A Comparative Study of Effect of High Intensity Interval Training and Slow Continuous Training on the Aerobic performance in Adult Healthy Untrained Male Volunteers (original) (raw)
Related papers
HIIT vs moderate intensity endurance training: impact on aerobic parameters in young adult men
2016
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of high-intensity interval training such as Billat 30s-30s training (HIIT) vs moderate intensity endurance training (CT+HIIT) on aerobic parameters in young adults men. The study involved 40 young adults men (20,15±0,56 years) who were randomly divided into the two training groups: Billat 30s working at 100% of vVO2max and 30s recovery of 50% of vVO2max (HIIT; N=20); and the moderate intensity endurance training (CT+HIIT; N=20). The training programs have lasted 4 weeks, three times per week. The measurement was carried out at two time points at Cosmed treadmill (model T 150) gas analysers (Quark b2) breath-by-breath method. Participants were tested for each of the following parameters: relative maximum oxygen consumption (rVO2max); absolute maximum oxygen consumption (aVO2max); minimum speed that athletes run when they reach VO2max (vVO2) and maximum heart rate (HRmax). To determine difference between effect of trainings, w...
The Effect of High Intensity Interval Training in Improving Aerobic Capacity
Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Sports, Health, and Physical Education, ISMINA 2021, 28-29 April 2021, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 2021
There are many kinds of exercise that can be used to improve aerobic capacity including High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT). The main purpose of this research was to analyze the effect of HIIT in improving aerobic capacity. This was a quantitave research with non randomized control groups pretest posttest design. This research was conducted at 30 male college students. Group 1 (15 players) was given high intensity of HIIT using V drill, 20m yard square, squirm, 40 yard lateral shuffle, 10 cone snake drill, 40 yard sprint for eight weeks period with frequency three times a week. Group 2 (15 players) was given a convensional exercise. Instrument of this research was multistage fitness test. Paired sample t test was used to analyze data. The result of this research seem that there was a significant improved of aerobic capacity after being given high intensity of HIIT. The conclusion can be stated that HIIT has improved aerobic capacity significantly.
2019
Aim: The present study aims to compare the effects of high-intensive interval training (HIIT) and all-out supramaximal intensity interval training (SIT) on maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), work economy (WE), lactate threshold (LT), anaerobic capacity (maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD)), and 300-and 3000-meter running performance in moderately endurance-trained females. Methods: 11 healthy, non-smoking, and recreational active to moderately endurance-trained females were randomized to perform HIIT or SIT three times per week over 8 weeks. HIIT was performed as 4 x 4-minute treadmill running intervals at 90-95 % of maximal heart rate (HRmax) interspersed with 3-minute active recovery at 70 % of HRmax between intervals. SIT was performed as 10 x 30-second all-out treadmill running intervals interspersed with 3.5-minute active recovery at 70 % of HRmax between intervals. Results: The VO2max and oxygen (O2) pulse increased significantly more after HIIT compared to SIT (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). VO2max increased by 8.9 % after HIIT (54.1 to 58.9 ml•kg-1 •min-1) and by 3.3 % after SIT (54.1 to 55.8 ml•kg-1 •min-1). The VO2max improvements were closely followed by O2 pulse improvements of 9.3 % after HIIT and by 3.5 % after SIT. MAOD increased significantly more after SIT compared to HIIT. The SIT group improved MAOD by 32 % (60.6 to 79.8 ml•kg-1), while the changes were not significant after HIIT. The 300-and 3000-meter running performance changes were not significantly different between groups. The 3000-meter running performance improved by 5.7 % after HIIT (843 to 794 seconds) and by 5.7 % after SIT (845 to 797 seconds). The 300meter running performance improved by 5.1 % after HIIT (57.5 to 54.6 seconds) and by 5.7 % after SIT (54.3 to 50.8 seconds). Conclusion: HIIT was significantly more effective in improving VO2max and O2 pulse compared to SIT. SIT was significantly more effective in improving MAOD compared to HIIT. There was no significant difference in WE, LT, 300and 3000-meter running performance changes between groups.
Effect of interval and continuous training on the athlete's aerobic fitness level
Effect of interval and continuous training on the athlete’s aerobic fitness level, 2019
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of continuous and interval training on athlete's aerobic fitness level. To meet this objective experimental research design was used. For this study 30 middle and long distance athletes were selected as a subject from 50 Birihan athletics project athletes comprehensively. All these athletes were divided into two different groups (i.e., continuous group (CG) and interval group (EG)) based on their pretest results. To see the effect of these training methods and to analyze whether there is a significant different between athlete's pre and post aerobic fitness test results after 12 weeks intervention paired sample t test was employed. And also, to compare difference between the two groups on athlete's aerobic fitness level an independent sample t-test with an alpha value of .05 was employed. Furthermore, to examine the magnitude of observed differences between groups, effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated. Finally, Results in this study showed that interval training group showed significant improvements in all three aerobic fitness level tests better than continuous training group. I.e., in Astrand treadmill test the mean VO2max score of interval group was 76.81 and 68.44 for continuous group with P = .032; in 2.4 Km run test the mean time for interval group was 0:07:21 and 0:08:05 for continuous group with P = .017; in 20m beep incremental test the mean result for interval group was 17.74 and 15.93 for continuous group, P = .045. Then, it was concluded that interval training method was beneficial in improving athlete's aerobic fitness level than continuous training method.
We compared the effects of submaximal and supramaximal cycling interval training on determinants of exercise performance in moderately endurance-trained men. Maximal oxygen consumption (VO 2max), peak power output (P peak), and peak and mean anaerobic power were measured before and after 6 weeks (3 sessions/week) of submaximal (85% maximal aerobic power [MP], HIIT 85 , n = 8) or supramaximal (115% MP, HIIT 115 , n = 9) interval training to exhaustion in moderately endurance-trained men. High-intensity training volume was 47% lower in HIIT 115 vs HIIT 85 (304 AE 77 vs 571 AE 200 min; P < 0.01). Exercise training was generally associated with increased VO 2max (HIIT 85 : +3.3 AE 3.1 mL/kg/min; HIIT 115 : +3.3 AE 3.6 ml/kg/min; Time effect P = 0.002; Group effect: P = 0.95), P peak (HIIT 85 : +18 AE 9 W; HIIT 115 : +16 AE 27 W; Time effect P = 0.045; Group effect: P = 0.49), and mean anaerobic power (HIIT 85 : +0.42 AE 0.69 W/kg; HIIT 115 : +0.55 AE 0.65 W/kg; Time effect P = 0.01; Group effect: P = 0.18). Six weeks of submaximal and supramaximal interval training performed to exhaustion seems to equally improve VO 2max and anaerobic power in endurance-trained men, despite half the accumulated time spent at the target intensity.
The Influence of an 8-Week High-Intensity Interval Training Toward VO2Max
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Sport Science, Health, and Physical Education (ICSSHPE 2019), 2020
This research wants to know; 1) an effect of 8 weeks HIIT on VO2Max of student as extracurricular participant futsal in Junior High School Budi Mulia Jakarta, 2) an increasing of VO2Max of student as extracurricular participant futsal in Junior High School Budi Mulia Jakarta through HIIT during 8 weeks. This research uses quasi experiment by research design of One-Group Pretest-Posttest. The researcher gives a treatment in the form of HIIT during 8 weeks in 3 times frequency per week. We measure VO2Max in initial and final of training by using Bleep Test to know the changing. The researcher uses SPSS 22 to analyse statistically the data obtained. The results showed an increase, that is the mean pre-test value is 28,9333 ml•kg-1•min-1 and after being given training, it increased to 31,4042 ml•kg-1•min-1 (8,54%). While the test uses paired t-test was obtained significant result as much 0,000, in other word p-value is < 0,05. Based on the results of the study indicated that there are differences VO2Max on student as extracurricular participant futsal in Junior High School Budi Mulia Jakarta after being given HIIT.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2020
Background: Long distance running is a form of continuous running over distance of at least three kilometers. Physiologically it is aerobic in nature and requires stamina as well as strength. Regular aerobic endurance training improves physical fitness and recovery rate.High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a type of exercise training characterized by brief, intermittent bursts of vigorous activity, interspersed with periods of low intensity activity. High intensity interval training appears to be an efficient and practical way to develop potentially large effects on exercise capacity and small time requirement. Objectives: To evaluate the effect of high volume HIIT on Cardiac autonomic function, aerobic capacity, knee strength ,body composition analysis and response to graded normobaric hypoxia in long distance runners. Methodology: A sample of 10 novice long distance runners within the age 21-30yrs males were recruited and informed about the study. Subjects were divided into two groups-Group-1 (control group)which did only long distance running training and Group-2 (experimental group) did long distance running training along with high volume high intensity interval training. Subjects in Group-2 received 1 set of HIIT thrice a week for 6 weeks. Measurements of all criterion measures were collected before and after the training period of 6 weeks. Pre-training measurements were taken a day before the start of training and post-training measurements were done a day after completion of training. Results and Conclusion: There were non-significant changes in cardiac autonomic function, aerobic capacity, knee strength ,body composition analysis and response to graded normobaric hypoxia
Comparative effect of moderate high and moderate intensity aerobic
Maximum Oxygen Uptake is broadly considered as the best single measurement of aerobic fitness. Intensity based continues exercise helps to improve / maintain aerobic fitness as well as cardiac function. The objective of this study was to find out the comparative effect of moderate high and moderate intensity aerobic training on VO2 max. To achieve this purpose of this study ninety (N=90) men students (mean age 22 ± 1.3 years) were randomly selected from, Jaffna, Sri Lanka and divided Group I [n=30, Moderat Intensity Aerobic Training (MIAT) and Group III (n=30) acted as control. All the experimental groups were practice respective training for 60±10min / day for 3 days / week over the period employed according to the maximum heart rate (Karvonen Formula). Jogging and Running was the mode of training employed during interventional period. Exercise intensity starts from 60 % and 70% of the maximum hea MIAT and MHIAT respectively. 2% rule was implemented in every two weeks. Data were collected on VO2 max assessed by Queen's step test before and after the experimental period. Collected data were statistically analyzed by using Dependent't' test to find out the difference between pre and post test. After eliminating the influence of pre post-test means of experimental groups, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to find out the mean gain differences. In addition to this, Scheffe From the results it was clear that Moderate High Intensity Aerobic Training and Moderate Intensity Aerobic Training significantly influence on VO2 max (F=10.28*). However, Moder improvement than Moderate Intensity Aerobic Training. Hence it was recommended that different intensities of aerobic training should be employed according to the nature and energy system of the sporting acti
Frontiers in Physiology, 2017
The purpose of the current study was to explore if training regimes utilizing diverse training intensity distributions result in different responses on neuromuscular status, anaerobic capacity/power and acute heart rate recovery (HRR) in well-trained endurance athletes. Methods: Thirty-six male (n = 33) and female (n = 3) runners, cyclists, triathletes and crosscountry skiers [peak oxygen uptake: (VO 2peak): 61.9 ± 8.0 mL•kg −1 •min −1 ] were randomly assigned to one of three groups (blocked high intensity interval training HIIT; polarized training POL; high volume low intensity oriented control group CG/HVLIT applying no HIIT). A maximal anaerobic running/cycling test (MART/MACT) was performed prior to and following a 9-week training period. Results: Only the HIIT group achieved improvements in peak power/velocity (+6.4%, P < 0.001) and peak lactate (P = 0.001) during the MART/MACT, while, unexpectedly, in none of the groups the performance at the established lactate concentrations (4, 6, 10 mmol•L −1) was changed (P > 0.05). Acute HRR was improved in HIIT (11.2%, P = 0.002) and POL (7.9%, P = 0.023) with no change in the HVLIT oriented control group. Conclusion: Only a training regime that includes a significant amount of HIIT improves the neuromuscular status, anaerobic power and the acute HRR in well-trained endurance athletes. A training regime that followed more a low and moderate intensity oriented model (CG/HVLIT) had no effect on any performance or HRR outcomes.