Current and Future Therapeutic Options in Pain Management: Multi-mechanistic Opioids Involving Both MOR and NOP Receptor Activation (original) (raw)

Activities of mixed NOP and μ‐opioid receptor ligands

British journal of …, 2008

Background and purpose: Compounds that activate both NOP and m-opioid receptors might be useful as analgesics and drug abuse medications. Studies were carried out to better understand the biological activity of such compounds. Experimental approach: Binding affinities were determined on membranes from cells transfected with NOP and opioid receptors. Functional activity was determined by [ 35 S]GTPgS binding on cell membranes and using the mouse vas deferens preparation in vitro and the tail flick antinociception assay in vivo. Key results: Compounds ranged in affinity from SR14150, 20-fold selective for NOP receptors, to buprenorphine, 50-fold selective for m-opioid receptors. In the [ 35 S]GTPgS assay, SR compounds ranged from full agonist to antagonist at NOP receptors and most were partial agonists at m-opioid receptors. Buprenorphine was a low efficacy partial agonist at m-opioid receptors, but did not stimulate [ 35 S]GTPgS binding through NOP. In the mouse vas deferens, each compound, except for SR16430, inhibited electrically induced contractions. In each case, except for N/OFQ itself, the inhibition was due to m-opioid receptor activation, as determined by equivalent results in NOP receptor knockout tissues. SR14150 showed antinociceptive activity in the tail flick test, which was reversed by the opioid antagonist naloxone. Conclusions and implications: Compounds that bind to both m-opioid and NOP receptors have antinociceptive activity but the relative contribution of each receptor is unclear. These experiments help characterize compounds that bind to both receptors, to better understand the mechanism behind their biological activities, and identify new pharmacological tools to characterize NOP and opioid receptors.

Structural Determinants of Opioid and NOP Receptor Activity in Derivatives of Buprenorphine

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2011

The unique pharmacological profile of buprenorphine has led to its considerable success as an analgesic and as a treatment agent for drug abuse. Activation of nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) receptors has been postulated to account for certain aspects of buprenorphine's behavioural profile. In order to investigate the role of NOP activation further, a series of buprenorphine analogues has been synthesised with the aim of increasing affinity for the NOP receptor. Binding and functional assay data on these new compounds indicate that the area around C20 in the orvinols is key to NOP receptor activity, with several compounds displaying higher affinity than buprenorphine. One compound, 1b, was found to be a mu opioid receptor partial agonist of comparable efficacy to buprenorphine, but with higher efficacy at NOP receptors.

NOP receptor mediates anti-analgesia induced by agonist–antagonist opioids

Neuroscience, 2014

Clinical studies have shown that agonistantagonist opioid analgesics that produce their analgesic effect via action on the kappa-opioid receptor, produce a delayed-onset anti-analgesia in men but not women, an effect blocked by co-administration of a low dose of naloxone. We now report the same time-dependent antianalgesia and its underlying mechanism in an animal model. Using the Randall-Selitto paw-withdrawal assay in male rats, we found that nalbuphine, pentazocine, and butorphanol each produced analgesia during the first hour followed by anti-analgesia starting at $90 min after administration in males but not females, closely mimicking its clinical effects. As observed in humans, co-administration of nalbuphine with naloxone in a dose ratio of 12.5:1 blocked antianalgesia but not analgesia. Administration of the highly selective kappa-opioid receptor agonist U69593 produced analgesia without subsequent anti-analgesia, and confirmed by the failure of the selective kappa antagonist nor-binaltorphimine to block nalbuphine-induced anti-analgesia, indicating that anti-analgesia is not mediated by kappa-opioid receptors. We therefore tested the role of other receptors in nalbuphine anti-analgesia. Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (NOP) and sigma-1 and sigma-2 receptors were chosen on the basis of their known anti-analgesic effects and receptor binding studies. The selective NOP receptor antagonists, JTC801, and J-113397, but not the sigma receptor antagonist, BD 1047, antagonized nalbuphine anti-analgesia. Furthermore, the NOP receptor agonist NNC 63-0532 produced anti-analgesia with the same delay in onset observed with the three agonist-antagonists, but without producing preceding analgesia and this anti-analgesia was also blocked by naloxone. These results strongly support the suggestion that clinically used agonist-antagonists act at the NOP receptor to produce anti-analgesia.

Selectively Promiscuous Opioid Ligands: Discovery of High Affinity/Low Efficacy Opioid Ligands with Substantial Nociceptin Opioid Peptide Receptor Affinity

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2014

Emerging clinical and preclinical evidence suggests that a compound displaying high affinity for μ, κ, and δ opioid (MOP, KOP, and DOP) receptors and antagonist activity at each, coupled with moderate affinity and efficacy at nociceptin opioid peptide (NOP) receptors will have utility as a relapse prevention agent for multiple types of drug abuse. Members of the orvinol family of opioid ligands have the desired affinity profile but have typically displayed substantial efficacy at MOP and or KOP receptors. In this study it is shown that a phenyl ring analogue (1d) of buprenorphine displays the desired profile in vitro with high, nonselective affinity for the MOP, KOP, and DOP receptors coupled with moderate affinity for NOP receptors. In vivo, 1d lacked any opioid agonist activity and was an antagonist of both the MOP receptor agonist morphine and the KOP receptor agonist ethylketocyclazocine, confirming the desired opioid receptor profile in vivo.

Development of nociceptin receptor (NOP) agonists and antagonists

Medicinal Research Reviews, 2011

The nociceptin opioid (NOP) receptor is the most recently discovered member of the family of the opioid receptors; its endogenous agonist is the peptide nociceptin. Due to the subsequent elucidation of its physiological role in both central and peripheral nervous system and in some non-neural tissues, there is a rapidly growing interest in the pharmacological application of substances active on this receptor. Despite the current clinical use of a morphinane-based NOP/MOP mixed ligand (buprenorphine) as an analgesic and in the treatment of drug addictions, so far just a few clinical trials have been made with selective NOP ligands. However, the perspective of their utilization is rapidly growing. Agonists can find applications in the treatment of neuropathic pain, anxiety, cough, drug addition, urinary incontinence, anorexia, congestive heart failure, hypertension; and antagonists for pain, depression, Parkinson's disease, obesity, and as memory enhancers. Besides peptide ligands, which are still subjected to many pharmacological investigations, many different chemical classes of NOP ligands have been discovered: piperidines, nortropanes, spiropiperidines, 4-amino-quinolines and quinazolines, and others. The new advances in establishing structure-activity relationships, also with the help of modeling studies, can permit the development of more active and selective molecules.

Activity of new NOP receptor ligands in a rat peripheral mononeuropathy model: Potentiation of morphine anti-allodynic activity by NOP receptor antagonists

European Journal of Pharmacology, 2009

The effect of new NOP receptor agonists and antagonists in the rat chronic constriction injury model was investigated. Intraperitoneally administered NOP receptor agonist SR14150 and antagonists SR16430 and SR14148, had no effect on mechanical allodynia when given alone. The nonselective NOP/mu-opioid receptor agonist SR16435, however, produced an anti-allodynic response, similar to morphine and reversible by naloxone. Notably, co-administration of the NOP receptor antagonists potentiated the anti-allodynic activity of both morphine and SR16435. Increased levels of the NOP receptor are implicated in the reduced efficacy of morphine in neuropathic pain. Our results suggest the utility of NOP receptor antagonists for potentiating opioid efficacy in chronic pain.

Novel Mixed NOP/Opioid Receptor Peptide Agonists

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2021

The nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ)/N/OFQ receptor (NOP) system controls different biological functions including pain and cough reflex. Mixed NOP/opioid receptor agonists elicit similar effects to strong opioids but with reduced side effects. In this work, 31 peptides with the general sequence [Tyr/Dmt 1 ,Xaa 5 ]N/OFQ(1-13)-NH 2 were synthesized and pharmacologically characterized for their action at human recombinant NOP/opioid receptors. The best results in terms of NOP versus mu opioid receptor potency were obtained by substituting both Tyr 1 and Thr 5 at the N-terminal portion of N/OFQ(1-13)-NH 2 with the noncanonical amino acid Dmt. [Dmt 1,5 ]N/OFQ(1-13)-NH 2 has been identified as the most potent dual NOP/mu receptor peptide agonist so far described. Experimental data have been complemented by in silico studies to shed light on the molecular mechanisms by which the peptide binds the active form of the mu receptor. Finally, the compound exerted antitussive effects in an in vivo model of cough.

Cebranopadol: A Novel Potent Analgesic Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ Peptide and Opioid Receptor Agonist

Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2014

indol]-4-amine) is a novel analgesic nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) and opioid receptor agonist [K i (nM)/EC 50 (nM)/relative efficacy (%): human NOP receptor 0.9/13.0/89; human mu-opioid peptide (MOP) receptor 0.7/1.2/104; human kappa-opioid peptide receptor 2.6/17/67; human delta-opioid peptide receptor 18/110/105]. Cebranopadol exhibits highly potent and efficacious antinociceptive and antihypersensitive effects in several rat models of acute and chronic pain (tail-flick, rheumatoid arthritis, bone cancer, spinal nerve ligation, diabetic neuropathy) with ED 50 values of 0.525.6 mg/kg after intravenous and 25.1 mg/kg after oral administration. In comparison with selective MOP receptor agonists, cebranopadol was more potent in models of chronic neuropathic than acute nociceptive pain. Cebranopadol's duration of action is long (up to 7 hours after intravenous 12 mg/kg; .9 hours after oral 55 mg/kg in the rat tail-flick test). The antihypersensitive activity of cebranopadol in the spinal nerve ligation model was partially reversed by pretreatment with the selective NOP receptor antagonist J-113397[1-[(3R,4R)-1-cyclooctylmethyl-3-hydroxymethyl-4-piperidyl]-3-ethyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzimidazol-2-one] or the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone, indicating that both NOP and opioid receptor agonism are involved in this activity. Development of analgesic tolerance in the chronic constriction injury model was clearly delayed compared with that from an equianalgesic dose of morphine (complete tolerance on day 26 versus day 11, respectively). Unlike morphine, cebranopadol did not disrupt motor coordination and respiration at doses within and exceeding the analgesic dose range. Cebranopadol, by its combination of agonism at NOP and opioid receptors, affords highly potent and efficacious analgesia in various pain models with a favorable side effect profile.

Role of mu-opioid agonist efficacy on antinociceptive interactions between mu agonists and the nociceptin opioid peptide agonist Ro 64-6198 in rhesus monkeys

European Journal of Pharmacology, 2018

Mu-opioid receptor agonists are clinically effective analgesics, but also produce undesirable effects that limit their clinical utility. The nociceptin opioid peptide (NOP) receptor system also modulates nociception, and NOP agonists might be useful adjuncts to enhance the analgesic effects or attenuate the undesirable effects of mu-opioid agonists. The present study determined behavioral interactions between the NOP agonist (-)-Ro 64-6198 and mu-opioid ligands that vary in mu-opioid receptor efficacy (17-cyclopropylmethyl-3,14β-dihyroxy-4,5α-epoxy-6α-[(3′isoquinolyl)acetamindo]morphinan (NAQ) < buprenorphine < nalbuphine < morphine = oxycodone < methadone) in male rhesus monkeys. For comparison, Ro 64-6198 interactions were also examined with the kappa-opioid receptor agonist nalfurafine. Each opioid ligand was examined alone and following fixed-dose Ro 64-6198 pretreatments in assays of thermal nociception (n=3-4) and schedule-controlled responding (n=3). Ro 64-6198 alone failed to produce significant antinociception up to doses (0.32 mg/kg, IM) that significantly decreased rates of responding. All opioid ligands, except NAQ and nalfurafine, produced dose-and thermal intensity-dependent antinociception. Ro 64-6198 enhanced the antinociceptive potency of buprenorphine, nalbuphine, methadone, and nalfurafine. Ro 64-6198 enhancement of nalbuphine antinociception was NOP antagonist SB-612111 reversible and occurred under a narrow range of dose and time conditions. All opioid ligands, except NAQ and buprenorphine, produced dosedependent decreases in rates of responding. Ro 64-6198 did not significantly alter mu-opioid ligand rate-decreasing effects. Although these results suggest that NOP agonists may selectively enhance the antinociceptive vs. rate-suppressant effects of some mu-opioid agonists, this small ✉

Opioid receptors in GtoPdb v.2023.1

IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology CITE

Opioid and opioid-like receptors are activated by a variety of endogenous peptides including [Met]enkephalin (met), [Leu]enkephalin (leu), β-endorphin (β-end), α-neodynorphin, dynorphin A (dynA), dynorphin B (dynB), big dynorphin (Big dyn), nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ); endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 are also potential endogenous peptides. The Greek letter nomenclature for the opioid receptors, μ, δ and κ, is well established, and NC-IUPHAR considers this nomenclature appropriate, along with the symbols spelled out (mu, delta, and kappa), and the acronyms, MOP, DOP, and KOP [124, 101, 92]. However the acronyms MOR, DOR and KOR are still widely used in the literature. The human N/OFQ receptor, NOP, is considered 'opioid-related' rather than opioid because, while it exhibits a high degree of structural homology with the conventional opioid receptors [304], it displays a distinct pharmacology. Currently there are numerous clinically used drugs, such as morphine and many othe...