NOP receptor mediates anti-analgesia induced by agonist–antagonist opioids (original) (raw)
Related papers
European Journal of Pharmacology, 2018
Mu-opioid receptor agonists are clinically effective analgesics, but also produce undesirable effects that limit their clinical utility. The nociceptin opioid peptide (NOP) receptor system also modulates nociception, and NOP agonists might be useful adjuncts to enhance the analgesic effects or attenuate the undesirable effects of mu-opioid agonists. The present study determined behavioral interactions between the NOP agonist (-)-Ro 64-6198 and mu-opioid ligands that vary in mu-opioid receptor efficacy (17-cyclopropylmethyl-3,14β-dihyroxy-4,5α-epoxy-6α-[(3′isoquinolyl)acetamindo]morphinan (NAQ) < buprenorphine < nalbuphine < morphine = oxycodone < methadone) in male rhesus monkeys. For comparison, Ro 64-6198 interactions were also examined with the kappa-opioid receptor agonist nalfurafine. Each opioid ligand was examined alone and following fixed-dose Ro 64-6198 pretreatments in assays of thermal nociception (n=3-4) and schedule-controlled responding (n=3). Ro 64-6198 alone failed to produce significant antinociception up to doses (0.32 mg/kg, IM) that significantly decreased rates of responding. All opioid ligands, except NAQ and nalfurafine, produced dose-and thermal intensity-dependent antinociception. Ro 64-6198 enhanced the antinociceptive potency of buprenorphine, nalbuphine, methadone, and nalfurafine. Ro 64-6198 enhancement of nalbuphine antinociception was NOP antagonist SB-612111 reversible and occurred under a narrow range of dose and time conditions. All opioid ligands, except NAQ and buprenorphine, produced dosedependent decreases in rates of responding. Ro 64-6198 did not significantly alter mu-opioid ligand rate-decreasing effects. Although these results suggest that NOP agonists may selectively enhance the antinociceptive vs. rate-suppressant effects of some mu-opioid agonists, this small ✉
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2011
1-(1-Cyclooctylpiperidin-4-yl)-indolin-2-one (SR14150) and 1-(1-(2,3,3a,4,5,6-hexahydro-1H-phenalen-1-yl)piperidinl-4-yl)indolin-2-one (SR16835) are moderately selective nociceptin/ orphanin FQ (NOP) receptor agonists. In the [ 35 S]guanosine 5Ј-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) assay in vitro, SR14150 is a partial agonist at both the NOP and -opioid receptors, whereas SR16835 is a full agonist at the NOP receptor and has low efficacy at receptors. These compounds were tested for antinociceptive and antiallodynic activity, using mice in chronic pain, subsequent to spinal nerve ligation (SNL) surgery. When administered subcutaneously to mice after SNL surgery, SR14150 but not SR16835 increased tail-flick latency, which was blocked by the opioid antagonist naloxone, but not by the NOP receptor antagonist (Ϫ)-cis-1-methyl-7-[[4-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)piperidin-1-yl]methyl]-6,7,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-benzocyclohepten-5-ol (SB-612111). In contrast, both SR14150 and SR16835 had antiallodynic activity when mechanical allodynia was measured with von Frey monofilaments. This effect was completely blocked by SB-612111 but not by naloxone. On the other hand, morphine antinociception and antiallodynia were both blocked by naloxone and potentiated by SB-612111. These results indicate that, in mice, circuitry mediating antinociceptive activity in acute and chronic pain states is different. It is possible that during a chronic pain state, an up-regulated NOP system in the spinal cord leads to NOP receptor-mediated antiallodynia, which is blocked by NOP antagonists. However, supraspinal up-regulation could lead to an attenuation of morphine antinociception and antiallodynia, which can be alleviated by an NOP receptor antagonist. Thus, although neither NOP agonists nor antagonists are effective as analgesics in acute pain, they may have efficacy as analgesics, either alone or in combination with morphine, for treatment of chronic pain.
Activities of mixed NOP and μ‐opioid receptor ligands
British journal of …, 2008
Background and purpose: Compounds that activate both NOP and m-opioid receptors might be useful as analgesics and drug abuse medications. Studies were carried out to better understand the biological activity of such compounds. Experimental approach: Binding affinities were determined on membranes from cells transfected with NOP and opioid receptors. Functional activity was determined by [ 35 S]GTPgS binding on cell membranes and using the mouse vas deferens preparation in vitro and the tail flick antinociception assay in vivo. Key results: Compounds ranged in affinity from SR14150, 20-fold selective for NOP receptors, to buprenorphine, 50-fold selective for m-opioid receptors. In the [ 35 S]GTPgS assay, SR compounds ranged from full agonist to antagonist at NOP receptors and most were partial agonists at m-opioid receptors. Buprenorphine was a low efficacy partial agonist at m-opioid receptors, but did not stimulate [ 35 S]GTPgS binding through NOP. In the mouse vas deferens, each compound, except for SR16430, inhibited electrically induced contractions. In each case, except for N/OFQ itself, the inhibition was due to m-opioid receptor activation, as determined by equivalent results in NOP receptor knockout tissues. SR14150 showed antinociceptive activity in the tail flick test, which was reversed by the opioid antagonist naloxone. Conclusions and implications: Compounds that bind to both m-opioid and NOP receptors have antinociceptive activity but the relative contribution of each receptor is unclear. These experiments help characterize compounds that bind to both receptors, to better understand the mechanism behind their biological activities, and identify new pharmacological tools to characterize NOP and opioid receptors.
CNS Drugs
Opioids are widely used in chronic pain management, despite major concerns about their risk of adverse events, particularly abuse, misuse, and respiratory depression from overdose. Multi-mechanistic opioids, such as tapentadol and buprenorphine, have been widely studied as a valid alternative to traditional opioids for their safer profile. Special interest was focused on the role of the nociceptin opioid peptide (NOP) receptor in terms of analgesia and improved tolerability. Nociceptin opioid peptide receptor agonists were shown to reinforce the antinociceptive effect of mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonists and modulate some of their adverse effects. Therefore, multi-mechanistic opioids involving both MOR and NOP receptor activation became a major field of pharmaceutical and clinical investigations. Buprenorphine was rediscovered in a new perspective, as an atypical analgesic and as a substitution therapy for opioid use disorders; and buprenorphine derivatives have been tested in animal models of nociceptive and neuropathic pain. Similarly, cebranopadol, a full MOR/NOP receptor agonist, has been clinically evaluated for its potent analgesic efficacy and better tolerability profile, compared with traditional opioids. This review overviews pharmacological mechanisms of the NOP receptor system, including its role in pain management and in the development of opioid tolerance. Clinical data on buprenorphine suggest its role as a safer alternative to traditional opioids, particularly in patients with non-cancer pain; while data on cebranopadol still require phase III study results to approve its introduction on the market. Other bifunctional MOR/NOP receptor ligands, such as BU08028, BU10038, and AT-121, are currently under pharmacological investigations and could represent promising analgesic agents for the future. Flaminia Coluzzi and Laura Rullo have contributed equally to this work.
European Journal of Pharmacology, 2009
The effect of new NOP receptor agonists and antagonists in the rat chronic constriction injury model was investigated. Intraperitoneally administered NOP receptor agonist SR14150 and antagonists SR16430 and SR14148, had no effect on mechanical allodynia when given alone. The nonselective NOP/mu-opioid receptor agonist SR16435, however, produced an anti-allodynic response, similar to morphine and reversible by naloxone. Notably, co-administration of the NOP receptor antagonists potentiated the anti-allodynic activity of both morphine and SR16435. Increased levels of the NOP receptor are implicated in the reduced efficacy of morphine in neuropathic pain. Our results suggest the utility of NOP receptor antagonists for potentiating opioid efficacy in chronic pain.
Neuropsychopharmacology, 2009
Behavioral effects of a nonpeptidic NOP (nociceptin/orphanin FQ Peptide) receptor agonist, Ro 64-6198, have not been studied in primate species. The aim of the study was to verify the receptor mechanism underlying the behavioral effects of Ro 64-6198 and to systematically compare behavioral effects of Ro 64-6198 with those of a m-opioid receptor agonist, alfentanil, in monkeys. Both Ro 64-6198 (0.001-0.06 mg/kg, s.c.) and alfentanil (0.001-0.06 mg/kg, s.c.) produced antinociception against an acute noxious stimulus (501C water) and capsaicin-induced allodynia. An NOP receptor antagonist, J-113397 (0.01-0.1 mg/kg, s.c.), dose-dependently produced rightward shifts of the dose-response curve of Ro 64-6198-induced antinociception. The apparent pA 2 value of J-113397 was 8.0. Antagonist studies using J-113397 and naltrexone revealed that Ro 64-6198 produced NOP receptor-mediated antinociception independent of m-opioid receptors. In addition, alfentanil dose-dependently produced respiratory depression and itch/scratching responses, but antinociceptive doses of Ro 64-6198 did not produce such effects. More important, Ro 64-6198 did not produce reinforcing effects comparable with those of alfentanil, cocaine, or methohexital under self-administration procedures in monkeys. These results provide the first functional evidence that the activation of NOP receptors produces antinociception without reinforcing effects in primates. Non-peptidic NOP receptor agonists may have therapeutic value as novel analgesics without abuse liability in humans.
Development of nociceptin receptor (NOP) agonists and antagonists
Medicinal Research Reviews, 2011
The nociceptin opioid (NOP) receptor is the most recently discovered member of the family of the opioid receptors; its endogenous agonist is the peptide nociceptin. Due to the subsequent elucidation of its physiological role in both central and peripheral nervous system and in some non-neural tissues, there is a rapidly growing interest in the pharmacological application of substances active on this receptor. Despite the current clinical use of a morphinane-based NOP/MOP mixed ligand (buprenorphine) as an analgesic and in the treatment of drug addictions, so far just a few clinical trials have been made with selective NOP ligands. However, the perspective of their utilization is rapidly growing. Agonists can find applications in the treatment of neuropathic pain, anxiety, cough, drug addition, urinary incontinence, anorexia, congestive heart failure, hypertension; and antagonists for pain, depression, Parkinson's disease, obesity, and as memory enhancers. Besides peptide ligands, which are still subjected to many pharmacological investigations, many different chemical classes of NOP ligands have been discovered: piperidines, nortropanes, spiropiperidines, 4-amino-quinolines and quinazolines, and others. The new advances in establishing structure-activity relationships, also with the help of modeling studies, can permit the development of more active and selective molecules.
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2006
We identified a novel NOP/μ-opioid receptor agonist, SR 16435, with high binding affinity and partial agonist activity at both receptors. It was hypothesized that SR 16435 would produce antinociception and yet unlike morphine, would have diminished rewarding properties and tolerance development. Antinociception was assessed in mice using the tail-flick assay, whereas behavioral and rewarding effects were assessed using the PC paradigm. PC was established by pairing drug injections with a distinct compartment. Behavioral effects were measured following acute and repeated drug administration and the test for PC was carried out 24h following four drug-and vehiclepairing sessions. SR 16435 produced an increase in tail flick latency but SR 16435-induced antinociception was lower than that observed with morphine. Given that naloxone blocked SR 16435induced antinociception, it is highly likely that this effect was mediated by μ-opioid receptors. Compared to morphine, chronic SR 16435 treatment resulted in reduced tolerance development to its antinociceptive effects. SR 16435-induced CPP was evident, an effect likely mediated via μ-opioid receptors, as it was reversed by co-administration of naloxone. NOP receptor agonist activity was also present given that SR 16435 decreased global activity, and this effect was partially reversed with the selective NOP antagonist, SR 16430. Naloxone, however, also reversed the SR 16435-induced decrease in activity indicating that both opioid and NOP receptors mediate this behavior. In summary, the mixed NOP/μ-opioid receptor partial agonist SR 16435 exhibited both NOP and μ-opioid receptor-mediated behaviors.