Re: dpANSI (original) (raw)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- To: Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com>
- Cc: Debian Legal <debian-legal@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: dpANSI
- From: Adam Warner <lists@consulting.net.nz>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:11:07 +1200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1087863067.1232.94.camel@work.consulting.net.nz>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] E1BcUoh-0004XJ-00@intech19.enhanced.com>
- References: <[🔎] E1BcUoh-0004XJ-00@intech19.enhanced.com>
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 07:50, Camm Maguire wrote:
Greetings! Can anyone comment on the DFSG status of the material at:
ftp://parcftp.xerox.com/pub/cl
? Please cc: me directly.
Hi Camm. This is an earlier answer from the X3J13 Project Editor, Kent M Pitman. It is as definitive as you can get without further evidence being made public: <http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=sfwr84z4dnq.fsf%40shell01.TheWorld.com>
I am personally prepared to rely upon the Common Lisp community understanding that they are public domain documents.
Whether the Debian project is similarly prepared to accept the uncertainty is their decision. I suggest the Debian project is relatively safe continuing to distribute gcl-doc and gclcvs-doc which include these unofficial sources.
Just remember than you should never use the HyperSpec nor the official ANSI Common Lisp standard as source as these are both clearly copyright and distribution is encumbered.
Regards, Adam
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dpANSI
* From: Camm Maguire camm@enhanced.com
- Re: dpANSI
- References:
- dpANSI
* From: Camm Maguire camm@enhanced.com
- dpANSI
- Prev by Date:Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in
- Next by Date:Re: Visualboy Advance question.
- Previous by thread:dpANSI
- Next by thread:Re: dpANSI
- Index(es):