Q U I N T E S S E N C E I N T E R N AT I O N A L First-choice treatment alternatives for caries removal using the chemomechanical method (original) (raw)

Effectiveness and efficiency of chemomechanical carious dentin removal

Allyson Moreira

Brazilian Dental Journal, 2006

View PDFchevron_right

Clinical evaluation of the Carisolv chemomechanical caries removal technique according to the site/stage concept, a revised caries classification system

F. Decup, J. Lasfargues, J. Tubiana, Sophie Doméjean

Clinical oral investigations, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

Comparative evaluation of effects of chemo-mechanical and conventional caries removal on dentinal morphology and its bonding characteristics — An SEM study

rachita arora

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Effect of two different chemomechanical caries removal agents on dentin microhardness: An in vitro study

Pranav Vanajassun

Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Chemical, morphological and microhardness changes of dentine after chemomechanical caries removal

Hamdi Hamama

Australian Dental Journal, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Chemomechanical Removal of Caries – An Invasive Method as Extension for Prevention: A Review

deepthi nirmal gavarraju

International Journal of Medical Reviews, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of mechanical and chemomechanical methods of caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth: A SEM study

Meghanand Nayak

Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Dentin Topographic Features following Chemomechanical Caries Removal in Primary Teeth

Mona Elkateb

Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Current update of chemomechanical caries removal methods

Hamdi Hamama, Cynthia Yiu

Australian Dental Journal, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

A comparative in vitro efficacy of conventional rotatory and chemomechanical caries removal: Influence on cariogenic flora, microhardness, and residual composition

Rosalia Bulnes

Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

Evaluation of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Three Minimally Invasive Methods of Caries Removal: An in vitro Study

Prof.dr. Münevver Çetin

International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

Clinical Evaluation of Chemomechanical Caries Removal in Primary Molars and Its Acceptance by Patients

P. Hahn

Caries Research, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

SEM Evaluation of Dentin Surface after Different Types of Caries Removal

Kiro Ivanovski

Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences

View PDFchevron_right

Chemical versus conventional caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a microhardness study

Leonardo Rodrigues

The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Clinical evaluation of efficacy on chemomechanical removal of caries with carisolv- An invivo study

mamta dali

View PDFchevron_right

Carisolv- an innovative method of caries removal

Vartika Kathuria

2013

View PDFchevron_right

Chemomechanical versus drilling methods for caries removal: an in vitro study

Kemporn Kitsahawong

Brazilian Oral Research, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Does chemomechanical caries removal affect dentine adhesion?

Rainer Haak

European Journal of Oral Sciences, 2000

View PDFchevron_right

Chemo-mechanical dentine caries removal with Carisolv using a rotating brush

abdul nourallah

European journal of paediatric dentistry : official journal of European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2006

View PDFchevron_right

Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Conventional and RMGIC Restorations following Conventional and Chemomechanical Caries Removal: An in vitro Study

Sivakumar Nuvvula

International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

An in-vitro evaluation of residual dentin retained after using novel enzymatic-based chemomechanical caries removal agents

lamis Al-Taee

View PDFchevron_right

Comparative evaluation of microhardness of residual dentin in primary molars following caries removal with chemomechanical agent (BRIX 3000) and polymer burs (ss white)

Vishwas Patil

International journal of health sciences

View PDFchevron_right

X-ray microtomography study of carious dentine and a comparison of its removal by three techniques

Mediah Ahmed

2010

View PDFchevron_right

Effectiveness of Different Mechanical Methods on Dentin Caries Removal: Micro-CT and Digital Image Evaluation

Juliano Mendonça, Monica Yamauti

View PDFchevron_right

Chemical-Mechanical Removal Of Infected Dentin in caries treatment

Janet Kirilova

MedInform, 2022

View PDFchevron_right

Chemomechanical caries removal in children

Marita Inglehart

The Journal of the American Dental Association, 2006

View PDFchevron_right

Chemo-mechanical method: A valuable alternative for caries removal

Khalid Abdelaziz

2009

View PDFchevron_right

Effectiveness of Different Methods in Removing Dentin Caries of Primary Teeth: Micro-CT and SEM Evaluation

Meral Arslan Malkoç

Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

View PDFchevron_right

Primary teeth caries removal using the Carisolv chemomechanical method: a clinical trial

Katerina Kavvadia

Pediatric …, 2004

View PDFchevron_right