Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty (original) (raw)
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 01:08:03 +0100 (BST)
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20070716000804.5523AF7343@nail.towers.org.uk>
- References: <[🔎] gfhkl4-f04.ln1@argenau.downhill.at.eu.org> <[🔎] 20070701163856.0e296842.frx@firenze.linux.it> <[🔎] 20070713150100.GR3558@freenet.de> <[🔎] nlJH0QCd4TmGFwk1@thewolery.demon.co.uk> <[🔎] 20070714221310.GE25591@dario.dodds.net>
Steve Langasek vorlon@debian.org wrote:
I think you forgot to preface this with the disclaimers "I am not a lawyer", [...]
Some of those disclaimers, plus "I am not a lawyer qualification authority" seemed to be missing from yours too.
Or maybe "He Is Not A *" posts should be banned from this list and we can get back to looking at packages, hmm?
Regards,
MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Reply to:
- References:
- LGPL v3 compatibilty
* From: Andreas Metzler ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org - Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
* From: Francesco Poli frx@firenze.linux.it - Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
* From: Michelle Konzack linux4michelle@freenet.de - Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
* From: "Anthony W. Youngman" debian@thewolery.demon.co.uk - Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
* From: Steve Langasek vorlon@debian.org
- LGPL v3 compatibilty
- Prev by Date:Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
- Next by Date:Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
- Previous by thread:Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
- Next by thread:Re: Copyright verification needed
- Index(es):