A Narrative Account: the Two Sides of the Libyan Conflict from February to October 2011 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Guest Editors' Note: The Libyan Event and the Part for the Whole
Middle East Critique, 2014
The events of 2011, which led to the death of Mu'ammar Qadhdhafi and the fall of the Jamahiriyya, triggered a profound reshaping of Libyan politics. In order to shed light on such a dynamic, yet traumatic, moment, this Special Issue of Middle East Critique is fully dedicated to Libya. Three years after the 2011 Event, multiple governments-one in Tobruk and one in Tripoli-and several militias create fertile ground for violence and lawlessness. In this issue, each article tries to return a theoretical and analytical complexity to the study of Libya and, in doing so, they collectively advocate for a multiplicity of narratives that challenge the dominant pre-2011 and post-2011 academic representations and media accounts. Doubtlessly, the unquestioned Orientalist mind-set, as formulated by Edward Said, has affected and still affects the academic comprehension of Libya and the formulation of policies toward the country. In fact, since Qadhdhafi's oil nationalization and the gradual rapprochement of Libya with the Soviet bloc through the purchase of weapons, western media and scholarship have used 'Qadhdhafi' and 'Libya' as synonyms, reiterating an Orientalist understanding of the Middle East. Scholars, analysts, and journalists depicted the 'Libyan head for the Libyan whole,' 1 to quote anthropologist John Davis, assuming that there was no 'Libya-ness' beyond the macro-historical metanarrative of 'Qadhdhafi-ness.' The cumbersome and ubiquitous personality of Qadhdhafi obscured Libya's complexity, and one Libyan became the symbol for all Libyans. This habit-'the part for the whole'-has continued even after Mu'ammar Qadhdhafi's fall. On the one hand, the revolution of 2011 has forced analysts to realize that beyond the Libyan regime there was a Libyan society: A complex universe comprised of tribes, cities, and agents that did not necessarily identify with Qadhdhafi's project. On the other hand, the discovery of a 'Libyan multiplicity' has overwhelmed the analysts who have continued to look desperately for the narrative, the key to unveil Libyan mysteries. Some writers have proposed 'tribalism' as the narrative to understand the revolution, others 'Islamism', and others, in turn, have demonstrated a fetishist attachment to the old narrative, reading the facts of 2011 simply as the end of 'Qadhdhafi-ness.' This Special Issue criticizes this phenomenon by demonstrating that post-revolutionary Libya cannot be understood by focusing on one story, one reading, or one aspect. Rather, it is necessary to consider a
A new season for Libya Meaning and future perspectives of the Libyan civil war
This paper will be an attempt of understanding the on-going situation of the Libyan conflict. The work will begin with the analysis of the word conflict and its theoretical implications, and then it will focus on a practical application of the conflict analysis in one of the most important, although not always considered, scenario in the Mediterranean area: the Libyan civil war. The importance for the international community of this conflict is given by the role United Nations and the NATOhave had in the first part of the Libyan uprising and inthe overthrowing of the Colonel Mu’ammar al-Qadhafi. The word conflict, as Bernard S. Mayer in his work “The Dynamics of Conflict Resolutions” stated, “may be viewed as a feeling, a disagreement, a real or perceived incompatibility of interests, inconsistent worldviews, or a set of behaviors”. The conflict can be generated both from the unbalanced condition within the society and from the transformation of the social links, provoking a necessary conflict for the evolution of the social dynamics. There is a multitude of different interests brought by different actors: this is the first factor of a conflict. What does the conflict mean for Libya? And what will the possible solutions be?
The Libyan conflict and its controversial roots
European View, 2017
The Libyan conflict is the result of a complex and controversial series of developments, where local political events have been strongly influenced and driven by exogenous factors. A dual set of conflicting interests can be found in both the Euro-Mediterranean and inter-Arab dimensions, with Italy and Turkey struggling against France and Great Britain on one side, and Qatar being opposed by the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia on the other. Muammar Qaddafi's regime, which was certainly not an example of good governance and respect for human rights, was quickly swept away by a conflict primarily fought by non-Libyan actors, which eventually caused the collapse of the central institutions in Libya and the creation of dozens of local militias. The failure of both local and exogenous ambitions has caused a crisis in which additional factors have been able to influence the Libyan civil war, making the situation very opaque and extremely difficult to solve.
Libya: from one revolution to another
La Balsa De Piedra Revista De Teoria Y Geoestrategia Iberoamericana Y Mediterranea, 2014
The revolution that overthrew Gaddafi's regime in 2011 was deeply marked by the essential features of Libyan society, such as its lack of social integration or its widespread clientelism and tribalism. All these features are deeply rooted in the historical past of the country. The Gaddafist regime itself was also formed very much by these same factors, and at the same time, it helped to shape them to some extent. Thus, it can be said that this regime was a singular experiment of partial modernisation in combination with a pronounced conservatism with respect to other aspects of social life. Consequently, despite its enthusiastic revolutionary rethoric, it appeared to be not very different from other regimes in the region. We believe it is on this basis that its ideology must be approached. Not only its actions in both the internal and external spheres but also those aspects that are most idiosyncratic and striking, such as the Green Book or the frequently histrionic behaviour of its leader.
Libya: A Case Study of a Failed Revolution
2015
The anti-Qaddafi movement that had spontaneously combusted the Libyan revolution in February 2011 was a demonstration of a leaderless revolutionary spirit that rejected the old political elite and state institutions altogether. Thuwar, or revolutionaries, came to represent an unorganized and unofficial vanguard of that spirit. These overwhelmingly young people vetted their frustrations, anger and disappointment through ever increasing violence as they were met with Qaddafi’s security and military forces. The Western power’s kneejerk reaction to the rapid deterioration of security situation in Libya during August 2011 to intervene militarily (under the approval of the united Nation Security Council) tipped the conflict scale in the favor of the revolutionaries bringing effectively the end of the Qaddafi regime. Soon thereafter the leaderless movement fractioned into local militias protecting their narrow interests, organized military units under the competing political opposition gro...
A History of Conflict and International Intervention in Libya
The purpose of this research is to examine the conflict in Libya; most notably from the 2011 ousting of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi up to the present issues surrounding the state. In doing so, this research will focus on three aspects: Libya's history and theories on the cause of violent conflict; foreign military intervention, as well as international reaction; and alternative suggestions to management, and resolutions regarding the current Libyan Conflict.
Libya ’ s Violent Revolution Emin Poljarevic
2013
Libya is unlike other states in North Africa mainly because of the distinctive arrangement of different socio-economic and political features it combines. This arrangement came into sharper focus in the wake of the recent collapse of its 40-year-old authoritarian regime. What had begun as a series of peaceful protests against the regime’s administrative misconducts became a full-scale confrontation between, increasingly frustrated crowds of protesters and ever-more violent regime forces and their supporters. It cannot be denied that the mobilization of Libyan dissidents was inspired by the preceding popular uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt. Just days after the collapse of the Mubarak regime, multiple street protests erupted across Libya. Even if one accepts the argument that the Libyan revolt was inspired by events outside the country, however, this does not explain why this popular uprising took such a significantly different path to those of its neighbors. This paper contextualizes ...
Trends and Dynamics of the Libya Conflict WalnshakDanfulani
The conflict in Libya manifests complex dynamics involving personal, group and international interests in a decade long struggle for power and its accruing benefits. Militia, terror and shadow groups are involved in moves and counter moves, flexible alliances and counter alliances based on interests that intricately maneuver fault-lines in the clash and dialogue of civilizations. This study looks at the trends and dynamics of the Libyan conflict; parties involved; the justification behind their actions. The study has recommended the complete withdrawal of shadow parties in the crisis to lessen the complexities involved in solving the crisis, implementation of proper Demobilization, Disarmament and Reintegration and power sharing under a federal structure. ABSTRACT Libya'daki çatışma, iktidar ve onun tahakkuk eden faydaları için on yıllık uzun bir mücadelede kişisel, grupsal ve uluslararası çıkarları içeren karmaşık dinamikleri ortaya koyuyor. Milisler, terör ve gölge grupları, medeniyetlerin çatışması ve diyalogundaki fay hatlarını karmaşık bir şekilde manevra eden çıkarlara dayalı hareketler ve karşı hamleler, esnek ittifaklar ve karşı ittifaklara dahil olurlar. Bu çalışma, Libya çatışmasının eğilimlerine ve dinamiklerine bakıyor; ilgili taraflar; eylemlerinin arkasındaki gerekçe. Çalışma, krizin çözülmesine, uygun Demobilizasyon, Silahsızlanma ve Yeniden Entegrasyonun uygulanmasına ve federal bir yapı altında güç paylaşımına ilişkin karmaşıklıkların azaltılması için krizdeki gölge partilerin tamamen geri çekilmesini tavsiye etti.
Cosmos/EUI Working Papers, 2012
The project addresses the role of civil society organizations (CSOs) in democratization processes, bridging social science approaches to social movements and democracy. The project starts by revisiting the "transitology" approach to democratization and the political process approach to social movements, before moving towards more innovative approaches in both areas. From the theoretical point of view, a main innovation will be in addressing both structural preconditions as well as actors' strategies, looking at the intersection of structure and agency. In an historical and comparative perspective, I aim to develop a description and an understanding of the conditions and effects of the participation of civil society organizations in the various stages of democratization processes. Different parts of the research will address different sub-questions linked to the broad question of CSOs' participation in democratization processes: a) under which (external and internal) conditions and through which mechanisms do CSOs support democratization processes? b) Under which conditions and through which mechanisms do they play an important role in democratization processes? c) Under which conditions and through which mechanisms are they successful in triggering democratization processes? d) And, finally, what is the legacy of the participation of civil society during transitions to democracy on the quality of democracy during consolidation? The main empirical focus will be on recent democratization processes in EU member and associated states. The comparative research design will, however, also include selected comparisons with oppositional social movements in authoritarian regimes as well as democratization processes in other historical times and geopolitical regions. From an empirical point of view, a main innovation will lie in the development of mixed method strategies, combining large N and small N analyses, and qualitative comparative analysis with in-depth, structured narratives.