Re: data "copyright" or not -- what is Debian's take? (original) (raw)
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: data "copyright" or not -- what is Debian's take?
- From: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:50:57 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20110124185057.06d3b637.frx@firenze.linux.it>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20110124160711.GA3913@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk>
- References: <[🔎] 20110124154434.GA30897@onerussian.com> <[🔎] 20110124160711.GA3913@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk>
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:07:11 +0000 Simon McVittie wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 at 10:44:34 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Should I advise to blindly attach a copyright statement and license, possibly copyrighting non-copyrightable, thus committing "Copyfraud" in some jurisdictions?
I'm not a lawyer or anything, but would this work?
To the extent that it is covered by copyright under any applicable laws, this data is copyright © 1984 Winston Smith. Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person [... and the rest of the usual MIT license text]
I'm not a lawyer either, but I think this could be a good strategy.
-- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:<pgpA6i2VeF2u6.pgp>
Description: PGP signature
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- data "copyright" or not -- what is Debian's take?
* From: Yaroslav Halchenko debian@onerussian.com - Re: data "copyright" or not -- what is Debian's take?
* From: Simon McVittie smcv@debian.org
- data "copyright" or not -- what is Debian's take?
- Prev by Date:Re: data "copyright" or not -- what is Debian's take?
- Next by Date:Re: data "copyright" or not -- what is Debian's take?
- Previous by thread:Re: data "copyright" or not -- what is Debian's take?
- Next by thread:Re: data "copyright" or not -- what is Debian's take?
- Index(es):