Re: Bacula and OpenSSL (original) (raw)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
- From: Thomas Dickey <dickey@saltmine.radix.net>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:16:21 -0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 139hmllhgn8s811@corp.supernews.com>
- References: <[🔎] 200707121641.53917.kern@sibbald.com> <[🔎] 1184273539.31105.9.camel@tomoyo> <[🔎] 200707122342.09009.kern@sibbald.com> <[🔎] 877ip3pdb9.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
Simon Josefsson simon@josefsson.org wrote:
Kern Sibbald kern@sibbald.com writes:
GPL + OpenSSL exception would be enough to be sure. You may have more luck convincing copyright owners to grant an OpenSSL exception than to accept an entirely new license.
I am told that FSF never grants exceptions so this is a hopeless path that I have already explored.
That is incorrect. The FSF has granted OpenSSL license exceptions to some software that links to OpenSSL. For example, GNU wget.
That's not an example (unless you're intending to show a case where FSF allows itself to do things that it forbids others ;-)
-- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
* From: Simon Josefsson simon@josefsson.org
- Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
- References:
- Bacula and OpenSSL
* From: Kern Sibbald kern@sibbald.com - Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
* From: Josselin Mouette joss@debian.org - Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
* From: Kern Sibbald kern@sibbald.com - Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
* From: Simon Josefsson simon@josefsson.org
- Bacula and OpenSSL
- Prev by Date:Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
- Next by Date:Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
- Previous by thread:Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
- Next by thread:Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
- Index(es):