Dueling Federalists: Supreme Court Decisions with Multiple Opinions Citing The Federalist , 1986-2007 (original) (raw)

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2006

How Constitutional Law Casebooks Perpetuate the Myth of Judicial Supremacy

“Remarkable Influence”: The Unexpected Importance of Justice Scalia\u27s Deceptively Unanimous and Contested Majority Opinions

Eric Nystrom

2021

View PDFchevron_right

Empirical Research on Decision-Making in the Federal Courts 2009 The Ideology of Legal Interpretation

Jason J. Czarnezki

2019

View PDFchevron_right

Ideological Cohesion and Precedent (Or Why the Court Only Cares About Precedent When Most Justices Agree With Each Other)

Neal Devins

86 North Carolina Law Review 1399 1442, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Federalism' s Old Deal: What' s Right and Wrong with Conservative Judicial Activism

Peter M Shane

View PDFchevron_right

Static History and Brittle Jurisprudence: Raoul Berger and the Problem of Constitutional Methodology

Robert Cottrol

BCL Rev., 1984

View PDFchevron_right

Federalism's 'Old Deal': What is Right and Wrong With Conservative Judicial Activism

Peter M Shane

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000

View PDFchevron_right

US Supreme Court Decisions: Judicial Philosophy, Precedent and Originalism

John McKeon Jr.

Constitutional Law Review Paper

View PDFchevron_right

Crucial and Routine Decisions: Why Ideology Affects Us Supreme Court Decision-Making the Way It Does

Tracy Lightcap

lagrange.edu

View PDFchevron_right

Crucial and Routine Decisions: A New Explanation of Why Ideology Affects US Supreme Court Decision Making the Way it Does

Tracy Lightcap

2010

View PDFchevron_right

HOW JUDGES DON'T THINK: THE INADVERTENT MISUSE OF PRECEDENT IN THE STRANGE CAREER OF THE ILLINOIS DOCTRINE OF ANTAGONISTIC DEFENSES, 1876-1985

Scott Dewey

The Journal Jurisprudence, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

doi:10.1017/S0003055408080283 Does Legal Doctrine Matter? Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court

Michael Bailey

2015

View PDFchevron_right

History in the American Juridical Field: Narrative, Justification, and Explanation

Christopher L Tomlins

Yale Journal of Law the Humanities, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Historiography and Constitutional Adjudication

William Partlett

Modern Law Review, 2023

View PDFchevron_right

Judicial Ideology and the Selection of Disputes for U.S. Supreme Court Adjudication

jeff Yates

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Politics and the Supreme Court: The Need for Ideological Balance

David Orentlicher

SSRN Electronic Journal

View PDFchevron_right

The Relative (Un)Importance of Rehnquist Court Decisions

Rob Robinson

View PDFchevron_right

HOW JUDGES DON'T THINK: THE INADVERTENT MISUSE OF PRECEDENT IN THE STRANGE CAREER OF THE ILLINOIS DOCTRINE OF ANTAGONISTIC DEFENSES, 1876-1985 INTRODUCTION: THE MEANING (IF ANY) OF PRECEDENT

Scott Dewey

View PDFchevron_right

Activism, Attitudes, and the Citation of Precedent in Supreme Court Opinions

Rob Robinson

View PDFchevron_right

The New Oral Argument: Justices as Advocates

Matthew Sag

2018

View PDFchevron_right

Toward a Revisionist History of the Supreme Court

Mark Tushnet

Cleveland State Law Review, 1988

View PDFchevron_right

Competing Conceptions of the Law: Public Arguments Regarding Nominees to the United States Supreme Court

John Katsulas

1989

View PDFchevron_right

If History Mattered: John Marshall and Reframing the Constitution

Aviam Soifer

Michigan Law Review, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

Judicial Review by the Burger and Rehnquist Courts

rorie solberg

Political Research Quarterly, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Framers Intent: The Illegitimate Uses of History

pierre schlag

Seattle University Law Review, 1985

View PDFchevron_right

Foreword Justice Scalia's Originalism: Original or Post-New Deal?

Roger Pilon

View PDFchevron_right

Ideology of Legal Interpretation, The

Jason J. Czarnezki

Wash. UJL & Pol'y, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Rachael K. Hinkle, Academia.edu, "Legal Constraint in the US Courts of Appeals" (originally published The University of Chicago Press "the jouranl of politics," Volume 77, Number 3 July 2015)

Scott Stafne

View PDFchevron_right

Precedent and Disagreement

Glen Staszewski

2021

View PDFchevron_right

“Remarkable Influence”: The Unexpected Importance of Justice Scalia’s Deceptively Unanimous and Contested Majority Opinions

Eric Nystrom

The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process, 2019

View PDFchevron_right

Does Legal Doctrine Matter? Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court

Michael Bailey

American Political Science Review, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

The Politics of Statutory Interpretation: The Hayekian Foundations of Justice Scalia's Jurisprudence

Gautam Bhatia

Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly (Forthcoming 2015)

View PDFchevron_right

The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited

J. Segal

2002

View PDFchevron_right

Dueling Federalists: Supreme Court Decisions with Multiple Opinions Citing The Federalist , 1986-2007 (original) (raw)

Related papers