Running to Stand Still: An Abbreviated History of Power in Today's Russia (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Power State is Back? The Evolution of Russian Political Though After 1991
2016
Almost 25 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the process of‘re-composition’ of a Moscow-dominated political space is still under way. Under the influence of different traditions, factors, events and interests, Russia seems to have developed a new version of the ‘power state’ that dominated European history until the 20th century's tragedies. What was the weight of the Soviet legacy and of the crises of the 1990s in this development? What has been the influence of political leaders and intellectuals, siloviki, and economic elites on the current Russian political thought? To what extent have external factors contributed to shape this thought? What place for minorities and cultural differences does this political trend leave? This volume is based on the proceedings of ‘The Evolution of Russian Political Thought After 1991 workshop organized by Reset-Dialogues on Civilizations (Berlin, 22-23 June 2015) and collects the essays written by Pavel K. Baev, Giancarlo Bosetti, Timothy J. Colton, Riccardo Mario Cucciolla, Alexander Golts, Lev Gudkov, Stephen E. Hanson, Mark Kramer, Marlene Laruelle, Alexey Miller, Olga Pavlenko and Victoria I. Zhuravleva.
Dichotomy of the Basic Aspects of the Image of Power in Russia: Traditional and Modern Models
Changing Societies & Personalities , 2019
Social and cultural characteristics of any country form a certain image of power in the minds of its representatives. The image of power is treated in this work as a set of perceptions about power, which is determined by the sociocultural specifics of a particular political culture. In this article, I discuss contradictions between the traditional model of the image of power inherent in the Russian political culture and the modern democratic model. A conclusion is made that today's Russia is characterised by the reproduction of the traditional model of the image of power.
The Putin System Russian Authoritarianism Today
Revista Mexicana de Análisis Político y Administración Pública, 2016
The article explores the main trends that have characterized the re-emergence, formation and consolidation of an autocratic regime in post-Soviet Russia. We revisit the developments that led Vladimir Putin to the presidency of the country; framing these events as precursors of changes in formal structures (institutional and legal) and informal power mechanisms that define the current Russian political leadership. Finally, we formulated questions related to potential future scenarios involving such leadership.
Politics and Law. 2012. Vol. 50. № 1. pp. 36-53
In “The Specific Nature of ‘Russian State Power’: Its Mental Structures, Ritual Practices, and Institutions,” Nikolai Rozov develops a dynamic theory of Russian state power as an ideal type and emphasizes the roles played by frames, symbols, and interactive rituals in its creation. He presents these frames as dichotomies, with key frames for Russian power including the concepts of our own versus other and idealism versus profit. He then argues that the specifics of these frames lead to the characteristics of the Russian national character, including such factors as atomization, poor self-discipline, and incapacity for self-organization, which result from the rejection of everything alien. Other characteristics, both positive and negative, result from various combinations of these frames. Rozov then goes on to consider how these frames can explain some of the key attributes of Russian state power. He notes that Russian officials consider the rest of the population to belong to the category of other, rather than considering them to be part of our own. This mentality increases their willingness to sacrifice the people for the goal of achieving and holding on to power. As a result, the rulers have limited legitimacy in the eyes of the population and frequently have to result to violence to maintain control. Rozov concludes that as the international community has evolved, the crises of the Russian authoritarian state have become more frequent. As a result, the cycle of disintegration and restoration may be broken through a peaceful institutional revolution carried out by those social groups that do not accept the traditional cultural frames.
(A cura di) The power state is back? The evolution of russian political thought after 1991
2016
Since its foundation in 2005, Reset DoC has promoted dialogue across cultural divides through seminars, conferences, publications, and international events. In more than ten years of activities, we managed to develop a network among intellectuals with different cultural, religious, political backgrounds all around the Mediterranean, the American and Asian regions. In this era of conflicts and tensions, Reset DoC has been able to promote the exchange of ideas even concerning the former Soviet Union context and its main actor, Russia, above all. In order to bridge the gap of knowledge, we gathered, under the coordination of the Italian historian Andrea Graziosi, some of the foremost international scholars and world experts on Russian studies. The first international workshop-entitled The Evolution of Russian Political Thought After 1991-was held in Berlin at the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik (DGAP) on June 22-23, 2015. It represented the start point of a long-term initiative that Reset DoC promoted in order to facilitate the exchange of ideas and views between Russian and international experts in the field of the Russian studies: The Russia Workshop project. This Berliner episode was the initial stage in a much longer journey and its core significance was in the fact that it unlocked a number of subsequent events, such as the concomitant roundtable entitled 'The Political Culture of Today's Russia. The Power Part II The Impact of War, Ethnic Conflict and the International Environment V.