Peer Review of Grant Applications: Criteria Used and Qualitative Study of Reviewer Practices (original) (raw)
Related papers
Criteria for assessing grant applications: a systematic review
Palgrave Communications, 2020
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 1997
Peer review of grant applications in biology and medicine. Reliability, fairness, and validity
Scientometrics, 2009
BMC Medicine, 2010
Grant application review: the case of transparency
2014
Enhancing review criteria for dissemination and implementation science grants
Implementation Science Communications
The journal of research administration, 2015
The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding
EMBO reports, 2019
What does 'significance' look like? Assessing the assessment process in competitive grants schemes
2006
2018
Technology &# 38; Innovation, 2010
Studying grant decision-making: a linguistic analysis of review reports
Scientometrics, 2018
Peering at peer review revealed high degree of chance associated with funding of grant applications
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
A new approach to grant review assessments: score, then rank
Research integrity and peer review, 2023
What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?
F1000Research, 2017
Evaluation of research proposals by peer review panels: broader panels for broader assessments?
Science & public policy, 2023
PLoS ONE, 2012
Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications
Criteria Used by a Peer Review Committee for Selection of Research Fellows
International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2005
BMC Health Services Research, 2015
Research Evaluation
Reviewer training for improving grant and journal peer review
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2020
Virtual and Peer Reviews of Grant Applications at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Reviewer training to assess knowledge translation in funding applications is long overdue
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2017
Evaluation of stakeholder views on peer review of NIHR applications for funding: a qualitative study
BMJ Open, 2018
What works for peer review and decision-making in research funding: a realist synthesis
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2022
Reviewing Specific Grant in 2015-2019 Period: Consistency and Quality Matters
Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 2020