Evaluation of the results from proximal fixation of uncemented conical femoral components in Dorr type C femurs (original) (raw)
The Relationship between Femoral Morphotype and Femoral Component Design
Michele F Surace
HIP International, 1995
View PDFchevron_right
Proximal Femur Size and Geometry in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients
Zbigniew Gugala, Ronald Lindsey
F1000Research, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Cone Femoral Prosthesis for Osteoarthritis of the Hip with Femoral Dysplasia
Richard Steiger
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Short-Term Clinical Results with an Elliptical Femoral Prosthesis
Luigi Molfetta
Hip International, 1995
View PDFchevron_right
The anatomic basis for the concept of lateralized femoral stems
Philippe Massin
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2000
View PDFchevron_right
Stable, Dependable Fixation of Short-stem Femoral Implants at 5 Years
Max Cayo
Orthopedics, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
A Prospective Outcomes Analysis of Femoral Component Fixation in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
Richard Iorio
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
A new short uncemented, proximally fixed anatomic femoral implant with a prominent lateral flare: design rationals and study design of an international clinical trial
Carlos Alberto Reyes Valverde
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Can a Conical Implant Successfully Address Complex Anatomy in Primary THA? Radiographs and Hip Scores at Early Followup
Stuart Goodman
Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Five-year prospective clinical and radiological results of a new cannulated cemented polished Tri-Taper femoral stem
Shashi Nanjayan
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, 2006
View PDFchevron_right
Boneloc versus Simplex Cement for Fixation of Femoral Components. An Interim Report of a Prospective Randomized Study of THRs with a 2,5 Year Mean Follow-Up Time
hakon kofoed
HIP International, 1996
View PDFchevron_right
Radiographic analysis of the proximal femoral anatomy in the Croatian population
Hrvoje Mokrovic
International Orthopaedics, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
Long term results of total hip arthroplasty with cemented and cementless tapered femoral component
Nimrod Snir
SICOT-J, 2023
View PDFchevron_right
A proximal femoral implant preserves physiological bone deformation: a biomechanical investigation in cadaveric bones
Warren Macdonald
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 2003
View PDFchevron_right
Long-term radiographic changes in cemented total hip arthroplasty with six designs of femoral components
Sophia Sangiorgio
Biomaterials, 2003
View PDFchevron_right
Changes in femur dimensions in asymptomatic non-cemented hip arthroplasties: 20 cases followed for 5-8 years
Dror Robinson
Acta Orthopaedica, 1994
View PDFchevron_right
Implant survival of cemented arthroplasty following failed fixation of proximal femoral fractures in patients aged 30–60 years: a retrospective study with a median follow-up of 10 years
Si Ying Li, Kay
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
View PDFchevron_right
Custom-design implants for severe distorted proximal anatomy of the femur in young adults followed for 4–8 years
panagiotis koulouvaris
Acta Orthopaedica, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
A Contemporary Classification System of Femoral Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
Gabrielle Roman
Arthroplasty Today, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
Comparative Clinical-Radiological Analysis of First-Generation vs . Second-Generation Flat Cementless Femoral Stems
Pablino Spesot
2021
View PDFchevron_right
A Comparison of Surgeon Estimation and Computed Tomographic Measurement of Femoral Component Anteversion in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
Aamer Malik
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
Porous Femoral Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty with Short Anatomical Stem: Radiographic Evaluation
suresh patil
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 2017
View PDFchevron_right
Native femoral anteversion should not be used as reference in cementless total hip arthroplasty with a straight, tapered stem: a retrospective clinical study
Benjamin Craiovan
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
Bone Remodelling in a Conservative Femoral Component for Hip Replacement Surgery
Gordon Blunn
HIP International, 2003
View PDFchevron_right
Cementless Femoral Revision Arthroplasty of the Hip
Martin Alejandro Moreno
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2001
View PDFchevron_right
Cement-in-cement femoral component revision
dominic meek
The Bone & Joint Journal, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
RESEARCH ARTICLE Proximal Femur Size and Geometry in Cementless Total Hip
Zbigniew Gugala
2016
View PDFchevron_right
Classification of Femoral Abnormalities in Total Hip Arthroplasty
James D'Antonio
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1993
View PDFchevron_right
Mastering the art of cemented femoral stem fixation 1 1 No benefits or funds were received in support of this study
Amar Ranawat
J Arthroplasty, 2004
View PDFchevron_right
Nineteen Year Results of THA Using Modular 9 mm S-ROM Femoral Component in Patients With Small Femoral Canals
Mansour Abolghasemian
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
A micro-architectural evaluation of osteoporotic human femoral heads to guide implant placement in proximal femoral fractures
Andrew van der Merwe
Acta Orthopaedica, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Mechanical evaluation of six types of reconstruction following 25, 50, and 75% resection of the proximal femur
Sean Kohles, Ray Vanderby
Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 1994
View PDFchevron_right
The major proximal femoral defects: megaprosthesis in non oncological patients - A case series
Fabio Zanchini
Orthopedic Reviews, 2023
View PDFchevron_right
An assessment of the biological fixation of a retrieved Mayo femoral component. Iowa Orthop J
Russell Meldrum
The Iowa orthopaedic journal
View PDFchevron_right