Noise in eukaryotic gene expression (original) (raw)

Nature volume 422, pages 633–637 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

Transcription in eukaryotic cells has been described as quantal1, with pulses of messenger RNA produced in a probabilistic manner2,3. This description reflects the inherently stochastic nature4,5,6,7,8,9 of gene expression, known to be a major factor in the heterogeneous response of individual cells within a clonal population to an inducing stimulus10,11,12,13,14,15,16. Here we show in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that stochasticity (noise) arising from transcription contributes significantly to the level of heterogeneity within a eukaryotic clonal population, in contrast to observations in prokaryotes15, and that such noise can be modulated at the translational level. We use a stochastic model of transcription initiation specific to eukaryotes to show that pulsatile mRNA production, through reinitiation, is crucial for the dependence of noise on transcriptional efficiency, highlighting a key difference between eukaryotic and prokaryotic sources of noise. Furthermore, we explore the propagation of noise in a gene cascade network and demonstrate experimentally that increased noise in the transcription of a regulatory protein leads to increased cell–cell variability in the target gene output, resulting in prolonged bistable expression states. This result has implications for the role of noise in phenotypic variation and cellular differentiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hume, D. A. Probability in transcriptional regulation and its implications for leukocyte differentiation and inducible gene expression. Blood 96, 2323–2328 (2000)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Ross, I. L., Browne, C. M. & Hume, D. A. Transcription of individual genes in eukaryotic cells occurs randomly and infrequently. Immunol. Cell Biol. 72, 177–185 (1994)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Walters, M. C. et al. Enhancers increase the probability but not the level of gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 7125–7129 (1995)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  4. Ko, M. S. H. A stochastic model for gene induction. J. Theor. Biol. 153, 181–194 (1991)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. McAdams, H. H. & Arkin, A. Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 814–819 (1997)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  6. Hasty, J., Pradines, J., Dolnik, M. & Collins, J. J. Noise-based switches and amplifiers for gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 2075–2080 (2000)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  7. Thattai, M. & van Oudenaarden, A. Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8614–8619 (2001)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  8. Kepler, T. B. & Elston, T. C. Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations. Biophys. J. 81, 3116–3136 (2001)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  9. Swain, P. S., Elowitz, M. B. & Siggia, E. D. Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12795–12800 (2002)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  10. Novick, A. & Weiner, M. Enzyme induction as an all-or-none phenomenon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 43, 553–566 (1957)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  11. Ko, M. S. H., Nakauchi, H. & Takahashi, N. The dose dependence of glucocorticoid-inducible gene expression results from changes in the number of transcriptionally active templates. EMBO J. 9, 2835–2842 (1990)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Fiering, S. et al. Single cell assay of a transcription factor reveals a threshold in transcription activated by signals emanating from the T-cell antigen receptor. Genes Dev. 4, 1823–1834 (1990)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. van Roon, M. A., Aten, J. A., van Oven, C. H., Charles, R. & Lamers, W. H. The initiation of hepatocyte-specific gene expression within embryonic hepatocytes is a stochastic event. Dev. Biol. 136, 508–516 (1989)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Becskei, A., Séraphin, B. & Serrano, L. Positive feedback in eukaryotic gene networks: cell differentiation by graded to binary response conversion. EMBO J. 20, 2528–2535 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Ozbudak, E. M., Thattai, M., Kurtser, I., Grossman, A. D. & van Oudenaarden, A. Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene. Nature Genet. 31, 69–73 (2002)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Elowitz, M. B., Levine, A. J., Siggia, E. D. & Swain, P. S. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297, 1183–1186 (2002)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  17. Ptashne, M. & Gann, A. Transcriptional activation by recruitment. Nature 386, 569–577 (1997)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  18. Bhaumik, S. R. & Green, M. R. SAGA is an essential in vivo target of the yeast acidic activator Gal4p. Genes Dev. 15, 1935–1945 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Larschan, E. & Winston, F. The S. cerevisiae SAGA complex functions in vivo as a coactivator for transcriptional activation by Gal4. Genes Dev. 15, 1946–1956 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  20. Rossi, F. M. V., Kringstein, A. M., Spicher, A., Guicherit, O. M. & Blau, H. M. Transcriptional control: rheostat converted to on/off switch. Mol. Cell 6, 723–728 (2000)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Biggar, S. R. & Crabtree, G. R. Cell signaling can direct either binary or graded transcriptional responses. EMBO J. 20, 3167–3176 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Chatterjee, S. & Struhl, K. Connecting a promoter-bound protein to TBP bypasses the need for a transcriptional activation domain. Nature 374, 820–822 (1995)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  23. Klages, N. & Strubin, M. Stimulation of RNA polymerase II transcription initiation by recruitment of TBP in vivo. Nature 374, 822–823 (1995)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  24. Struhl, K. Chromatin structure and RNA polymerase II connection: implications for transcription. Cell 84, 179–182 (1996)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  25. Hahn, S. Activation and the role of reinitiation in the control of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 63, 181–188 (1998)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  26. Sharp, P. M. & Li, W. H. The codon adaptation index—a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 1281–1295 (1987)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  27. Thattai, M. & van Oudenaarden, A. Attenuation of noise in ultrasensitive signaling cascades. Biophys. J. 82, 2943–2950 (2002)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  28. Kemkemer, R., Schrank, S., Vogel, W., Gruler, H. & Kaufmann, D. Increased noise as an effect of haploinsufficiency of the tumour-suppressor gene neurofibromatosis type 1 in vitro. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 13783–13788 (2002)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  29. Stewart, J. J. & Stargell, L. A. The stability of the TFIIA-TBP-DNA complex is dependent on the sequence of the TATAAA element. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 30078–30084 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  30. Yean, D. & Gralla, J. Transcription reinitiation rate: a special role for the TATA box. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 3809–3816 (1997)
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T. Gilmore for guidance and helpful advice on switch construction, F. Isaacs for helpful discussions and advice, and B. Cormack for the gift of pEGFP3. This work was supported by DARPA, NSF and the Danish Research Agency.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.J.C.
  2. William J. Blake and Mads KÆrn: These authors contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for BioDynamics, Center for Advanced Biotechnology, Bioinformatics Program, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, 44 Cummington Street, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, USA
    William J. Blake, Mads KÆrn, Charles R. Cantor & J. J. Collins

Authors

  1. William J. Blake
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Mads KÆrn
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Charles R. Cantor
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. J. J. Collins
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toJ. J. Collins.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blake, W., KÆrn, M., Cantor, C. et al. Noise in eukaryotic gene expression.Nature 422, 633–637 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01546

Download citation

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.