The Effect of High Intensity Interval Training in Improving Aerobic Capacity (original) (raw)
Related papers
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Sport Science, Health, and Physical Education (ICSSHPE 2018), 2019
Futsal is football game which required speed, all players must have dynamic and fast movement ability. So that each player is required to have excellent physical ability. HIIT methods is one of the effort to improve the physical abilities which is anaerobic and aerobic. The purpose of this research is to find out whether HIIT method can give a significant impact on the ability of anaerobic. The sample in this study amounted to 14 people by using purposive sampling technique. The method of research is experimental method. The instrument for this research is (1) Speed: 20 m dash sprint test (validity 0.829 and reliability 0.906). (2) Agility: shuttle run 4m x 5 rep (validity 0.796 and reliability 0.877). (3) Power leg: 3 Hop test (Validity 0.792 and reliability 0.871). (4) Power Endurance: Hurdle Jump (validity 0.709 and reliability 0.797). (5) Speed Endurance: sprint test: 150 m (validity 0.945 and reliability 0.971). Data analysis using SPSS version 20 with hypotheses examination th...
2019
Physical training is one of some important and decided factor in reaching the achievement. There are some method of training that can be used in increasing the abilities of physic. Futsal is the sport which need the prime physical ability. One of some components of futsal player physical ability as the beginning fundamental; is the endure (aerobik). The purpose of this research is in order to know the meaningful of the influence of HIIT training method application to the increasing of ability of aerobik. Population in this research is the unit of activity of female Indonesia Education University student for futsal is about 26 persons and sample that be taken is about 14 persons who be chosen as the needs of team. Sampling technical use purposive sampling technical. Research method use experiment method. Data collecting use bleep test for measuring the endure or aerobic of body. The statistic calculation use two average equivalent test. The result of research point out the average va...
Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research, 2016
Introduction: Endurance is a key requirement for overall physical fitness and most other organised sports. Coaches have different favourite methods to train for endurance, and jury is divided on which is the best of them. Aim: This study aims to compare the effects of two popular methods of endurance training, High Intensity Interval Training and Slow Continuous Training. Hypothesis: High Intensity Interval Training provides better gain in endurance than Slow Continuous Training in untrained adult male over a six week training protocol. Methods: During the period 2010-2013, 238 young adult healthy male volunteers were randomly divided into HIIT and SCT groups. Both groups were provided supervised training as per protocol given below. Each session additionally incorporated warm up and cool down. HIIT: 03 sessions/ week for 06 weeks at velocity equal to maximum velocity achieved in pre experiment beep test, with Training/Active rest in ratio of 1:1 (30s/30s), 05 reps per set, 04 sets per session with 03 min rest between sets SCT: 05 sessions of 30 min each per week for 06 weeks, at velocity equal to 60-70% of maximum velocity achieved in pre experiment beep test Endurance using beep test was measured just before administering the experimental protocols, at 3 weeks interval and upon conclusion of study at 6 weeks. VO2max was calculated using VO2max calculator provided at the official website http://www.thebeeptest.com/calculator.htm. The results were compared for statistical significance. Results: Mean pre test VO2max levels of both HIIT and SCT were comparable (34.29mL/kg vs 37.12mL/kg). After three weeks of training, HIIT group showed higher enhancement in VO2max (13.87% vs 8.76%) than SCT group. After six weeks of training, HIIT group continued to have higher gain in VO2max (20.75% vs 15.19%) than SCT group. The study shows that High Intensity Interval Training provides superior gain in endurance than Slow Continuous Training. Conclusion: High Intensity Interval Training provides superior gain in aerobic capacity than Slow Continuous Training over 6 weeks of training using lesser training time.
Effect of interval and continuous training on the athlete's aerobic fitness level
Effect of interval and continuous training on the athlete’s aerobic fitness level, 2019
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of continuous and interval training on athlete's aerobic fitness level. To meet this objective experimental research design was used. For this study 30 middle and long distance athletes were selected as a subject from 50 Birihan athletics project athletes comprehensively. All these athletes were divided into two different groups (i.e., continuous group (CG) and interval group (EG)) based on their pretest results. To see the effect of these training methods and to analyze whether there is a significant different between athlete's pre and post aerobic fitness test results after 12 weeks intervention paired sample t test was employed. And also, to compare difference between the two groups on athlete's aerobic fitness level an independent sample t-test with an alpha value of .05 was employed. Furthermore, to examine the magnitude of observed differences between groups, effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated. Finally, Results in this study showed that interval training group showed significant improvements in all three aerobic fitness level tests better than continuous training group. I.e., in Astrand treadmill test the mean VO2max score of interval group was 76.81 and 68.44 for continuous group with P = .032; in 2.4 Km run test the mean time for interval group was 0:07:21 and 0:08:05 for continuous group with P = .017; in 20m beep incremental test the mean result for interval group was 17.74 and 15.93 for continuous group, P = .045. Then, it was concluded that interval training method was beneficial in improving athlete's aerobic fitness level than continuous training method.
The study aimed to know the effect of interval training on the indicators of aerobic capacity, and knowing the existence of variances between the change parentages of these capabilities after the training, as that the researcher supposed that there are variances with statistical significance between pre and post measurement in aerobic capabilities after interval training, and according to the nature of the research that depends on experimental method, it has been chosen a sample research non randomly which include twenty four players from the team of Widad Mostaganem under the age of nineteen that they underwent to the training program with interval method for eight weeks which contains three quotas in the week, while the pre and post tests have conducted in order to measure their capabilities aerobic, as the results showed the existence of variances with statistical significance between pre and post measurement for the research sample and in favor of post-test, as that they showed the existence of variances with statistical significance between the change parentages of aerobic capabilities for maximum aerobic speed and anaerobic threshold.So we conclude that the interval training improved aerobic capabilities by increasing the (VO2MAX, VAM,AT and FCMAX )and the greatest influence be into the anaerobic threshold(AT) and the maximal aerobic speed(MAS) . Key Words: interval training, Maximum oxygen uptake, maximal aerobic speed, aerobic threshold
Comparative effect of moderate high and moderate intensity aerobic
Maximum Oxygen Uptake is broadly considered as the best single measurement of aerobic fitness. Intensity based continues exercise helps to improve / maintain aerobic fitness as well as cardiac function. The objective of this study was to find out the comparative effect of moderate high and moderate intensity aerobic training on VO2 max. To achieve this purpose of this study ninety (N=90) men students (mean age 22 ± 1.3 years) were randomly selected from, Jaffna, Sri Lanka and divided Group I [n=30, Moderat Intensity Aerobic Training (MIAT) and Group III (n=30) acted as control. All the experimental groups were practice respective training for 60±10min / day for 3 days / week over the period employed according to the maximum heart rate (Karvonen Formula). Jogging and Running was the mode of training employed during interventional period. Exercise intensity starts from 60 % and 70% of the maximum hea MIAT and MHIAT respectively. 2% rule was implemented in every two weeks. Data were collected on VO2 max assessed by Queen's step test before and after the experimental period. Collected data were statistically analyzed by using Dependent't' test to find out the difference between pre and post test. After eliminating the influence of pre post-test means of experimental groups, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to find out the mean gain differences. In addition to this, Scheffe From the results it was clear that Moderate High Intensity Aerobic Training and Moderate Intensity Aerobic Training significantly influence on VO2 max (F=10.28*). However, Moder improvement than Moderate Intensity Aerobic Training. Hence it was recommended that different intensities of aerobic training should be employed according to the nature and energy system of the sporting acti
HIIT vs moderate intensity endurance training: impact on aerobic parameters in young adult men
2016
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of high-intensity interval training such as Billat 30s-30s training (HIIT) vs moderate intensity endurance training (CT+HIIT) on aerobic parameters in young adults men. The study involved 40 young adults men (20,15±0,56 years) who were randomly divided into the two training groups: Billat 30s working at 100% of vVO2max and 30s recovery of 50% of vVO2max (HIIT; N=20); and the moderate intensity endurance training (CT+HIIT; N=20). The training programs have lasted 4 weeks, three times per week. The measurement was carried out at two time points at Cosmed treadmill (model T 150) gas analysers (Quark b2) breath-by-breath method. Participants were tested for each of the following parameters: relative maximum oxygen consumption (rVO2max); absolute maximum oxygen consumption (aVO2max); minimum speed that athletes run when they reach VO2max (vVO2) and maximum heart rate (HRmax). To determine difference between effect of trainings, w...
AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 2021
The purpose of this study was to determine the development of physiological aspects of increasing aerobic and anaerobic performance in students who become badminton athletes through optimizing footwork exercises using the high-intensity interval method (HITT). This research will provide a solution for trainers in combining and optimizing footwork exercises as a technique in badminton combined with the principles of interval training to increase badminton athletes' aerobic and anaerobic capacity. This study used an experimental approach by giving footwork training treatment (HITT) to 30 Padang State University students who became badminton athletes. Researchers saw the effect of the exercise given on aerobic capacity (VO2max) and anaerobic capacity. The statistical analysis results showed that footwork exercise with The HIIT (High High-Intensity Interval Training) method positively affects badminton athletes' maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max) anaerobic capacity. In this conce...
International Education Studies, 2020
The aim of this study was to examine the physical and selected performance characteristics of 9-week High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) on sedentary university students. Participants were separated two groups as HIIT and control group (CG). HIIT group applied training 3 times a week for 9 weeks. CG was not applied any training. Before and after HIIT training program, the subjects were applied to age, height, body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI) tests for physical parameters and standing long jump (SLJ), vertical jump (VJ), 10-20 m sprint, T agility test (TAT), star excursion balance test (SEBT), running-based anaerobic sprint test (RAST) for performance parameters. Multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to analyze of inter-group, intra group and the effect of training in repeated measurements. Bonferroni test was used for Post Hoc comparisons; the significance level was accepted as 0.05. There was a significant difference in BW, BMI and all performance parameters in...