Monica Bernardi | Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca (original) (raw)

Books by Monica Bernardi

by Anthony Paul, jose ramos, Monica Bernardi, Dr.Marta Botta, Timothy E Dolan, Julian Waters-Lynch, Neal Gorenflo, Arlene Goldbard, Scott Boylston, Christine McDougall, Michael Linton, Teppo Eskelinen, and Nathan Schneider

Brings together 34 contributions which explore policy options and strategies for creating cities ... more Brings together 34 contributions which explore policy options and strategies for creating cities as commons - common pool resources - for urban development and transformation. Each contribution explores a different aspect of commoning a city and proposes strategies and provides policy recommendations based on existing projects around the world. Topics include:

Design and the City Commons
Active Transit & City Commons: Putting People Back into the City & the City Back into Place
Repurposing Public Spaces in a City as a Commons: the Library .
Heritage and City Commons
Sharing Cities: An Asset-based Approach to the Urban Commons
Community Currencies and City Commons
Time Banks and City Commoning
Construction Waste Transformation and City Commons
Platform Cooperatives for Democratic Cities Coworking: Challenges and Opportunities for a Prosperous and Fair New Economy
Orchards and the City as a Commons
Cosmo-localism and Urban Commoning
City Commons and Energy Demand
It’s Time to Create Chambers of Commons
Sharing Cities: Governing the City as Commons
Devolved Commons Governance for Cities
Anticipatory Governance and the City as a Commons
A Civic Union
Tax Reform for a Commons-based City
Tax Delinquent Private Property and City Commons
Community Land Trusts
The City as a Regional Commons
Open Data and City Commons
Human Service Directory Data as a Commons
The Unseen City: Commons Oriented Cities and the Commons Beyond
Culture as Commons
Ubuntu as a Primer for City Commons
Cultural Intelligence (CQ) and the City as Commons
Bologna Celebrates One Year of a Bold Experiment in Urban Commoning
Milano, New Practices to Booster Social Innovation
The Emergence of Assemblies of the Commons
History and Evolution of the Chamber of Commons Idea
Big Blue Sky: Re-igniting the Art of Citizenship
Zaragoza Activa, an Ecosystem of Entrepreneurship, Social Innovation and Creativity, in an Old Sugar Factory

Papers by Monica Bernardi

Aeroporti (in)volontariamente evitato, ossia si riproducono le medesime forme di (auto) segregazi... more Aeroporti (in)volontariamente evitato, ossia si riproducono le medesime forme di (auto) segregazione fisica che ritroviamo nelle gated communities, stavolta però senza la primaria funzione dell'abitare, e perciò con un livello di mutevolezza e provvisorietà portato a parossismo.

Il capitolo affronta il tema dell'home sharing riflettendo sugli impatti degli affitti a ... more Il capitolo affronta il tema dell'home sharing riflettendo sugli impatti degli affitti a breve termine nei contesti urbani. La letteratura riferisce principalmente di fenomeni di gentrification e disneyficazione, mentre la principale piattaforma di affitti a breve terminem Airbnb, evidenzia il potenziale di rivitalizzazione e sviluppo economico per i territori interessati dall'home sharing. Nel capitolo sono brevemente presentati tre diversi casi, con scale territoriali diverse (una metropoli, una città media e realtà urbane minori) per comprendere se sussistono differenze legate alla scala e verificare dove e a quali condizioni si verificano i fenomeni denunciati dalla letteratura.

Tavola rotonda con performance di coinvolgimento del pubblico Data Giovedi 4 maggio 2017 Orario 9... more Tavola rotonda con performance di coinvolgimento del pubblico Data Giovedi 4 maggio 2017 Orario 9:00-13:00 Luogo Biblioteca grande (I° piano) Giardino interno

In G. Mura e M. Ferrari (a cura di). Le sfide dell’apprendimento continuo. Istituzioni in cambiam... more In G. Mura e M. Ferrari (a cura di). Le sfide dell’apprendimento continuo. Istituzioni in cambiamento e nuove istanze identitarie. Milano: Franco Angeli, pp. 67-87

The paper offer a first reflection about the governance models applied in two cities that are try... more The paper offer a first reflection about the governance models applied in two cities that are trying to support the sharing economy in reply to common urban problems like urbanization, pollution, social inequality, isolation. Thanks to the massive diffusion of the information and communication technologies people are always connected and interact in a peer-to-peer way. The Internet of Things and billions of sensors that connect people, objects and data, allow using what they need for the time that they need, reducing the waste of resources. In this context have emerged new, resilient and adaptive answers almost inconceivable few years ago: practices more open, transparent and participatory based on sharing and collaboration; new service models that enable people to exchange and share goods, space and skills, promoting lifestyles based on saving, redistribution of money and socialization. The practices are many and varied: from share workplaces (co-working), sharing mobility (car and bike sharing, carpooling), shared hospitality (couchsurfing, housing swap…) to co-housing and welfare services (like Social Street), from co-designing, co-production (makerspaces, FabLab), shared urban gardens, to the finance sector (peer-to-peer lending, alternative currencies, collaborative insurance, crowdfunding ...), and the education (collaborative learning, open courses...). Practices are so many that is difficult find a common, univocal definition (Botsman, 2013), in addition many limitations and distortions of the original concept of sharing generated doubts about the nature, the perspectives and the impacts of the sharing economy itself. Citizens wonder about the concrete usefulness of these practices, big companies are uncertain about the real hidden opportunities and governments seem perplexed among regulation, promotion and prohibition. The level of the Public Administration is the focus of the paper, considering that PA represents a key player of the system, able to regulate, guide and transform into reality the ideas of collaborative initiatives and to define innovative strategies for the local development. PA can be an enabling actor, a platform, to promote the potential of the collaborative services, spread awareness among citizens and regulate without suffocate the phenomenon. Luckily, PA are more and more interesting in the topic (as demonstrated during the last FORUM PA and in general in the current debate): reflections, experimentations, new tools created ad hoc for public authorities are spreading. This paper provides a glimpse of what are doing two cities, different and distant, but both interested in supporting services and platforms of sharing for the benefit of their citizens: Milan and Seoul. These cities adopted two different approaches, almost opposed: in Milan the reflection has emerged spontaneously from the bottom and has found in the public administration an attentive listener and then a clear supporter; in Seoul the initial push came from the Mayor, Park Won-Soon, who has launched a wave of innovation that is generating a real ecosystem of sharing. The research was conducted adopting the approach of participant observation (especially for the Italian case), monitoring the development of the public discussion and taking part in panels, round table, public meetings, local initiatives, as well as deepening the institutional, popular and scientific materials. In addition, the key players of ‘Milan Sharing City’ and ‘Sharing City Seoul’ has been interviewed in order to retrace the origin of the process, its general framework, current outcomes and future possibilities. The goal is understand the features of the governance models adopted and in what extent we can talk of Collaborative Governance in Iaione words (LUISS “Guido Carli” – LabGov).

In Aa.Vv. (2017), (S)radicamenti, Società di studi geografici. Memorie geografiche NS 15, pp. 435... more In Aa.Vv. (2017), (S)radicamenti, Società di studi geografici. Memorie geografiche NS 15, pp. 435-441 ISBN 978-88-908926-3-9

Partecipazione e Conflitto, 2020

For Book Reviews Abstract is not require

The chapter focuses both on the relationship between tourism and the new generations (Millennials... more The chapter focuses both on the relationship between tourism and the new generations (Millennials in particular) and on the connection between Millennials and the sharing economy. More specifically, the chapter explores the case of South Korean Millennials by analysing the project ‘Sharing City, Seoul’. This project, launched by the Seoul Metropolitan Government in 2012, is boosting social innovation and promoting local sharing entrepreneurship, also in the tourism sector, with specific regard to Korean Millennials. The case is investigated through a mixed-methods approach, confirming (1) the high involvement of Korean Millennials in the local process of innovation, especially in terms of entrepreneurship, and (2) the importance of a generational perspective for the future growth of the tourist market. The relationship between Millennials and tourism, apart from few exceptions, is still underexplored. However, the understanding of the future tourism trends cannot miss a generational...

Partecipazione e Conflitto, 2020

For Book Reviews Abstract is not require