004) 127 [hep-ph/0405040] [INSPIRE].
• J.D. Wells and Z. Zhang, Effective theories of universal theories, JHEP 01 (2016) 123 [arXiv:1510.08462] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
• CLICdp collaboration, Top-quark physics at the CLIC electron-positron linear collider, JHEP 11 (2019) 003 [arXiv:1807.02441] [INSPIRE].
• D. Barducci et al., Interpreting top-quark LHC measurements in the standard-model effective field theory, arXiv:1802.07237 [INSPIRE].
• G.F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol and R. Rattazzi, The strongly-interacting light Higgs, JHEP 06 (2007) 045 [hep-ph/0703164] [INSPIRE].
• ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the double-differential high-mass Drell-Yan cross section in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 08 (2016) 009 [arXiv:1606.01736] [INSPIRE].
• CMS collaboration, Measurements of the differential and double-differential Drell-Yan cross sections in proton-proton collisions at 8 TeV, CMS-PAS-SMP-14-003 (2014).
• CMS collaboration, Measurement of the differential Drell-Yan cross section in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, CMS-PAS-SMP-16-009 (2016).
• S. Alioli, W. Dekens, M. Girard and E. Mereghetti, NLO QCD corrections to SM-EFT dilepton and electroweak Higgs boson production, matched to parton shower in POWHEG, JHEP 08 (2018) 205 [arXiv:1804.07407] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• P. Artoisenet, V. Lemaitre, F. Maltoni and O. Mattelaer, Automation of the matrix element reweighting method, JHEP 12 (2010) 068 [arXiv:1007.3300] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].
• C. Degrande, G. Durieux, F. Maltoni, K. Mimasu, E. Vryonidou and C. Zhang, Automated one-loop computations in the SMEFT, arXiv:2008.11743 [INSPIRE].
• S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re, NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG, JHEP 07 (2008) 060 [arXiv:0805.4802] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Y. Li and F. Petriello, Combining QCD and electroweak corrections to dilepton production in FEWZ, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 094034 [arXiv:1208.5967] [INSPIRE].
• L. Barze, G. Montagna, P. Nason, O. Nicrosini and F. Piccinini, Implementation of electroweak corrections in the POWHEG BOX: single W production, JHEP 04 (2012) 037 [arXiv:1202.0465] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• L. Barze, G. Montagna, P. Nason, O. Nicrosini, F. Piccinini and A. Vicini, Neutral current Drell-Yan with combined QCD and electroweak corrections in the POWHEG BOX, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2474 [arXiv:1302.4606] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• T. Sjöstrand et al., An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1410.3012] [INSPIRE].
• S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP 11 (2007) 070 [arXiv:0709.2092] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• S. Catani and M.H. Seymour, A general algorithm for calculating jet cross-sections in NLO QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 485 (1997) 291 [Erratum ibid. 510 (1998) 503] [hep-ph/9605323] [INSPIRE].
• A. Denner, B. Jantzen and S. Pozzorini, Two-loop electroweak next-to-leading logarithmic corrections to massless fermionic processes, Nucl. Phys. B 761 (2007) 1 [hep-ph/0608326] [INSPIRE].
• S. Pozzorini, Electroweak radiative corrections at high-energies, other thesis, 2001 [hep-ph/0201077] [INSPIRE].
• J.H. Kühn, A.A. Penin and V.A. Smirnov, Summing up subleading Sudakov logarithms, Eur. Phys. J. C 17 (2000) 97 [hep-ph/9912503] [INSPIRE].
• J.H. Kühn, S. Moch, A.A. Penin and V.A. Smirnov, Next-to-next-to-leading logarithms in four fermion electroweak processes at high-energy, Nucl. Phys. B 616 (2001) 286 [Erratum ibid. 648 (2003) 455] [hep-ph/0106298] [INSPIRE].
• B. Jantzen, J.H. Kühn, A.A. Penin and V.A. Smirnov, Two-loop electroweak logarithms in four-fermion processes at high energy, Nucl. Phys. B 731 (2005) 188 [Erratum ibid. 752 (2006) 327] [hep-ph/0509157] [INSPIRE].
• E. Bothmann and D. Napoletano, Automated evaluation of electroweak Sudakov logarithms in Sherpa, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 1024 [arXiv:2006.14635] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• A. Celis, J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Vicente and J. Virto, DsixTools: the standard model effective field theory toolkit, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 405 [arXiv:1704.04504] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• S. Brensing, S. Dittmaier, M. Krämer and A. Muck, Radiative corrections to W − boson hadroproduction: higher-order electroweak and supersymmetric effects, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 073006 [arXiv:0710.3309] [INSPIRE].
• S. Dittmaier and M. Huber, Radiative corrections to the neutral-current Drell-Yan process in the Standard Model and its minimal supersymmetric extension, JHEP 01 (2010) 060 [arXiv:0911.2329] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• C.M. Carloni Calame, G. Montagna, O. Nicrosini and A. Vicini, Precision electroweak calculation of the production of a high transverse-momentum lepton pair at hadron colliders, JHEP 10 (2007) 109 [arXiv:0710.1722] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• U. Baur, Weak boson emission in hadron collider processes, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 013005 [hep-ph/0611241] [INSPIRE].
• A. Buckley et al., LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC precision era, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 132 [arXiv:1412.7420] [INSPIRE].
• J. Butterworth et al., PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II, J. Phys. G 43 (2016) 023001 [arXiv:1510.03865] [INSPIRE].
• S. Dulat et al., New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 033006 [arXiv:1506.07443] [INSPIRE].
• L.A. Harland-Lang, A.D. Martin, P. Motylinski and R.S. Thorne, Parton distributions in the LHC era: MMHT 2014 PDFs, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 204 [arXiv:1412.3989] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• S. Carrazza, J.I. Latorre, J. Rojo and G. Watt, A compression algorithm for the combination of PDF sets, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 474 [arXiv:1504.06469] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• S. Alioli et al., Precision studies of observables in pp → W → lν l and pp → γ, Z → l+l − processes at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 280 [arXiv:1606.02330] [INSPIRE].
• G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1554 [Erratum ibid. 73 (2013) 2501] [arXiv:1007.1727] [INSPIRE].
• D.S.M. Alves, J. Galloway, J.T. Ruderman and J.R. Walsh, Running electroweak couplings as a probe of new physics, JHEP 02 (2015) 007 [arXiv:1410.6810] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar