United States v. Carolene Products Co. (original) (raw)
- United States v. Carolene Products Company, 304 U.S. 144 (1938), was a case of the United States Supreme Court that upheld the federal government's power to prohibit filled milk from being shipped in interstate commerce. In his majority opinion for the Court, Associate Justice Harlan F. Stone wrote that economic regulations were "presumptively constitutional" under a deferential standard of review known as the "rational basis test". The case is most notable for Footnote Four, in which Stone wrote that the Court would exercise a stricter standard of review when a law appears on its face to violate a provision of the United States Constitution, restricts the political process in a way that could impede the repeal of an undesirable law, or discriminates against "discrete and insular" minorities. Footnote Four would influence later Supreme Court decisions, and the higher standard of review is now known as "strict scrutiny". (en)
- https://archive.org/details/dirtydozenhowtwe00levy
- https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/304/144/
- https://archive.org/details/dirtydozenhowtwe00levy/page/n211
- https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/287/
- https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/7/500/1943047/
- http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep304/usrep304144/usrep304144.pdf
- 1214243 (xsd:integer)
- 14328 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
- 1121474696 (xsd:integer)
- dbc:United_States_constitutional_case_law
- dbc:Dairy_farming_in_the_United_States
- dbr:De_Jonge_v._Oregon
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_304
- dbr:United_States_Constitution
- dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Seventh_Circuit
- dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_Illinois
- dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court
- dbr:Due_Process_Clause
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbr:McCulloch_v._Maryland
- dbr:Strict_scrutiny
- dbr:Coconut_oil
- dbr:Gitlow_v._New_York
- dbr:Constitutional_law
- dbr:Equal_Protection_Clause
- dbr:Louis_Lusky
- dbr:Skinner_v._Oklahoma
- dbr:Stromberg_v._California
- dbc:1938_in_United_States_case_law
- dbr:Commerce_Clause
- dbr:Demurrer
- dbc:United_States_Commerce_Clause_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Constitution_Article_One_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Hughes_Court
- dbr:Whitney_v._California
- dbr:Nixon_v._Herndon
- dbr:Farrington_v._Tokushige
- dbr:Fiske_v._Kansas
- dbr:Nixon_v._Condon
- dbr:Grosjean_v._American_Press_Co.
- dbr:Harlan_F._Stone
- dbr:Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbc:United_States_substantive_due_process_case_law
- dbr:John_Hart_Ely
- dbr:L._Ed.
- dbr:Pierce_v._Society_of_Sisters
- dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbr:Filled_milk
- dbr:Meyer_v._Nebraska
- dbr:Near_v._Minnesota
- dbr:Nebbia_v._New_York
- dbr:New_Deal
- dbr:Obiter_dictum
- dbr:Standard_of_review
- dbr:Presumption_of_constitutionality
- dbr:Rational_basis_review
- dbr:Skimmed_milk
- dbr:Korematsu_v._U.S.
- dbr:Harlan_Stone
- dbr:Lovell_v._Griffin
- dbr:Rational_basis_test
- dbr:Herndon_v._Lowry
- dbr:F._Supp.
- dbr:Standard_of_judicial_review
- dbr:U.S._LEXIS
- 0001-04-06 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 1938 (xsd:integer)
- United States v. Carolene Products Co., (en)
- Butler (en)
- 0001-04-25 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 1938 (xsd:integer)
- McReynolds (en)
- United States v. Carolene Products Company (en)
- The Filled Milk Act did not exceed the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce, or violate due process under the Fifth Amendment. (en)
- Hughes, Brandeis, Roberts, Black (en)
- U.S. Const. art. I; U.S. Const. amend. V; (en)
- United States v. Carolene Products Co. (en)
- Stone (en)
- Reed and Cardozo (en)
- 58 (xsd:integer)
- Demurrer to indictment sustained, 7 F. Supp. 500 (en)
- 144 (xsd:integer)
- 304 (xsd:integer)
- dbt:Caselaw_source
- dbt:Cite_book
- dbt:Cite_journal
- dbt:Cn
- dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
- dbt:Quote
- dbt:Reflist
- dbt:Short_description
- dbt:UnitedStatesCode
- dbt:Wikisource
- dbt:Ussc
- dbt:USArticleI
- dbt:US5thAmendment
- dbc:United_States_constitutional_case_law
- dbc:Dairy_farming_in_the_United_States
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:1938_in_United_States_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Commerce_Clause_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Constitution_Article_One_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Hughes_Court
- dbc:United_States_substantive_due_process_case_law
- owl:Thing
- dbo:Case
- dbo:LegalCase
- dbo:UnitOfWork
- wikidata:Q2334719
- yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases
- yago:Abstraction100002137
- yago:Case107308889
- yago:Event100029378
- yago:Happening107283608
- yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100
- yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
- dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
- United States v. Carolene Products Company, 304 U.S. 144 (1938), was a case of the United States Supreme Court that upheld the federal government's power to prohibit filled milk from being shipped in interstate commerce. In his majority opinion for the Court, Associate Justice Harlan F. Stone wrote that economic regulations were "presumptively constitutional" under a deferential standard of review known as the "rational basis test". (en)
- United States v. Carolene Products Co. (en)
- freebase:United States v. Carolene Products Co.
- yago-res:United States v. Carolene Products Co.
- wikidata:United States v. Carolene Products Co.
- https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4wHC2
- (en)
- United States v. Carolene Products Company (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
- dbr:304_U.S._144
- dbr:United_States_v._Carolene_Products_Co
- dbr:United_States_v_Carolene_Products_Co.
- dbr:Carolene_Products
- dbr:Famous_footnote_four
- dbr:Filled_Milk_Act
- dbr:Discrete_and_insular
- dbr:Discrete_and_insular_minorities
- dbr:Footnote_4
- dbr:Footnote_Four
- dbr:Footnote_four
- dbr:Us_v._carolene_products
- dbr:United_States_v._Carolene_Prods._Co.
- dbr:United_States_v._Carolene_Products
- dbr:United_States_v._Caroline_Products
- dbr:US_v._Carolene_Products_Co.
- dbr:U.S._v._Carolene
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
- dbr:April_1938
- dbr:Hughes_Court
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_304
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Hughes_Court
- dbr:The_New_Jim_Crow
- dbr:Strict_scrutiny
- dbr:Constitutional_challenges_to_the_New_Deal
- dbr:Equal_Protection_Clause
- dbr:Louis_Lusky
- dbr:West_Virginia_State_Board_of_Education_v._Barnette
- dbr:Lochner_era
- dbr:304_U.S._144
- dbr:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
- dbr:Judicial_review_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Harlan_F._Stone
- dbr:Charles_Evans_Hughes
- dbr:Article_12_of_the_Constitution_of_Singapore
- dbr:Filled_milk
- dbr:Minersville_School_District_v._Gobitis
- dbr:Substantive_due_process
- dbr:Obiter_dictum
- dbr:Political_process_theory_(law)
- dbr:Rational_basis_review
- dbr:United_States_v._Carolene_Products_Co
- dbr:United_States_v_Carolene_Products_Co.
- dbr:Carolene_Products
- dbr:Famous_footnote_four
- dbr:Filled_Milk_Act
- dbr:Discrete_and_insular
- dbr:Discrete_and_insular_minorities
- dbr:Footnote_4
- dbr:Footnote_Four
- dbr:Footnote_four
- dbr:Us_v._carolene_products
- dbr:United_States_v._Carolene_Prods._Co.
- dbr:United_States_v._Carolene_Products
- dbr:United_States_v._Caroline_Products
- dbr:US_v._Carolene_Products_Co.
- dbr:U.S._v._Carolene
is foaf:primaryTopic of