Re: data "copyright" or not -- what is Debian's take? (original) (raw)
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: data "copyright" or not -- what is Debian's take?
- From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:07:11 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20110124160711.GA3913@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20110124154434.GA30897@onerussian.com>
- References: <[🔎] 20110124154434.GA30897@onerussian.com>
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 at 10:44:34 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Should I advise to blindly attach a copyright statement and license, possibly copyrighting non-copyrightable, thus committing "Copyfraud" in some jurisdictions?
I'm not a lawyer or anything, but would this work?
To the extent that it is covered by copyright under any applicable laws,
this data is copyright © 1984 Winston Smith.
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
[... and the rest of the usual MIT license text]
If it turns out not to be covered by copyright, this is a no-op; if it is, it gives permission for more or less everything.
S
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: data "copyright" or not -- what is Debian's take?
* From: Francesco Poli frx@firenze.linux.it
- Re: data "copyright" or not -- what is Debian's take?
- References:
- data "copyright" or not -- what is Debian's take?
* From: Yaroslav Halchenko debian@onerussian.com
- data "copyright" or not -- what is Debian's take?
- Prev by Date:data "copyright" or not -- what is Debian's take?
- Next by Date:Re: data "copyright" or not -- what is Debian's take?
- Previous by thread:data "copyright" or not -- what is Debian's take?
- Next by thread:Re: data "copyright" or not -- what is Debian's take?
- Index(es):