debian-legal Jun 2004 by date (original) (raw)

[previous month]	[first page]	[previous page]	Page 1 of 2	[next page]	[last page]	[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Jun 01

Re: ipw2100 firmware distributable? Marco Franzen
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG# Andrew Suffield
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Matthew Palmer
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG# Glenn Maynard
You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Francesco Poli
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Francesco Poli
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Francesco Poli
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG# Andrew Suffield

Jun 02

Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Henning Makholm
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Raul Miller
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Francesco Poli
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Adam McKenna
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Francesco Poli
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main martin f krafft
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Glenn Maynard
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Nathanael Nerode

Jun 03

Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Nathanael Nerode
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Nathanael Nerode
Re: ipw2100 firmware distributable? Nathanael Nerode
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Glenn Maynard
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Nathanael Nerode
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Walter Landry
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Glenn Maynard
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Nathanael Nerode
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Nathanael Nerode
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Andrew Suffield
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Bug#251885: ITP: cgal -- C++ library for computational geometry Joachim Reichel
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Branden Robinson
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Branden Robinson
Re: DFSG#10 and the Open Source Initiative Branden Robinson
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Raul Miller
Re: Bug#251885: ITP: cgal -- C++ library for computational geometry Josh Triplett
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Glenn Maynard
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Glenn Maynard
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Francesco Poli
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Francesco Poli

Jun 04

Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Henning Makholm
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Henning Makholm
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Lewis Jardine
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Glenn Maynard
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Raul Miller
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Walter Landry
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Carlo Wood
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Bernhard R. Link
Which license for a documentation? Matthieu Delahaye
Re: Which license for a documentation? Walter Landry
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Henning Makholm
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Andrew Suffield
Re: Which license for a documentation? MJ Ray
Re: Which license for a documentation? Josh Triplett
Re: Which license for a documentation? Måns Rullgård
Re: Which license for a documentation? Lewis Jardine
Re: Which license for a documentation? Glenn Maynard
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Anthony DeRobertis
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Glenn Maynard
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Anthony DeRobertis
Re: Which license for a documentation? Anthony DeRobertis
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Anthony DeRobertis
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Andrew Suffield
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Glenn Maynard
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Glenn Maynard

Jun 05

Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Nathanael Nerode
Re: Which license for a documentation? Nathanael Nerode
Re: Which license for a documentation? Nathanael Nerode
Re: Which license for a documentation? Nathanael Nerode
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Glenn Maynard
Re: Which license for a documentation? Nathanael Nerode
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Adam McKenna
Re: Which license for a documentation? Måns Rullgård
Re: Which license for a documentation? Lewis Jardine
Re: Which license for a documentation? Måns Rullgård
Re: Which license for a documentation? MJ Ray
Re: Which license for a documentation? Andrew Suffield
Re: Which license for a documentation? MJ Ray
Re: Which license for a documentation? Måns Rullgård
Re: Which license for a documentation? Andrew Suffield
Re: Which license for a documentation? Glenn Maynard
XMMS in main? Jerry Haltom
Re: Which license for a documentation? Glenn Maynard
Re: XMMS in main? Andrew Suffield
Re: XMMS in main? Måns Rullgård
Re: Which license for a documentation? Andrew Suffield

Jun 06

Re: Which license for a documentation? Josh Triplett
ALERT - Virus W32/Netsky.p@MM (ED) found; an attachment has been quarantined DSAVOIDCI-PROXY001(Network Associates Anti-Virus - Mailbox Agent)
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Francesco Poli
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Francesco Poli
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Adam McKenna
Re: Which license for a documentation? Don Armstrong
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Glenn Maynard
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Matthew Palmer
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Glenn Maynard

Jun 07

Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Matthew Palmer
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Glenn Maynard
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Per Olofsson
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Walter Landry
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Andrew Suffield
chugging Jimmy
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Sean Kellogg
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Florian Weimer
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Francesco Poli
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Adam McKenna
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL Michael Poole
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL Adam McKenna

Jun 08

Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL Michael Poole
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL Adam McKenna
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Branden Robinson
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Branden Robinson
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Glenn Maynard
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Branden Robinson
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Branden Robinson
Re: Which license for a documentation? Branden Robinson
Re: Which license for a documentation? Måns Rullgård
Re: Which license for a documentation? Bernhard R. Link
gens License Check - Non-free Benjamin Cutler
Re: Which license for a documentation? MJ Ray
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Barak Pearlmutter
Re: Which license for a documentation? Barak Pearlmutter
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Benjamin Cutler
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Humberto Massa
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Benjamin Cutler
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Lewis Jardine
Creative Commons Attribution license element Evan Prodromou
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Humberto Massa
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Andrew Suffield
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Benjamin Cutler
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Benjamin Cutler
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Andrew Suffield
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Andrew Suffield
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Andrew Suffield
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Josh Triplett
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Josh Triplett
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Benjamin Cutler
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Humberto Massa
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Benjamin Cutler
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Benjamin Cutler
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Evan Prodromou
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Ken Arromdee
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Andrew Suffield
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Josh Triplett
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Andrew Suffield
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Ken Arromdee
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Josh Triplett
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Humberto Massa
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Evan Prodromou
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Glenn Maynard
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element MJ Ray
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Evan Prodromou
license change for POSIX manpages Andre Lehovich
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Andrew Suffield
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element MJ Ray
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Andrew Suffield
Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jim Marhaus
Re: license change for POSIX manpages MJ Ray
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element MJ Ray

Jun 09

Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Nathanael Nerode
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Nathanael Nerode
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Nathanael Nerode
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Nathanael Nerode
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element MJ Ray
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Josh Triplett
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Nathanael Nerode
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Glenn Maynard
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Josh Triplett
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Josh Triplett
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Matthew Palmer
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Ken Arromdee
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Sean Kellogg
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Evan Prodromou
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element MJ Ray
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Florian Weimer
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Evan Prodromou
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Josh Triplett
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Evan Prodromou
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jim Marhaus
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Mahesh T. Pai
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Lex Spoon
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Andrew Suffield
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Lex Spoon
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Andrew Suffield
Re: XMMS in main? Jerry Haltom
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? MJ Ray

Jun 10

How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software? Andrew Pollock
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Glenn Maynard
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Glenn Maynard
Re: How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software? Glenn Maynard
Re: How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software? Andrew Pollock
Banner Advertisements info
FAQ Improvements (was: license change for POSIX manpages) Barak Pearlmutter
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Florian Weimer
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Andrew Suffield
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Glenn Maynard
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Branden Robinson
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Andrew Suffield
request-tracker3: license shadiness Michael Poole
Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jim Marhaus
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Andrew Suffield
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Andrew Suffield
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jacobo Tarrio
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Michael Poole
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Josh Triplett

Jun 11

Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Nic Suzor
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Josh Triplett
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Don Armstrong
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Josh Triplett
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Don Armstrong
Re: How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software? Nathanael Nerode
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Nathanael Nerode
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Nathanael Nerode
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Andrew Suffield
Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness] Matthew Palmer
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Matthew Palmer
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Mahesh T. Pai
Re: Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness] Glenn Maynard
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Florian Weimer
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness mdpoole

Jun 12

Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Lex Spoon
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Lex Spoon
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Lex Spoon
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Lex Spoon
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Lewis Jardine
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Matthew Palmer
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Lex Spoon
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Mahesh T. Pai
Re: How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software? Francesco Paolo Lovergine
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Francesco Paolo Lovergine
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Francesco Paolo Lovergine
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Evan Prodromou
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Andrew Suffield
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Evan Prodromou
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Francesco Paolo Lovergine
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Lex Spoon
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Lex Spoon
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Nathanael Nerode
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Nathanael Nerode
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Nathanael Nerode

Jun 13

Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Nathanael Nerode
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Andreas Barth
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Bernhard R. Link
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Marco Franzen
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Raul Miller
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jim Marhaus
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Francesco Poli
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Francesco Poli
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jim Marhaus
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Marco Franzen
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Brian Thomas Sniffen

Jun 14

Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Marco Franzen
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Walter Landry
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free MJ Ray
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Marco Franzen
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Anthony DeRobertis
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Barak Pearlmutter
Unfortunate Licence Mix Joachim Breitner
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Unfortunate Licence Mix Steve Langasek
Re: Unfortunate Licence Mix Nathanael Nerode
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Nathanael Nerode
Re: Unfortunate Licence Mix Josh Triplett
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Anthony DeRobertis
Licence problems with psybnc Joachim Breitner

Jun 15

Re: Unfortunate Licence Mix Russ Allbery
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: Unfortunate Licence Mix Mahesh T. Pai
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Marco Franzen
DBD::InterBase licence Damyan Ivanov
Re: DBD::InterBase licence MJ Ray
Re: DBD::InterBase licence Damyan Ivanov
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Barak Pearlmutter
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Brian Thomas Sniffen
Bug#254596: jftpgw: Several license problems Romain Francoise
How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Nathanael Nerode
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Matthew Wilcox
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Anthony DeRobertis

Jun 16

Re: gens License Check - Non-free Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Ken Arromdee
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Evan Prodromou
Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Joe Wreschnig
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Humberto Massa
{MSEMEA#717-276}something for you Microsoft MKB Info Nederland
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Andrew Suffield
Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Francesco Poli
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? viro
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Josh Triplett
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Thiemo Seufer

Jun 17

Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Andrew Suffield
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Frank Küster
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Andreas Barth
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? mdpoole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Thiemo Seufer
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Thiemo Seufer
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Thiemo Seufer
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Andrew Suffield
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jim Marhaus
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Anthony DeRobertis
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Matthew Wilcox
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Francesco Poli
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Francesco Poli
Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Josh Triplett

Jun 18

Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Joe Moore
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Josh Triplett
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Thiemo Seufer
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Andreas Barth
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Andrew Suffield
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Andrew Suffield
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Matthew Palmer
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Dave Howe
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Matthew Wilcox
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Raul Miller
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? William Lee Irwin III
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Thiemo Seufer
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Humberto Massa
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Humberto Massa
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Alexander Cherepanov
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Glenn Maynard
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Raul Miller
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? William Lee Irwin III
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Alexander Cherepanov
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? William Lee Irwin III
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? William Lee Irwin III
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Patrick Herzig
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Patrick Herzig
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Michael Poole
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Michael Poole
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Brian Thomas Sniffen
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? William Lee Irwin III
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Patrick Herzig
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Patrick Herzig
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig

Jun 19

RE: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? David Schwartz
Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Francesco Poli
Visualboy Advance question. Dan Korostelev
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Benjamin Cutler
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Dan Korostelev
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Evan Prodromou
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Dan Korostelev
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Benjamin Cutler
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Evan Prodromou

Jun 20

Tracking down Rockfall's copyright holder. J.B. Nicholson-Owens
Re: Tracking down Rockfall's copyright holder. Andrew Saunders
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Benjamin Cutler
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Francesco Poli
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Raul Miller
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Evan Prodromou
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Benjamin Cutler
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Francesco Poli
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Francesco Poli
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Francesco Poli
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Francesco Poli
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Raul Miller
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Evan Prodromou
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Evan Prodromou
cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Benjamin Cutler
cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Benjamin Cutler

Jun 21

Re: Visualboy Advance question. Matthew Palmer
Re: cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Matthew Palmer
Re: cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Benjamin Cutler
Unterminated sentence at webwml/english/legal/licenses/dls-007-opl.wml Gustavo R. Montesino
Re: Visualboy Advance question. J.B. Nicholson-Owens
Re: cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Benjamin Cutler
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Billy Biggs
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Benjamin Cutler
historical question about fceu in contrib Evan Prodromou
dpANSI Camm Maguire
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Francesco Poli
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Francesco Poli
Re: dpANSI MJ Ray
Re: dpANSI Camm Maguire

Jun 22

Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Raul Miller
Re: dpANSI Adam Warner
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Matthew Palmer
Re: dpANSI Camm Maguire
Re: dpANSI MJ Ray
Re: dpANSI Andrew Saunders
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Francesco Poli
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Francesco Poli
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Evan Prodromou
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Josh Triplett

Jun 23

Re: Visualboy Advance question. Evan Prodromou
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Don Armstrong
Re: dpANSI Adam Warner
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Josh Triplett The last update was on 06:19 GMT Mon May 06. There are 645 messages. Page 1 of 2.

[previous month]	[first page]	[previous page]	Page 1 of 2	[next page]	[last page]	[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc