Very weak oscillating magnetic field disrupts the magnetic compass of songbird migrants - PubMed (original) (raw)
Very weak oscillating magnetic field disrupts the magnetic compass of songbird migrants
Alexander Pakhomov et al. J R Soc Interface. 2017 Aug.
Abstract
Previously, it has been shown that long-distance migrants, garden warblers (Sylvia borin), were disoriented in the presence of narrow-band oscillating magnetic field (1.403 MHz OMF, 190 nT) during autumn migration. This agrees with the data of previous experiments with European robins (Erithacus rubecula). In this study, we report the results of experiments with garden warblers tested under a 1.403 MHz OMF with various amplitudes (∼0.4, 1, ∼2.4, 7 and 20 nT). We found that the ability of garden warblers to orient in round arenas using the magnetic compass could be disrupted by a very weak oscillating field, such as an approximate 2.4, 7 and 20 nT OMF, but not by an OMF with an approximate 0.4 nT amplitude. The results of the present study indicate that the sensitivity threshold of the magnetic compass to the OMF lies around 2-3 nT, while in experiments with European robins the birds were disoriented in a 15 nT OMF but could choose the appropriate migratory direction when a 5 nT OMF was added to the stationary magnetic field. The radical-pair model, one of the mainstream theories of avian magnetoreception, cannot explain the sensitivity to such a low-intensity OMF, and therefore, it needs further refinement.
Keywords: bird migration; garden warbler; magnetic compass; orientation; radical-pair model; radiofrequency field.
© 2017 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
We declare we have no competing interests.
Figures
Figure 1.
Average amplitude of the magnetic field noise measured at the experimental site as a function of the central position of the 100 kHz detection window. Red curve is the signal measured using a single-loop non-resonant antenna. Blue curve is the signal measured using a two-turn loop resonant antenna. Top _x-_axis shows a low-frequency border of AM broadcast bands (LW, long-wave; MW, middle-wave, 120 m–31 m; SW, short-wave bands).
Figure 2.
An example of the frequency spectrum of the oscillating magnetic field, measured at an OMF amplitude of 0.6 nT with a resolution bandwidth of 10 kHz.
Figure 3.
The dependence of the magnitude of the orientation vector r on the amplitude of the oscillating magnetic field (from all our tests).
Figure 4.
Orientation of garden warblers in the local geomagnetic field (NMF) during the first phase of experiments, autumn 2014–2015: (a) autumn 2014 (α = 184°, n = 22, r = 0.39, p = 0.033; 95% CI = 143°–226°), (b) autumn 2015 (α = 205°, n = 16, r = 0.45, p = 0.036; 95% CI = 164°–247°) and (c) 2 years pooled (α = 194°, n = 38, r = 0.41, p = 0.001; 95% CI 164°–224°). Here α is the direction of the mean vector, r is the length of the mean vector (r varies from 0 to 1), n is the number of birds, p is the significance level and 95% CI is 95% confidence intervals. Dots denote individual directions of each bird; arrow denotes the mean group vector; inner and outer dashed circles are 1 and 5% significance levels of the Rayleigh test, respectively. Radial lines indicate 95% CI. The red triangle and letters mN are the position of the magnetic north.
Figure 5.
Orientation of garden warblers when 1.403 MHz OMFs with various amplitudes were added to the local geomagnetic field, autumn 2014–2015. (b,d,f,h) Orientation of the experimental birds (subsample) in the OMF during the second phase. (a,c,e,g) Orientation of the same birds (the same subsample) in the NMF during the first phase of experiments. Row (a,b): 20 nT RF field subsample in the NMF ((a) α = 180°, _n_= 13, r = 0.38, p = 0.16) and OMF ((b) α = 129°, n = 13, r = 0.03, p = 0.99). Row (c,d): 7 nT RF field subsample in the NMF ((c) α = 185°, n = 31, r = 0.45, p = 0.001, 95% CI = 156°–215°) and OMF ((d) α = 201°, n = 31, r = 0.16, p = 0.46). Row (e,f): 1 nT RF field subsample in the NMF ((e) α = 206°, n = 16, r = 0.45, p = 0.036, 95% CI = 164°–247°) and OMF ((f) α = 71°, n = 16, r = 0.29, p = 0.27). Row (g,h): 0 nT RF field subsample in the NMF during the first phase of experiments ((g) α = 198°, n = 15, r = 0.49, p = 0.024, 95% CI = 157°–239°) and the NMF during the second phase when RF coils were turned off ((h) α = 94°, n = 15, r = 0.52, p = 0.016, 95% CI = 55°–132°). For a description of the circular diagrams, see the legend to figure 1.
Figure 6.
Orientation of garden warblers in three experimental conditions during 2016 autumn experiments: in the NMF ((a) α = 241°, n = 25, r = 0.125, p = 0.68); in an approximate 2.4 nT RF field ((b) α = 139°, n = 21, r = 0.201, p = 0.44); in an approximate 0.4 nT RF field ((c) α = 183°, n = 26, r = 0.349, p < 0.05, 95% CI = 140°–226°). For a description of the circular diagrams, see the legend to figure 1.
Figure 7.
The amplitude attenuation factor for the vertical OMF as a function of oscillation frequency.
Similar articles
- Magnetic compass of garden warblers is not affected by oscillating magnetic fields applied to their eyes.
Bojarinova J, Kavokin K, Pakhomov A, Cherbunin R, Anashina A, Erokhina M, Ershova M, Chernetsov N. Bojarinova J, et al. Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 26;10(1):3473. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60383-x. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32103061 Free PMC article. - Magnetic orientation of garden warblers (Sylvia borin) under 1.4 MHz radiofrequency magnetic field.
Kavokin K, Chernetsov N, Pakhomov A, Bojarinova J, Kobylkov D, Namozov B. Kavokin K, et al. J R Soc Interface. 2014 Aug 6;11(97):20140451. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0451. J R Soc Interface. 2014. PMID: 24942848 Free PMC article. - Night-migratory songbirds possess a magnetic compass in both eyes.
Engels S, Hein CM, Lefeldt N, Prior H, Mouritsen H. Engels S, et al. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e43271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043271. Epub 2012 Sep 12. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22984416 Free PMC article. - A conceptual framework on the role of magnetic cues in songbird migration ecology.
Karwinkel T, Peter A, Holland RA, Thorup K, Bairlein F, Schmaljohann H. Karwinkel T, et al. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024 Aug;99(4):1576-1593. doi: 10.1111/brv.13082. Epub 2024 Apr 17. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024. PMID: 38629349 Review. - Navigating at night: fundamental limits on the sensitivity of radical pair magnetoreception under dim light.
Hiscock HG, Hiscock TW, Kattnig DR, Scrivener T, Lewis AM, Manolopoulos DE, Hore PJ. Hiscock HG, et al. Q Rev Biophys. 2019 Oct 22;52:e9. doi: 10.1017/S0033583519000076. Q Rev Biophys. 2019. PMID: 31637984 Review.
Cited by
- Magnetoreception in birds.
Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W. Wiltschko R, et al. J R Soc Interface. 2019 Sep 27;16(158):20190295. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0295. Epub 2019 Sep 4. J R Soc Interface. 2019. PMID: 31480921 Free PMC article. Review. - No evidence for the use of magnetic declination for migratory navigation in two songbird species.
Chernetsov N, Pakhomov A, Davydov A, Cellarius F, Mouritsen H. Chernetsov N, et al. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 24;15(4):e0232136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232136. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32330188 Free PMC article. - Electromagnetic 0.1-100 kHz noise does not disrupt orientation in a night-migrating songbird implying a spin coherence lifetime of less than 10 µs.
Kobylkov D, Wynn J, Winklhofer M, Chetverikova R, Xu J, Hiscock H, Hore PJ, Mouritsen H. Kobylkov D, et al. J R Soc Interface. 2019 Dec;16(161):20190716. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0716. Epub 2019 Dec 18. J R Soc Interface. 2019. PMID: 31847760 Free PMC article. - Why is it so difficult to study magnetic compass orientation in murine rodents?
Phillips J, Muheim R, Painter M, Raines J, Anderson C, Landler L, Dommer D, Raines A, Deutschlander M, Whitehead J, Fitzpatrick NE, Youmans P, Borland C, Sloan K, McKenna K. Phillips J, et al. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2022 Jan;208(1):197-212. doi: 10.1007/s00359-021-01532-z. Epub 2022 Jan 30. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2022. PMID: 35094127 Review. - Effects of low-level RF fields reveal complex pattern of magnetic input to the avian magnetic compass.
Muheim R, Phillips JB. Muheim R, et al. Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 15;13(1):19970. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46547-5. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37968316 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials