A morphologic study of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts in the mitral position exhibiting primary tissue failure in adults in comparison with Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts (original) (raw)

The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve: Ten-year results

Robert Stewart

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1995

View PDFchevron_right

Failure of Hancock pericardial xenografts: Is prophylactic bioprosthetic replacement justified

francisco guerra

Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1991

View PDFchevron_right

Long-term evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position

Amina Jindani

Journal of Cardiac Surgery

View PDFchevron_right

The last generation of pericardial valves in the aortic position: Ten-year follow-up in 589 patients

Michel Aupart

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1996

View PDFchevron_right

15-year experience with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis

Nancy Poirier

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: Comparison of carpentier-edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses

Michel Aupart

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1999

View PDFchevron_right

Natural History of a Carpentier-Edwards Pericardial Aortic Valve Replaced after 25 Years for Structural Valve Degeneration

Rodolphe Durieux

CASE, 2020

View PDFchevron_right

Causes of failure and pathologic findings in surgically removed Ionescu- Shiley standard bovine pericardial heart valve bioprostheses: emphasis on progressive structural deterioration

Aura Cernaianu

Circulation, 1987

View PDFchevron_right

Fifteen-year experience with the mitral Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis

Paul Herijgers

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Very late outcomes for mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 25-year follow-up of 450 implantations

Michel Aupart, Thierry Bourguignon

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve: Intermediate results☆

Robert Frater

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1992

View PDFchevron_right

Two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of complications involving the ionescu-shiley pericardial valve in the mitral position

Cyd Leonard

Journal of the American …, 1984

View PDFchevron_right

Mode of failure of the hancock pericardial valve xenograft

Aldo Milano

The American Journal of Cardiology, 1989

View PDFchevron_right

Five-Year Follow-up of Hancock Pericardial Valves: Management of Premature Failure

Hugh Scully

Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 1988

View PDFchevron_right

Twelve-year experience with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve at a single Japanese center

Michel Aupart

Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Fifty years of the pericardial valve: Long‐term results in the aortic position

damian balmforth

Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

One thousand Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valves in the aortic position: what has changed in the past 20 years, and what are the effects on hospital complications?

Wilhelm Mistiaen

The Journal of heart valve disease, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Durability after aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow versus the Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis: a single-centre experience in 2393 patients

Sten Nielsen

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic or mitral position: A 12-year experience

Michel Aupart

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1999

View PDFchevron_right

Sequential Hemodynamic Studies in Patients Having Aortic Valve Replacement with the Ionescu-Shiley Pericardial Xenograft

marian ionescu

Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1977

View PDFchevron_right

Mid-Term Comparative Follow-Up After Aortic Valve Replacement with Carpentier-Edwards and Pericarbon Pericardial Prostheses

J. Hennequin, D. Grandmougin

Circulation, 1999

View PDFchevron_right

Bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in patients aged 65 years or younger: long-term outcomes with the Carpentier–Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial valve†

Michel Aupart

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis: Clinical performance to ten years

Richard Brownlee

Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995

View PDFchevron_right

Assessment of untreated fresh autologous pericardium as material for construction of heart valve: Result at 5 years

Shantanu Pande

Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 2019

View PDFchevron_right

Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis experience in aortic valve replacement ≥60 years of age

Richard Brownlee

Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

Age and valve size effect on the long-term durability of the Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthesis

Eugene Blackstone

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2001

View PDFchevron_right