HOW PROSECUTORS AND DEFENSE ATTORNEYS DIFFER IN THEIR USE OF NEUROSCIENCE EVIDENCE (original) (raw)
Related papers
THE MYTH OF THE DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF NEUROSCIENCE EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL CASES
Boston College Law Review, 2015
Eyal Aharoni, Michael Gazzaniga
Annals of The New York Academy of Sciences, 2008
2010
The Place for Neuroscience in Criminal Law
Neurolaw in Australia: The use of neuroscience in Australian criminal proceedings
2018
Actions speak louder than images: the use of neuroscientific evidence in criminal cases
Journal of Law and the Biosciences
Neuroscience and Law: Neuroscientific evidence in the courts of law
Neurolaw in Australia: The Use of Neuroscientific Evidence in Criminal
2017
Cognitive neuroscience and the law
Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2006
Reconciling the opposing effects of neurobiological evidence on criminal sentencing judgments.
2019
Neuroscience and the Personalization of Criminal Law
University of Chicago Law Review, 2019
Neuroscience, Justice and the 'Mental Causation' Fallacy
2019
Psychology, Crime and Law, 2018
Criminal Behavior and the Brain: When Law and Neuroscience Collide
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 2018
Why Neuroscience Matters for Law
2020
Unasked (and Unanswered) Questions About the Role of Neuroimaging in the Criminal Trial Process
2010
Integrating Neuroscience in Criminal Law: The Dutch Situation as an Example
International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2019
Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 2018
Looping effects of neurolaw, and the precarious marriage between neuroscience and the law
Balkan Journal of Philosophy, 2018
The Implications of Neuroscience on Sentencing
IJLS Journal, 2018
Neuroscience, Cognitive Psychology, and the Criminal Justice System
Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 2010
Is Neurolaw Conceptually Confused?
The Journal of Ethics, 2014
Athens Journal of Law , 2024
Neuroimaging in criminal trials and the role of psychiatrists expert witnesses: A case study
2019
Law and Cognitive Neuroscience
Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2010
Three Research Strategies of Neuroscience and the Future of Legal Imaging Evidence
Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018
USES AND ABUSES OF NEUROSCIENCE TECHNOLOGY IN THE COURTROOM “I did not do it, it was my brain...”
2016
Changing Law’s Mind: How Neuroscience Can Help Us Punish Criminals More Fairly and Effectively
Criminal Behavior and the Brain : When Law and Neuroscience Collide Foreword
2016
Toward a better understanding of the relationship between neurosciences and law.
Law & Neurosciences ejoural
Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2017