| dbo:abstract |
An abstention doctrine is any of several doctrines that a United States court may (or in some cases must) apply to refuse to hear a case if hearing the case would potentially intrude upon the powers of another court. Such doctrines are usually invoked where lawsuits involving the same issues are brought in two different court systems at the same time (such as federal and state courts). The United States has a federal court system with limitations on the cases that it can hear, while each state has its own individual court system. In some instances, the jurisdiction of these courts overlap, so a lawsuit between two parties may be brought in either or both courts. The latter circumstance can lead to confusion, waste resources, as well as cause the appearance that one court is disrespecting the other. Both federal and state courts have developed rules determining when one court will defer to another's jurisdiction over a particular case. (en) 불개입 원칙이란 미국의 연방법원이 주법원과의 불필요한 충돌이나 마찰을 피하기 위하여 주법의 해석이나 주의 내부적인 행정영역에 관한 사항에 대해서 주법원 스스로 판단하게 하고 연방법원의 판단을 자제하는 미국헌법 상의 원칙이다. 미국의 정부체계 이념인 연방주의의 구현으로 볼 수 있다. (ko) |
| dbo:wikiPageID |
1633439 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageLength |
12601 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
1123377288 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
dbr:England_v._Louisiana_State_Board_of_Medical_Examiners dbr:Moses_H._Cone_Memorial_Hospital_v._Mercury_Constr._Corp. dbr:All_Writs_Act dbr:United_States_Constitution dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:Colorado_River_Water_Conservation_District_v._United_States dbr:Contempt_of_court dbr:Civil_rights dbr:Minnesota_Supreme_Court dbr:Rooker-Feldman_doctrine dbr:Louisiana_Power_&_Light_Co._v._City_of_Thibodaux dbr:Comity dbr:Halal dbr:Burford_v._Sun_Oil_Co. dbr:Tort dbr:Jurisdiction dbr:Lawsuit dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Cause_of_action dbr:Res_judicata dbc:Legal_doctrines_and_principles dbr:Abstention dbc:Civil_procedure dbc:Law_of_the_United_States dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Diversity_jurisdiction dbc:United_States_abstention_case_law dbr:Kosher dbr:Railroad_Commission_v._Pullman_Co. dbr:Writ_of_certiorari dbr:Younger_v._Harris dbr:Parallel_litigation dbr:Government_and_Civil_Employees_Organizing_Committee,_CIO_v._Windsor |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate |
dbt:Reflist dbt:USArticleIII dbt:US_fed_civ_pro |
| dcterms:subject |
dbc:Legal_doctrines_and_principles dbc:Civil_procedure dbc:Law_of_the_United_States |
| rdf:type |
yago:WikicatLegalDoctrinesAndPrinciples yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Belief105941423 yago:Cognition100023271 yago:Content105809192 yago:Doctrine105943300 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 |
| rdfs:comment |
불개입 원칙이란 미국의 연방법원이 주법원과의 불필요한 충돌이나 마찰을 피하기 위하여 주법의 해석이나 주의 내부적인 행정영역에 관한 사항에 대해서 주법원 스스로 판단하게 하고 연방법원의 판단을 자제하는 미국헌법 상의 원칙이다. 미국의 정부체계 이념인 연방주의의 구현으로 볼 수 있다. (ko) An abstention doctrine is any of several doctrines that a United States court may (or in some cases must) apply to refuse to hear a case if hearing the case would potentially intrude upon the powers of another court. Such doctrines are usually invoked where lawsuits involving the same issues are brought in two different court systems at the same time (such as federal and state courts). (en) |
| rdfs:label |
Abstention doctrine (en) 불개입 원칙 (ko) |
| owl:sameAs |
freebase:Abstention doctrine yago-res:Abstention doctrine wikidata:Abstention doctrine dbpedia-ko:Abstention doctrine https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4LMqX |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom |
wikipedia-en:Abstention_doctrine?oldid=1123377288&ns=0 |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf |
wikipedia-en:Abstention_doctrine |
| is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of |
dbr:Abstention_(disambiguation) |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of |
dbr:Burford_Abstention dbr:Abstention_Doctrine dbr:Abstention_doctrines dbr:Younger_Abstention dbr:Pullman_Abstention dbr:Pullman_abstention dbr:Pullman_doctrine dbr:Colorado_River_Abstention dbr:Thibidaux_Abstention |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of |
dbr:Roy_Moore dbr:England_v._Louisiana_State_Board_of_Medical_Examiners dbr:Anti-Injunction_Act dbr:Hugo_Black dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Burger_Court dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Hughes_Court dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Stone_Court dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Warren_Court dbr:Burford_Abstention dbr:United_Gas_Pipe_Line_Co._v._Ideal_Cement_Co. dbr:United_Gas_Pipe_Line_Co._v._Mobile_Gas_Service_Corp. dbr:Index_of_law_articles dbr:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States dbr:Colorado_River_Water_Conservation_District_v._United_States dbr:Goldberg_v._Kelly dbr:Montana_Water_Court dbr:Moses_H._Cone_Memorial_Hospital dbr:Moses_H._Cone_Memorial_Hospital_v._Mercury_Construction_Corp. dbr:Louisiana_Power_&_Light_Co._v._City_of_Thibodaux dbr:Federal_judiciary_of_the_United_States dbr:Burford_v._Sun_Oil_Co. dbr:Winters_v._United_States dbr:2013_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg dbr:Abd_al-Rahim_al-Nashiri dbr:Exxon_Mobil_Corp._v._Saudi_Basic_Industries_Corp. dbr:Abstention_(disambiguation) dbr:Abstention_Doctrine dbr:Abstention_doctrines dbr:Jack_Thompson_(activist) dbr:Advisory_opinion dbr:Susan_B._Anthony_List_v._Driehaus dbr:Susan_B._Anthony_Pro-Life_America dbr:Tafflin_v._Levitt dbr:Dombrowski_v._Pfister dbr:Southland_Corp._v._Keating dbr:Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs dbr:Ohio_Civil_Rights_Commission_v._Dayton_Christian_Schools,_Inc. dbr:Railroad_Commission_v._Pullman_Co. dbr:Woollard_v._Gallagher dbr:Younger_v._Harris dbr:Railroad_Commission_of_Texas dbr:Parallel_litigation dbr:Younger_Abstention dbr:Pullman_Abstention dbr:Pullman_abstention dbr:Pullman_doctrine dbr:Colorado_River_Abstention dbr:Thibidaux_Abstention |
| is foaf:primaryTopic of |
wikipedia-en:Abstention_doctrine |