Effects of animal-assisted therapy on social behaviour in patients with acquired brain injury: a randomised controlled trial - PubMed (original) (raw)

Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of animal-assisted therapy on social behaviour in patients with acquired brain injury: a randomised controlled trial

Karin Hediger et al. Sci Rep. 2019.

Abstract

Animal-assisted therapy (AAT) is increasingly used to address impaired social competence in patients with acquired brain injury. However, the efficacy of AAT has not been tested in these patients. We used a randomised, controlled within subject trial to determine the effects of AAT on social competence in patients undergoing stationary neurorehabilitation. Participants received both AAT sessions and paralleled conventional therapy sessions. The patients' social behaviour was systematically coded on the basis of video recordings of therapy sessions. Moreover, mood, treatment motivation and satisfaction was measured during each therapy session. We analysed 222 AAT and 219 control sessions of 19 patients with linear mixed models. Patients showed a significantly higher amount of social behaviour during AAT. Furthermore, patients' positive emotions, verbal and non-verbal communication, mood, treatment motivation and satisfaction were increased in the presence of an animal. Neutral emotions were reduced but no effect was found regarding negative emotions. Our results show that AAT increases aspects of social competence and leads to higher emotional involvement of patients with acquired brain injury, reflected in higher social engagement, motivation and satisfaction during a therapeutic session.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

CONSORT flowchart.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Differences in patient total social behaviour between AAT and conventional therapy sessions (control). Bars represent means with standard deviations.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Effects of AAT and conventional therapy sessions (control) for each patient separately over the course of time. Lines and corresponding CI’s were estimated by lowess algorithm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Majdan M, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries in Europe: a cross-sectional analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2016;1:76–83. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30017-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maas AIR, et al. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:987–1048. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30371-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosema S, Crowe L, Anderson V. Social function in children and adolescents after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review 1989–2011. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29:1277–1291. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2144. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Sousa A, McDonald S, Rushby J. Changes in emotional empathy, affective responsivity, and behavior following severe traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2012;34:606–623. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2012.667067. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonald, S., Togher, L. & Code, C. Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury (Routledge, 2016).

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources